Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
Who does not already know that Suleimani was a clear and present danger? Who? Think Progress? The Huffington Post? CNN? Good grief, this is crazy.
And let's keep in mind that when Iran hit an American ship with a mine when Reagan was president, Reagan sank or disabled half of Iran's navy--and they backed down big time.
Oh really, good, maybe I just didn’t hear the news. So what was the imminent attack?It’s not about what YOU need. As a country when you drop a bomb on the top general for another country you tell the world why you did it. You don’t give a vague and generic excuse. Especially after days of upheaval and bows of retribution. You say, we killed him because we found out..... blah blah blah... and you show the imminent threat that justifies the killLike Gaddafi, right?cant speak for them,,,but if we are going to be there we might as well kill the leaders first,,,thats the american way,,,
that was hilary not the US military, and we werent at war with them,,,I voted for him because I wanted a decisive leader. He just showed it. That’s what’s my vote was about and I , through my vote, trust his judgment. I dneed, nor do I rate, intelligence reports. You know you can’t trust the Democrats. They use this shit to smear Trump.my feeling about Trump has nothing to do with it. It has to do with showing the world why we dropped a bomb on somebody. They said there was an imminent threat. Well what was it?! People will accept self defense killings if the threat is shown. It makes no sense why they wouldn't expose the threat. They can do so without compromising sources.Why does Trump have to release any information about actual intelligence, just because you don’t like him?You think I want to expose sources?! Not even close. Why in the world would you assume that?
nothing vague or generic about it,,,unless youre ignorant about world events
No, don’t do that... that’s a completely different thing. If Soleimani was a wanted terrorist then the US could have made their accusations and demanded Iran turn him over. If they refused then we go with the manhunt. Transparent. Dead or alive like OBL. Everybody knew we were hunting OBL so when we got him it wasn’t a surprise. This Soleimani thing came out of the blue and the excuse wasn’t that he was a wanted man, it was that they found out about an imminent threat and had to act. A little honesty please MikeThis intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
Who does not already know that Suleimani was a clear and present danger? Who? Think Progress? The Huffington Post? CNN? Good grief, this is crazy.
And let's keep in mind that when Iran hit an American ship with a mine when Reagan was president, Reagan sank or disabled half of Iran's navy--and they backed down big time.
Oh really, good, maybe I just didn’t hear the news. So what was the imminent attack?It’s not about what YOU need. As a country when you drop a bomb on the top general for another country you tell the world why you did it. You don’t give a vague and generic excuse. Especially after days of upheaval and bows of retribution. You say, we killed him because we found out..... blah blah blah... and you show the imminent threat that justifies the killLike Gaddafi, right?
that was hilary not the US military, and we werent at war with them,,,I voted for him because I wanted a decisive leader. He just showed it. That’s what’s my vote was about and I , through my vote, trust his judgment. I dneed, nor do I rate, intelligence reports. You know you can’t trust the Democrats. They use this shit to smear Trump.my feeling about Trump has nothing to do with it. It has to do with showing the world why we dropped a bomb on somebody. They said there was an imminent threat. Well what was it?! People will accept self defense killings if the threat is shown. It makes no sense why they wouldn't expose the threat. They can do so without compromising sources.Why does Trump have to release any information about actual intelligence, just because you don’t like him?
nothing vague or generic about it,,,unless youre ignorant about world events
No, don’t do that... that’s a completely different thing. If Soleimani was a wanted terrorist then the US could have made their accusations and demanded Iran turn him over. If they refused then we go with the manhunt. Transparent. Dead or alive like OBL. Everybody knew we were hunting OBL so when we got him it wasn’t a surprise. This Soleimani thing came out of the blue and the excuse wasn’t that he was a wanted man, it was that they found out about an imminent threat and had to act. A little honesty please MikeThis intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
Who does not already know that Suleimani was a clear and present danger? Who? Think Progress? The Huffington Post? CNN? Good grief, this is crazy.
And let's keep in mind that when Iran hit an American ship with a mine when Reagan was president, Reagan sank or disabled half of Iran's navy--and they backed down big time.
No shit. So when you said that was Hilary what did you mean?We might as well kill their leaders... that’s what you said. That’s what was done in both cases.where am I wrong, how was it the same???Haha. Ohh ok. Totally different. Got it ;-)Like Gaddafi, right?
that was hilary not the US military, and we werent at war with them,,,
my god you are a stupid fuck,,
we didnt kill kadafi,, his people did,,,
No shit. So when you said that was Hilary what did you mean?We might as well kill their leaders... that’s what you said. That’s what was done in both cases.where am I wrong, how was it the same???Haha. Ohh ok. Totally different. Got it ;-)that was hilary not the US military, and we werent at war with them,,,
my god you are a stupid fuck,,
we didnt kill kadafi,, his people did,,,
Plans for what? Did we get this from a fortune teller or mind reader?Oh really, good, maybe I just didn’t hear the news. So what was the imminent attack?It’s not about what YOU need. As a country when you drop a bomb on the top general for another country you tell the world why you did it. You don’t give a vague and generic excuse. Especially after days of upheaval and bows of retribution. You say, we killed him because we found out..... blah blah blah... and you show the imminent threat that justifies the killthat was hilary not the US military, and we werent at war with them,,,I voted for him because I wanted a decisive leader. He just showed it. That’s what’s my vote was about and I , through my vote, trust his judgment. I dneed, nor do I rate, intelligence reports. You know you can’t trust the Democrats. They use this shit to smear Trump.my feeling about Trump has nothing to do with it. It has to do with showing the world why we dropped a bomb on somebody. They said there was an imminent threat. Well what was it?! People will accept self defense killings if the threat is shown. It makes no sense why they wouldn't expose the threat. They can do so without compromising sources.
nothing vague or generic about it,,,unless youre ignorant about world events
fuck your dumb,,,
he was on his way to make plans for it,,,
And there’s the dodge. Thanks for playingNo shit. So when you said that was Hilary what did you mean?We might as well kill their leaders... that’s what you said. That’s what was done in both cases.where am I wrong, how was it the same???Haha. Ohh ok. Totally different. Got it ;-)
my god you are a stupid fuck,,
we didnt kill kadafi,, his people did,,,
if you dont already know you to fucking stupid to understand,,,
Plans for what? Did we get this from a fortune teller or mind reader?Oh really, good, maybe I just didn’t hear the news. So what was the imminent attack?It’s not about what YOU need. As a country when you drop a bomb on the top general for another country you tell the world why you did it. You don’t give a vague and generic excuse. Especially after days of upheaval and bows of retribution. You say, we killed him because we found out..... blah blah blah... and you show the imminent threat that justifies the killI voted for him because I wanted a decisive leader. He just showed it. That’s what’s my vote was about and I , through my vote, trust his judgment. I dneed, nor do I rate, intelligence reports. You know you can’t trust the Democrats. They use this shit to smear Trump.
nothing vague or generic about it,,,unless youre ignorant about world events
fuck your dumb,,,
he was on his way to make plans for it,,,
thats an observation not a dodge,,,And there’s the dodge. Thanks for playingNo shit. So when you said that was Hilary what did you mean?We might as well kill their leaders... that’s what you said. That’s what was done in both cases.where am I wrong, how was it the same???
my god you are a stupid fuck,,
we didnt kill kadafi,, his people did,,,
if you dont already know you to fucking stupid to understand,,,
yeah, that’s what dumb people say when they can’t explain themselves. Like I said. Thanks for playing.Plans for what? Did we get this from a fortune teller or mind reader?Oh really, good, maybe I just didn’t hear the news. So what was the imminent attack?It’s not about what YOU need. As a country when you drop a bomb on the top general for another country you tell the world why you did it. You don’t give a vague and generic excuse. Especially after days of upheaval and bows of retribution. You say, we killed him because we found out..... blah blah blah... and you show the imminent threat that justifies the kill
nothing vague or generic about it,,,unless youre ignorant about world events
fuck your dumb,,,
he was on his way to make plans for it,,,
your to fucking stupid to understand,,,
yeah, that’s what dumb people say when they can’t explain themselves. Like I said. Thanks for playing.Plans for what? Did we get this from a fortune teller or mind reader?Oh really, good, maybe I just didn’t hear the news. So what was the imminent attack?nothing vague or generic about it,,,unless youre ignorant about world events
fuck your dumb,,,
he was on his way to make plans for it,,,
your to fucking stupid to understand,,,
No, smart people use logic and reason to win arguments. Dumb people avoid answers and explanations to call their opponent names.yeah, that’s what dumb people say when they can’t explain themselves. Like I said. Thanks for playing.Plans for what? Did we get this from a fortune teller or mind reader?Oh really, good, maybe I just didn’t hear the news. So what was the imminent attack?
fuck your dumb,,,
he was on his way to make plans for it,,,
your to fucking stupid to understand,,,
its what smart people do when they know they are dealing with an ignorant moron
No, smart people use logic and reason to win arguments. Dumb people avoid answers and explanations to call their opponent names.yeah, that’s what dumb people say when they can’t explain themselves. Like I said. Thanks for playing.Plans for what? Did we get this from a fortune teller or mind reader?fuck your dumb,,,
he was on his way to make plans for it,,,
your to fucking stupid to understand,,,
its what smart people do when they know they are dealing with an ignorant moron
I guess you didnt notice because the pro obama lib news media didnt make a big fuss about itYes that’s how he preceded with OBL and as far as I’ve seen they followed the law with the other strikes. I wasn’t paying attention at the time they killed the American boy, but I would have made a stink about that and demanded answers for sure. Nice distraction, it worked. Can we get back to the subject at hand now?Is that how obama dealt with osama bin laden?ok then nail up the wanted dead or alive poster for him. If the search and destroy is on for this guy then great, run it through congress, talk to our allies. Discuss the reasoning for it and possible repercussions and make that call. That’s what we did for Saddam, it’s what we did for OBL.I know the nature of iranian terrorism led by soleimani and thats reason enough for meWev already announced that we knew about an imminent attack. That’s known to the world. If there was an imminent attack then our enemy knows exactly what we are talking about. Saying what that attack was to justify the killing of Soleimani to the world is not compromising sources.Sometimes just telling what we know may reveal who we know it from
but after watching Pompeo dodge that question over and over in every one of his interviews it’s sending the message that there wasn’t a specific imminent attack.
Its been reported he was responsible for the deaths of 600 servicemen since 2003
That wasn’t done for Soleimani. it was a quick call bombing that was said to be a reaction to intel about an imminent attack. And you don’t care if that excuse was BS or not... you don’t think an explanation is appropriate... really?!
or the hundreds of other drone strikes he authorized?
in one case he assassinated an American citizen and the mans young son with a drone
no I was just smarter back then and didn’t waste my time following the news or politics. It’s really no different than the Kardashians or any of the other horrible reality shows out there.I guess you didnt notice because the pro obama lib news media didnt make a big fuss about itYes that’s how he preceded with OBL and as far as I’ve seen they followed the law with the other strikes. I wasn’t paying attention at the time they killed the American boy, but I would have made a stink about that and demanded answers for sure. Nice distraction, it worked. Can we get back to the subject at hand now?Is that how obama dealt with osama bin laden?ok then nail up the wanted dead or alive poster for him. If the search and destroy is on for this guy then great, run it through congress, talk to our allies. Discuss the reasoning for it and possible repercussions and make that call. That’s what we did for Saddam, it’s what we did for OBL.I know the nature of iranian terrorism led by soleimani and thats reason enough for meWev already announced that we knew about an imminent attack. That’s known to the world. If there was an imminent attack then our enemy knows exactly what we are talking about. Saying what that attack was to justify the killing of Soleimani to the world is not compromising sources.
but after watching Pompeo dodge that question over and over in every one of his interviews it’s sending the message that there wasn’t a specific imminent attack.
Its been reported he was responsible for the deaths of 600 servicemen since 2003
That wasn’t done for Soleimani. it was a quick call bombing that was said to be a reaction to intel about an imminent attack. And you don’t care if that excuse was BS or not... you don’t think an explanation is appropriate... really?!
or the hundreds of other drone strikes he authorized?
in one case he assassinated an American citizen and the mans young son with a drone
no I was just smarter back then and didn’t waste my time following the news or politics. It’s really no different than the Kardashians or any of the other horrible reality shows out there.I guess you didnt notice because the pro obama lib news media didnt make a big fuss about itYes that’s how he preceded with OBL and as far as I’ve seen they followed the law with the other strikes. I wasn’t paying attention at the time they killed the American boy, but I would have made a stink about that and demanded answers for sure. Nice distraction, it worked. Can we get back to the subject at hand now?Is that how obama dealt with osama bin laden?ok then nail up the wanted dead or alive poster for him. If the search and destroy is on for this guy then great, run it through congress, talk to our allies. Discuss the reasoning for it and possible repercussions and make that call. That’s what we did for Saddam, it’s what we did for OBL.I know the nature of iranian terrorism led by soleimani and thats reason enough for me
Its been reported he was responsible for the deaths of 600 servicemen since 2003
That wasn’t done for Soleimani. it was a quick call bombing that was said to be a reaction to intel about an imminent attack. And you don’t care if that excuse was BS or not... you don’t think an explanation is appropriate... really?!
or the hundreds of other drone strikes he authorized?
in one case he assassinated an American citizen and the mans young son with a drone
You only thought current events were no more important than the Kardashiansno I was just smarter back then and didn’t waste my time following the news or politics. It’s really no different than the Kardashians or any of the other horrible reality shows out there.I guess you didnt notice because the pro obama lib news media didnt make a big fuss about itYes that’s how he preceded with OBL and as far as I’ve seen they followed the law with the other strikes. I wasn’t paying attention at the time they killed the American boy, but I would have made a stink about that and demanded answers for sure. Nice distraction, it worked. Can we get back to the subject at hand now?Is that how obama dealt with osama bin laden?ok then nail up the wanted dead or alive poster for him. If the search and destroy is on for this guy then great, run it through congress, talk to our allies. Discuss the reasoning for it and possible repercussions and make that call. That’s what we did for Saddam, it’s what we did for OBL.I know the nature of iranian terrorism led by soleimani and thats reason enough for me
Its been reported he was responsible for the deaths of 600 servicemen since 2003
That wasn’t done for Soleimani. it was a quick call bombing that was said to be a reaction to intel about an imminent attack. And you don’t care if that excuse was BS or not... you don’t think an explanation is appropriate... really?!
or the hundreds of other drone strikes he authorized?
in one case he assassinated an American citizen and the mans young son with a drone
