Does cross-dressing actually preserve masculinity? What if they're not doing it just to get your attention? One can at least see why one of the reasons for Trump's increased black support links to his increased LGBTQ support:
'If we consider the great binary aggregates, such as the sexes or classes, it is evident that they also cross over into molecular assemblages of a different nature, and that there is a double reciprocal dependency between them. For the two sexes imply a multiplicity of molecular combinations bringing into play not only the man in the woman and the woman in the man, but the relation of each to the animal, the plant, etc.: a thousand tiny sexes.
(Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, p. 213)
If molar unities, like the division of classes, races, and sexes, attempt to form and stabilize identities, fixities, systems that function homeostatically, sealing in their energies and intensities, molecular becomings traverse, create a path, destabilize, enable energy seepage within and through these molar unities. In his paper "Politics," Deleuze makes a distinction between three types of "lines" relevant to understanding the nexus between the individual and the social. First, there is the rigidly segmented line, the line that divides, orders, hierarchizes, and regulates social relations through binary codes, creating the opposition between the sexes, classes, and races, and dividing the real into subjects and objects. This is a stratifying or (molar [italics]) line. Second, there is a more fluid, (molecular [it.]) line, which forms connections and relations beyond the rigidity of the molar line. It is composed of fluid lines, which map processes of becoming, change, movement, and reorganization. While it is not in itself "revolutionary" (if it's still meaningful today to say this), it accounts for both sociopolitical and micro becomings, demassifies molar segmentations, and creates overcoded territories, passages, cracks between segments, so that they may drift and yet something may pass between them.
And third, there is a more (nomadic [it.]) line, not always clearly distinguishable from the molecular line, which moves beyond given segments to destinations unknown in advance, lines of flight, mutations, even quantum leaps. Thus if the division, the binary opposition, between the sexes -- or, for that matter, the global systems constituting patriarchy -- can be considered molar lines of segmentation, then the processes of becoming woman -- for both men and women -- consists in the releasing of minoritarian fragments or particles of "sexuality" (sexuality no longer functioning on the level of the unified, genitalized organization of the sexed body), lines of flight, which break down and seep into binary aggregations. But this process of the multiplication of sexualities is only a step in the creation of a nomadic line, a line of becoming-imperceptible, which disaggregates the molar structures.'
(Grosz E, A Thousand Tiny Sexes: Feminism and Rhizomatics, in Gilles Deleuze and the Theater of Philosophy, Routledge, 1994)
There is no increased black support for Trump.
Why do you constantly lie? Don't bother to whine about the source unless you have a reliable source and working link proving my facts a lie.
Poll: Trump support among black voters up this week … to 32%
Rasmussen Reports August 11, 2019
Poll: Trump support among black voters up this week … to 32% - Liberty Unyielding