Trump did it again Now more drugs will be available.

grbb

VIP Member
Oct 15, 2016
840
61
80
Trump’s Potential FDA Pick Says Drugmakers Shouldn’t Have to Prove Their Products Work Before Selling Them

Now drug company doesn't have to proof drug effectiveness before selling it.

Is that bad?

Sound bad right?

Till you know that they simply do not have to proof that their drug is effective to GOVERNMENT.

The drug may be effective. Proofing it is difficult. Proofing anything obvious is difficult to government officials.

Government is very inefficient at judging anything. Resorting to government or court system to certify anything is useless.

How do you know that the more effective drugs will not be approved precisely because it's too effective and their competitors bribe the government.

Drug companies will need to proof the effectiveness of the drug on free market.

I think they should put a warning label that FDA doesn't proof it yet and let the customers and doctors decide.
 
It will be interesting to see what, if anything, changes. If I'm not mistaken, supplements and vitamins aren't government regulated. Surely, there is a middle road here. A company's research and development departments do tests on their products and there are independent labs that do testing... how about making this information available to the consumer?
 
How can you proof or disproof anything to politicians anyway?

It's easy to proof or disproof things to customers. If things are good customers want to use it. But try to "convince" politicians of any fact. Think about it.
 
The testing of new drugs before they hit the market is fairly extensive. One of the main things that are determined during the early stage of testing is the dose rate, the rate and path it takes to clear out of the system and if the body builds up a reserve of the drug.
Take all of that away and we as consumers are in deep shit. Its why the FDA was created in the first place
 
How do you proof to politicians that ganja is harmless? How do you proof to politicians that religions are dangerous?

It doesn't matter that there are no people die due to ganja and thousands of people die because some islamic terrorist slam airplane to building. Politicians will just spin it out.
 
Proving, not proofing. Drugs should be tested but it takes way too long and it's too expensive to run everything through the FDA now. How can Europe and Canada do it so much quicker?
 
The testing of new drugs before they hit the market is fairly extensive. One of the main things that are determined during the early stage of testing is the dose rate, the rate and path it takes to clear out of the system and if the body builds up a reserve of the drug.
Take all of that away and we as consumers are in deep shit. Its why the FDA was created in the first place

And that is precisely what the problem is. It takes too long under government.
 
There are 4 stages that drugs have to go through when being tested. It takes longer than people want, it costs more than it should and at times it might keep a possible cure away from someone that needs it.
But we have safe drugs when used properly. I personally do not want to go back to the 1800s when anything could be sold as a cure without any proof or testing.
Think about it, there was a time when heroin was good for coughs, or get this, relief from teething pain for your infants. Oh, and it was non addictive. Like I said, there are reasons for the testing.
 
Somehow I think turning the greedy fuckers at big pharma loose to sell their potions without proper trials would result in a pretty decent body count.

That's simply batshit crazy.
 
Repubtards started the DEA & FDA. Repubtards created every regulation that cripples the USA
actually the pharmaceutical industry was doing a pretty good job at crippling the USA on their own. Literally.
The DEA and the FDA also are responsible for the ethics in testing now.
Of course we could go back to the days of Testing without ethics, It actually worked out pretty damn good.
Tuskegee Study - Timeline - CDC - NCHHSTP
 
Repubtards started the DEA & FDA. Repubtards created every regulation that cripples the USA
actually the pharmaceutical industry was doing a pretty good job at crippling the USA on their own. Literally.
The DEA and the FDA also are responsible for the ethics in testing now.
Of course we could go back to the days of Testing without ethics, It actually worked out pretty damn good.
Tuskegee Study - Timeline - CDC - NCHHSTP

How ethical were Republicans who extend patent protection like Epi-Pen for Big Pharma while most of their money goes to Republicans in Congress?
 
Repubtards pass most code enforcement laws telling neighbors what color to paint their house, how to cut grass, building codes, ect...
 
Trump’s Potential FDA Pick Says Drugmakers Shouldn’t Have to Prove Their Products Work Before Selling Them

Now drug company doesn't have to proof drug effectiveness before selling it.

Is that bad?

Sound bad right?

Till you know that they simply do not have to proof that their drug is effective to GOVERNMENT.

The drug may be effective. Proofing it is difficult. Proofing anything obvious is difficult to government officials.

Government is very inefficient at judging anything. Resorting to government or court system to certify anything is useless.

How do you know that the more effective drugs will not be approved precisely because it's too effective and their competitors bribe the government.

Drug companies will need to proof the effectiveness of the drug on free market.

I think they should put a warning label that FDA doesn't proof it yet and let the customers and doctors decide.
YOU need to "Proof" you aren't an illiterate radical islamofascist jerk-off!
The word here in the US is: 'prove'.
The 'Paki' internet cafe you're posting from should have a english dictionary lying around.
 
Trump’s Potential FDA Pick Says Drugmakers Shouldn’t Have to Prove Their Products Work Before Selling Them

Now drug company doesn't have to proof drug effectiveness before selling it.

Is that bad?

Sound bad right?

Till you know that they simply do not have to proof that their drug is effective to GOVERNMENT.

The drug may be effective. Proofing it is difficult. Proofing anything obvious is difficult to government officials.

Government is very inefficient at judging anything. Resorting to government or court system to certify anything is useless.

How do you know that the more effective drugs will not be approved precisely because it's too effective and their competitors bribe the government.

Drug companies will need to proof the effectiveness of the drug on free market.

I think they should put a warning label that FDA doesn't proof it yet and let the customers and doctors decide.
YOU need to "Proof" you aren't an illiterate radical islamofascist jerk-off!
The word here in the US is: 'prove'.
The 'Paki' internet cafe you're posting from should have a english dictionary lying around.
Thanks for the morning snicker.
 
Repubtards pass most code enforcement laws telling neighbors what color to paint their house, how to cut grass, building codes, ect...
That would either come from the homeowners association, or city ordinance, if from the city,county or state, the majority of the time it is due to the house being of historical age.
 

Forum List

Back
Top