Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This makes no sense.Because at some point, someone needs to get taxed. And if it's not corporations, who are rolling in dough right now ...
Guess who gets to pay more? Not the rich, who make most of their $$ through investment.
That would be us, the middle and upper middle class folks. We get to pay more.
If a corporation does not get taxed, which individual benefits and avoids taxation?
If a corporation has coffers full of money, who benefits? Not the corporation. Sitting on unused capital is wasteful.
Anyone who makes more money through investment eventually gets taxed.
Individuals get better, more jobs. The government then actually works FOR THE PEOPLE, not the reverse.
They get taxed like 15% on dividends, I recall. If the investment income is taxed only once, it stays a measly 15%. That's pretty weak sauce, considering little ol' me is getting taxed around 30%.
To compensate for the deficit caused by the lack of corporate taxes, income taxes would have to go up. Otherwise ... well, you thought the national debt was bad now ...
Granted, I'm not a tax expert. I admit, I don't have all the answers. This is my understanding; the workers won't benefit from tax cuts. Especially not compared to investors.
If that suits your purposes, so be it. It's not ideal for me.
You have a simpleton understanding of economics. Tax policy should encourage corporations and the wealthy to take risks on new businesses and expansion, that's how jobs are created and growth happens. If the left had its way, punishment taxation of the wealthy and corporations the wealthy and corporations just don't bend over and take it. They say fuck you liberals and run for the exits. Relocate to other countries. The wealthy hunker down hoarding their wealth. They don't take risks on starting new businesses or expansion. Job growth slows, economic growth slows, and tax revenue falls. You can't punishment tax your way to prosperity.
Okay. But you're kind of misrepresenting what I'm saying. I never said that there is NOTHING good that will come out of the new tax laws, whatever they end up looking like. But it's certainly not going to be this brilliant paradise that Trump and his supporters are claiming.
Do you actually believe corporations should not be taxed? And where will that money come from then? That was sort of my original question.
Which is what they have been doing.That's exactly what corporations do when liberals attack them with punishment taxes and regulations. Liberals are too stupid to understand business expansion, capital improvements and investments, the high risk of starting new businesses, liberal policies often tip the balance towards hoarding cash. Why take the risk just to hand over your profits to the government.
This makes no sense.Because at some point, someone needs to get taxed. And if it's not corporations, who are rolling in dough right now ...
Guess who gets to pay more? Not the rich, who make most of their $$ through investment.
That would be us, the middle and upper middle class folks. We get to pay more.
If a corporation does not get taxed, which individual benefits and avoids taxation?
If a corporation has coffers full of money, who benefits? Not the corporation. Sitting on unused capital is wasteful.
Anyone who makes more money through investment eventually gets taxed.
Individuals get better, more jobs. The government then actually works FOR THE PEOPLE, not the reverse.
They get taxed like 15% on dividends, I recall. If the investment income is taxed only once, it stays a measly 15%. That's pretty weak sauce, considering little ol' me is getting taxed around 30%.
To compensate for the deficit caused by the lack of corporate taxes, income taxes would have to go up. Otherwise ... well, you thought the national debt was bad now ...
Granted, I'm not a tax expert. I admit, I don't have all the answers. This is my understanding; the workers won't benefit from tax cuts. Especially not compared to investors.
If that suits your purposes, so be it. It's not ideal for me.
You have a simpleton understanding of economics. Tax policy should encourage corporations and the wealthy to take risks on new businesses and expansion, that's how jobs are created and growth happens. If the left had its way, punishment taxation of the wealthy and corporations the wealthy and corporations just don't bend over and take it. They say fuck you liberals and run for the exits. Relocate to other countries. The wealthy hunker down hoarding their wealth. They don't take risks on starting new businesses or expansion. Job growth slows, economic growth slows, and tax revenue falls. You can't punishment tax your way to prosperity.
Okay. But you're kind of misrepresenting what I'm saying. I never said that there is NOTHING good that will come out of the new tax laws, whatever they end up looking like. But it's certainly not going to be this brilliant paradise that Trump and his supporters are claiming.
Do you actually believe corporations should not be taxed? And where will that money come from then? That was sort of my original question.
You are blaming Trump. Congress created this tax reform bill not Trump. Now, Dem's in congress decided to sit on the sidelines and just bitch and complain so they are useless. The GOP, infested with lying corrupt GOP establishment hacks bought and paid for by special interests drafted the bill. Naturally its full of pork and political favors and in many ways not what Trump asked for. Lets start there.
It either increases the dividends to the remaining shareholders (which gets taxed) or it allows the corporation to use that extra cash to invest in expansion, which also increases the value of the remaining shares.Sure. But do you want to finish that thought?
MOST of the time, it is BOTH. SO, everybody gets paid, including the Fed.
Corporations employ millions of people enabling them to pay federal, state, and local taxes, plus contribute to the overall economy. Why the left demonizes corporations makes no sense.
I'm not demonizing them (well, I'm not on the left either, but perhaps compared to you I am).
I'm saying that if we're going to reduce the declared corporate tax rate, we should probably close the loopholes that reduce the effective corporate tax rate.
You know ... as the republicans promised over and over again.
So you think handing wealthy people money that they will start new businesses?This makes no sense.Because at some point, someone needs to get taxed. And if it's not corporations, who are rolling in dough right now ...
Guess who gets to pay more? Not the rich, who make most of their $$ through investment.
That would be us, the middle and upper middle class folks. We get to pay more.
If a corporation does not get taxed, which individual benefits and avoids taxation?
If a corporation has coffers full of money, who benefits? Not the corporation. Sitting on unused capital is wasteful.
Anyone who makes more money through investment eventually gets taxed.
Individuals get better, more jobs. The government then actually works FOR THE PEOPLE, not the reverse.
They get taxed like 15% on dividends, I recall. If the investment income is taxed only once, it stays a measly 15%. That's pretty weak sauce, considering little ol' me is getting taxed around 30%.
To compensate for the deficit caused by the lack of corporate taxes, income taxes would have to go up. Otherwise ... well, you thought the national debt was bad now ...
Granted, I'm not a tax expert. I admit, I don't have all the answers. This is my understanding; the workers won't benefit from tax cuts. Especially not compared to investors.
If that suits your purposes, so be it. It's not ideal for me.
You have a simpleton understanding of economics. Tax policy should encourage corporations and the wealthy to take risks on new businesses and expansion, that's how jobs are created and growth happens. If the left had its way, punishment taxation of the wealthy and corporations the wealthy and corporations just don't bend over and take it. They say fuck you liberals and run for the exits. Relocate to other countries. The wealthy hunker down hoarding their wealth. They don't take risks on starting new businesses or expansion. Job growth slows, economic growth slows, and tax revenue falls. You can't punishment tax your way to prosperity.
This makes no sense.
If a corporation does not get taxed, which individual benefits and avoids taxation?
If a corporation has coffers full of money, who benefits? Not the corporation. Sitting on unused capital is wasteful.
Anyone who makes more money through investment eventually gets taxed.
Individuals get better, more jobs. The government then actually works FOR THE PEOPLE, not the reverse.
They get taxed like 15% on dividends, I recall. If the investment income is taxed only once, it stays a measly 15%. That's pretty weak sauce, considering little ol' me is getting taxed around 30%.
To compensate for the deficit caused by the lack of corporate taxes, income taxes would have to go up. Otherwise ... well, you thought the national debt was bad now ...
Granted, I'm not a tax expert. I admit, I don't have all the answers. This is my understanding; the workers won't benefit from tax cuts. Especially not compared to investors.
If that suits your purposes, so be it. It's not ideal for me.
You have a simpleton understanding of economics. Tax policy should encourage corporations and the wealthy to take risks on new businesses and expansion, that's how jobs are created and growth happens. If the left had its way, punishment taxation of the wealthy and corporations the wealthy and corporations just don't bend over and take it. They say fuck you liberals and run for the exits. Relocate to other countries. The wealthy hunker down hoarding their wealth. They don't take risks on starting new businesses or expansion. Job growth slows, economic growth slows, and tax revenue falls. You can't punishment tax your way to prosperity.
Okay. But you're kind of misrepresenting what I'm saying. I never said that there is NOTHING good that will come out of the new tax laws, whatever they end up looking like. But it's certainly not going to be this brilliant paradise that Trump and his supporters are claiming.
Do you actually believe corporations should not be taxed? And where will that money come from then? That was sort of my original question.
You are blaming Trump. Congress created this tax reform bill not Trump. Now, Dem's in congress decided to sit on the sidelines and just bitch and complain so they are useless. The GOP, infested with lying corrupt GOP establishment hacks bought and paid for by special interests drafted the bill. Naturally its full of pork and political favors and in many ways not what Trump asked for. Lets start there.
It's hard to say exactly what happened. We weren't there.
Trump has endorsed the tax cuts. I'm aware that he probably had next to no influence on the details.
From what I understand, the dems were excluded from the process. So I'm not sure why you think they were just hanging out on the sidelines, refusing to participate. They were more likely shoved off the field by republicans.
The rest seems pretty accurate.
So you think handing wealthy people money that they will start new businesses?This makes no sense.Because at some point, someone needs to get taxed. And if it's not corporations, who are rolling in dough right now ...
Guess who gets to pay more? Not the rich, who make most of their $$ through investment.
That would be us, the middle and upper middle class folks. We get to pay more.
If a corporation does not get taxed, which individual benefits and avoids taxation?
If a corporation has coffers full of money, who benefits? Not the corporation. Sitting on unused capital is wasteful.
Anyone who makes more money through investment eventually gets taxed.
Individuals get better, more jobs. The government then actually works FOR THE PEOPLE, not the reverse.
They get taxed like 15% on dividends, I recall. If the investment income is taxed only once, it stays a measly 15%. That's pretty weak sauce, considering little ol' me is getting taxed around 30%.
To compensate for the deficit caused by the lack of corporate taxes, income taxes would have to go up. Otherwise ... well, you thought the national debt was bad now ...
Granted, I'm not a tax expert. I admit, I don't have all the answers. This is my understanding; the workers won't benefit from tax cuts. Especially not compared to investors.
If that suits your purposes, so be it. It's not ideal for me.
You have a simpleton understanding of economics. Tax policy should encourage corporations and the wealthy to take risks on new businesses and expansion, that's how jobs are created and growth happens. If the left had its way, punishment taxation of the wealthy and corporations the wealthy and corporations just don't bend over and take it. They say fuck you liberals and run for the exits. Relocate to other countries. The wealthy hunker down hoarding their wealth. They don't take risks on starting new businesses or expansion. Job growth slows, economic growth slows, and tax revenue falls. You can't punishment tax your way to prosperity.
NO. They will expand 7 create new when there is demand.
You people know shit about economics.
Trump is an ignorant fool.obviously not, it was drafted by 6,000 lobbyists. Too funnyIts not Trump's tax plan, its congress tax plan, drafted by the people's representatives in congress hence its the people's tax plan. Someone hand liberals a tissue.
liberals think Trump is the boogieman I'm trying to calm their fears.
They get taxed like 15% on dividends, I recall. If the investment income is taxed only once, it stays a measly 15%. That's pretty weak sauce, considering little ol' me is getting taxed around 30%.
To compensate for the deficit caused by the lack of corporate taxes, income taxes would have to go up. Otherwise ... well, you thought the national debt was bad now ...
Granted, I'm not a tax expert. I admit, I don't have all the answers. This is my understanding; the workers won't benefit from tax cuts. Especially not compared to investors.
If that suits your purposes, so be it. It's not ideal for me.
You have a simpleton understanding of economics. Tax policy should encourage corporations and the wealthy to take risks on new businesses and expansion, that's how jobs are created and growth happens. If the left had its way, punishment taxation of the wealthy and corporations the wealthy and corporations just don't bend over and take it. They say fuck you liberals and run for the exits. Relocate to other countries. The wealthy hunker down hoarding their wealth. They don't take risks on starting new businesses or expansion. Job growth slows, economic growth slows, and tax revenue falls. You can't punishment tax your way to prosperity.
Okay. But you're kind of misrepresenting what I'm saying. I never said that there is NOTHING good that will come out of the new tax laws, whatever they end up looking like. But it's certainly not going to be this brilliant paradise that Trump and his supporters are claiming.
Do you actually believe corporations should not be taxed? And where will that money come from then? That was sort of my original question.
You are blaming Trump. Congress created this tax reform bill not Trump. Now, Dem's in congress decided to sit on the sidelines and just bitch and complain so they are useless. The GOP, infested with lying corrupt GOP establishment hacks bought and paid for by special interests drafted the bill. Naturally its full of pork and political favors and in many ways not what Trump asked for. Lets start there.
It's hard to say exactly what happened. We weren't there.
Trump has endorsed the tax cuts. I'm aware that he probably had next to no influence on the details.
From what I understand, the dems were excluded from the process. So I'm not sure why you think they were just hanging out on the sidelines, refusing to participate. They were more likely shoved off the field by republicans.
The rest seems pretty accurate.
President Trump is at the mercy of the DC swamp, the bought and paid for establishment in both the Dem and Rep parties. He ran against the DC establishment which is why so many establishment hacks in the GOP hate his guts. Trump has tried to influence the tax bill as best he can, but ultimately the swamp will dictate the terms.
The Dem rank and file have no power, its concentrated at the top of the party and if the Dem rank and file dare break ranks they are retaliated against by the party. Same shit happens in the Rep party. Only difference is there are enough uppity conservatives and tea party members in the Rep party to band together and cause trouble, safety in numbers, but the Rep party leadership still gets pissed off and retaliates against them.
That is the current state of affairs in congress, kind of a mess and has been for a while now. That Trump managed to barge into this swamp and wrestle control of the White House away from the establishment...I like how he has disrupted the DC status quo. I'm realistic about how much he can accomplish given the state of things in congress but its 'a' step in the right direction vs 4 more years of establishment status quo in DC.
So you think handing wealthy people money that they will start new businesses?This makes no sense.Because at some point, someone needs to get taxed. And if it's not corporations, who are rolling in dough right now ...
Guess who gets to pay more? Not the rich, who make most of their $$ through investment.
That would be us, the middle and upper middle class folks. We get to pay more.
If a corporation does not get taxed, which individual benefits and avoids taxation?
If a corporation has coffers full of money, who benefits? Not the corporation. Sitting on unused capital is wasteful.
Anyone who makes more money through investment eventually gets taxed.
Individuals get better, more jobs. The government then actually works FOR THE PEOPLE, not the reverse.
They get taxed like 15% on dividends, I recall. If the investment income is taxed only once, it stays a measly 15%. That's pretty weak sauce, considering little ol' me is getting taxed around 30%.
To compensate for the deficit caused by the lack of corporate taxes, income taxes would have to go up. Otherwise ... well, you thought the national debt was bad now ...
Granted, I'm not a tax expert. I admit, I don't have all the answers. This is my understanding; the workers won't benefit from tax cuts. Especially not compared to investors.
If that suits your purposes, so be it. It's not ideal for me.
You have a simpleton understanding of economics. Tax policy should encourage corporations and the wealthy to take risks on new businesses and expansion, that's how jobs are created and growth happens. If the left had its way, punishment taxation of the wealthy and corporations the wealthy and corporations just don't bend over and take it. They say fuck you liberals and run for the exits. Relocate to other countries. The wealthy hunker down hoarding their wealth. They don't take risks on starting new businesses or expansion. Job growth slows, economic growth slows, and tax revenue falls. You can't punishment tax your way to prosperity.
NO. They will expand 7 create new when there is demand.
You people know shit about economics.
Christ almighty, its their money hello.
So you think handing wealthy people money that they will start new businesses?This makes no sense.
If a corporation does not get taxed, which individual benefits and avoids taxation?
If a corporation has coffers full of money, who benefits? Not the corporation. Sitting on unused capital is wasteful.
Anyone who makes more money through investment eventually gets taxed.
Individuals get better, more jobs. The government then actually works FOR THE PEOPLE, not the reverse.
They get taxed like 15% on dividends, I recall. If the investment income is taxed only once, it stays a measly 15%. That's pretty weak sauce, considering little ol' me is getting taxed around 30%.
To compensate for the deficit caused by the lack of corporate taxes, income taxes would have to go up. Otherwise ... well, you thought the national debt was bad now ...
Granted, I'm not a tax expert. I admit, I don't have all the answers. This is my understanding; the workers won't benefit from tax cuts. Especially not compared to investors.
If that suits your purposes, so be it. It's not ideal for me.
You have a simpleton understanding of economics. Tax policy should encourage corporations and the wealthy to take risks on new businesses and expansion, that's how jobs are created and growth happens. If the left had its way, punishment taxation of the wealthy and corporations the wealthy and corporations just don't bend over and take it. They say fuck you liberals and run for the exits. Relocate to other countries. The wealthy hunker down hoarding their wealth. They don't take risks on starting new businesses or expansion. Job growth slows, economic growth slows, and tax revenue falls. You can't punishment tax your way to prosperity.
NO. They will expand 7 create new when there is demand.
You people know shit about economics.
Christ almighty, its their money hello.
Making product for whom?It either increases the dividends to the remaining shareholders (which gets taxed) or it allows the corporation to use that extra cash to invest in expansion, which also increases the value of the remaining shares.Sure. But do you want to finish that thought?
MOST of the time, it is BOTH. SO, everybody gets paid, including the Fed.
Corporations employ millions of people enabling them to pay federal, state, and local taxes, plus contribute to the overall economy. Why the left demonizes corporations makes no sense.
You have a simpleton understanding of economics. Tax policy should encourage corporations and the wealthy to take risks on new businesses and expansion, that's how jobs are created and growth happens. If the left had its way, punishment taxation of the wealthy and corporations the wealthy and corporations just don't bend over and take it. They say fuck you liberals and run for the exits. Relocate to other countries. The wealthy hunker down hoarding their wealth. They don't take risks on starting new businesses or expansion. Job growth slows, economic growth slows, and tax revenue falls. You can't punishment tax your way to prosperity.
Okay. But you're kind of misrepresenting what I'm saying. I never said that there is NOTHING good that will come out of the new tax laws, whatever they end up looking like. But it's certainly not going to be this brilliant paradise that Trump and his supporters are claiming.
Do you actually believe corporations should not be taxed? And where will that money come from then? That was sort of my original question.
You are blaming Trump. Congress created this tax reform bill not Trump. Now, Dem's in congress decided to sit on the sidelines and just bitch and complain so they are useless. The GOP, infested with lying corrupt GOP establishment hacks bought and paid for by special interests drafted the bill. Naturally its full of pork and political favors and in many ways not what Trump asked for. Lets start there.
It's hard to say exactly what happened. We weren't there.
Trump has endorsed the tax cuts. I'm aware that he probably had next to no influence on the details.
From what I understand, the dems were excluded from the process. So I'm not sure why you think they were just hanging out on the sidelines, refusing to participate. They were more likely shoved off the field by republicans.
The rest seems pretty accurate.
President Trump is at the mercy of the DC swamp, the bought and paid for establishment in both the Dem and Rep parties. He ran against the DC establishment which is why so many establishment hacks in the GOP hate his guts. Trump has tried to influence the tax bill as best he can, but ultimately the swamp will dictate the terms.
The Dem rank and file have no power, its concentrated at the top of the party and if the Dem rank and file dare break ranks they are retaliated against by the party. Same shit happens in the Rep party. Only difference is there are enough uppity conservatives and tea party members in the Rep party to band together and cause trouble, safety in numbers, but the Rep party leadership still gets pissed off and retaliates against them.
That is the current state of affairs in congress, kind of a mess and has been for a while now. That Trump managed to barge into this swamp and wrestle control of the White House away from the establishment...I like how he has disrupted the DC status quo. I'm realistic about how much he can accomplish given the state of things in congress but its 'a' step in the right direction vs 4 more years of establishment status quo in DC.
I thought he was supposed to drain the swamp. Judging by his cabinet, and the fact that he is pretty much just going by the playbook of Mitch McConnell, it's hard for me to believe that he's been very successful so far. No term limits. Lobbyists still everywhere. When does the draining start?
Its the Trump plan.This makes no sense.Because at some point, someone needs to get taxed. And if it's not corporations, who are rolling in dough right now ...
Guess who gets to pay more? Not the rich, who make most of their $$ through investment.
That would be us, the middle and upper middle class folks. We get to pay more.
If a corporation does not get taxed, which individual benefits and avoids taxation?
If a corporation has coffers full of money, who benefits? Not the corporation. Sitting on unused capital is wasteful.
Anyone who makes more money through investment eventually gets taxed.
Individuals get better, more jobs. The government then actually works FOR THE PEOPLE, not the reverse.
They get taxed like 15% on dividends, I recall. If the investment income is taxed only once, it stays a measly 15%. That's pretty weak sauce, considering little ol' me is getting taxed around 30%.
To compensate for the deficit caused by the lack of corporate taxes, income taxes would have to go up. Otherwise ... well, you thought the national debt was bad now ...
Granted, I'm not a tax expert. I admit, I don't have all the answers. This is my understanding; the workers won't benefit from tax cuts. Especially not compared to investors.
If that suits your purposes, so be it. It's not ideal for me.
You have a simpleton understanding of economics. Tax policy should encourage corporations and the wealthy to take risks on new businesses and expansion, that's how jobs are created and growth happens. If the left had its way, punishment taxation of the wealthy and corporations the wealthy and corporations just don't bend over and take it. They say fuck you liberals and run for the exits. Relocate to other countries. The wealthy hunker down hoarding their wealth. They don't take risks on starting new businesses or expansion. Job growth slows, economic growth slows, and tax revenue falls. You can't punishment tax your way to prosperity.
Okay. But you're kind of misrepresenting what I'm saying. I never said that there is NOTHING good that will come out of the new tax laws, whatever they end up looking like. But it's certainly not going to be this brilliant paradise that Trump and his supporters are claiming.
Do you actually believe corporations should not be taxed? And where will that money come from then? That was sort of my original question.
You are blaming Trump. Congress created this tax reform bill not Trump. Now, Dem's in congress decided to sit on the sidelines and just bitch and complain so they are useless. The GOP, infested with lying corrupt GOP establishment hacks bought and paid for by special interests drafted the bill. Naturally its full of pork and political favors and in many ways not what Trump asked for. Lets start there.
Making product for whom?It either increases the dividends to the remaining shareholders (which gets taxed) or it allows the corporation to use that extra cash to invest in expansion, which also increases the value of the remaining shares.Sure. But do you want to finish that thought?
MOST of the time, it is BOTH. SO, everybody gets paid, including the Fed.
Corporations employ millions of people enabling them to pay federal, state, and local taxes, plus contribute to the overall economy. Why the left demonizes corporations makes no sense.
If you don't put money in the hands of those that will spend it, nothing will happen except corps will coninue to hoard money, buy back their stocks, & buy more dumbass Republicans
Its the Trump plan.This makes no sense.
If a corporation does not get taxed, which individual benefits and avoids taxation?
If a corporation has coffers full of money, who benefits? Not the corporation. Sitting on unused capital is wasteful.
Anyone who makes more money through investment eventually gets taxed.
Individuals get better, more jobs. The government then actually works FOR THE PEOPLE, not the reverse.
They get taxed like 15% on dividends, I recall. If the investment income is taxed only once, it stays a measly 15%. That's pretty weak sauce, considering little ol' me is getting taxed around 30%.
To compensate for the deficit caused by the lack of corporate taxes, income taxes would have to go up. Otherwise ... well, you thought the national debt was bad now ...
Granted, I'm not a tax expert. I admit, I don't have all the answers. This is my understanding; the workers won't benefit from tax cuts. Especially not compared to investors.
If that suits your purposes, so be it. It's not ideal for me.
You have a simpleton understanding of economics. Tax policy should encourage corporations and the wealthy to take risks on new businesses and expansion, that's how jobs are created and growth happens. If the left had its way, punishment taxation of the wealthy and corporations the wealthy and corporations just don't bend over and take it. They say fuck you liberals and run for the exits. Relocate to other countries. The wealthy hunker down hoarding their wealth. They don't take risks on starting new businesses or expansion. Job growth slows, economic growth slows, and tax revenue falls. You can't punishment tax your way to prosperity.
Okay. But you're kind of misrepresenting what I'm saying. I never said that there is NOTHING good that will come out of the new tax laws, whatever they end up looking like. But it's certainly not going to be this brilliant paradise that Trump and his supporters are claiming.
Do you actually believe corporations should not be taxed? And where will that money come from then? That was sort of my original question.
You are blaming Trump. Congress created this tax reform bill not Trump. Now, Dem's in congress decided to sit on the sidelines and just bitch and complain so they are useless. The GOP, infested with lying corrupt GOP establishment hacks bought and paid for by special interests drafted the bill. Naturally its full of pork and political favors and in many ways not what Trump asked for. Lets start there.
Democrats weren't allowed behind those closed doors.
Quit trying to blame Democrats for not stopping your God Damn supid Corporation loving party
That sounds familiar.Its the Trump plan.
Democrats weren't allowed behind those closed doors.
Quit trying to blame Democrats for not stopping your God Damn supid Corporation loving party
Making product for whom?It either increases the dividends to the remaining shareholders (which gets taxed) or it allows the corporation to use that extra cash to invest in expansion, which also increases the value of the remaining shares.Sure. But do you want to finish that thought?
MOST of the time, it is BOTH. SO, everybody gets paid, including the Fed.
Corporations employ millions of people enabling them to pay federal, state, and local taxes, plus contribute to the overall economy. Why the left demonizes corporations makes no sense.
If you don't put money in the hands of those that will spend it, nothing will happen except corps will coninue to hoard money, buy back their stocks, & buy more dumbass Republicans
Corporations put money in the hands of its employees, and its shareholders which include millions of middle class Americans who have trillions of dollars invested in corporations. I'm sorry who is the left trying to punish by confiscating wealth from corporations? Do you have any idea what's going to happen when most of the baby boomers are retired and there's far fewer people working and paying taxes? You better hope the baby boomers make a ton of money investing in corporations so they can spend it during their retirement.
Trump Tax Plan Worries Europe
