These are the facts in evidence. Trumpette's, avert your eyes.

[g5000]

92 countries, including one whose Prime Minister is under indictment.

All but one of the corrupt countries got foreign aid, without a penny of it being held up for one second.

Only Ukraine, and only the one company with a connection to Trump's chief political rival.

You have to be a special kind of retard not to see this for what it is. Abuse of power for personal political gain.

And so I will call you all a special kind of retard, because you beg to be called that.

The end.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

View attachment 294564

Whew...boy - you got it bad.

LOL!!!

So.........attempting to refute the facts isn't your thing. Got it.

When you start posting facts instead of opinions, maybe some will honor your idiotic post by responding. Until then, suck it up!

What in the OP is an opinion? Specifically.

You still haven't told me what specific law Trump broke. This is why Trump will be reelected and we will get a majority in both houses. Thank you!

Is this you, old lady?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

92 countries, including one whose Prime Minister is under indictment.

All but one of the corrupt countries got foreign aid, without a penny of it being held up for one second.

Only Ukraine, and only the one company with a connection to Trump's chief political rival.

You have to be a special kind of retard not to see this for what it is. Abuse of power for personal political gain.

And so I will call you all a special kind of retard, because you beg to be called that.

The end.

He is not a coward that blocks people you are. That makes you a special kind of coward. And the aid was released. Dumbass.

 

[AntonToo]

Announcement absolutely was made by Sondland to Ukranian officials and other diplomats that EVERYTHING (the phonecalls, the WH visit and even aid) is conditioned on investigations and public announcements by Zelensky. He testified to it before Congress.

The aid was held back with ZERO sane explanation and released only AFTER CONGRESS OPENED INVESTIGATIONS.


I know you are tipsy drunk and all but COME ON, wake the fuck up and wake up your idiot rightwing friends too.

Antosha is embarrassing himself again. Poor Antosha.

As for corrupting the 2020 election, even if Ukraine had announced an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden, Trump couldn’t know how effective it would be, how long it would take, or whether it might even exonerate them. The election is still a year away. If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think.

Dumbass, the mere announcement that Biden was under actual investigation for corruption would be a huge political blow.

Trump learned that DAMN WELL during the last election when Comey was publicly t-boning Hillary.

Trump campaign is preparing to spend millions on these ads against Biden in early Democrat primary states. He is their top concern.

Hold on. He did it on a public call and it is not as if he made up the data on Biden. Burisma is real and to your point the Democrats just gave him free publicity of how corrupt Biden is. LMAO.

c

1. It was NOT a public call and in fact the original transcribe of the call was inapropriately placed into top-security vault by WH lawyers , even though it had nothing classified contained. This original, most complete technical transcription has not been made available, instead we got the memorandum from WH. Which is again, evidence of cover-up.

2. If Trump had any real basis for true investigation of Biden's corruption in his capacity as an American VP then he would have done it THE RIGHT WAY. Which is to file a complaint with DOJ and let them open, and pursue investigation. There is no basis for it, there is no real investigation and so Trump did the only thing he COULD - pressure Ukraine for bogus public announcements by abusing millitary aid apropriation.

You did not answer my question and it was not a private call with all the people listening in. LOL.

If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think. So YOU BELIEVE THAT OUR DEMOCRACY IS THAT WEAK? Y or N?

Answer the question, Antosha.

Foreign policy advisors and top administration members listening in DOES NOT MAKE IT PUBLIC. That is not a complicated concept.

You are bringing up a rediculous red herring - Trump conducting corrupt transactions with Ukraine is deeply wrong no matter how large or small the effects are at the voting booth.

It was explicitly illigal for Trump to hold up Congresionally aproved aid just to pressure Ukrainians into doing him political favors. It is text book abuse of office and he deserves to be impeached for this swamp behavior.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Antosha is embarrassing himself again. Poor Antosha.

As for corrupting the 2020 election, even if Ukraine had announced an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden, Trump couldn’t know how effective it would be, how long it would take, or whether it might even exonerate them. The election is still a year away. If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think.

Dumbass, the mere announcement that Biden was under actual investigation for corruption would be a huge political blow.

Trump learned that DAMN WELL during the last election when Comey was publicly t-boning Hillary.

Trump campaign is preparing to spend millions on these ads against Biden in early Democrat primary states. He is their top concern.

Hold on. He did it on a public call and it is not as if he made up the data on Biden. Burisma is real and to your point the Democrats just gave him free publicity of how corrupt Biden is. LMAO.

c

1. It was NOT a public call and in fact the original transcribe of the call was inapropriately placed into top-security vault by WH lawyers , even though it had nothing classified contained. This original, most complete technical transcription has not been made available, instead we got the memorandum from WH. Which is again, evidence of cover-up.

2. If Trump had any real basis for true investigation of Biden's corruption in his capacity as an American VP then he would have done it THE RIGHT WAY. Which is to file a complaint with DOJ and let them open, and pursue investigation. There is no basis for it, there is no real investigation and so Trump did the only thing he COULD - pressure Ukraine for bogus public announcements by abusing millitary aid apropriation.

You did not answer my question and it was not a private call with all the people listening in. LOL.

If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think. So YOU BELIEVE THAT OUR DEMOCRACY IS THAT WEAK? Y or N?

Answer the question, Antosha.

Foreign policy advisors and top administration members listening in DOES NOT MAKE IT PUBLIC. That is not a complicated concept.

You are bringing up a rediculous red herring - Trump conducting corrupt transactions with Ukraine is deeply wrong no matter how large or small the effects are at the voting booth.

So you will not answer the question. Trump released the transcript. He is not hiding anything. He didn't make up the Bidens involvement with Burisma. He has no idea what a Ukrainian investigation would or would not find. Other leaders have asked for similar "favors". You're grasping at straws because you have TDS.

If all this data is so damning why not allow the people decide at the voter booth? Why pursue a one sided impeachment that has zero chance of success in the Senate? This is 100% pure political theater. You're a complete dumbass if you don't see that.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Antosha is embarrassing himself again. Poor Antosha.

As for corrupting the 2020 election, even if Ukraine had announced an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden, Trump couldn’t know how effective it would be, how long it would take, or whether it might even exonerate them. The election is still a year away. If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think.

Dumbass, the mere announcement that Biden was under actual investigation for corruption would be a huge political blow.

Trump learned that DAMN WELL during the last election when Comey was publicly t-boning Hillary.

Trump campaign is preparing to spend millions on these ads against Biden in early Democrat primary states. He is their top concern.

Hold on. He did it on a public call and it is not as if he made up the data on Biden. Burisma is real and to your point the Democrats just gave him free publicity of how corrupt Biden is. LMAO.

c

1. It was NOT a public call and in fact the original transcribe of the call was inapropriately placed into top-security vault by WH lawyers , even though it had nothing classified contained. This original, most complete technical transcription has not been made available, instead we got the memorandum from WH. Which is again, evidence of cover-up.

2. If Trump had any real basis for true investigation of Biden's corruption in his capacity as an American VP then he would have done it THE RIGHT WAY. Which is to file a complaint with DOJ and let them open, and pursue investigation. There is no basis for it, there is no real investigation and so Trump did the only thing he COULD - pressure Ukraine for bogus public announcements by abusing millitary aid apropriation.

You did not answer my question and it was not a private call with all the people listening in. LOL.

If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think. So YOU BELIEVE THAT OUR DEMOCRACY IS THAT WEAK? Y or N?

Answer the question, Antosha.

Foreign policy advisors and top administration members listening in DOES NOT MAKE IT PUBLIC. That is not a complicated concept.

You are bringing up a rediculous red herring - Trump conducting corrupt transactions with Ukraine is deeply wrong no matter how large or small the effects are at the voting booth.

It was explicitly illigal for Trump to hold up Congresionally aproved aid just to pressure Ukrainians into doing him political favors. It is text book abuse of office and he deserves to be impeached for this swamp behavior.

I'll post this for you again since you're dumb.


Their problem is that Mr. Trump didn’t withhold military aid to Ukraine, and even if he had he would have merely been returning to Barack Obama’s policy of denying lethal aid. How would that have jeopardized national security? Every President also solicits actions from foreign leaders that he hopes will help him politically at home.

As for corrupting the 2020 election, even if Ukraine had announced an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden, Trump couldn’t know how effective it would be, how long it would take, or whether it might even exonerate them. The election is still a year away. If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think.

 

[berg80]

They got the money and were never aware of the slightest delay.

But..........that's a lie.

Ukraine inquired about aid the same day Trump asked Zelenskiy about Biden probe, impeachment witness says
Ukraine inquired about aid the same day Trump asked Zelenskiy about Biden probe, impeachment witness says

 

[colfax_m]

Dumbass, the mere announcement that Biden was under actual investigation for corruption would be a huge political blow.

Trump learned that DAMN WELL during the last election when Comey was publicly t-boning Hillary.

Trump campaign is preparing to spend millions on these ads against Biden in early Democrat primary states. He is their top concern.

Hold on. He did it on a public call and it is not as if he made up the data on Biden. Burisma is real and to your point the Democrats just gave him free publicity of how corrupt Biden is. LMAO.

c

1. It was NOT a public call and in fact the original transcribe of the call was inapropriately placed into top-security vault by WH lawyers , even though it had nothing classified contained. This original, most complete technical transcription has not been made available, instead we got the memorandum from WH. Which is again, evidence of cover-up.

2. If Trump had any real basis for true investigation of Biden's corruption in his capacity as an American VP then he would have done it THE RIGHT WAY. Which is to file a complaint with DOJ and let them open, and pursue investigation. There is no basis for it, there is no real investigation and so Trump did the only thing he COULD - pressure Ukraine for bogus public announcements by abusing millitary aid apropriation.

You did not answer my question and it was not a private call with all the people listening in. LOL.

If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think. So YOU BELIEVE THAT OUR DEMOCRACY IS THAT WEAK? Y or N?

Answer the question, Antosha.

Foreign policy advisors and top administration members listening in DOES NOT MAKE IT PUBLIC. That is not a complicated concept.

You are bringing up a rediculous red herring - Trump conducting corrupt transactions with Ukraine is deeply wrong no matter how large or small the effects are at the voting booth.

So you will not answer the question. Trump released the transcript. He is not hiding anything. He didn't make up the Bidens involvement with Burisma. He has no idea what a Ukrainian investigation would or would not find. Other leaders have asked for similar "favors". You're grasping at straws because you have TDS.

If all this data is so damning why not allow the people decide at the voter booth? Why pursue a one sided impeachment that has zero chance of success in the Senate? This is 100% pure political theater. You're a complete dumbass if you don't see that.

He’s hiding everything that isn’t the phone transcript and whistleblower report.

Zero document subpoenas are being honored. He’s ordered his entire administration to ignore testimony subpoenas.

How can you not know this?

 

[AntonToo]

Dumbass, the mere announcement that Biden was under actual investigation for corruption would be a huge political blow.

Trump learned that DAMN WELL during the last election when Comey was publicly t-boning Hillary.

Trump campaign is preparing to spend millions on these ads against Biden in early Democrat primary states. He is their top concern.

Hold on. He did it on a public call and it is not as if he made up the data on Biden. Burisma is real and to your point the Democrats just gave him free publicity of how corrupt Biden is. LMAO.

c

1. It was NOT a public call and in fact the original transcribe of the call was inapropriately placed into top-security vault by WH lawyers , even though it had nothing classified contained. This original, most complete technical transcription has not been made available, instead we got the memorandum from WH. Which is again, evidence of cover-up.

2. If Trump had any real basis for true investigation of Biden's corruption in his capacity as an American VP then he would have done it THE RIGHT WAY. Which is to file a complaint with DOJ and let them open, and pursue investigation. There is no basis for it, there is no real investigation and so Trump did the only thing he COULD - pressure Ukraine for bogus public announcements by abusing millitary aid apropriation.

You did not answer my question and it was not a private call with all the people listening in. LOL.

If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think. So YOU BELIEVE THAT OUR DEMOCRACY IS THAT WEAK? Y or N?

Answer the question, Antosha.

Foreign policy advisors and top administration members listening in DOES NOT MAKE IT PUBLIC. That is not a complicated concept.

You are bringing up a rediculous red herring - Trump conducting corrupt transactions with Ukraine is deeply wrong no matter how large or small the effects are at the voting booth.

So you will not answer the question. Trump released the transcript. He is not hiding anything. He didn't make up the Bidens involvement with Burisma. He has no idea what a Ukrainian investigation would or would not find. Other leaders have asked for similar "favors". You're grasping at straws because you have TDS.

If all this data is so damning why not allow the people decide at the voter booth? Why pursue a one sided impeachment that has zero chance of success in the Senate? This is 100% pure political theater. You're a complete dumbass if you don't see that.

You are wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong again.

Transcript was not released, on the contrary, in was buried. Memorandum of the call reconstructed by the WH was released. Vindman specifically objected to material ommisions in the memorandum vs the actual transcript.

This memorandum was released AFTER Congress opened investigations and White Hosue failed to stop whistleblower complaint from being delivered to Congress (not for lack of trying though). Trump released the still-damning memorandum because that was more vague than the direct contextual explanation of the call in the whistleblower complaint.

 

[berg80]

Their problem is that Mr. Trump didn’t withhold military aid to Ukraine, and even if he had he would have merely been returning to Barack Obama’s policy of denying lethal aid.

Nope. Trump put a hold on appropriated aid to use as leverage in violation of the law. Obama never did anything close.

 

[berg80]

Hold on. He did it on a public call and it is not as if he made up the data on Biden. Burisma is real and to your point the Democrats just gave him free publicity of how corrupt Biden is. LMAO.

c

1. It was NOT a public call and in fact the original transcribe of the call was inapropriately placed into top-security vault by WH lawyers , even though it had nothing classified contained. This original, most complete technical transcription has not been made available, instead we got the memorandum from WH. Which is again, evidence of cover-up.

2. If Trump had any real basis for true investigation of Biden's corruption in his capacity as an American VP then he would have done it THE RIGHT WAY. Which is to file a complaint with DOJ and let them open, and pursue investigation. There is no basis for it, there is no real investigation and so Trump did the only thing he COULD - pressure Ukraine for bogus public announcements by abusing millitary aid apropriation.

You did not answer my question and it was not a private call with all the people listening in. LOL.

If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think. So YOU BELIEVE THAT OUR DEMOCRACY IS THAT WEAK? Y or N?

Answer the question, Antosha.

Foreign policy advisors and top administration members listening in DOES NOT MAKE IT PUBLIC. That is not a complicated concept.

You are bringing up a rediculous red herring - Trump conducting corrupt transactions with Ukraine is deeply wrong no matter how large or small the effects are at the voting booth.

So you will not answer the question. Trump released the transcript. He is not hiding anything. He didn't make up the Bidens involvement with Burisma. He has no idea what a Ukrainian investigation would or would not find. Other leaders have asked for similar "favors". You're grasping at straws because you have TDS.

If all this data is so damning why not allow the people decide at the voter booth? Why pursue a one sided impeachment that has zero chance of success in the Senate? This is 100% pure political theater. You're a complete dumbass if you don't see that.

You are wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong again.

Transcript was not released, on the contrary, in was buried. Memorandum of the call reconstructed by the WH was released. Vindman specifically objected to material ommisions in the memorandum vs the actual transcript.

This memorandum was released AFTER Congress opened investigations and whistleblower complaint that described the call was to become public (after Administration failed to bury that too). Trump released the still-damning memorandum because that was more vague that the direct contextual explanation of the call in the whistleblower complaint.

Facts are pesky things. It's why Trumpette's hate them.

 

[jknowgood]

Horse shit. THe Democrats have twisted the law into a weapon. There is nothing noble about what they are doing.

I've ask them what specific law Trump broke, they cannot tell me.

LOL Berg won't even answer the simple question whether he believes Schiff's claim that he doesn't know the Whistleblower.

What difference does it make? Do you folks have anything other than diversions?

It makes ALL the difference. When the mastermind behind the entire Impeachment farce bald face lies to the committee, he shows he has no credibility. Since you are ducking the question I assume you don't believe him.

How did Schiff mastermind Trump holding up millitary aid to Ukraine with absolutely no proper explanation?

How did Schiff mastermind Jiuliani running around Ukraine looking for dirt on Bidens and trying to get embassador to Ukraine removed?

How did Schiff mastermind Trump call with Zelensky where he talked about Ukraine not recieprocating generous American aid, and how they ought to do us favors in investigating DNC server and Bidens?

How did Schiff mastermind Sondland telling Ukrainians that everything is conditioned on announcement of investigations?

How did Schiff mastermind Zelensky scheduling CNN interview?

He must be no less than God himself.

You can make up stuff better than Schiff. Tell me why didn't Obama give military aid to Ukraine?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Hold on. He did it on a public call and it is not as if he made up the data on Biden. Burisma is real and to your point the Democrats just gave him free publicity of how corrupt Biden is. LMAO.

c

1. It was NOT a public call and in fact the original transcribe of the call was inapropriately placed into top-security vault by WH lawyers , even though it had nothing classified contained. This original, most complete technical transcription has not been made available, instead we got the memorandum from WH. Which is again, evidence of cover-up.

2. If Trump had any real basis for true investigation of Biden's corruption in his capacity as an American VP then he would have done it THE RIGHT WAY. Which is to file a complaint with DOJ and let them open, and pursue investigation. There is no basis for it, there is no real investigation and so Trump did the only thing he COULD - pressure Ukraine for bogus public announcements by abusing millitary aid apropriation.

You did not answer my question and it was not a private call with all the people listening in. LOL.

If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think. So YOU BELIEVE THAT OUR DEMOCRACY IS THAT WEAK? Y or N?

Answer the question, Antosha.

Foreign policy advisors and top administration members listening in DOES NOT MAKE IT PUBLIC. That is not a complicated concept.

You are bringing up a rediculous red herring - Trump conducting corrupt transactions with Ukraine is deeply wrong no matter how large or small the effects are at the voting booth.

So you will not answer the question. Trump released the transcript. He is not hiding anything. He didn't make up the Bidens involvement with Burisma. He has no idea what a Ukrainian investigation would or would not find. Other leaders have asked for similar "favors". You're grasping at straws because you have TDS.

If all this data is so damning why not allow the people decide at the voter booth? Why pursue a one sided impeachment that has zero chance of success in the Senate? This is 100% pure political theater. You're a complete dumbass if you don't see that.

He’s hiding everything that isn’t the phone transcript and whistleblower report.

Zero document subpoenas are being honored. He’s ordered his entire administration to ignore testimony subpoenas.

How can you not know this?

This is what he said and I see ZERO wrong with it. How can you not agree with me?

I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Hold on. He did it on a public call and it is not as if he made up the data on Biden. Burisma is real and to your point the Democrats just gave him free publicity of how corrupt Biden is. LMAO.

c

1. It was NOT a public call and in fact the original transcribe of the call was inapropriately placed into top-security vault by WH lawyers , even though it had nothing classified contained. This original, most complete technical transcription has not been made available, instead we got the memorandum from WH. Which is again, evidence of cover-up.

2. If Trump had any real basis for true investigation of Biden's corruption in his capacity as an American VP then he would have done it THE RIGHT WAY. Which is to file a complaint with DOJ and let them open, and pursue investigation. There is no basis for it, there is no real investigation and so Trump did the only thing he COULD - pressure Ukraine for bogus public announcements by abusing millitary aid apropriation.

You did not answer my question and it was not a private call with all the people listening in. LOL.

If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think. So YOU BELIEVE THAT OUR DEMOCRACY IS THAT WEAK? Y or N?

Answer the question, Antosha.

Foreign policy advisors and top administration members listening in DOES NOT MAKE IT PUBLIC. That is not a complicated concept.

You are bringing up a rediculous red herring - Trump conducting corrupt transactions with Ukraine is deeply wrong no matter how large or small the effects are at the voting booth.

So you will not answer the question. Trump released the transcript. He is not hiding anything. He didn't make up the Bidens involvement with Burisma. He has no idea what a Ukrainian investigation would or would not find. Other leaders have asked for similar "favors". You're grasping at straws because you have TDS.

If all this data is so damning why not allow the people decide at the voter booth? Why pursue a one sided impeachment that has zero chance of success in the Senate? This is 100% pure political theater. You're a complete dumbass if you don't see that.

You are wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong again.

Transcript was not released, on the contrary, in was buried. Memorandum of the call reconstructed by the WH was released. Vindman specifically objected to material ommisions in the memorandum vs the actual transcript.

This memorandum was released AFTER Congress opened investigations and White Hosue failed to stop whistleblower complaint from being delivered to Congress (not for lack of trying though). Trump released the still-damning memorandum because that was more vague than the direct contextual explanation of the call in the whistleblower complaint.

You cannot even answer a simple question. Laughable.

This is what he said and I find zero wrong with it.

I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.

 

[AntonToo]

1. It was NOT a public call and in fact the original transcribe of the call was inapropriately placed into top-security vault by WH lawyers , even though it had nothing classified contained. This original, most complete technical transcription has not been made available, instead we got the memorandum from WH. Which is again, evidence of cover-up.

2. If Trump had any real basis for true investigation of Biden's corruption in his capacity as an American VP then he would have done it THE RIGHT WAY. Which is to file a complaint with DOJ and let them open, and pursue investigation. There is no basis for it, there is no real investigation and so Trump did the only thing he COULD - pressure Ukraine for bogus public announcements by abusing millitary aid apropriation.

You did not answer my question and it was not a private call with all the people listening in. LOL.

If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think. So YOU BELIEVE THAT OUR DEMOCRACY IS THAT WEAK? Y or N?

Answer the question, Antosha.

Foreign policy advisors and top administration members listening in DOES NOT MAKE IT PUBLIC. That is not a complicated concept.

You are bringing up a rediculous red herring - Trump conducting corrupt transactions with Ukraine is deeply wrong no matter how large or small the effects are at the voting booth.

So you will not answer the question. Trump released the transcript. He is not hiding anything. He didn't make up the Bidens involvement with Burisma. He has no idea what a Ukrainian investigation would or would not find. Other leaders have asked for similar "favors". You're grasping at straws because you have TDS.

If all this data is so damning why not allow the people decide at the voter booth? Why pursue a one sided impeachment that has zero chance of success in the Senate? This is 100% pure political theater. You're a complete dumbass if you don't see that.

He’s hiding everything that isn’t the phone transcript and whistleblower report.

Zero document subpoenas are being honored. He’s ordered his entire administration to ignore testimony subpoenas.

How can you not know this?

This is what he said and I see ZERO wrong with it. How can you not agree with me?

I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.

America wants Ukraine to investigate DNC server and Bidens for them to get millitary aid?

You sir are on drugs. Trump wanted that.

 

[LaDairis]

Facts are pesky things.

that Democrats really hate.

What was the FACTUAL REASON why Burisma gave all that money to Hunter Biden, who never showed up to "work?"

 

[jknowgood]

View attachment 294564

Whew...boy - you got it bad.

LOL!!!

So.........attempting to refute the facts isn't your thing. Got it.

When you start posting facts instead of opinions, maybe some will honor your idiotic post by responding. Until then, suck it up!

What in the OP is an opinion? Specifically.

You still haven't told me what specific law Trump broke. This is why Trump will be reelected and we will get a majority in both houses. Thank you!

Simple question. Specifically what law did Trump break?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Their problem is that Mr. Trump didn’t withhold military aid to Ukraine, and even if he had he would have merely been returning to Barack Obama’s policy of denying lethal aid.

Nope. Trump put a hold on appropriated aid to use as leverage in violation of the law. Obama never did anything close.

He did? LOL and you know this how? Are you Jewish? Yes or No?

Here is the call. I see zero wrong with it.

I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.

 

[colfax_m]

1. It was NOT a public call and in fact the original transcribe of the call was inapropriately placed into top-security vault by WH lawyers , even though it had nothing classified contained. This original, most complete technical transcription has not been made available, instead we got the memorandum from WH. Which is again, evidence of cover-up.

2. If Trump had any real basis for true investigation of Biden's corruption in his capacity as an American VP then he would have done it THE RIGHT WAY. Which is to file a complaint with DOJ and let them open, and pursue investigation. There is no basis for it, there is no real investigation and so Trump did the only thing he COULD - pressure Ukraine for bogus public announcements by abusing millitary aid apropriation.

You did not answer my question and it was not a private call with all the people listening in. LOL.

If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think. So YOU BELIEVE THAT OUR DEMOCRACY IS THAT WEAK? Y or N?

Answer the question, Antosha.

Foreign policy advisors and top administration members listening in DOES NOT MAKE IT PUBLIC. That is not a complicated concept.

You are bringing up a rediculous red herring - Trump conducting corrupt transactions with Ukraine is deeply wrong no matter how large or small the effects are at the voting booth.

So you will not answer the question. Trump released the transcript. He is not hiding anything. He didn't make up the Bidens involvement with Burisma. He has no idea what a Ukrainian investigation would or would not find. Other leaders have asked for similar "favors". You're grasping at straws because you have TDS.

If all this data is so damning why not allow the people decide at the voter booth? Why pursue a one sided impeachment that has zero chance of success in the Senate? This is 100% pure political theater. You're a complete dumbass if you don't see that.

He’s hiding everything that isn’t the phone transcript and whistleblower report.

Zero document subpoenas are being honored. He’s ordered his entire administration to ignore testimony subpoenas.

How can you not know this?

This is what he said and I see ZERO wrong with it. How can you not agree with me?

I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.

Do you think the phone transcript is the end of the story?

 

[jknowgood]

So.........attempting to refute the facts isn't your thing. Got it.

When you start posting facts instead of opinions, maybe some will honor your idiotic post by responding. Until then, suck it up!

What in the OP is an opinion? Specifically.

You still haven't told me what specific law Trump broke. This is why Trump will be reelected and we will get a majority in both houses. Thank you!

Is this you, old lady?

View attachment 294583