The following story demonstrates the effects of institutional racism...
.
There's NO such thing as "Institutional Racism", it's just a default word blacks/leftists can use on ALL whites who are Not Racists instead of acknowledging the Elephant-in-the-Room.... black genetic issues: mainly Low IQ on avg.

There is in fact, "Institutional Affirmative Action", in Social/Poverty Spending, College Admissions, Hiring Quotas, etc, etc.


`
You forgot to begin your sentence with "In my [uninformed] opinion..."

And I find it very interesting that you understand the concept of "institutional" when it comes to affirmative action which is race neutral yet apparently can't put 2 and 2 together when it comes to legislation that specifically elevates the rights of whites over blacks or specifically restricts the rights of blacks while giving whites a pass

The term "affirmative action" was first used in the United States in "Executive Order No. 10925",[9] signed by President John F. Kennedy on 6 March 1961, which included a provision that government contractors "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin"​

How is that possible, that you can see one situation as institutional which is not race based yet cannot see the other as institutional when it's specifically race based?
 
The following story demonstrates the effects of institutional racism...
.
There's NO such thing as "Institutional Racism", it's just a default word blacks/leftists can use on ALL whites who are Not Racists instead of acknowledging the Elephant-in-the-Room.... black genetic issues: mainly Low IQ on avg.

There is in fact, "Institutional Affirmative Action", in Social/Poverty Spending, College Admissions, Hiring Quotas, etc, etc.


`
You forgot to begin your sentence with "In my [uninformed] opinion..."

And I find it very interesting that you understand the concept of "institutional" when it comes to affirmative action which is race neutral yet apparently can't put 2 and 2 together when it comes to legislation that specifically elevates the rights of whites over blacks or specifically restricts the rights of blacks while giving whites a pass

The term "affirmative action" was first used in the United States in "Executive Order No. 10925",[9] signed by President John F. Kennedy on 6 March 1961, which included a provision that government contractors "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin"​

How is that possible, that you can see one situation as institutional which is not race based yet cannot see the other as institutional when it's specifically race based?

Don't hurt em like that newsvine!
 
`
The Worst cities for Blacks are all in Africa... where Black GDP is 1/10th of what it is in the USA.
`
 
The following story demonstrates the effects of institutional racism.

"Disparities in socioeconomic measures exist to some degree nationwide. However, in certain cities, gaps in outcomes along racial lines are chasmic. 24/7 Wall St. created an index based on racial disparities in eight socioeconomic measures in U.S. metro areas to identify the worst cities for black Americans.

In an interview with 24/7 Wall St., Camille M. Busette, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, laid out some of the causal factors behind these disparities in the cities on this list. “Looking historically, these are cities where there is a tremendous amount of residential segregation,” Busette said.

The cities on this list are largely concentrated in the Midwest and have long histories of systemic racial segregation. Though about half a century has passed since the Fair Housing Act legally banned discriminatory lending, zoning, and renting practices, such practices persist in much of the country in less overt ways."
The Worst Cities For Black Americans
Now which cities aren’t terrible for white Americans?
 

Forum List

Back
Top