Trump not being Honest when comparing his first month to Barry's...

[mal]

Trump via Twitter: "The media has not reported that the National Debt in my first month went down by $12 billion vs a $200 billion increase in Obama first mo."... I will call out either side and do and Don needs to be corrected. Obama's 1st month nor yours is your doing. The Generational Correction saw 6 to 800,000 jobs a month were going out the winder in late 2008 and early 2009... Think that might find the Fed taking in less money?... Yep. I would need to know how anything Don has done so far has had a direct impact on the debt since Obama's final budget doesn't end until this Fall and the massive expansion in cities like LA, San Fran, Denver and others has been going on now for a couple of years. I calls em as I sees them.



peace...

 

[Political Junky]

Trump hasn't done anything that decrease the debt in his first month.

 

[rightwinger]

Unbelievable that Trump compares the economy he was given to what Obama was given

Is this the part where he thanks Obama?

 

[Reasonable]

Trump via Twitter: "The media has not reported that the National Debt in my first month went down by $12 billion vs a $200 billion increase in Obama first mo."... I will call out either side and do and Don needs to be corrected. Obama's 1st month nor yours is your doing. The Generational Correction saw 6 to 800,000 jobs a month were going out the winder in late 2008 and early 2009... Think that might find the Fed taking in less money?... Yep. I would need to know how anything Don has done so far has had a direct impact on the debt since Obama's final budget doesn't end until this Fall and the massive expansion in cities like LA, San Fran, Denver and others has been going on now for a couple of years. I calls em as I sees them.



peace...

Using the words Trump/ honesty in the same sentence is an oxymoron.

 

[Reasonable]

Unbelievable that Trump compares the economy he was given to what Obama was given

Is this the part where he thanks Obama?

Ha haha

 

[mal]

All that's fine and good... Bush didn't create the Generational Correction and Barry didn't fix it... They all take credit and lay blame at other's feet. I'm just not going to let either side do it.



peace...

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

Fair is a debatable term. If the numbers compared were accurate and compiled using the same method, then it is a fair comparison.

 

[mal]

It's this simple... Obama saw deficits in his first month because of the Correction that started before him where hundreds and hundreds of thousands of tax payers stopped paying taxes due to becoming unemployed... Trump is seeing better numbers because he entered into an expansion...



peace...

 

[SmokeALib]

Unbelievable that Trump compares the economy he was given to what Obama was given

Is this the part where he thanks Obama?

Thank him for what? Doubling our debt? Incurred more debt than all previous presidents combined?

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

It's this simple... Obama saw deficits in his first month because of the Correction that started before him where hundreds and hundreds of thousands of tax payers stopped paying taxes due to becoming unemployed... Trump is seeing better numbers because he entered into an expansion...



peace...

Those are explanations as to why the data are as they are. It doesn't address, nor is it relevant to, the issue of whether the comparison is fair.

Fairness rests only upon the accuracy of the data and methods used to produce it.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

What Trump missed in misleading claim about the debt

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Unbelievable that Trump compares the economy he was given to what Obama was given

Is this the part where he thanks Obama?

Thank him for what? Doubling our debt? Incurred more debt than all previous presidents combined?

He didn't.

And its obvious that drumpf plans the same thing bush pulled - run up the debt and let the next guy take the blame. Its a Repub thing and RWNJ traitors are too dumb to figure it out.

 

[G.T.]

It's this simple... Obama saw deficits in his first month because of the Correction that started before him where hundreds and hundreds of thousands of tax payers stopped paying taxes due to becoming unemployed... Trump is seeing better numbers because he entered into an expansion...



peace...

Those are explanations as to why the data are as they are. It doesn't address, nor is it relevant to, the issue of whether the comparison is fair.

Fairness rests only upon the accuracy of the data and methods used to produce it.

Uh, no.

Comparing the two is moot, as neither number is attributable to said President. Trump implying causation is the unfair part. Neither had dick to do with it.

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

It's this simple... Obama saw deficits in his first month because of the Correction that started before him where hundreds and hundreds of thousands of tax payers stopped paying taxes due to becoming unemployed... Trump is seeing better numbers because he entered into an expansion...



peace...

Those are explanations as to why the data are as they are. It doesn't address, nor is it relevant to, the issue of whether the comparison is fair.

Fairness rests only upon the accuracy of the data and methods used to produce it.

Uh, no.

Comparing the two is moot, as neither number is attributable to said President. Trump implying causation is the unfair part. Neither had dick to do with it.

You miss the whole point, as usual, but do manage to bring dicks into it.

The issue Pupps is addressing is the statistical validity of the comparison. Meet the outlined criterion and the comparison is valid.

Pupps' posts had nothing to do with politics. Now go crawl back into your Neanderthal cave and give Catz a shave with your tongue.

 

[G.T.]

It's this simple... Obama saw deficits in his first month because of the Correction that started before him where hundreds and hundreds of thousands of tax payers stopped paying taxes due to becoming unemployed... Trump is seeing better numbers because he entered into an expansion...



peace...

Those are explanations as to why the data are as they are. It doesn't address, nor is it relevant to, the issue of whether the comparison is fair.

Fairness rests only upon the accuracy of the data and methods used to produce it.

Uh, no.

Comparing the two is moot, as neither number is attributable to said President. Trump implying causation is the unfair part. Neither had dick to do with it.

You miss the whole point, as usual, but do manage to bring dicks into it.

The issue Pupps is addressing is the statistical validity of the comparison. Meet the outlined criterion and the comparison is valid.

Pupps' posts had nothing to do with politics. Now go crawl back into your Neanderthal cave and give Catz a shave with your tongue.

Nobody can question, now, your comprehension nor your hero worship issues.

Mal pointed as to why it was dishonest to make the comparison.

He wasnt calling the literal fucking numbers wrong.

Jesus christ.

 

[rightwinger]

Unbelievable that Trump compares the economy he was given to what Obama was given

Is this the part where he thanks Obama?

Thank him for what? Doubling our debt? Incurred more debt than all previous presidents combined?

Haven't seen any Trump policy to reduce the debt. In fact, his budget adds ten trillion

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

It's this simple... Obama saw deficits in his first month because of the Correction that started before him where hundreds and hundreds of thousands of tax payers stopped paying taxes due to becoming unemployed... Trump is seeing better numbers because he entered into an expansion...



peace...

Those are explanations as to why the data are as they are. It doesn't address, nor is it relevant to, the issue of whether the comparison is fair.

Fairness rests only upon the accuracy of the data and methods used to produce it.

Uh, no.

Comparing the two is moot, as neither number is attributable to said President. Trump implying causation is the unfair part. Neither had dick to do with it.

You miss the whole point, as usual, but do manage to bring dicks into it.

The issue Pupps is addressing is the statistical validity of the comparison. Meet the outlined criterion and the comparison is valid.

Pupps' posts had nothing to do with politics. Now go crawl back into your Neanderthal cave and give Catz a shave with your tongue.

Nobody can question, now, your comprehension nor your hero worship issues.

Mal pointed as to why it was dishonest to make the comparison.

He wasnt calling the literal fucking numbers wrong.

Jesus christ.

It was a statistically fair and HONEST comparison. Number A versus Number B - provided both are accurately provided via the same method.. The fact you don't like is irrelevant.

 

[G.T.]

It's this simple... Obama saw deficits in his first month because of the Correction that started before him where hundreds and hundreds of thousands of tax payers stopped paying taxes due to becoming unemployed... Trump is seeing better numbers because he entered into an expansion...



peace...

Those are explanations as to why the data are as they are. It doesn't address, nor is it relevant to, the issue of whether the comparison is fair.

Fairness rests only upon the accuracy of the data and methods used to produce it.

Uh, no.

Comparing the two is moot, as neither number is attributable to said President. Trump implying causation is the unfair part. Neither had dick to do with it.

You miss the whole point, as usual, but do manage to bring dicks into it.

The issue Pupps is addressing is the statistical validity of the comparison. Meet the outlined criterion and the comparison is valid.

Pupps' posts had nothing to do with politics. Now go crawl back into your Neanderthal cave and give Catz a shave with your tongue.

Nobody can question, now, your comprehension nor your hero worship issues.

Mal pointed as to why it was dishonest to make the comparison.

He wasnt calling the literal fucking numbers wrong.

Jesus christ.

It was a statistically fair and HONEST comparison. Number A versus Number B - provided both are accurately provided via the same method.. The fact you don't like is irrelevant.

"statistically fair and HONEST"


lol

cool story dude, he was dishonestly attributing the numbers to HIMSELF, and Obama.


Quit your ball washin, grow up. The fawning is disgusting.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Unbelievable that Trump compares the economy he was given to what Obama was given

Is this the part where he thanks Obama?

Thank him for what? Doubling our debt? Incurred more debt than all previous presidents combined?

This is fake news passed on by the far right sites. And the sheeple pass it along like it
Is fact.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

Those are explanations as to why the data are as they are. It doesn't address, nor is it relevant to, the issue of whether the comparison is fair.

Fairness rests only upon the accuracy of the data and methods used to produce it.

Uh, no.

Comparing the two is moot, as neither number is attributable to said President. Trump implying causation is the unfair part. Neither had dick to do with it.

You miss the whole point, as usual, but do manage to bring dicks into it.

The issue Pupps is addressing is the statistical validity of the comparison. Meet the outlined criterion and the comparison is valid.

Pupps' posts had nothing to do with politics. Now go crawl back into your Neanderthal cave and give Catz a shave with your tongue.

Nobody can question, now, your comprehension nor your hero worship issues.

Mal pointed as to why it was dishonest to make the comparison.

He wasnt calling the literal fucking numbers wrong.

Jesus christ.

It was a statistically fair and HONEST comparison. Number A versus Number B - provided both are accurately provided via the same method.. The fact you don't like is irrelevant.

"statistically fair and HONEST"


lol

cool story dude, he was dishonestly attributing the numbers to HIMSELF, and Obama.


Quit your ball washin, grow up. The fawning is disgusting.

The comparison is valid, whining won't change that. End of discussion.