They Use Words, But Don't Know What They Mean

[PoliticalChic]

Obama -democrat. Trump inherited what Obama created.

Obama -demcrat. Border crossings were at a 40 year low when trump took office.

Obama -democrat. The current inflation is global. We would be facing thiis had trump won.

Neither. You forget what was going on during trump.

Obama-democrat. Oil prices are caused by the demand created by the return to normal after the pandemic.

The charge was conspiracy. Collusion is not a crime listed in the U.S. code. Bill Barr lied, and Mueller never exonerated trump. Also trump refused to let witnesses testify. That's not getting the truth.

Trump made the agreement to leave by a date after he left office without including the afghan government. So the afghan government and military quit.

Republican state legislatures.

Trump. He made agencies shut up. Did not holdpress briefings for the majority of his term, fired people who told the truth about his corruption, and tried to use the DOJ as his police force.

Neither. But when trump pulled out of the JCPOA or whatever it was called, he enabled Iran to reconstitute it's nuclear program.

More idiocy by the village idiot.

That was really fun destroying you, wiping up the floor with you.....



Not difficult.....but fun.

 

[Orangecat]

More idiocy by the village idiot.

At least you signed off correctly.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I always attempt to use the English language with the diligence of a UN translator.
I expect no less of the other side.



As proven above, there is no "Far Right" in this country.....Democrats should stop using the phrase.

Democrats use words, but they don't know what they mean.



Just today.....

"Biden outlines new steps aimed at bolstering abortion rights"​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/07/08/biden-outline-new-steps-aimed-bolstering-abortion-rights/#:~:text=Biden%20outlines%20new%20steps%20aimed%20at%20bolstering%20abortion%20rights

There are no abortion "Rights."


Here is what ‘rights’ are.

A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

Rights belong to each human individually.

Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.
How can the killing of another human being not infringe, diminish, deprive the victim of it's rights.....the rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness?????



In pagan, savage, societies, perhaps those in charge allow, decree, demand the slaughter of other human beings.....but let's not pretend it is a "right" in America.

But.....in Democrat circles.....it does appear to be a demand.
It very much reflects what we saw in Genesis 18, Sodom and Gomorrah.

 

[Donald H]

"It’s Simple: Under This Deal, Iran Will Have Nuclear Weapons in Little Over a Decade
Our children will live their lives under an Iranian nuclear Sword of Damocles"
It’s Simple: Under This Deal, Iran Will Have Nuclear Weapons in Little Over a Decade

It simply doesn't matter anymore. Iran has the capability to crush the Zionist regime if it cares to bother.
Also, Iran falls under Russia's and China's nuclear umbrellas of protection.

Iran has no incentive for possessing nuclear weapons anymore, if in fact they ever did?

America's children are already living under the Russian nuclear sword of etc., etc.

Our children will live their lives under an Iranian nuclear Sword of Damocles"

Iran is another party to the great opposing alliance against America. American blood will be on Iran's hands too, as surely as it may be on Russia's and China's hands if the proxy war in the Ukraine is mismanaged.

It's not a dry run,
Anymore hon!

 

[flan327]

1. Twice this week I've had blithering idiots.....er, Democrat supporters......challenge news articles as coming from right-wing sources, and are therefore not acceptable.
Of course, I simply provided glaring lies from the NYTimes and the LATimes, and provided some 50 lies and hoaxes that have been exposed, but were constantly pushed by Democrat medai organs.


2. This morn, an article in the Right Scoop exposing just what the title states.

"KNIVES OUT: The New York Times smears Mayra Flores ‘far-right’ and ‘extreme’ while WAPO smears DeSantis​

The New York Times is out with a hit piece this morning, smearing the newly elected Mayra Flores as both a ‘far-right Latina’ and an ‘extremist’.

Christina Pushaw responded to the article this morning, pointing out that “everyone who disagrees with the legacy media Stalinists is “far right” and “extreme.””. She noted that the positions of Flores which the New York Slimes calls ‘far-right’ and ‘extreme’ are:

— America has borders, federal immigration law must be enforced


— Pro-life (as are most Catholics, many in a 85% Latino district)

— Her constituents care more about inflation than J6 hearings


3. “But what is most striking is that Ms. Flores won by shunning moderates, embracing the far right and wearing her support for Donald J. Trump on her sleeve — more Marjorie Taylor Greene than Kay Bailey Hutchison.”

KNIVES OUT: The New York Times smears Mayra Flores ‘far-right’ and ‘extreme’ while WAPO smears DeSantis

The New York Times is out with a hit piece this morning, smearing the newly elected Mayra Flores as both a ‘far-right Latina’ and an ‘extremist’. Christina Pushaw responded …

therightscoop.com

4. What is glaring and proves the title is the term "Far Right."
There is none in this country......only a Far Left.
I can prove it.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center. American traditions, values, and history represent that center. The Right, represented by the Republican Party, has no radial positions not consistent with America’s heritage…..but the Democrats sure do!

Subservient to the master they serve, that fire and brimstone guy, the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

Talk about “Far”!!!!

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.





5. ....there certainly is a Far Left.

The thesis is based on the definitions involved:

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."


"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)



It's what the radical Obama was getting at when he said “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” — Barack Obama, October 30, 2008. “

Transforming from the positions that America was built on.



Radical positions as opposed to traditional ones identify "Far" Left.
Should we begin with "men can be pregnant"?????????

TL; don’t care

 

[flan327]

I always attempt to use the English language with the diligence of a UN translator.
I expect no less of the other side.



As proven above, there is no "Far Right" in this country.....Democrats should stop using the phrase.

Democrats use words, but they don't know what they mean.



Just today.....

"Biden outlines new steps aimed at bolstering abortion rights"​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/07/08/biden-outline-new-steps-aimed-bolstering-abortion-rights/#:~:text=Biden%20outlines%20new%20steps%20aimed%20at%20bolstering%20abortion%20rights

There are no abortion "Rights."


Here is what ‘rights’ are.

A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

Rights belong to each human individually.

Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.
How can the killing of another human being not infringe, diminish, deprive the victim of it's rights.....the rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness?????



In pagan, savage, societies, perhaps those in charge allow, decree, demand the slaughter of other human beings.....but let's not pretend it is a "right" in America.

View attachment 667813


But.....in Democrat circles.....it does appear to be a demand.
It very much reflects what we saw in Genesis 18, Sodom and Gomorrah.

LMAO

Who reads the Bible and TAKES IT LITERALLY?

 

[PoliticalChic]

It simply doesn't matter anymore. Iran has the capability to crush the Zionist regime if it cares to bother.
Also, Iran falls under Russia's and China's nuclear umbrellas of protection.

Iran has no incentive for possessing nuclear weapons anymore, if in fact they ever did?

America's children are already living under the Russian nuclear sword of etc., etc.




Iran is another party to the great opposing alliance against America. American blood will be on Iran's hands too, as surely as it may be on Russia's and China's hands if the proxy war in the Ukraine is mismanaged.

It's not a dry run,
Anymore hon!

Better get home.

Tucker: Trudeau has declared Canada a dictatorship​

Baby Doc Trudeau invoked martial law, for the first time ever in Canada, where people congregating at rallies and protests, were subject to arrest by machine gun toting Gestapo. People were protesting the strict mandates, shutting down and destroying the economy, and lives, against the Covid, which has a lethality rate of …..ZERO.

This is one of the comments under the vid:

“At this point it's gone way beyond the mandates. It's all about control and power.”

 

[PoliticalChic]

TL; don’t care

This is why you did so poorly in school, and spent so much time in summer school.

Your posts reflect same.

 

[PoliticalChic]

LMAO

Who reads the Bible and TAKES IT LITERALLY?

The Founders of America......you've heard of them, even as dumb as you are.

They used the Bible in writing our founding documents.
The reason our revolution was so different from the violent, homicidal chaos of the French version was the dominant American culture was Anglo-Saxon and Christian. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” http://www.davidlimbaugh.com/mt/archives/2010/02/new_column_libe_4.html Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundamentalist hate group.”


Did you know that there is a specific reference to Jesus Christ in the Constitution?

You haven't read it?????

You are a dunce.


1. The most quoted source was the Bible. Established in the original writings of our Founding Fathers we find that they discovered in Isaiah 33:22 the three branches of government: Isaiah 33:22 “For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; he will save us.” Here we see the judicial, the legislative and the executive branches. In Ezra 7:24 we see where they established the tax exempt status of the church: Ezra 7:24 “Also we certify you, that touching any of the priests and Levites, singers, porters, Nethinims, or ministers of this house of God, it shall not be lawful to impose toll, tribute, or custom, upon them.”

When we look at our Constitution we see in Article 4 Section 4 that we are guaranteed a Republican form of government, that was found in Exodus 18“Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens:” This indicates that we are to choose, or elect God fearing men and women. Looking at Article 3 Section 3 we see almost word for word Deuteronomy 17:6: ‘No person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses. . .’ Deuteronomy 17:6 “At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses. . .”. The next paragraph in Article 3 Section 3 refers to who should pay the price for treason. In England, they could punish the sons for the trespasses of the father, if the father died.

Roger Anghis -- Bring America Back To Her Religious Roots, Part 7



Don't be a moron your whole life......



,....take a day off.

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

If you didn't know you were living in Orwell's 1984, here is what the protagonist was doing, changing the media to conform to Big Brother's narratives.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And another Democrat using a word without knowing what it means......"unconstitutional"







Another failure giving those of us with an Ivy League degree a bad name.

 

[Mac1958]

Good gawd, she uses a completely, typically one-sided Tucker rant as a "source". That's like a left winger using a Keith Olbermann rant as a "source".

Another example of how a hardcore partisan ideology robs a person of fundamental critical thinking skills and (probably worse) basic human curiosity.

Not once do followers of this stuff ask themselves, "hmm, I wonder what the other side of this story is? Not what HE'S TELLING ME it is, but an accurate representation so that I can draw an informed conclusion". That would require too much work. And intellectual honesty.

We're in real trouble.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"You may recall a scene in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. The protagonist, Winston Smith, stands before the Ministry of Truth building and reads the words written on the façade: “War Is Peace, Freedom Is Slavery, Ignorance Is Strength.”

When language has become so elastic that words can mean anything or nothing at all, we have entered Orwell territory.

Conservatives believe that words mean things, but Democrats treat language as Silly Putty. In the late 1990s, part of President Clinton’s defense in his impeach- ment trial was, “It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”

In the Lexicon of the Left, illegal aliens have become “undocumented immigrants”—or, more simply, “immigrants,” blurring the distinction between legal and illegal immigrants. It won’t be long before Democrats begin calling them “unregistered Democrats.” The emergency at the southern border is not a crisis; it’s a “challenge.” The rooms used to house unaccompanied minors are called cages under President Trump but reception centers under President Biden."
Spicer, "Radical Nation"



George Orwell put it this way: “Political language . . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.”

 

[Leo123]

Good gawd, she uses a completely, typically one-sided Tucker rant as a "source". That's like a left winger using a Keith Olbermann rant as a "source".

Another example of how a hardcore partisan ideology robs a person of fundamental critical thinking skills and (probably worse) basic human curiosity.

Not once do followers of this stuff ask themselves, "hmm, I wonder what the other side of this story is? Not what HE'S TELLING ME it is, but an accurate representation so that I can draw an informed conclusion". That would require too much work. And intellectual honesty.

We're in real trouble.

The 'other side of the story' ARE commentators like Tucker Carlson. They don't reach the huge demographic of the liberal-left MSM.

 

[Leo123]

"You may recall a scene in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. The protagonist, Winston Smith, stands before the Ministry of Truth building and reads the words written on the façade: “War Is Peace, Freedom Is Slavery, Ignorance Is Strength.”

When language has become so elastic that words can mean anything or nothing at all, we have entered Orwell territory.

Conservatives believe that words mean things, but Democrats treat language as Silly Putty. In the late 1990s, part of President Clinton’s defense in his impeach- ment trial was, “It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”

In the Lexicon of the Left, illegal aliens have become “undocumented immigrants”—or, more simply, “immigrants,” blurring the distinction between legal and illegal immigrants. It won’t be long before Democrats begin calling them “unregistered Democrats.” The emergency at the southern border is not a crisis; it’s a “challenge.” The rooms used to house unaccompanied minors are called cages under President Trump but reception centers under President Biden."
Spicer, "Radical Nation"



George Orwell put it this way: “Political language . . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.”

You have described Marxism and the American Marxist 'bible' 'Rules For Radicals' which teaches the 'art' of changing the lexicon.