The reasoning behind the comparison is invalid, and you know that and have to play jerkoff because it makes him look bad - in turn - making yourself look bad because you're bending over backwards to stretch out why what he said was perfectly up&up."statistically fair and HONEST"Nobody can question, now, your comprehension nor your hero worship issues.Uh, no.
Comparing the two is moot, as neither number is attributable to said President. Trump implying causation is the unfair part. Neither had dick to do with it.
You miss the whole point, as usual, but do manage to bring dicks into it.
The issue Pupps is addressing is the statistical validity of the comparison. Meet the outlined criterion and the comparison is valid.
Pupps' posts had nothing to do with politics. Now go crawl back into your Neanderthal cave and give Catz a shave with your tongue.
Mal pointed as to why it was dishonest to make the comparison.
He wasnt calling the literal fucking numbers wrong.
Jesus christ.
It was a statistically fair and HONEST comparison. Number A versus Number B - provided both are accurately provided via the same method.. The fact you don't like is irrelevant.
lol
cool story dude, he was dishonestly attributing the numbers to HIMSELF, and Obama.
Quit your ball washin, grow up. The fawning is disgusting.
The comparison is valid, whining won't change that. End of discussion.
Buuut, thats your business however you live with yourself like that....with that man crush and all