SpidermanTuba
Rookie
- Banned
- #81
There was no global cooling hoax in the 70's.
Just like there has been no global warming since 1995.
they tried in the 70 with global cooloing ..../QUOTE]
no, they didn't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There was no global cooling hoax in the 70's.
Just like there has been no global warming since 1995.
they tried in the 70 with global cooloing ..../QUOTE]
no, they didn't.
You're the only nitwit who's saying it has to be a conspiracy.
What motivated them to throw in with the sham artists in the first place, professor?
wow how surprising
Hmm, lets see, they are for-profit corporations, so I'm going to hazard a wild guess.....
PROFIT?
No more of a "conspiracy" than how people get into a private country club.You're the only nitwit who's saying it has to be a conspiracy.
"Three Big Supporters Throw Climate Hoaxers Overboard."
the whole thing is a hoax but it's not a conspiracy.....Professor Dud rides again!
Isn't it true that CO2 is a lagging indicator in this hoax? The temps rise, and CO2 follows, the temps lower, and the CO2 follows?
This is what the fearmongers hang their hats on?
Just like there has been no global warming since 1995.
they tried in the 70 with global cooloing ..../QUOTE]
no, they didn't.
Yes they did, and some of the same scientists now were part of that hoax, too.
Ahhhh....Circular logic strikes again!Isn't it true that CO2 is a lagging indicator in this hoax? The temps rise, and CO2 follows, the temps lower, and the CO2 follows?
This is what the fearmongers hang their hats on?
CO2 and be a cause as well as an effect of rising temperatures. For instance, if something else causes an initial rise in temperature (e.g. a Milankovich cycle), this can cause ice to melt, releasing trapped CO2, which traps more heat, which causes further temperature rise.
they tried in the 70 with global cooloing ..../QUOTE]
no, they didn't.
Yes they did, and some of the same scientists now were part of that hoax, too.
Uhh, no, sorry. You're wrong.
Isn't it true that CO2 is a lagging indicator in this hoax? The temps rise, and CO2 follows, the temps lower, and the CO2 follows?
This is what the fearmongers hang their hats on?
CO2 and be a cause as well as an effect of rising temperatures. For instance, if something else causes an initial rise in temperature (e.g. a Milankovich cycle), this can cause ice to melt, releasing trapped CO2, which traps more heat, which causes further temperature rise.
Yes they did, and some of the same scientists now were part of that hoax, too.
Uhh, no, sorry. You're wrong.
Uhh, no....your wrong.
Then I wouldn't be seeing temperatures lowering again, would I?
Then having the methane gas kick in from the thawing ice....we would never see cooling temperatures, would we?
Uhh, no, sorry. You're wrong.
Uhh, no....your wrong.
You have no evidence.
Peer review is a dead letter, Bubba.
I had no idea Time Magazine was a peer reviewed scientific journal.
Then I wouldn't be seeing temperatures lowering again, would I?
Of course you would. Just wait for nightfall.
Then having the methane gas kick in from the thawing ice....we would never see cooling temperatures, would we?
No, like I said, wait for nightfall, you'll see cooling temperatures. Also happens in the fall and winter.
Then I wouldn't be seeing temperatures lowering again, would I?
Of course you would. Just wait for nightfall.
Then having the methane gas kick in from the thawing ice....we would never see cooling temperatures, would we?
No, like I said, wait for nightfall, you'll see cooling temperatures. Also happens in the fall and winter.
Now your acting just like an idiot. What ain't you got nuttin' else?