Trump send US Army to raid Google and CNN in simultaneous sting operation.

[Gdjjr]

And the Truther dipshittery begins anew!

What do you have against truth that makes you use the word disparagingly?

 

[ABikerSailor]

He's not smart enough to even know what SETI is.

Where do you get your information?

Where do I get my information? A myriad of places. I watch a little FOX news (to find out the conservative talking points), a bit of CNN, and MSNBC. I also check out the BBC on occasion to see what is going on in the rest of the world. As far as internet information? Any news source that I trust (like the AP, among others), and I bounce the stories I've read against each other to see if it's true or not. If they all agree, chances are, it really happened.

As far as where do I get my information about Angelo being an idiot? That comes from the posts he leaves here on USMB. I don't put anyone on ignore, because even a blind pig will find a truffle every now and again.

 

[Gdjjr]

I get mine from the Federal Network

Post a link

 

[Gdjjr]

Where do I get my information? A myriad of places. I watch a little FOX news (to find out the conservative talking points), a bit of CNN, and MSNBC.

MSM- known liars- got it-

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"We can't let them steal our election."
View attachment 427126

Good satire has elements of the truth – and it’s certainly true that Trump would love nothing more than to use the military to silence the press, remain in power, and establish an authoritarian dictatorship.

 

[Skylar]

And the Truther dipshittery begins anew!

What do you have against truth that makes you use the word disparagingly?

Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.

Does that help clear up any confusion?

 

[Gdjjr]

Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.

Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.

 

[skews13]

"We can't let them steal our election."
View attachment 427126

 

[Skylar]

Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.

Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.

Truth is great. Alas, 'Truthers' have nothing to do with it.

 

[Gdjjr]

Alas, 'Truthers' have nothing to do with it.

You, sir, are a liar. Period.

 

[Ringel05]

I get mine from the Federal Network

Post a link

 

[Ringel05]

"We can't let them steal our election."
View attachment 427126

Good satire has elements of the truth – and it’s certainly true that Trump would love nothing more than to use the military to silence the press, remain in power, and establish an authoritarian dictatorship.

You're as clueless as they are.

 

[Gdjjr]

I get mine from the Federal Network

Post a link

That's what I figured- 0, zilch, nada

 

[MisterBeale]

Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.

Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.

Truth is great. Alas, 'Truthers' have nothing to do with it.

I think we must differentiate between "facts" and "truth."

One person's "truth," is another person's "conspiracy theory," though they may both be based on the same facts, yet they be wildly interpreted differently.

 

[Skylar]

Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.

Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.

Truth is great. Alas, 'Truthers' have nothing to do with it.

I think we must differentiate between "facts" and "truth."

One person's "truth," is another person's "conspiracy theory," though they may both be based on the same facts, yet they be wildly interpreted differently.

I'm more partial to the 'in accordance with fact or reality' kind of Truth.

And in that, Truthers are sorely lacking.

 

[Ringel05]

I get mine from the Federal Network

Post a link

That's what I figured- 0, zilch, nada

Well if you're referring to yourself ya figured correctly.

 

[Ringel05]

Apparently some don't get this is in the Political Satire forum....... The rest of us are just having fun with it.......

 

[MisterBeale]

Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.

Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.

Truth is great. Alas, 'Truthers' have nothing to do with it.

I think we must differentiate between "facts" and "truth."

One person's "truth," is another person's "conspiracy theory," though they may both be based on the same facts, yet they be wildly interpreted differently.

I'm more partial to the 'in accordance with fact or reality' kind of Truth.

And in that, Truthers are sorely lacking.

No, what you are, is devoid of anything but the position that science can solve all questions, and it is the final arbitrator of truth, which, it is not.

The default position you assume, is the only path to "truth" is through "logical positivism," which, of course, is a fallacy. You cannot disregard the philosophical outlook of the entire rest of, not only western civilization, but also eastern civilization, just because they do not share your POV on truth.

Don't be absurd.

 

[Skylar]

Oh, "Truther" and "Truth" have nothing to do with each other.

Apparently you don't like the truth? Correct? Unless it comes from an official source, no matter that the source(s) have an agenda- got it.

Truth is great. Alas, 'Truthers' have nothing to do with it.

I think we must differentiate between "facts" and "truth."

One person's "truth," is another person's "conspiracy theory," though they may both be based on the same facts, yet they be wildly interpreted differently.

I'm more partial to the 'in accordance with fact or reality' kind of Truth.

And in that, Truthers are sorely lacking.

No, what you are, is devoid of anything but the position that science can solve all questions, and it is the final arbitrator of truth, which, it is not.

The default position you assume, is the only path to "truth" is through "logical positivism," which, of course, is a fallacy. You cannot disregard the philosophical outlook of the entire rest of, not only western civilization, but also eastern civilization, just because they do not share your POV on truth.

Don't be absurd.

Can you propose a better process for figuring out how 911 occurred?

By all means, allow philosophy to enlighten us. And use neither science nor logical positivism.