D
Deleted member 61768
Guest
I have read the Second Amendment and I believe it was intended for states' militias, not an individual right.It does meet the requirement for the home guard to be well-regulated as was the intent of the framers of the 2nd Amendment.That state militias require firearms to be kept in an armory is proof that they are well-regulated.LOL, State militias are not allowed to keep their firearms in their homes nor to open carry them like in the USA unlike in Switzerland. Best learn American Law!
That does not meet "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" now does it!
And as long as it only meets half of the Second Amendment that is all that matters to you right? I was in the only Airborne Infantry National Guard unit in the United States and while we may have been well regulated we were not free to keep and bear our arms so the peoples right as a whole were most definitely infringed upon. Try addressing the whole of the Second Amendment as it was written by the founders. It was written so that the common citizen could have a firearm at hand and be rallied a a "minutes notice" to defend the people. If you bothered to read how and why the "militias" were formed by the founding fathers but that is not your purpose now is it.
Remember that the states saw the federal government as a threat on liberty similar to the English monarchy was seen then. It was meant to guarantee the safety of states to bear arms and to defend themselves should the federal government become an autocracy.
All I can say is you are wrong according to our founding fathers and the documents they wrote!