para bellum
Platinum Member
I laugh at the way lefties are trying to spin this ruling.
The court slashed the bond amount because Trump's attorneys made a compelling argument, backed up by the factual record and the law, that the judgement would not survive appeal.
$255 Million of the judgement (not including interest) was time-barred by the appellate court before the "trial" even began. It would have been remarkable if the court had required a bond to make that argument, when the proof of the statute of limitations violation was provided in the filing...
The court slashed the bond amount because Trump's attorneys made a compelling argument, backed up by the factual record and the law, that the judgement would not survive appeal.
$255 Million of the judgement (not including interest) was time-barred by the appellate court before the "trial" even began. It would have been remarkable if the court had required a bond to make that argument, when the proof of the statute of limitations violation was provided in the filing...