Trump bond reduced

[JackOfNoTrades]

Court decides $454 was excessive? TDS warning issued​

Trump Can Post Smaller Bond in Civil Fraud Case, Court Rules​

The former president must post a bond of $175 million within 10 days as he appeals the $454 million judgment against him.

The ruling by a five-judge panel of appellate court judges is a crucial and unexpected victory for the former president, potentially staving off a looming financial disaster. Had the court denied his request — and had he failed to obtain the full bond — Mr. Trump was at risk of losing control over his bank accounts and, eventually, even some of his marquee properties.

Trump Can Post Smaller Bond in Civil Fraud Case, Court Rules

The former president must post a bond of $175 million within 10 days as he appeals the $454 million judgment against him.

www.nytimes.com

LOL. He still can't make the $175M bond.

 

[CowboyTed]

I'll be shocked if he's convicted of anything.

The far bigger problem is that this disaster isn't about him, and never has been.

The bond reduction will be very troubling within the NYC financial district...

If borrowers are allowed to cheat lenders and nothing is done if caught, you have to build this into your risk profile.... This would lead to a retraction of money in the market.

NYC financial enforcement is about no matter how big you think you are, you are not too big to break the law.. This bond reduction means that Trump is getting favourable handling...

Why not lend money in more secure markets...

 

[Mac1958]

The bond reduction will be very troubling within the NYC financial district...

If borrowers are allowed to cheat lenders and nothing is done if caught, you have to build this into your risk profile.... This would lead to a retraction of money in the market.

NYC financial enforcement is about no matter how big you think you are, you are not too big to break the law.. This bond reduction means that Trump is getting favourable handling...

Why not lend money in more secure markets...

The rules are being re-written as we speak.

They want to break down our institutions and create chaos. It's working.

 

[CowboyTed]

LOL. He still can't make the $175M bond.

I would give him 50/50 on it...

He is $100m in the hole for defame case...

This would mean he would multiple bonds of multiple properties... Interesting..

 

[CowboyTed]

The rules are being re-written as we speak.

They want to break down our institutions and create chaos. It's working.

Risk management does like changing rules on the fly... Least amount of risk, more money is made...

Strangely Trump never understood that... Stable economic conditions is where most money is made, look at Biden in last few months after he got things stable, competition kicks in...

 

[CowboyTed]

You might be right, this actually is just about how far commie pinko DAs can pervert and twist the laws to persecute future political enemies. Good catch.

The DA saw a crime and sworn to investigate and if law has been broken, prosecute...

Judeg saw the evidence and said it was overwhealming.

So you are blaming the DA for doing her job and the Judge for doing his job...

Ever think of blaming Trump for breaking the law.

 

[BluesLegend]

Court decides $454 was excessive? TDS warning issued​

Trump Can Post Smaller Bond in Civil Fraud Case, Court Rules​

The former president must post a bond of $175 million within 10 days as he appeals the $454 million judgment against him.

The ruling by a five-judge panel of appellate court judges is a crucial and unexpected victory for the former president, potentially staving off a looming financial disaster. Had the court denied his request — and had he failed to obtain the full bond — Mr. Trump was at risk of losing control over his bank accounts and, eventually, even some of his marquee properties.

Trump Can Post Smaller Bond in Civil Fraud Case, Court Rules

The former president must post a bond of $175 million within 10 days as he appeals the $454 million judgment against him.

www.nytimes.com

Even the liberal NY court of appeals knows this turd of a case is going to get flushed. It's absurd on the face of it. Ignores statute of limitations. Has no victims or damages. Accounting experts say Trump's books are well within the accepted guidelines of accounting principals, they found nothing wrong.

This was simply Dems attempts to take all of Trump's cash during the election year and interfere with his campaign for POTUS. They know it's going to get tossed on appeal.

 

[Rogue AI]

Risk management does like changing rules on the fly... Least amount of risk, more money is made...

Strangely Trump never understood that... Stable economic conditions is where most money is made, look at Biden in last few months after he got things stable, competition kicks in...

Nah, those months were how long it took for the Democrat corporate welfare to kick in.

 

[Delldude]

The bond, not the judgement, which is still $450M

No kidding. Object was to prevent Trump from appealing......looks like that just shit the bed.

 

[Delldude]

Actually, I'm a little disappointed. The optics of Democrats seizing his properties would guarantee his election in November and a lawsuit against New York for $5 Billion.

Once seized and sold He wouldn't get them back.....a limited win for The James Gang.

 

[Delldude]

The court did not find what you claim or infer -- "$454 was excessive."

If they reduced it, that's proof right there.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

If they reduced it, that's proof right there.

Nope. The legal argument was not 'it's excessive, please reduce it"

You poor MAGA Trolls are celebrating a technicality that is irrelevant. The ruling was by a five-judge panel of appellate court judges.

"Mr. Trump’s lawyers had asked the appeals court to either accept a smaller bond or pause the bond requirement altogether. They argued that the court would be likely to overturn the trial judge’s $454 million penalty once it heard the substance of his appeal, contending that it was “grossly disproportionate and unconstitutional.”"

think about what it is actually about. The court did not pause the bond requirement either

 

[Delldude]

LOL. He still can't make the $175M bond.

CNBC

“We’ll post whatever is necessary, whether it be cash or security or bonds” Trump said about the new bond threshold set by the appeals court, after he left a criminal court hearing where his trial on charges related to a hush money payment to a porn star was set for April 15.

 

[Delldude]

You poor MAGA Trolls are celebrating a technicality that is irrelevant.

And look at you.

If the courts didn't think the $454 was excessive, they wouldn't have agreed with Trump defense.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

And look at you.

If the courts didn't think the $454 was excessive, they wouldn't have agreed with Trump defense.

The legal argument by the Trump lawyers was not 'it's excessive, please reduce it" They argued that the court would be likely to overturn the trial judge’s $454 million penalty once it heard the substance of his appeal, contending that it was “grossly disproportionate and unconstitutional.” So this panel of judges did not rule on the fine being excessive. They're responding to the argument about what might happen after legal arguments are made. So they accepted a smaller bond and did not pause the bond requirement altogether.



You poor MAGA Trolls are celebrating a technicality that is irrelevant. The ruling was by a five-judge panel of appellate court judges.

"Mr. Trump’s lawyers had asked the appeals court to either accept a smaller bond or pause the bond requirement altogether. They argued that the court would be likely to overturn the trial judge’s $454 million penalty once it heard the substance of his appeal, contending that it was “grossly disproportionate and unconstitutional.”"

think about what it is actually about.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

And look at you.

If the courts didn't think the $454 was excessive, they wouldn't have agreed with Trump defense.

and it's not the 'courts' -- it's the court

 

[jwoodie]

The legal argument was not 'it's excessive, please reduce it"

The court did not find what you claim or infer -- "$454 was excessive."

These statements are hallmarks of disingenuous argument, wherein disputes about form are elevated over substance. This can always be detected when a poster claims an error has been made but does not offer a substantive correction..

 

[Delldude]

and it's not the 'courts' -- it's the court

5 Judges.

 

[BluesLegend]

You got him now failure #642

 

[jwoodie]

Court decides $454 was excessive? TDS warning issued​

Trump Can Post Smaller Bond in Civil Fraud Case, Court Rules​

The former president must post a bond of $175 million within 10 days as he appeals the $454 million judgment against him.

The ruling by a five-judge panel of appellate court judges is a crucial and unexpected victory for the former president, potentially staving off a looming financial disaster. Had the court denied his request — and had he failed to obtain the full bond — Mr. Trump was at risk of losing control over his bank accounts and, eventually, even some of his marquee properties.

Trump Can Post Smaller Bond in Civil Fraud Case, Court Rules

The former president must post a bond of $175 million within 10 days as he appeals the $454 million judgment against him.

www.nytimes.com

It looks like the appellate court is practicing damage control now that this case has turned into a political fiasco.