This country built by immigrants

We have immigrants from all over the world who never became Americans. Instead we have mexicans who intend that this become a mexican country. Muslims who will make it an islamic country. Blacks who want to create a new African homeland, and Asians who might well think about foreclosing on their loans.

What could possibly go wrong?

The only thing these competing racial and ethnic groups have in common is that the United States is dying and the bones are up for grabs.
 
A country that doesn't inforce it's laws is disfunctional.

Everyone who knowingly came here illegally has shown a calious disrespect for the USA, and for our citizens, and a propensity for criminal behaviour. Whatever the reason for their infiltration, they have put their personal interest above the law - that is what criminals do!

They compete with our citizens in the labor force. They are replete in the construction trades - plummers, electricions, carpenters etc. etc. etc. To say that they only take jobs that Americans don't want is a crock of shit! Someone intrepid enough to invade our country, and set up shop, is not going to only take jobs that they think Americans don't want. They don't give a shit about Americans; they are here to steal from us.

Whatever land Mexico lost to us was taken by war - tough shit. They have no right to any of it. If they want to take it back, let them try.

The immigrants who built this country did not play the entitlement, or victim card! They help build the hospitals, bridges etc. The illegals burden what the legals built! The illegals owe the American tax payers restitution - as they ( US Citizens ) are the victims of their ( Illegals ) CRIMINAL actions!
 
We have immigrants from all over the world who never became Americans. Instead we have mexicans who intend that this become a mexican country. Muslims who will make it an islamic country. Blacks who want to create a new African homeland, and Asians who might well think about foreclosing on their loans.

What could possibly go wrong?

The only thing these competing racial and ethnic groups have in common is that the United States is dying and the bones are up for grabs.

And we have few cracked in the head whites who want to take us racially back to the 1950s.

They will not succeed anymore than the few Mexicans or few Muslim who want to make the country in their image only.
 
We have immigrants from all over the world who never became Americans. Instead we have mexicans who intend that this become a mexican country. Muslims who will make it an islamic country. Blacks who want to create a new African homeland, and Asians who might well think about foreclosing on their loans.

What could possibly go wrong?

The only thing these competing racial and ethnic groups have in common is that the United States is dying and the bones are up for grabs.

You nailed it my man.

"Ethnic diversity is our strength" - How many times have we heard the simpletons in DC say that. It isn't true. It never has been true in the history of the world. It isn't true in the USA with the present crop of non assimilaters.
 
We have immigrants from all over the world who never became Americans. Instead we have mexicans who intend that this become a mexican country. Muslims who will make it an islamic country. Blacks who want to create a new African homeland, and Asians who might well think about foreclosing on their loans.

What could possibly go wrong?

The only thing these competing racial and ethnic groups have in common is that the United States is dying and the bones are up for grabs.


Calm down, Chicken Little.
 
We have immigrants from all over the world who never became Americans. Instead we have mexicans who intend that this become a mexican country. Muslims who will make it an islamic country. Blacks who want to create a new African homeland, and Asians who might well think about foreclosing on their loans.

What could possibly go wrong?

The only thing these competing racial and ethnic groups have in common is that the United States is dying and the bones are up for grabs.

You nailed it my man.

"Ethnic diversity is our strength" - How many times have we heard the simpletons in DC say that. It isn't true. It never has been true in the history of the world.


The United States itself proves you wrong.
 
A country that doesn't inforce [sic] it's [sic] laws is disfunctional.

Everyone who knowingly came here illegally has shown a calious [sic] disrespect for the USA, and for our citizens, and a propensity for criminal behaviour.


You are showing disrespect for the English language.
 
José;6736931 said:
Guadalupe-Hidalgo for american dummies who don't know shit about the history of their own country...

1 - A violent thug armed to the teeth (America) breaks into your house, destroy everything you have...

During the invasion and occupation of Mexico the US troops behaved like a maurading gang, pillaging and destroying every Mexican, village, town and city unfortunate enough to be in their way...

Hundreds of catholic churches were desecrated and/or destroyed, the town's food and water supplies were generally looted or confiscated, the civilian population was terrorised, when armed resistance was met the whole place was frequently burned to the ground.

The atrocities against Mexico during the US army march towards Mexico City were so horrendous that a group of Irish immigrants serving in the US army, disgusted at so many brutalities being commited against fellow catholics, decided to desert and fight alongside mexican troops defending the country from the foreign agression.

They were later arrested, charged with treason and executed by the US Army and to this day Mexico honors the memory of those brave Irish americans EVERY SINGLE YEAR.

They are known in Mexico as the "Saint Patrick Battallion".

2 - After invading your home, destroying all your furniture and beating the crap out of you the thug threatens to confiscate your entire house if you don't "sell" it to him for a ridiculous sum.

American troops occupied Mexico for more than 1 year and the American authorities made it clear to the mexican people and authorities:

""Sell" us Texas, California, New Mexico, half of your country to be brief or FACE THE THREAT OF TOTAL ANEXATION."

Under extreme duress, with their hands being violently forced behind their backs mexican authorities finally "agreed" to "sell" half of the country's territory for peanuts.

Do you really want to go there? Catholic churches and the atrocites they have committed?
That is what war is. Don't hear me, a native american, complainging about european invasion and occupation. Shit happen and you cannot alway to do overs.
America has paid for the entire country of Mexico, times over with the illegal aliens invasion and occpation.

Did mexico really owned the south west?

As it turns out, the Spaniards occupied Mexico for some 300 years and even the word Hispanic was one employed by the Romans when they occupied what now is Spain. So, the Spanish language that is spoken across Latin America is a result of Spanish occupation. Likewise, it was Spain that occupied Mexico for hundreds of years.

in 1846 the Mexican-American war began in the wake of the 1845 U.S. annexation of Texas. Mexico considered Texas part of its territory despite the Texas Revolution nearly a decade prior. Mexico never acknowledged Texas’ independence.

U.S. agreed to buy the land from Mexico for $15 million, even though it was won squarely in victory and there was no obligation to do so
We Never Occupied Mexico: Beck Schools Eva Longoria on Her Mexican History | Video | TheBlaze.com
 
Last edited:
Does Mexico Really Own the Southwest?
By Allan Wall

Even some of the arguments used on our side are a little lame. Some try to prove the territory wasn't conquered. After all, we did pay $15 million dollars for it. True, but that makes it sound like a garden variety real estate deal. Mexico was soundly defeated, and as defeated nations throughout history, had to abide by the terms of defeat. It was a conquest.

And historically, there's nothing unique about that. Just about every country in the world was formed by some type of conquest, and just about all the real estate in the world has been conquered and re-conquered, some of it quite a few times. That includes Mexico.

The contemporary conventional Mexican view is that the evil Spaniards conquered Mexico. But when Hernan Cortes arrived in 1519, the present-day country of Mexico did not exist. The Aztec Empire (itself a product of conquest), only covered about a quarter of present-day Mexico. After the Spaniards conquered that empire, they went on conquering numerous other indigenous entities, including the Tarascan Empire, enemy of the Aztec Empire, thus assembling the enormous colony of "Nueva España," which was renamed Mexico, after independence. Furthermore, throughout the history of independent Mexico, the government has repeatedly used force to subdue rebellious tribes and areas, and keep them in Mexico. So yes, Mexico was formed by conquest as well. Nor is invading a neighbor country at all rare. In fact, it's the most common form of international invasion there is.

And supposing the Mexican War hadn't started in 1846, it's quite probable Mexico would have lost the territories anyway. The region in question was far from the heartland of Mexico, and sparsely settled. Neither the Spanish Empire nor the independent Mexico which succeeded it, did much to develop the area, which was prone to frequent anti-government uprisings. In the 1840s, there was speculation that the British, the French, or the Russians might take try to take it. But the most likely possibility would have been that growing communities of unassimilated American settlers would have revolted, seceded from Mexico, and joined the U.S.

Does Mexico Really Own the Southwest?
 
No war is one way. That is Hitler talk. Both were at fault, both had points to consider. Mexico lost, and that's the end of it. Any who try to take it back to Mexico using techniques outside of the Constitution should be tried, convicted, put against the wall, and shot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top