There Is No "Far Right" In This Country

The D party has fallen so far to the left, that their kooky followers think the progressive R party are a bunch of radical right wingers.

One need only research the speeches and policies of JFK to see how far left the D party has fallen. JFK is so conservative the R party wouldn't nominate him today.

You lie. JFK was no conservative.
Yet another Lib who does not know history.

Read this book...well if you read books.
Amazon.com: JFK, Conservative (9780547585987): Ira Stoll: Books


"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges." Coulter
Yeah, quoting coulter doesn't help you.
 
1. There is no "far right" in this country.
Yet....the very same folks who poke fun at religious Americans, by comparing God with Santa Claus, go on and on.....

"F**k the far right."
MARCO RUBIO: I 'Absolutely' Support Tuition Breaks For Illegal Aliens

'Or Sanders, who does even better against the far right tard candidates'
BUSTED ! – Republican State of Union Response Carried Amnesty Pledge in Spanish Version…

'I bet this will drive the far right loons insane:'
Nikki Haley rebukes Trump in State of the Union rebuttal

'Uh.. there is very much a "far right" in this country.'
The Delusional Candidate

'... what the far right reactionaries are posting.'
Another reason Americans WANT to see Obama and Obamacare GO!!!

'...for some time now the most and loudest noise has come from the Far Right.'
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"...how insane the far right is."
Yes, You're A Communist






2. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.




3. It is a well know axiom that, to see what the Left is doing, note what they are blaming the other side of doing.
One regularly sees the Leftists, Liberals, Progressives, Democrats, whatever....railing against the "Far Right," using "Far Right" as a pejorative, an imprecation.
And....BTW.....there certainly is a Far Left.


But I'll prove that "Far Right" doesn't exist.

Do you not know of people like Stephen "Don" Black, Preston Wigginton, David Duke then? They're in the US and they're far right. The former was a member of the US Nazi Party.. just in case you think he's not far right.

He runs Stormfront, you can find a lot of far right racists hanging out there.
You are obviously unaware that NAZI is the acronym for National Socialist German Workers' Party. Leftist values, not conservative.

You're obviously unaware Democratic People's Republic of North Korea is not a republic, not democratic and the government doesn't have much to do with the people either.

You're obviously unaware that the Federal Republic of Somalia doesn't even really have much in the way of politics at all.

A name is a name.

Also, just for your information, NAZI has "National Socialist", it did not have "Socialist".

National Socialism is different to socialism. There's a reason why the "National" comes first.

The main thing about National Socialism is that it was a Pan-Germanic nationalism. It wanted all the Germanic peoples together under one roof. That was Austria, Parts of Switzerland, Germany, parts of surrounding areas where there were German people.

The socialism part came from the Volksgemeinschaft, people's community.

Volksgemeinschaft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"
Volksgemeinschaft (German pronunciation: [ˈfɔlksɡəˌmaɪnʃaft]) is a German expression meaning "people's community".[1] This expression originally became popular during World War I as Germans rallied in support of the war, and it appealed to the idea of breaking down elitism and uniting people across class divides to achieve a national purpose."

The guy who more or less invented this, opposed the Nazis.

This Volksgemeinschaft was changed by Hitler into something else,

Yes, this did include things like welfare, but that alone doesn't make it Socialism.

There were parts of Socialism in the Nazi regime, but there are parts of socialism in the USA, that doesn't make it the United Socialists of America, does it?
 
The D party has fallen so far to the left, that their kooky followers think the progressive R party are a bunch of radical right wingers.

One need only research the speeches and policies of JFK to see how far left the D party has fallen. JFK is so conservative the R party wouldn't nominate him today.

Maybe you need some perspective. Go look at left parties in Europe, and then say whether you think the Democrats are left or not.
 
1. There is no "far right" in this country.
Yet....the very same folks who poke fun at religious Americans, by comparing God with Santa Claus, go on and on.....

"F**k the far right."
MARCO RUBIO: I 'Absolutely' Support Tuition Breaks For Illegal Aliens

'Or Sanders, who does even better against the far right tard candidates'
BUSTED ! – Republican State of Union Response Carried Amnesty Pledge in Spanish Version…

'I bet this will drive the far right loons insane:'
Nikki Haley rebukes Trump in State of the Union rebuttal

'Uh.. there is very much a "far right" in this country.'
The Delusional Candidate

'... what the far right reactionaries are posting.'
Another reason Americans WANT to see Obama and Obamacare GO!!!

'...for some time now the most and loudest noise has come from the Far Right.'
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"...how insane the far right is."
Yes, You're A Communist






2. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.




3. It is a well know axiom that, to see what the Left is doing, note what they are blaming the other side of doing.
One regularly sees the Leftists, Liberals, Progressives, Democrats, whatever....railing against the "Far Right," using "Far Right" as a pejorative, an imprecation.
And....BTW.....there certainly is a Far Left.


But I'll prove that "Far Right" doesn't exist.

Do you not know of people like Stephen "Don" Black, Preston Wigginton, David Duke then? They're in the US and they're far right. The former was a member of the US Nazi Party.. just in case you think he's not far right.

He runs Stormfront, you can find a lot of far right racists hanging out there.
You are obviously unaware that NAZI is the acronym for National Socialist German Workers' Party. Leftist values, not conservative.

You're obviously unaware Democratic People's Republic of North Korea is not a republic, not democratic and the government doesn't have much to do with the people either.

You're obviously unaware that the Federal Republic of Somalia doesn't even really have much in the way of politics at all.

A name is a name.

Also, just for your information, NAZI has "National Socialist", it did not have "Socialist".

National Socialism is different to socialism. There's a reason why the "National" comes first.

The main thing about National Socialism is that it was a Pan-Germanic nationalism. It wanted all the Germanic peoples together under one roof. That was Austria, Parts of Switzerland, Germany, parts of surrounding areas where there were German people.

The socialism part came from the Volksgemeinschaft, people's community.

Volksgemeinschaft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"
Volksgemeinschaft (German pronunciation: [ˈfɔlksɡəˌmaɪnʃaft]) is a German expression meaning "people's community".[1] This expression originally became popular during World War I as Germans rallied in support of the war, and it appealed to the idea of breaking down elitism and uniting people across class divides to achieve a national purpose."

The guy who more or less invented this, opposed the Nazis.

This Volksgemeinschaft was changed by Hitler into something else,

Yes, this did include things like welfare, but that alone doesn't make it Socialism.

There were parts of Socialism in the Nazi regime, but there are parts of socialism in the USA, that doesn't make it the United Socialists of America, does it?
You forget the NAZIs practiced socialism. They took from who they felt was wealthy and redistributed the wealth.
1. There is no "far right" in this country.
Yet....the very same folks who poke fun at religious Americans, by comparing God with Santa Claus, go on and on.....

"F**k the far right."
MARCO RUBIO: I 'Absolutely' Support Tuition Breaks For Illegal Aliens

'Or Sanders, who does even better against the far right tard candidates'
BUSTED ! – Republican State of Union Response Carried Amnesty Pledge in Spanish Version…

'I bet this will drive the far right loons insane:'
Nikki Haley rebukes Trump in State of the Union rebuttal

'Uh.. there is very much a "far right" in this country.'
The Delusional Candidate

'... what the far right reactionaries are posting.'
Another reason Americans WANT to see Obama and Obamacare GO!!!

'...for some time now the most and loudest noise has come from the Far Right.'
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"...how insane the far right is."
Yes, You're A Communist






2. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.




3. It is a well know axiom that, to see what the Left is doing, note what they are blaming the other side of doing.
One regularly sees the Leftists, Liberals, Progressives, Democrats, whatever....railing against the "Far Right," using "Far Right" as a pejorative, an imprecation.
And....BTW.....there certainly is a Far Left.


But I'll prove that "Far Right" doesn't exist.

Do you not know of people like Stephen "Don" Black, Preston Wigginton, David Duke then? They're in the US and they're far right. The former was a member of the US Nazi Party.. just in case you think he's not far right.

He runs Stormfront, you can find a lot of far right racists hanging out there.
You are obviously unaware that NAZI is the acronym for National Socialist German Workers' Party. Leftist values, not conservative.

You're obviously unaware Democratic People's Republic of North Korea is not a republic, not democratic and the government doesn't have much to do with the people either.

You're obviously unaware that the Federal Republic of Somalia doesn't even really have much in the way of politics at all.

A name is a name.

Also, just for your information, NAZI has "National Socialist", it did not have "Socialist".

National Socialism is different to socialism. There's a reason why the "National" comes first.

The main thing about National Socialism is that it was a Pan-Germanic nationalism. It wanted all the Germanic peoples together under one roof. That was Austria, Parts of Switzerland, Germany, parts of surrounding areas where there were German people.

The socialism part came from the Volksgemeinschaft, people's community.

Volksgemeinschaft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"
Volksgemeinschaft (German pronunciation: [ˈfɔlksɡəˌmaɪnʃaft]) is a German expression meaning "people's community".[1] This expression originally became popular during World War I as Germans rallied in support of the war, and it appealed to the idea of breaking down elitism and uniting people across class divides to achieve a national purpose."

The guy who more or less invented this, opposed the Nazis.

This Volksgemeinschaft was changed by Hitler into something else,

Yes, this did include things like welfare, but that alone doesn't make it Socialism.

There were parts of Socialism in the Nazi regime, but there are parts of socialism in the USA, that doesn't make it the United Socialists of America, does it?
You forget the NAZIs practiced socialism. They took from who they felt was wealthy and redistributed the wealth. The economy was government controlled, there was no free capitalist market.
 
The dimocrats are almost exactly like the Nazi party was in 1938, and are using the same talking points as hitler did to appeal to the masses. If you don't know that you are really just building your OWN history in a fantasy world.
 
The dimocrats are almost exactly like the Nazi party was in 1938, and are using the same talking points as hitler did to appeal to the masses. If you don't know that you are really just building your OWN history in a fantasy world.
You mean the Democrats are talking about taking Czechoslovakia?
 
1. There is no "far right" in this country.
Yet....the very same folks who poke fun at religious Americans, by comparing God with Santa Claus, go on and on.....

"F**k the far right."
MARCO RUBIO: I 'Absolutely' Support Tuition Breaks For Illegal Aliens

'Or Sanders, who does even better against the far right tard candidates'
BUSTED ! – Republican State of Union Response Carried Amnesty Pledge in Spanish Version…

'I bet this will drive the far right loons insane:'
Nikki Haley rebukes Trump in State of the Union rebuttal

'Uh.. there is very much a "far right" in this country.'
The Delusional Candidate

'... what the far right reactionaries are posting.'
Another reason Americans WANT to see Obama and Obamacare GO!!!

'...for some time now the most and loudest noise has come from the Far Right.'
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"...how insane the far right is."
Yes, You're A Communist






2. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.




3. It is a well know axiom that, to see what the Left is doing, note what they are blaming the other side of doing.
One regularly sees the Leftists, Liberals, Progressives, Democrats, whatever....railing against the "Far Right," using "Far Right" as a pejorative, an imprecation.
And....BTW.....there certainly is a Far Left.


But I'll prove that "Far Right" doesn't exist.

Do you not know of people like Stephen "Don" Black, Preston Wigginton, David Duke then? They're in the US and they're far right. The former was a member of the US Nazi Party.. just in case you think he's not far right.

He runs Stormfront, you can find a lot of far right racists hanging out there.
You are obviously unaware that NAZI is the acronym for National Socialist German Workers' Party. Leftist values, not conservative.

You're obviously unaware Democratic People's Republic of North Korea is not a republic, not democratic and the government doesn't have much to do with the people either.

You're obviously unaware that the Federal Republic of Somalia doesn't even really have much in the way of politics at all.

A name is a name.

Also, just for your information, NAZI has "National Socialist", it did not have "Socialist".

National Socialism is different to socialism. There's a reason why the "National" comes first.

The main thing about National Socialism is that it was a Pan-Germanic nationalism. It wanted all the Germanic peoples together under one roof. That was Austria, Parts of Switzerland, Germany, parts of surrounding areas where there were German people.

The socialism part came from the Volksgemeinschaft, people's community.

Volksgemeinschaft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"
Volksgemeinschaft (German pronunciation: [ˈfɔlksɡəˌmaɪnʃaft]) is a German expression meaning "people's community".[1] This expression originally became popular during World War I as Germans rallied in support of the war, and it appealed to the idea of breaking down elitism and uniting people across class divides to achieve a national purpose."

The guy who more or less invented this, opposed the Nazis.

This Volksgemeinschaft was changed by Hitler into something else,

Yes, this did include things like welfare, but that alone doesn't make it Socialism.

There were parts of Socialism in the Nazi regime, but there are parts of socialism in the USA, that doesn't make it the United Socialists of America, does it?
You forget the NAZIs practiced socialism. They took from who they felt was wealthy and redistributed the wealth.
1. There is no "far right" in this country.
Yet....the very same folks who poke fun at religious Americans, by comparing God with Santa Claus, go on and on.....

"F**k the far right."
MARCO RUBIO: I 'Absolutely' Support Tuition Breaks For Illegal Aliens

'Or Sanders, who does even better against the far right tard candidates'
BUSTED ! – Republican State of Union Response Carried Amnesty Pledge in Spanish Version…

'I bet this will drive the far right loons insane:'
Nikki Haley rebukes Trump in State of the Union rebuttal

'Uh.. there is very much a "far right" in this country.'
The Delusional Candidate

'... what the far right reactionaries are posting.'
Another reason Americans WANT to see Obama and Obamacare GO!!!

'...for some time now the most and loudest noise has come from the Far Right.'
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"...how insane the far right is."
Yes, You're A Communist






2. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.




3. It is a well know axiom that, to see what the Left is doing, note what they are blaming the other side of doing.
One regularly sees the Leftists, Liberals, Progressives, Democrats, whatever....railing against the "Far Right," using "Far Right" as a pejorative, an imprecation.
And....BTW.....there certainly is a Far Left.


But I'll prove that "Far Right" doesn't exist.

Do you not know of people like Stephen "Don" Black, Preston Wigginton, David Duke then? They're in the US and they're far right. The former was a member of the US Nazi Party.. just in case you think he's not far right.

He runs Stormfront, you can find a lot of far right racists hanging out there.
You are obviously unaware that NAZI is the acronym for National Socialist German Workers' Party. Leftist values, not conservative.

You're obviously unaware Democratic People's Republic of North Korea is not a republic, not democratic and the government doesn't have much to do with the people either.

You're obviously unaware that the Federal Republic of Somalia doesn't even really have much in the way of politics at all.

A name is a name.

Also, just for your information, NAZI has "National Socialist", it did not have "Socialist".

National Socialism is different to socialism. There's a reason why the "National" comes first.

The main thing about National Socialism is that it was a Pan-Germanic nationalism. It wanted all the Germanic peoples together under one roof. That was Austria, Parts of Switzerland, Germany, parts of surrounding areas where there were German people.

The socialism part came from the Volksgemeinschaft, people's community.

Volksgemeinschaft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"
Volksgemeinschaft (German pronunciation: [ˈfɔlksɡəˌmaɪnʃaft]) is a German expression meaning "people's community".[1] This expression originally became popular during World War I as Germans rallied in support of the war, and it appealed to the idea of breaking down elitism and uniting people across class divides to achieve a national purpose."

The guy who more or less invented this, opposed the Nazis.

This Volksgemeinschaft was changed by Hitler into something else,

Yes, this did include things like welfare, but that alone doesn't make it Socialism.

There were parts of Socialism in the Nazi regime, but there are parts of socialism in the USA, that doesn't make it the United Socialists of America, does it?
You forget the NAZIs practiced socialism. They took from who they felt was wealthy and redistributed the wealth. The economy was government controlled, there was no free capitalist market.

No, I didn't forget this, I stated that there were elements of Socialism in Nazi Germany, just as there are elements of this in the USA.

The economy was controlled heavily. That doesn't mean that the govt owned everything. They simply told people what to do. Ever seen Schindler's List? Schindler owned a company. In Nazi Germany.
 
The dimocrats are almost exactly like the Nazi party was in 1938, and are using the same talking points as hitler did to appeal to the masses. If you don't know that you are really just building your OWN history in a fantasy world.

Almost exactly like? Er.... you need to go do some history.

What talking points are they using that Hitler used? Please, use quotes to show us.
 
The D party has fallen so far to the left, that their kooky followers think the progressive R party are a bunch of radical right wingers.

One need only research the speeches and policies of JFK to see how far left the D party has fallen. JFK is so conservative the R party wouldn't nominate him today.

You lie. JFK was no conservative.
Yet another Lib who does not know history.

Read this book...well if you read books.
Amazon.com: JFK, Conservative (9780547585987): Ira Stoll: Books


"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges." Coulter

JFK was a liberal.

If you want to prove otherwise, challenge me in a one on one debate.
He is NOT a liberal by today's standards. He believed in limited gov, free markets, low taxation, strong defense, etc...all things libs despise today. Just as the Ds shit on Jim Webb, they would do the same to JFK today.

If you bother to be objective for once, you would realize the D party has moved way left since JFK...and so has the R party.

All you need do is compare JFK and Big Ears state of the union speeches...but then you being the fanatical left wing partisan are unable to objectively compare anything.
 
The D party has fallen so far to the left, that their kooky followers think the progressive R party are a bunch of radical right wingers.

One need only research the speeches and policies of JFK to see how far left the D party has fallen. JFK is so conservative the R party wouldn't nominate him today.

Maybe you need some perspective. Go look at left parties in Europe, and then say whether you think the Democrats are left or not.
Absurd.

Because western Europe is more leftist and the USA, it is all okay. Is that your conclusion?

How about China or Cuba?
 
The D party has fallen so far to the left, that their kooky followers think the progressive R party are a bunch of radical right wingers.

One need only research the speeches and policies of JFK to see how far left the D party has fallen. JFK is so conservative the R party wouldn't nominate him today.

Maybe you need some perspective. Go look at left parties in Europe, and then say whether you think the Democrats are left or not.
Absurd.

Because western Europe is more leftist and the USA, it is all okay. Is that your conclusion?

How about China or Cuba?

I didn't make any comment about whether it was okay or not. I made a comment on whether the left in the US had "fallen so far to the left".......

I disagree with you. I don't think they've fallen so far to the left at all.
 
The D party has fallen so far to the left, that their kooky followers think the progressive R party are a bunch of radical right wingers.

One need only research the speeches and policies of JFK to see how far left the D party has fallen. JFK is so conservative the R party wouldn't nominate him today.

Maybe you need some perspective. Go look at left parties in Europe, and then say whether you think the Democrats are left or not.
Absurd.

Because western Europe is more leftist and the USA, it is all okay. Is that your conclusion?

How about China or Cuba?

I didn't make any comment about whether it was okay or not. I made a comment on whether the left in the US had "fallen so far to the left".......

I disagree with you. I don't think they've fallen so far to the left at all.
Yes you disagreed based on Europe being even more left. Europe means nothing to the debate.

The D party is far more leftist today than it was just 20 years ago. Disputing this fact can only mean one is not informed.
 
The D party has fallen so far to the left, that their kooky followers think the progressive R party are a bunch of radical right wingers.

One need only research the speeches and policies of JFK to see how far left the D party has fallen. JFK is so conservative the R party wouldn't nominate him today.

Maybe you need some perspective. Go look at left parties in Europe, and then say whether you think the Democrats are left or not.
Absurd.

Because western Europe is more leftist and the USA, it is all okay. Is that your conclusion?

How about China or Cuba?

I didn't make any comment about whether it was okay or not. I made a comment on whether the left in the US had "fallen so far to the left".......

I disagree with you. I don't think they've fallen so far to the left at all.
Yes you disagreed based on Europe being even more left. Europe means nothing to the debate.

The D party is far more leftist today than it was just 20 years ago. Disputing this fact can only mean one is not informed.

Oh, it means nothing to the debate because you decide that is so. I disagree.

Maybe the Democrats are more left than they were. That's not what was said. What was said was how far left they have fallen. I'd say they are not that far left, just because they may have moved to the left, doesn't mean they have fallen far to the left.
 
The D party has fallen so far to the left, that their kooky followers think the progressive R party are a bunch of radical right wingers.

One need only research the speeches and policies of JFK to see how far left the D party has fallen. JFK is so conservative the R party wouldn't nominate him today.

You lie. JFK was no conservative.
Yet another Lib who does not know history.

Read this book...well if you read books.
Amazon.com: JFK, Conservative (9780547585987): Ira Stoll: Books


"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges." Coulter
Yeah, quoting coulter doesn't help you.



"Yeah, quoting coulter doesn't help you."
Really?

Most Liberals never let their ignorance stand in the way of their firm beliefs.

Take Queen Ann, for example.....You have a firm negative opinion.....

So.....how many of her dozen best scholarly and well documented sellers have you read?



Or....did you just prove her quote perfectly apt?

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges." Coulter
 
What talking points of hitlers are they NOT using. I know the history, you must be reading the rewritten indoctrination version of history.
 
The D party has fallen so far to the left, that their kooky followers think the progressive R party are a bunch of radical right wingers.

One need only research the speeches and policies of JFK to see how far left the D party has fallen. JFK is so conservative the R party wouldn't nominate him today.

Maybe you need some perspective. Go look at left parties in Europe, and then say whether you think the Democrats are left or not.
Absurd.

Because western Europe is more leftist and the USA, it is all okay. Is that your conclusion?

How about China or Cuba?

I didn't make any comment about whether it was okay or not. I made a comment on whether the left in the US had "fallen so far to the left".......

I disagree with you. I don't think they've fallen so far to the left at all.
Yes you disagreed based on Europe being even more left. Europe means nothing to the debate.

The D party is far more leftist today than it was just 20 years ago. Disputing this fact can only mean one is not informed.

Oh, it means nothing to the debate because you decide that is so. I disagree.

Maybe the Democrats are more left than they were. That's not what was said. What was said was how far left they have fallen. I'd say they are not that far left, just because they may have moved to the left, doesn't mean they have fallen far to the left.
Now you want to argue 'fallen left' or 'moved to the left.' WTF!

Just compare the inaugural and SOTU speeches of big ears and JFK. If you can't conclude from those speeches that your beloved party is fallen to the left, then you are beyond help.

Just the mere fact that a crazed socialist might win your party's nomination this year, ought to tell you something...but I have my doubts.
 
Maybe you need some perspective. Go look at left parties in Europe, and then say whether you think the Democrats are left or not.
Absurd.

Because western Europe is more leftist and the USA, it is all okay. Is that your conclusion?

How about China or Cuba?

I didn't make any comment about whether it was okay or not. I made a comment on whether the left in the US had "fallen so far to the left".......

I disagree with you. I don't think they've fallen so far to the left at all.
Yes you disagreed based on Europe being even more left. Europe means nothing to the debate.

The D party is far more leftist today than it was just 20 years ago. Disputing this fact can only mean one is not informed.

Oh, it means nothing to the debate because you decide that is so. I disagree.

Maybe the Democrats are more left than they were. That's not what was said. What was said was how far left they have fallen. I'd say they are not that far left, just because they may have moved to the left, doesn't mean they have fallen far to the left.
Now you want to argue 'fallen left' or 'moved to the left.' WTF!

Just compare the inaugural and SOTU speeches of big ears and JFK. If you can't conclude from those speeches that your beloved party is fallen to the left, then you are beyond help.

Just the mere fact that a crazed socialist might win your party's nomination this year, ought to tell you something...but I have my doubts.

What I'm saying is that you said something, I replied to what you said, then you disagree with what I said claiming you said something different to what you said.

How am I supposed to deal with this? I can't reply to what you THINK you wrote.

Actually have a socialist might just be the same as having an entertaining in the Republican Party, people are getting annoyed with the status quo but don't know how to express this. Same happened in the UK with Corbyn.
 
In the vast black orb between PC/s ears how would she describe the Sovereign Citizens in Oregon? Far left? Commies or progressives? Democrats?

98 pages wasted on a thread posted by a troll is way too many.
 

Forum List

Back
Top