Oddball
Unobtanium Member
- Thread starter
- #81
There are scores of e-mails here that clearly show a pattern of abuse, destruction of contrary evidence, refusal to allow outside assessment of the "research" and outright collusion and conspiracy...Picking one out of the entirety and trying to use it as some sort of linchpin that debunks the rest is just plain daffy.PS, guys, this email doesn't tell you what you think it tells you...
What the email is saying to sex up the graph. You could consider that unethical, but that's not fabricating data. Furthermore, accepting your argument as valid (that they were where playing with the data), what decline was there to cover up? The email was written in 1999, which was the year after the hottest year on record.
Though, not unexpected.