Three Big Supporters Throw Climate Hoaxers Overboard

[SpidermanTuba]

There was no global cooling hoax in the 70's.

Just like there has been no global warming since 1995.

they tried in the 70 with global cooloing ..../QUOTE]

no, they didn't.

 

[Meister]

Isn't it true that CO2 is a lagging indicator in this hoax? The temps rise, and CO2 follows, the temps lower, and the CO2 follows?
This is what the fearmongers hang their hats on?

 

[Jay Canuck]

You're the only nitwit who's saying it has to be a conspiracy.

"Three Big Supporters Throw Climate Hoaxers Overboard."

the whole thing is a hoax but it's not a conspiracy.....Professor Dud rides again!

 

[Oddball]

wow how surprising

What motivated them to throw in with the sham artists in the first place, professor?

Hmm, lets see, they are for-profit corporations, so I'm going to hazard a wild guess.....


PROFIT?

Oh, the scandal!

 

[Oddball]

You're the only nitwit who's saying it has to be a conspiracy.

"Three Big Supporters Throw Climate Hoaxers Overboard."

the whole thing is a hoax but it's not a conspiracy.....Professor Dud rides again!

No more of a "conspiracy" than how people get into a private country club.

 

[SpidermanTuba]

Isn't it true that CO2 is a lagging indicator in this hoax? The temps rise, and CO2 follows, the temps lower, and the CO2 follows?
This is what the fearmongers hang their hats on?

CO2 and be a cause as well as an effect of rising temperatures. For instance, if something else causes an initial rise in temperature (e.g. a Milankovich cycle), this can cause ice to melt, releasing trapped CO2, which traps more heat, which causes further temperature rise.

 

[Meister]

Just like there has been no global warming since 1995.

they tried in the 70 with global cooloing ..../QUOTE]

no, they didn't.

Yes they did, and some of the same scientists now were part of that hoax, too.

 

[Oddball]

Isn't it true that CO2 is a lagging indicator in this hoax? The temps rise, and CO2 follows, the temps lower, and the CO2 follows?
This is what the fearmongers hang their hats on?

CO2 and be a cause as well as an effect of rising temperatures. For instance, if something else causes an initial rise in temperature (e.g. a Milankovich cycle), this can cause ice to melt, releasing trapped CO2, which traps more heat, which causes further temperature rise.

Ahhhh....Circular logic strikes again!

 

[SpidermanTuba]

they tried in the 70 with global cooloing ..../QUOTE]

no, they didn't.

Yes they did, and some of the same scientists now were part of that hoax, too.

Uhh, no, sorry. You're wrong.

 

[Oddball]

 

[Oddball]

 

[Meister]

Isn't it true that CO2 is a lagging indicator in this hoax? The temps rise, and CO2 follows, the temps lower, and the CO2 follows?
This is what the fearmongers hang their hats on?

CO2 and be a cause as well as an effect of rising temperatures. For instance, if something else causes an initial rise in temperature (e.g. a Milankovich cycle), this can cause ice to melt, releasing trapped CO2, which traps more heat, which causes further temperature rise.

Then I wouldn't be seeing temperatures lowering again, would I? After the initial primer to start the rise of CO2, it would be a sustaining agent, that would keep increasing...wouldn't it? Then having the methane gas kick in from the thawing ice....we would never see cooling temperatures, would we?
You can buy into the hoax.....but, I'm too intelligent for that.

 

[Oddball]

 

[SpidermanTuba]

I had no idea Time Magazine was a peer reviewed scientific journal.

 

[Meister]

Yes they did, and some of the same scientists now were part of that hoax, too.

Uhh, no, sorry. You're wrong.

Uhh, no....your wrong.

 

[SpidermanTuba]

Then I wouldn't be seeing temperatures lowering again, would I?

Of course you would. Just wait for nightfall.

Then having the methane gas kick in from the thawing ice....we would never see cooling temperatures, would we?

No, like I said, wait for nightfall, you'll see cooling temperatures. Also happens in the fall and winter.

 

[SpidermanTuba]

Uhh, no, sorry. You're wrong.

Uhh, no....your wrong.

You have no evidence.

 

[Oddball]

I had no idea Time Magazine was a peer reviewed scientific journal.

Peer review is a dead letter, Bubba.

 

[Meister]

Then I wouldn't be seeing temperatures lowering again, would I?

Of course you would. Just wait for nightfall.

Then having the methane gas kick in from the thawing ice....we would never see cooling temperatures, would we?

No, like I said, wait for nightfall, you'll see cooling temperatures. Also happens in the fall and winter.

Now your acting just like an idiot. What ain't you got nuttin' else?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Then I wouldn't be seeing temperatures lowering again, would I?

Of course you would. Just wait for nightfall.

Then having the methane gas kick in from the thawing ice....we would never see cooling temperatures, would we?

No, like I said, wait for nightfall, you'll see cooling temperatures. Also happens in the fall and winter.

Now your acting just like an idiot. What ain't you got nuttin' else?

Spiderman is mindfucking himself... let him have his moment.