This is child abuse

Taxpayer money! Now if you took a bible to school you would be lambasted.
Wrong.

Students are at liberty to bring bibles to public schools, pray in public schools, and talk to other students about their beliefs in public schools, absent the involvement or facilitation of school officials.

Establishment Clause jurisprudence applies solely to government, such as public schools, not private citizens.

Your post exhibits the ignorance and stupidity common to most on the right.
 
No crosses allowed in the public square.
At least you’re consistent at being ignorant and wrong.

Religious expression and symbols in public places are allowed when they have a secular purpose or intent, when their primary effect does not seek to advance religion, and when they do not foster an excessive entanglement of government and religion. (Lemon v. Kurtzman)
 
No crosses allowed in the public square.
At least you’re consistent at being ignorant and wrong.

Religious expression and symbols in public places are allowed when they have a secular purpose or intent, when their primary effect does not seek to advance religion, and when they do not foster an excessive entanglement of government and religion. (Lemon v. Kurtzman)
Horseshit.
 
"This is child abuse"

No, this is children learning about diversity and expressions of individual liberty – both of which most conservatives fear.
They don’t need a drag queen to learn about diversity and individual liberty. That’s sick. They’re children.
 
Taxpayer money! Now if you took a bible to school you would be lambasted.

And 'god' only drowns all of humanity in that book.
God didn’t drown all of humanity or we wouldn’t be alive

upload_2018-2-17_16-18-58.jpeg
 

Forum List

Back
Top