Trump leads when polls not skewed!

Last edited:
Hillary at 273 EVs not counting battlegrounds

Now THAT is some skewing

Road to 270: CNN's general election map - CNNPolitics.com

And we are going to continue another eight years of this rotten economy.

Don't blame me....you are the idiots who selected Trump

President Obamas economy added $50 trillion to our nations wealth

I blame a lot of people for picking the first socialist candidate that they can find. They also seem to wonder why their are not as many jobs as there once was.

This is going to suck for a long time but there is very little I can do about it until people figure out that 'liberal' economic policies don't work.
 
Hillary at 273 EVs not counting battlegrounds

Now THAT is some skewing

Road to 270: CNN's general election map - CNNPolitics.com

And we are going to continue another eight years of this rotten economy.

Don't blame me....you are the idiots who selected Trump

President Obamas economy added $50 trillion to our nations wealth

I blame a lot of people for picking the first socialist candidate that they can find. They also seem to wonder why their are not as many jobs as there once was.

This is going to suck for a long time but there is very little I can do about it until people figure out that 'liberal' economic policies don't work.
But then again....you guys predicted the end of the world when Obama was elected

We are used to you Drama Queens
 
Hillary at 273 EVs not counting battlegrounds

Now THAT is some skewing

Road to 270: CNN's general election map - CNNPolitics.com

And we are going to continue another eight years of this rotten economy.

Don't blame me....you are the idiots who selected Trump

President Obamas economy added $50 trillion to our nations wealth



X
Do you have a source for that $50 trillion USA wealth?
My sources show the growth is less then $30 trillion...not $50 trillion.
 
Hillary at 273 EVs not counting battlegrounds

Now THAT is some skewing

Road to 270: CNN's general election map - CNNPolitics.com

And we are going to continue another eight years of this rotten economy.

Don't blame me....you are the idiots who selected Trump

President Obamas economy added $50 trillion to our nations wealth



X
Do you have a source for that $50 trillion USA wealth?
My sources show the growth is less then $30 trillion...not $50 trillion.

US Debt Clock

Total National assets today $123 Trillion
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Total National assets Aug 2008. $77 Trillion
U.S. National Debt Clock 2008
 
Hillary at 273 EVs not counting battlegrounds

Now THAT is some skewing

Road to 270: CNN's general election map - CNNPolitics.com

And we are going to continue another eight years of this rotten economy.

Don't blame me....you are the idiots who selected Trump

President Obamas economy added $50 trillion to our nations wealth

I blame a lot of people for picking the first socialist candidate that they can find. They also seem to wonder why their are not as many jobs as there once was.

This is going to suck for a long time but there is very little I can do about it until people figure out that 'liberal' economic policies don't work.
But then again....you guys predicted the end of the world when Obama was elected

We are used to you Drama Queens

Yeah, the social media era isn't really the best for conservative melodrama. As you realize really quickly how much of their hysteric, over the top histrionics are just recycled, rewarmed dogshit.

Like the 'skewed polls' nonsense. Its the exact, verbatim nonsense they offered us in 2012. And were comically, laughably wrong.

But a few minutes in the rhetorical microwave....and that plate of dogshit is bubbling and ready to be reused!
 
No I haven't so as I said before 31 percent is much closer to reality than 26 percent republican. That's 4 to 5 percent in the polls it makes a huuuuuuge difference. That ls how they skew polls.

I'm they.had a sample of 70 percent republican 10 percent democrat....it would be incorrect...so the percentage matters.
How do you know the percentage of Republicans out there? When the pollsters are all coming up with similar numbers, you should trust them.

That's the part that is so laughably hillarious. His source on party affiliation numbers......is pollsters recording self identified party affiliation.

Yet in his next breath, he insists that pollsters recording self identified party affiliation can't be trusted.

Its like watching Norman slowly winding down on an episode of Star Trek

latest


Wow you have no clue...you know people have precinct data....they know where certain voters live.

Dude, you're literally citing pollsters asking about party affiliation as your justification for IGNORING pollsters asking about party affiliation.

Its like watching a dog chase its own tail. As any argument you would apply to the poll you want to ignore would apply just as equally to the poll you're citing.

You're engaged in willful, desperate, even frantic confirmation bias.....assessing credibility on whether or not a source says what you want to believe.

Even when you have to cite and ignore the same source on the same topic!

Lying to yourself is not going to give you useful information. It only makes you *feel* better. It doesn't actually help you predict any outcome.


You are stupid.....I'm saying they rig the polls..how?

By calling areas with more democrats.

Show us, don't tell us. As you 'saying' something doesn't factually establish that it is actually happening.

As your ilk's melodramatic hysterics in 2012 on how the polls were 'skewed against Romney' and democrats were being 'oversampled' demonstrated elegantly.

The polls weren't skewed against Romney. And Democrats weren't oversampled. The polls before the election showed the same democratic edge in self identification as the exit polls after the election.

About 6%

But this time its different....because you say so, huh?

It's really not hard

Since pollsters asking for self identified party affiliation are unreliable and untrustworthy......why are you citing pollsters asking for self identified party affiliation?

Laughing.....good luck with that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top