Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'll tell you why....Because he's only interested in being a shit stirring gadfly....When Oboingo was in power, he did a very realistic and convincing Robert Taft impersonation.Trump hired several criminals to work for him.
They went to jail.
That just makes you mental defectives' asses hurt, don't it.
What's funny is the repub establishment, who are very closely aligned with the democommie establishment wouldn't work for Trump because they realized very early on that he was anti establishment. So, he was forced to use whoever would work for him. Interestingly enough, Manofort, who was under investigation was allowed to work for Trump and the investigators neglected to tell Trump about him.
I wonder why they is? Could it be that he gave the coup plotters yet another access point to Trump?
I think that to be highly likely.
What's funny is you rightfully point out that a lot of Trumps people have been convicted. What you are taking great pains to hide is the fact that ALL the convictions are for crimes long before Trump ever hired them.
Why do you lie like that?
I get that you're Butthurt, but try to focus.Almost every Republican just joined almost every Democrat reauthorizing intelligence activities without any reforms to protect the civil liberties of the American electorate. And President Trump will absolutely sign it. - http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll672.xml
That said, neither Hannity, Rush, Nunes or you are showing any concern for the real problem. Intead they, and you in this instance, give us a steady stream of worthless, meaningless reality show type circus bullshit that doesn't in any way pertain to how the electorate is being screwed over by the intelligence agencies.
In fact, every one of those people you mention praise it.
The Steele Dossier was paid for by Hillary/DNC.
The Steel Dossier was BS.
The Obama FBI knew the Dossier was false.
The Obama FBI did not tell the FISA Judge that the Dossier was paid for by Hillary/DNC.
The Dossier was central to getting the FISA warrants approved.
The Obama FBI used the warrant to spy on the Trump campaign.
The Obama FBI did employ spies and electronic surveillance against the Trump campaign.
Democrats repeatedly denied the obvious truths listed above. Feinstien, Shifft, CNN, MSNBC, etc....
When will you people start listening to people that aren't wrong so often? And how could you believe something so stupid on if's face?
Yet the Dems will continue to deny that Obama illegally spied on Trump.The Obama FBI used the warrant to spy on the Trump campaign.
The Obama FBI did employ spies and electronic surveillance against the Trump campaign.
When will you people start listening to people that aren't wrong so often? And how could you believe something so stupid on if's face?
Yet the Dems will continue to deny that Obama illegally spied on Trump.The Obama FBI used the warrant to spy on the Trump campaign.
The Obama FBI did employ spies and electronic surveillance against the Trump campaign.
When will you people start listening to people that aren't wrong so often? And how could you believe something so stupid on if's face?
Like an impeachment based off hearsay and loose interpretation...Nope, experience says this is just more conservitard bullshit to occupy the weak minded base.The real news is there won't be any indictments.The bad news is that Durham won't issue indictments until late spring.
Who said that there won't be any indictments? Barr and Durham strongly disagree. You are obviously talking out your arse.
There will be no indictments.
"Told you so." Rush, Hanitty, Nunes, and I were right about FISA abuse and Spying
Nope. All "hearsay" has been verified with direct testimony. No loose interpretation.Like an impeachment based off hearsay and loose interpretation...Nope, experience says this is just more conservitard bullshit to occupy the weak minded base.The real news is there won't be any indictments.The bad news is that Durham won't issue indictments until late spring.
Who said that there won't be any indictments? Barr and Durham strongly disagree. You are obviously talking out your arse.
There will be no indictments.
"Documentary" and "testimonial" are words that we in the semantics biz call "qualifiers"."Told you so." Rush, Hanitty, Nunes, and I were right about FISA abuse and Spying
Yep, you said that there would be no evidence of political bias against Trump found and you were right.
Nope. All "hearsay" has been verified with direct testimony. No loose interpretation.
Except that it's not.Like an impeachment based off hearsay and loose interpretation...Nope, experience says this is just more conservitard bullshit to occupy the weak minded base.The real news is there won't be any indictments.The bad news is that Durham won't issue indictments until late spring.
Who said that there won't be any indictments? Barr and Durham strongly disagree. You are obviously talking out your arse.
There will be no indictments.
Nope. All "hearsay" has been verified with direct testimony. No loose interpretation.Like an impeachment based off hearsay and loose interpretation...Nope, experience says this is just more conservitard bullshit to occupy the weak minded base.The real news is there won't be any indictments.The bad news is that Durham won't issue indictments until late spring.
Who said that there won't be any indictments? Barr and Durham strongly disagree. You are obviously talking out your arse.
There will be no indictments.
trumptards trying to get something on dems, but it's trumpdawg and his buddies always in trouble. Look it his clown act of half a dozen of his handlers in jail or awaiting jail while trump's awaiting impeachment. Actually it's the republicans who've been pulling crap and not getting away with it at least since nixon. Obama, hillary...a clean record.
Trump hired several criminals to work for him.
They went to jail.
That just makes you mental defectives' asses hurt, don't it.
"Documentary" and "testimonial" are words that we in the semantics biz call "qualifiers"."Told you so." Rush, Hanitty, Nunes, and I were right about FISA abuse and Spying
Yep, you said that there would be no evidence of political bias against Trump found and you were right.
Guess what?...There is a fuck ton of circumstantial evidence that there was bias all over the place....Not the least of which were the 17 "mistakes" that all mysteriously fell in only one direction, it total defiance of all statistical probability.
No, it's not.Nope. All "hearsay" has been verified with direct testimony. No loose interpretation.Like an impeachment based off hearsay and loose interpretation...Nope, experience says this is just more conservitard bullshit to occupy the weak minded base.The real news is there won't be any indictments.
Who said that there won't be any indictments? Barr and Durham strongly disagree. You are obviously talking out your arse.
There will be no indictments.
Article-2 is DOA. The USSC killed it when they took the Trump vs House subpoenas case for Trump's tax records. "Obstruction of Congress" is not a thing, let alone an impeachable thing. Congress needs to take their issues with the Executive to court to force compliance.
Article-1 is bullshit too. Proving "Abuse of Power", which is not a crime, is "impeachable" will be impossible. So all the dems want to do is try to damage Trump before the 2020 election. What they never learn, like Wily Coyote, is that whenever they rig a diabolical trap for Trump, it ALWAYS backfires and bites them on the ass.
I have no such working theory as you say....And the FBI knew that page was a CIA operative....Failing (refusing) to disclose this was one of the 17 "mistakes"."Documentary" and "testimonial" are words that we in the semantics biz call "qualifiers"."Told you so." Rush, Hanitty, Nunes, and I were right about FISA abuse and Spying
Yep, you said that there would be no evidence of political bias against Trump found and you were right.
Guess what?...There is a fuck ton of circumstantial evidence that there was bias all over the place....Not the least of which were the 17 "mistakes" that all mysteriously fell in only one direction, it total defiance of all statistical probability.
Stop for a second and use your head from high view of the whole thing.
Your working theory is that Obama had FBI wiretap Carter page, who left Trump campaign a month ago and went to Russia...to spy on the campaign?
It just does not make any sense.
There is another theory, one that is far more cohesive - FBI honestly suspected that Carter Page was a Russian agent.
