Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 94,990
- 67,538
- 3,645
It's actually happening. Right now. In reality. Go check.See lib loons reality is their wishes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's actually happening. Right now. In reality. Go check.See lib loons reality is their wishes.
Well…except when voting for them of course.Republican politicians are weak. I have no control over them.
Well he pissed on the gag order about 24 hours ago so how’s it going with Eggmoron efforts to have him taken into custody?It's actually happening. Right now. In reality. Go check.
I don't vote for RINOs.Well…except when voting for them of course.
I don't know, I can't read minds. Custody?Fines are also possible.Well he pissed on the gag order about 24 hours ago so how’s it going with Eggmoron efforts to have him taken into custody?
/——-/ There was no fraud in spite of the biased judge and DAs baseless accusations. Even the representative of the bank said so.Yes it was. Or maybe you are not familiar with what the word "fraud" means.
These unevidenced and unargued claims won't help you or Trump. Sorry. They are useless.There was no fraud in spite of the biased judge and DAs baseless accusations.
What money was stolen? Who's the victim?Yes it was. Or maybe you are not familiar with what the word "fraud" means.
All fraudulently gained money is stolen.What money was stolen? Who's the victim?
/——-/ There was no fraud in spite of the biased judge and DAs baseless accusations. Even the representative of the bank said so.
What fraudulently gained money?All fraudulently gained money is stolen.
Nope. The banks involved have all said they weren't victims of any fraud.The victims are the banks and the State of New York.
Same as the last 1000 times you asked that stupid fking question.
What money was stolen? Who's the victim?
What are you laughing about, dingbat?Thank you for your audition, but the part of Perry Mason is taken. Your argument has no validity in fact or in law. Two retired Deutches Banke employees, who are saying two entirely different things.
"But, testifying for the defense, managing director David Williams said the bankers viewed clients’ reports of their net worth as “subjective or subject to estimates” and took its own view of such financial statements.
“I think we expect clients-provided information to be accurate. At the same time, it’s not an industry standard that these statements be audited. They’re largely reliant on the use of estimates,” Williams said, so bankers routinely “make some adjustments.
A now-retired Deutsche Bank executive, Nicholas Haigh, testified earlier in the trial that he assumed the figures “were broadly accurate,” though the bank subjected them to ”sanity checks” and sometimes made sizable “haircuts.”
Trump acted as the guarantor for the loans and was quick to act when the bank raised concerns that the properties weren’t generating enough cash to make payments, Williams said. At one point, Trump moved $8.6 million into the Washington hotel’s coffers after its cash flow fell short of a requirement. No payments were missed, and the loans were never found to be in default, Williams said."
Banker involved in big loans to Trump's company testifies for his defense in civil fraud trial
A Deutsche Bank executive says the bank followed its own guidelines when deciding to lend Donald Trump’s company hundreds of millions of dollars.apnews.com
Trump's loan guarantees were also subject to his own personal net worth maintaining a certain level as well.
I've been watching the trial and the reading filings because I read and speak legalese fluently. Trump and his whole team of 4th rate hacks and hangers on are getting their asses handed to them on a plate - daily.
Every time there's Hearing televised, I make a bowl of popcorn and laugh and laugh and laugh.
Yep. And now that someone else has done all the work of gathering the evidence and getting a court decision that Trump defrauded them, the banks and insurers may sue him.The banks and insurance companies charged lower rates of interest and lower premiums to Trump and his companies.
The banks, insurance companies, and their shareholders are the victims Trump should have paid them higher iterest rates/premiums, so this is income they should have received and didn't. The local taxpayers are the victims, when Trump undervalues his real estate. The little guys have their property taxes raised to make up for the shortfall. The municipalities have already spent the money budgeted.
The banks claimed the were not victims. They also said they would have charged Trump the same rate if he was worth twice what he claimed.The banks and insurance companies charged lower rates of interest and lower premiums to Trump and his companies.
The banks, insurance companies, and their shareholders are the victims Trump should have paid them higher iterest rates/premiums, so this is income they should have received and didn't. The local taxpayers are the victims, when Trump undervalues his real estate. The little guys have their property taxes raised to make up for the shortfall. The municipalities have already spent the money budgeted.
lolNo crybaby, we are the arbiters of reality.
No they won't.Yep. And now that someone else has done all the work of gathering the evidence and getting a court decision that Trump defrauded them, the banks and insurers may sue him.
The “judge” ruled before the trial. kangaroo court.These unevidenced and unargued claims won't help you or Trump. Sorry. They are useless.
Trump and his crotch goblins committing criminal fraud for decades is now an adjudicated fact in the public record.
How was the state of NY injured? We already know the banks say they weren’t.All fraudulently gained money is stolen.
The victims are the banks and the State of New York.
Same as the last 1000 times you asked that stupid fking question.