Trump is bringing back conservative "values"

[OnePercenter]

Pointing out hypocrisy is never stupid.

No, but what you posted was.

I posted a factual conservative value; pedophilia.

NO, you posted a claim, made a completely unsupported assumption based on it, and then smeared good people based on your unsupported and hateful assumption.


That was stupid.


Really, it was a lot worse than stupid, but I was being generous.


Would you like me to be honest instead?

So you're say that a 30 year old man can't marry an eleven year old girl in Tennessee, a family values State?

It is funny the way that libs cannot read something and respond to what they read, they need to invent something and then ask the person is that was what they said, when they obviously didnt' say it.


This is what I said. YOu can respond to it, or not.





you posted a claim, made a completely unsupported assumption based on it, and then smeared good people based on your unsupported and hateful assumption.


That was stupid.


Really, it was a lot worse than stupid, but I was being generous.


Would you like me to be honest instead?

It would seem that liberals are trying to screw-up the southern red State family value of pedophilia.

Child marriage in Tennessee: Lawmakers take action to close legal loophole

 

[Correll]

No, but what you posted was.

I posted a factual conservative value; pedophilia.

NO, you posted a claim, made a completely unsupported assumption based on it, and then smeared good people based on your unsupported and hateful assumption.


That was stupid.


Really, it was a lot worse than stupid, but I was being generous.


Would you like me to be honest instead?

So you're say that a 30 year old man can't marry an eleven year old girl in Tennessee, a family values State?

It is funny the way that libs cannot read something and respond to what they read, they need to invent something and then ask the person is that was what they said, when they obviously didnt' say it.


This is what I said. YOu can respond to it, or not.





you posted a claim, made a completely unsupported assumption based on it, and then smeared good people based on your unsupported and hateful assumption.


That was stupid.


Really, it was a lot worse than stupid, but I was being generous.


Would you like me to be honest instead?

It would seem that liberals are trying to screw-up the southern red State family value of pedophilia.

Child marriage in Tennessee: Lawmakers take action to close legal loophole

Still unable to respond to anything I say, I see.


I will stop being nice now, and will be honest, instead.


You are a lying asshole.

 

[OnePercenter]

I posted a factual conservative value; pedophilia.

NO, you posted a claim, made a completely unsupported assumption based on it, and then smeared good people based on your unsupported and hateful assumption.


That was stupid.


Really, it was a lot worse than stupid, but I was being generous.


Would you like me to be honest instead?

So you're say that a 30 year old man can't marry an eleven year old girl in Tennessee, a family values State?

It is funny the way that libs cannot read something and respond to what they read, they need to invent something and then ask the person is that was what they said, when they obviously didnt' say it.


This is what I said. YOu can respond to it, or not.





you posted a claim, made a completely unsupported assumption based on it, and then smeared good people based on your unsupported and hateful assumption.


That was stupid.


Really, it was a lot worse than stupid, but I was being generous.


Would you like me to be honest instead?

It would seem that liberals are trying to screw-up the southern red State family value of pedophilia.

Child marriage in Tennessee: Lawmakers take action to close legal loophole

Still unable to respond to anything I say, I see.


I will stop being nice now, and will be honest, instead.


You are a lying asshole.

You're pro-pedophilia?

 

[Correll]

NO, you posted a claim, made a completely unsupported assumption based on it, and then smeared good people based on your unsupported and hateful assumption.


That was stupid.


Really, it was a lot worse than stupid, but I was being generous.


Would you like me to be honest instead?

So you're say that a 30 year old man can't marry an eleven year old girl in Tennessee, a family values State?

It is funny the way that libs cannot read something and respond to what they read, they need to invent something and then ask the person is that was what they said, when they obviously didnt' say it.


This is what I said. YOu can respond to it, or not.





you posted a claim, made a completely unsupported assumption based on it, and then smeared good people based on your unsupported and hateful assumption.


That was stupid.


Really, it was a lot worse than stupid, but I was being generous.


Would you like me to be honest instead?

It would seem that liberals are trying to screw-up the southern red State family value of pedophilia.

Child marriage in Tennessee: Lawmakers take action to close legal loophole

Still unable to respond to anything I say, I see.


I will stop being nice now, and will be honest, instead.


You are a lying asshole.

You're pro-pedophilia?

And the ass continues to reply to shit he just makes up.


Mmm, let me restate that.


I meant to say, THE FUCKING ASSHOLE.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Plus, in family values Tennessee, a 30 year old man to marry an 11 year old girl. Seems that the conservative values States are the pedophilia States.

And the Democrats wonder why so many people refuse to vote for them

 

[Dragonlady]

America First. The globalists hate it.

If Trump believed in America First, we would be leading and not running from our friends. You can't be any more obvious.

Our "friends" have been crappy friends, for quite some time now.

not as good as the friends on FOX?

America’s friends have been taking in the refugees created by American foreign policy. 5 million of them. The US denied them entry, and paid nothing for their upkeep.

America’s friends have faithfully imposed sanctions in those countries the US asked them to sanction, even when doing so cost them business with their trading partners and created shortages and higher prices at home.

To thank his allies for their cooperation and assistance, Trump railed against trade imbalances and lack of military spending.

When is Trump going to pay the costs of resettling Syrian refugees?

 

[OnePercenter]

Plus, in family values Tennessee, a 30 year old man to marry an 11 year old girl. Seems that the conservative values States are the pedophilia States.

And the Democrats wonder why so many people refuse to vote for them

Democrats want to end laws in States that allow legal pedophilia.

Democrats want wage increases for working Americans.

Republicans want legal pedophilia and a thug in the White House that promotes battery on women in grabbing them by the pussy, and walking into dressing rooms of minor girls.

Republicans want low pay for working Americans by using the "market price" philosophy (like fish) and refusing to raise minimums.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Plus, in family values Tennessee, a 30 year old man to marry an 11 year old girl. Seems that the conservative values States are the pedophilia States.

And the Democrats wonder why so many people refuse to vote for them

Democrats want to end laws in States that allow legal pedophilia.

Democrats want wage increases for working Americans.

Republicans want legal pedophilia and a thug in the White House that promotes battery on women in grabbing them by the pussy, and walking into dressing rooms of minor girls.

Republicans want low pay for working Americans by using the "market price" philosophy (like fish) and refusing to raise minimums.

You do know your wants sailed away decades ago with JFK and Bill Clinton, right?


God damn it son this is not George's 1984.

 

[deanrd]

Plus, in family values Tennessee, a 30 year old man to marry an 11 year old girl. Seems that the conservative values States are the pedophilia States.

And the Democrats wonder why so many people refuse to vote for them

Democrats want to end laws in States that allow legal pedophilia.

Democrats want wage increases for working Americans.

Republicans want legal pedophilia and a thug in the White House that promotes battery on women in grabbing them by the pussy, and walking into dressing rooms of minor girls.

Republicans want low pay for working Americans by using the "market price" philosophy (like fish) and refusing to raise minimums.

You do know your wants sailed away decades ago with JFK and Bill Clinton, right?


God damn it son this is not George's 1984.

No, it's Trump's and the GOP's Nazi 2018. The party of racists, the Alt White and the Aryan Nation.

We got it. We understand where Republicans are coming from. Loud and Clear.

 

[deanrd]

Perkins: Trump gets a 'mulligan' for behavior

Tony Perkins, the president of the conservative Family Research Council, tells CNN's Erin Burnett that the evangelical community has given President Trump a "mulligan" when it comes to his past transgressions.

---------------

Hillary stayed with her husband.
Clearly, thrice married Trump is better.

 

[Correll]

Plus, in family values Tennessee, a 30 year old man to marry an 11 year old girl. Seems that the conservative values States are the pedophilia States.

And the Democrats wonder why so many people refuse to vote for them

Democrats want to end laws in States that allow legal pedophilia.

Democrats want wage increases for working Americans.

Republicans want legal pedophilia and a thug in the White House that promotes battery on women in grabbing them by the pussy, and walking into dressing rooms of minor girls.

Republicans want low pay for working Americans by using the "market price" philosophy (like fish) and refusing to raise minimums.

You do know your wants sailed away decades ago with JFK and Bill Clinton, right?


God damn it son this is not George's 1984.

No, it's Trump's and the GOP's Nazi 2018. The party of racists, the Alt White and the Aryan Nation.

We got it. We understand where Republicans are coming from. Loud and Clear.

Sure. Because Trade and Immigration is the same as WWII.


It boggles the mind, how fucking stupid and vile you are, you piece of shit.

 

[Muhammed]

America First. The globalists hate it.

The term goes back to Americans in 1940 who wanted to stay out of the war, many of whom were Pro-Nazi.

America First Committee - Wikipedia
<excerpt>

Charles Lindbergh speaking at an AFC rally
Charles Lindbergh was admired in Germany and allowed to see the buildup of the German air force, the Luftwaffe, in 1937. He was impressed by its strength and secretly reported his findings to the General Staff of the United States Army, warning them that the U.S. had fallen behind and that it must urgently build up its aviation.[13] He had feuded with the Roosevelt administration for years. His first radio speech was broadcast on September 15, 1939, on all three of the major radio networks. He urged listeners to look beyond the speeches and propaganda that they were being fed and instead look at who was writing the speeches and reports, who owned the papers and who influenced the speakers.

On June 20, 1941, Lindbergh spoke to 30,000 people in Los Angeles and billed it as a "Peace and Preparedness Mass Meeting", Lindbergh criticized those movements which he perceived were leading America into the war. He proclaimed that the United States was in a position that made it virtually impregnable. He claimed that the interventionists and the British who called for "the defense of England" really meant "the defeat of Germany".[14][15]

Nothing did more to escalate the tensions than the speech which Lindbergh delivered to a rally in Des Moines, Iowa on September 11, 1941. In that speech, he identified the forces pulling America into the war as the British, the Roosevelt administration, and American Jews. While he expressed sympathy for the plight of the Jews in Germany, he argued that America's entry into the war would serve them little better. He said in part:

It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race. No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution the Jewish race suffered in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy, both for us and for them.

Instead of agitating for war the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way, for they will be among the first to feel its consequences. Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastation. A few farsighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not. Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government.[16]

History shows that Lindbergh was 100% correct. WWII was a complete disaster for America. Millions were forced into slavery by FDR's fascist government, hundreds of thousands of young Americans were killed and countless others disabled for life.

FDR was a fucking evil slave driver.

All of you party of slavery supporters are scumbags.

 

[OnePercenter]

America First. The globalists hate it.

The term goes back to Americans in 1940 who wanted to stay out of the war, many of whom were Pro-Nazi.

America First Committee - Wikipedia
<excerpt>

Charles Lindbergh speaking at an AFC rally
Charles Lindbergh was admired in Germany and allowed to see the buildup of the German air force, the Luftwaffe, in 1937. He was impressed by its strength and secretly reported his findings to the General Staff of the United States Army, warning them that the U.S. had fallen behind and that it must urgently build up its aviation.[13] He had feuded with the Roosevelt administration for years. His first radio speech was broadcast on September 15, 1939, on all three of the major radio networks. He urged listeners to look beyond the speeches and propaganda that they were being fed and instead look at who was writing the speeches and reports, who owned the papers and who influenced the speakers.

On June 20, 1941, Lindbergh spoke to 30,000 people in Los Angeles and billed it as a "Peace and Preparedness Mass Meeting", Lindbergh criticized those movements which he perceived were leading America into the war. He proclaimed that the United States was in a position that made it virtually impregnable. He claimed that the interventionists and the British who called for "the defense of England" really meant "the defeat of Germany".[14][15]

Nothing did more to escalate the tensions than the speech which Lindbergh delivered to a rally in Des Moines, Iowa on September 11, 1941. In that speech, he identified the forces pulling America into the war as the British, the Roosevelt administration, and American Jews. While he expressed sympathy for the plight of the Jews in Germany, he argued that America's entry into the war would serve them little better. He said in part:

It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race. No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution the Jewish race suffered in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy, both for us and for them.

Instead of agitating for war the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way, for they will be among the first to feel its consequences. Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastation. A few farsighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not. Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government.[16]

History shows that Lindbergh was 100% correct. WWII was a complete disaster for America. Millions were forced into slavery by FDR's fascist government, hundreds of thousands of young Americans were killed and countless others disabled for life.

FDR was a fucking evil slave driver.

All of you party of slavery supporters are scumbags.

With the political ideology change of the 60's, FDR would be a Republican today.

 

[OnePercenter]

America First. The globalists hate it.

The term goes back to Americans in 1940 who wanted to stay out of the war, many of whom were Pro-Nazi.

America First Committee - Wikipedia
<excerpt>

Charles Lindbergh speaking at an AFC rally
Charles Lindbergh was admired in Germany and allowed to see the buildup of the German air force, the Luftwaffe, in 1937. He was impressed by its strength and secretly reported his findings to the General Staff of the United States Army, warning them that the U.S. had fallen behind and that it must urgently build up its aviation.[13] He had feuded with the Roosevelt administration for years. His first radio speech was broadcast on September 15, 1939, on all three of the major radio networks. He urged listeners to look beyond the speeches and propaganda that they were being fed and instead look at who was writing the speeches and reports, who owned the papers and who influenced the speakers.

On June 20, 1941, Lindbergh spoke to 30,000 people in Los Angeles and billed it as a "Peace and Preparedness Mass Meeting", Lindbergh criticized those movements which he perceived were leading America into the war. He proclaimed that the United States was in a position that made it virtually impregnable. He claimed that the interventionists and the British who called for "the defense of England" really meant "the defeat of Germany".[14][15]

Nothing did more to escalate the tensions than the speech which Lindbergh delivered to a rally in Des Moines, Iowa on September 11, 1941. In that speech, he identified the forces pulling America into the war as the British, the Roosevelt administration, and American Jews. While he expressed sympathy for the plight of the Jews in Germany, he argued that America's entry into the war would serve them little better. He said in part:

It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race. No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution the Jewish race suffered in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy, both for us and for them.

Instead of agitating for war the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way, for they will be among the first to feel its consequences. Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastation. A few farsighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not. Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government.[16]

History shows that Lindbergh was 100% correct. WWII was a complete disaster for America. Millions were forced into slavery by FDR's fascist government, hundreds of thousands of young Americans were killed and countless others disabled for life.

FDR was a fucking evil slave driver.

All of you party of slavery supporters are scumbags.

With the political ideology change of the 60's, FDR would be a Republican today.

Correll and Muhammed seem to think it's funny. How would either one of you explain the pro-Union Republican party of 1956, arguably the best financial year for working class Americans?

 

[Correll]

America First. The globalists hate it.

The term goes back to Americans in 1940 who wanted to stay out of the war, many of whom were Pro-Nazi.

America First Committee - Wikipedia
<excerpt>

Charles Lindbergh speaking at an AFC rally
Charles Lindbergh was admired in Germany and allowed to see the buildup of the German air force, the Luftwaffe, in 1937. He was impressed by its strength and secretly reported his findings to the General Staff of the United States Army, warning them that the U.S. had fallen behind and that it must urgently build up its aviation.[13] He had feuded with the Roosevelt administration for years. His first radio speech was broadcast on September 15, 1939, on all three of the major radio networks. He urged listeners to look beyond the speeches and propaganda that they were being fed and instead look at who was writing the speeches and reports, who owned the papers and who influenced the speakers.

On June 20, 1941, Lindbergh spoke to 30,000 people in Los Angeles and billed it as a "Peace and Preparedness Mass Meeting", Lindbergh criticized those movements which he perceived were leading America into the war. He proclaimed that the United States was in a position that made it virtually impregnable. He claimed that the interventionists and the British who called for "the defense of England" really meant "the defeat of Germany".[14][15]

Nothing did more to escalate the tensions than the speech which Lindbergh delivered to a rally in Des Moines, Iowa on September 11, 1941. In that speech, he identified the forces pulling America into the war as the British, the Roosevelt administration, and American Jews. While he expressed sympathy for the plight of the Jews in Germany, he argued that America's entry into the war would serve them little better. He said in part:

It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race. No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution the Jewish race suffered in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy, both for us and for them.

Instead of agitating for war the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way, for they will be among the first to feel its consequences. Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastation. A few farsighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not. Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government.[16]

History shows that Lindbergh was 100% correct. WWII was a complete disaster for America. Millions were forced into slavery by FDR's fascist government, hundreds of thousands of young Americans were killed and countless others disabled for life.

FDR was a fucking evil slave driver.

All of you party of slavery supporters are scumbags.

With the political ideology change of the 60's, FDR would be a Republican today.

Correll and Muhammed seem to think it's funny. How would either one of you explain the pro-Union Republican party of 1956, arguably the best financial year for working class Americans?

It's interesting that you want to support you claim about FDR, who was long dead by 1956, by talking about the Republican Part of that year.


The obvious way for YOU to support your claim would be to list the polices of FDR, of the 1930s that would fit with the Republican platform of today.


Franklin D. Roosevelt - Wikipedia


"In his acceptance speech, Roosevelt declared, "I pledge you, I pledge myself to a new deal for the American people... This is more than a political campaign. It is a call to arms."[131] Roosevelt promised securities regulation, tariff reduction, farm relief, government-funded public works, and other government actions to address the Great Depression."


Nothing really screams out "Republican" to me. You want to explain it to me?

 

[joaquinmiller]

Now Trump is saying our intelligence agencies filled with men and women who put their lives on the line to protect this country colluded with Russia.

No he didn't......

His problem is with the upper assholes who are doing this crap...........not the rank and file...

pffft.

And you believe that? You trust in Trump?

 

[joaquinmiller]

So there are two competing events going on tonight.

There is the Washington Press event which raises money for education.

There is the Trump "suck my dik" party in Michigan with white Trump sycophants.....

I read to here. You say "White" like it is a bad thing.

Fuck you, you racist.

He said 'white' like it was a true thing. And it was.

 

[OnePercenter]

America First. The globalists hate it.

The term goes back to Americans in 1940 who wanted to stay out of the war, many of whom were Pro-Nazi.

America First Committee - Wikipedia
<excerpt>

Charles Lindbergh speaking at an AFC rally
Charles Lindbergh was admired in Germany and allowed to see the buildup of the German air force, the Luftwaffe, in 1937. He was impressed by its strength and secretly reported his findings to the General Staff of the United States Army, warning them that the U.S. had fallen behind and that it must urgently build up its aviation.[13] He had feuded with the Roosevelt administration for years. His first radio speech was broadcast on September 15, 1939, on all three of the major radio networks. He urged listeners to look beyond the speeches and propaganda that they were being fed and instead look at who was writing the speeches and reports, who owned the papers and who influenced the speakers.

On June 20, 1941, Lindbergh spoke to 30,000 people in Los Angeles and billed it as a "Peace and Preparedness Mass Meeting", Lindbergh criticized those movements which he perceived were leading America into the war. He proclaimed that the United States was in a position that made it virtually impregnable. He claimed that the interventionists and the British who called for "the defense of England" really meant "the defeat of Germany".[14][15]

Nothing did more to escalate the tensions than the speech which Lindbergh delivered to a rally in Des Moines, Iowa on September 11, 1941. In that speech, he identified the forces pulling America into the war as the British, the Roosevelt administration, and American Jews. While he expressed sympathy for the plight of the Jews in Germany, he argued that America's entry into the war would serve them little better. He said in part:

It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race. No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution the Jewish race suffered in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy, both for us and for them.

Instead of agitating for war the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way, for they will be among the first to feel its consequences. Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastation. A few farsighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not. Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government.[16]

History shows that Lindbergh was 100% correct. WWII was a complete disaster for America. Millions were forced into slavery by FDR's fascist government, hundreds of thousands of young Americans were killed and countless others disabled for life.

FDR was a fucking evil slave driver.

All of you party of slavery supporters are scumbags.

With the political ideology change of the 60's, FDR would be a Republican today.

Correll and Muhammed seem to think it's funny. How would either one of you explain the pro-Union Republican party of 1956, arguably the best financial year for working class Americans?

It's interesting that you want to support you claim about FDR, who was long dead by 1956, by talking about the Republican Part of that year.


The obvious way for YOU to support your claim would be to list the polices of FDR, of the 1930s that would fit with the Republican platform of today.


Franklin D. Roosevelt - Wikipedia


"In his acceptance speech, Roosevelt declared, "I pledge you, I pledge myself to a new deal for the American people... This is more than a political campaign. It is a call to arms."[131] Roosevelt promised securities regulation, tariff reduction, farm relief, government-funded public works, and other government actions to address the Great Depression."


Nothing really screams out "Republican" to me. You want to explain it to me?

In what way did Roosevelt NOT help business?

 

[Political Junky]

The term goes back to Americans in 1940 who wanted to stay out of the war, many of whom were Pro-Nazi.

America First Committee - Wikipedia
<excerpt>

Charles Lindbergh speaking at an AFC rally
Charles Lindbergh was admired in Germany and allowed to see the buildup of the German air force, the Luftwaffe, in 1937. He was impressed by its strength and secretly reported his findings to the General Staff of the United States Army, warning them that the U.S. had fallen behind and that it must urgently build up its aviation.[13] He had feuded with the Roosevelt administration for years. His first radio speech was broadcast on September 15, 1939, on all three of the major radio networks. He urged listeners to look beyond the speeches and propaganda that they were being fed and instead look at who was writing the speeches and reports, who owned the papers and who influenced the speakers.

On June 20, 1941, Lindbergh spoke to 30,000 people in Los Angeles and billed it as a "Peace and Preparedness Mass Meeting", Lindbergh criticized those movements which he perceived were leading America into the war. He proclaimed that the United States was in a position that made it virtually impregnable. He claimed that the interventionists and the British who called for "the defense of England" really meant "the defeat of Germany".[14][15]

Nothing did more to escalate the tensions than the speech which Lindbergh delivered to a rally in Des Moines, Iowa on September 11, 1941. In that speech, he identified the forces pulling America into the war as the British, the Roosevelt administration, and American Jews. While he expressed sympathy for the plight of the Jews in Germany, he argued that America's entry into the war would serve them little better. He said in part:

It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race. No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution the Jewish race suffered in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy, both for us and for them.

Instead of agitating for war the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way, for they will be among the first to feel its consequences. Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastation. A few farsighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not. Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government.[16]

History shows that Lindbergh was 100% correct. WWII was a complete disaster for America. Millions were forced into slavery by FDR's fascist government, hundreds of thousands of young Americans were killed and countless others disabled for life.

FDR was a fucking evil slave driver.

All of you party of slavery supporters are scumbags.

With the political ideology change of the 60's, FDR would be a Republican today.

Correll and Muhammed seem to think it's funny. How would either one of you explain the pro-Union Republican party of 1956, arguably the best financial year for working class Americans?

It's interesting that you want to support you claim about FDR, who was long dead by 1956, by talking about the Republican Part of that year.


The obvious way for YOU to support your claim would be to list the polices of FDR, of the 1930s that would fit with the Republican platform of today.


Franklin D. Roosevelt - Wikipedia


"In his acceptance speech, Roosevelt declared, "I pledge you, I pledge myself to a new deal for the American people... This is more than a political campaign. It is a call to arms."[131] Roosevelt promised securities regulation, tariff reduction, farm relief, government-funded public works, and other government actions to address the Great Depression."


Nothing really screams out "Republican" to me. You want to explain it to me?

In what way did Roosevelt NOT help business?

Since cons rewrote history.

 

[Baz Ares]

So there are two competing events going on tonight.

There is the Washington Press event which raises money for education.

There is the Trump "suck my dik" party in Michigan with white Trump sycophants.

So the camera has been alternating between the Red Carpet and the Sycophants.

So Trump supporters in Michigan were asked what it is they like about Trump and they said all the achievements. When asked to name a few, they answered, and I'm paraphrasing:

He's bringing back "conservative values". I'm guessing like unprotected sex with a porn star and cheating on his wife and lots and lots of lying.

The tax cuts for needy billionaires.

Tax cuts for corporations who have been making more than ever before.

Cutting his bases healthcare.

Continuing the great economy Obama left him.

Hatred for Mexicans.

Then on the Red Carpet, KellyAnne Conway said he is the most transparent president in history with call ins into Fox and Friends. And KellyAnne talked about all the 5 million bonuses and pay raises. When you see that there are 154 million Americans working, that's like a whopping 2.8% of all American workers who either got a raise or a one time bonus. And it only cost a few trillion. Take that Democrats!

One black Republican who used to work for Bush said he was disappointed the Michigan crowd was all white people and didn't represent America. Which is stupid. Republicans are in power, they represent America and they are 90% white. So they represent all the white people voted into office. Duh!

Can't wait to hear Trump's nuggets of wisdom.

I love nuggets.

Remember, Reagan didn't go.

Once.

Course, he had just been shot

and he did call in from the hospital.

But like Trump, he didn't go.

Only Trump hasn't gone twice.

I like how the Great Douche Pays for his Family Values.