The war on Poverty and how it is affecting the economy.(15 Trillion Dollars spent)

[Markle]

Lets see if this can sink into your sociopathic brain.
Before George Bush 41, all wars after the US was created, were started by Democrats/Liberals/Progressives/Marxists. George Bush 41 & 43 are progressive Republicans, who increased government and also started the Gulf Wars 1 and 2. Today, Barrack Hussein Obama, has been using bombing and cruise missiles in his failed attempt to stop ISIS who was created by the Vagina Candidate, which those bombs and missiles cost US billions, why aren't you bitching about that? If there was no military , there wouldn't be a country for those on welfare to live in. So we spend billions of dollars for the military, while trillions are spent on entitlements. If we spent more on the military, maybe those on the entitlements would join the military?
Who has been the president of the US for the past 7 years? Why are the most ever in US history in poverty?

Being a veteran I like the military, but I really like to see stuff blowed up..
WWI was not stared by a democrat, neither was WWII, Korea, sorry they attacked the USA....Nam, Eisenhower should not have intervened after the French defeat...Gulf war,Saddam started that war..
You know that many people can't join the military due to physical problems, it's a tough physical job.....
Sociopath? Why thank you, but I never was able to grasp killing animals for fun...or killing my way to the top.......I did use women for sexual gratification...

How many trillions have we spent on actual wars?
What have we gotten out of them?

The war on poverty means actually helping Americans, why would anyone object to that expenditure?

Did anyone actually believe we would reach a point where we have "won" and Americans no longer need help?

First off dumbass, if there wasn't a military we wouldn't have a country to provide for those who don't want to work(are you one of those who don't want to?). While billions are spent in military spending, the social programs that were developed by liberals spent 10-100 times that amount. All we have to show for it is $19,000,000,000,000 in debt. Most in poverty ever, 1 in 5 children going to bed hungry, 33,000 born and unborn children executed on the abortion table, lowest participation rate in education, 50% failure rate of those that do participate, inner cities on fire and....... The next president is going to inherit a mess from Obama that may take a century to fix.

Actually we can defend our shore with one tenth the military we have today. We have not seen a foreign invader in 200 years. Two huge oceans will do that

The money we spend on a military to police the world comes out of money we could spend on modern infrastructure, education, healthcare and feeding our poor

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

 

[rightwinger]

Being a veteran I like the military, but I really like to see stuff blowed up..
WWI was not stared by a democrat, neither was WWII, Korea, sorry they attacked the USA....Nam, Eisenhower should not have intervened after the French defeat...Gulf war,Saddam started that war..
You know that many people can't join the military due to physical problems, it's a tough physical job.....
Sociopath? Why thank you, but I never was able to grasp killing animals for fun...or killing my way to the top.......I did use women for sexual gratification...

How many trillions have we spent on actual wars?
What have we gotten out of them?

The war on poverty means actually helping Americans, why would anyone object to that expenditure?

Did anyone actually believe we would reach a point where we have "won" and Americans no longer need help?

First off dumbass, if there wasn't a military we wouldn't have a country to provide for those who don't want to work(are you one of those who don't want to?). While billions are spent in military spending, the social programs that were developed by liberals spent 10-100 times that amount. All we have to show for it is $19,000,000,000,000 in debt. Most in poverty ever, 1 in 5 children going to bed hungry, 33,000 born and unborn children executed on the abortion table, lowest participation rate in education, 50% failure rate of those that do participate, inner cities on fire and....... The next president is going to inherit a mess from Obama that may take a century to fix.

Actually we can defend our shore with one tenth the military we have today. We have not seen a foreign invader in 200 years. Two huge oceans will do that

The money we spend on a military to police the world comes out of money we could spend on modern infrastructure, education, healthcare and feeding our poor

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

 

[Markle]

First off dumbass, if there wasn't a military we wouldn't have a country to provide for those who don't want to work(are you one of those who don't want to?). While billions are spent in military spending, the social programs that were developed by liberals spent 10-100 times that amount. All we have to show for it is $19,000,000,000,000 in debt. Most in poverty ever, 1 in 5 children going to bed hungry, 33,000 born and unborn children executed on the abortion table, lowest participation rate in education, 50% failure rate of those that do participate, inner cities on fire and....... The next president is going to inherit a mess from Obama that may take a century to fix.

Actually we can defend our shore with one tenth the military we have today. We have not seen a foreign invader in 200 years. Two huge oceans will do that

The money we spend on a military to police the world comes out of money we could spend on modern infrastructure, education, healthcare and feeding our poor

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

."
What does this even mean? Quote from you. "All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world."

As you know, the vast majority of roads, bridges, and water distribution are all LOCAL matters. Yes, our power grid is extremely vulnerable to a terrorist attack. What has Lame Duck President Obama proposed for our power grid?

 

[Markle]

First off dumbass, if there wasn't a military we wouldn't have a country to provide for those who don't want to work(are you one of those who don't want to?). While billions are spent in military spending, the social programs that were developed by liberals spent 10-100 times that amount. All we have to show for it is $19,000,000,000,000 in debt. Most in poverty ever, 1 in 5 children going to bed hungry, 33,000 born and unborn children executed on the abortion table, lowest participation rate in education, 50% failure rate of those that do participate, inner cities on fire and....... The next president is going to inherit a mess from Obama that may take a century to fix.

Actually we can defend our shore with one tenth the military we have today. We have not seen a foreign invader in 200 years. Two huge oceans will do that

The money we spend on a military to police the world comes out of money we could spend on modern infrastructure, education, healthcare and feeding our poor

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

Your quote: "Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars".
Benjamin Franklin

November 27-29 1766


“I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, I observed in different countries that the more public provision were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And on the contrary, the less was done for them the more they did for themselves and became richer.”

 

[Muhammed]

So when the GOP is in control they are intimidated by democrats?
They can declare war and spend trillions, but cower to take away the trillion in welfare.....
Sounds like a lack of your convictions..

History proves beyond any doubt that the Democrats are the war mongers and slave drivers. They enslave people and use them as cannon fodder.

The US lost more people at war in a single day under Democrat control than were lost in the entire history of Republican control. And the Democrats enslave people and send them to war over issues that have absolutely nothing to do with US National security.

THINK!

 

[Slyhunter]

Actually we can defend our shore with one tenth the military we have today. We have not seen a foreign invader in 200 years. Two huge oceans will do that

The money we spend on a military to police the world comes out of money we could spend on modern infrastructure, education, healthcare and feeding our poor

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

Your quote: "Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars".
Benjamin Franklin

November 27-29 1766


“I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, I observed in different countries that the more public provision were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And on the contrary, the less was done for them the more they did for themselves and became richer.”

That was true prior our automating all the means to do so leaving them with no hope.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

First off dumbass, if there wasn't a military we wouldn't have a country to provide for those who don't want to work(are you one of those who don't want to?). While billions are spent in military spending, the social programs that were developed by liberals spent 10-100 times that amount. All we have to show for it is $19,000,000,000,000 in debt. Most in poverty ever, 1 in 5 children going to bed hungry, 33,000 born and unborn children executed on the abortion table, lowest participation rate in education, 50% failure rate of those that do participate, inner cities on fire and....... The next president is going to inherit a mess from Obama that may take a century to fix.

Actually we can defend our shore with one tenth the military we have today. We have not seen a foreign invader in 200 years. Two huge oceans will do that

The money we spend on a military to police the world comes out of money we could spend on modern infrastructure, education, healthcare and feeding our poor

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

Did you know that George Bush 43 was an establish republican that pissed of Conservative with his reaching across the aisle to screw America? I never said "Nation Building", I said defense. We need a strong military, for without that, we wouldn't be a country. So lets take useless money, give it to liberal schlobs, who sit in their parents basement, typing on political boards, bitching and moaning they cant get a fair shake, when the schlob voted for Obama not once but twice, thinking the messiah was going to make his life better with Hope and Change. Such stupid people vote Dumbocrat and expect their lives to get better. Liberalism is all about equality, when everyone(except the liberal elites) is equally poor and equally miserable, then the liberals have succeeded in FAIRNESS.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

First off dumbass, if there wasn't a military we wouldn't have a country to provide for those who don't want to work(are you one of those who don't want to?). While billions are spent in military spending, the social programs that were developed by liberals spent 10-100 times that amount. All we have to show for it is $19,000,000,000,000 in debt. Most in poverty ever, 1 in 5 children going to bed hungry, 33,000 born and unborn children executed on the abortion table, lowest participation rate in education, 50% failure rate of those that do participate, inner cities on fire and....... The next president is going to inherit a mess from Obama that may take a century to fix.

Actually we can defend our shore with one tenth the military we have today. We have not seen a foreign invader in 200 years. Two huge oceans will do that

The money we spend on a military to police the world comes out of money we could spend on modern infrastructure, education, healthcare and feeding our poor

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

After 7 1/2 years why are they still substandard, when 1 trillion dollars when to shovel ready jobs, that weren't really shovel ready? Liberals are as dumb as the Radical Left Wing Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorists.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Here is a mathematical equation on what $1 trillion dollars looks like to a normal person.

If you spent $1 a second, how long would it take you to spend $1,000,000,000,000(1 Trillion Dollars)?
$1 x 60 seconds = $60 a minute.
$60 x 60 minutes = $360 an hour.
$360 x 24 hours = $8,640 a day
$8,640 x 365 = $3,153,600 a year. (That is over 3 million dollars in a year.)
$3,153,600 x 10,000 years = $31,536,000,000 10,000 years. (over 31 billion dollars but not yet 1 trillion)
Over 33,000 years it would take one person to spend 1 trillion dollars yet the government has spent 15 times that since 1963 and today, we have the most in poverty ever.

Who has been the president of the US for the past 7 years?

When liberals find that a Republican policy doesn't work, the liberals want to get rid of that policy. When a Democrat policy doesn't work, the liberals double down on it, making it fail more. Liberals believe everyone should be equal, equally poor and equally miserable. The vagina candidate wants to make more people equal.

Hillary: Why Yes My Proposals Require a $1 Trillion Tax Hike

Hillary: Why Yes My Proposals Require a $1 Trillion Tax Hike

View attachment 71854

1 other thing about why I posted this math test.
If it takes 1 human to spent 1 trillion dollars over 33,000 years, why was it that 15 times that, and still with a Socialist white black president in office, the most ever in the history of the US, have been put in poverty?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

First off dumbass, if there wasn't a military we wouldn't have a country to provide for those who don't want to work(are you one of those who don't want to?). While billions are spent in military spending, the social programs that were developed by liberals spent 10-100 times that amount. All we have to show for it is $19,000,000,000,000 in debt. Most in poverty ever, 1 in 5 children going to bed hungry, 33,000 born and unborn children executed on the abortion table, lowest participation rate in education, 50% failure rate of those that do participate, inner cities on fire and....... The next president is going to inherit a mess from Obama that may take a century to fix.

Actually we can defend our shore with one tenth the military we have today. We have not seen a foreign invader in 200 years. Two huge oceans will do that

The money we spend on a military to police the world comes out of money we could spend on modern infrastructure, education, healthcare and feeding our poor

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

Does your helping Americans involve the illegal horde that has crossed the border taking away resources and funds that normally would of helped US citizens? Healthcare? Education? Why are Dumbocrats all about party first and not to help those in need? Because liberals hate everyone, even themselves, so must punish everyone for being alive.

 

[rightwinger]

Actually we can defend our shore with one tenth the military we have today. We have not seen a foreign invader in 200 years. Two huge oceans will do that

The money we spend on a military to police the world comes out of money we could spend on modern infrastructure, education, healthcare and feeding our poor

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

."
What does this even mean? Quote from you. "All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world."

As you know, the vast majority of roads, bridges, and water distribution are all LOCAL matters. Yes, our power grid is extremely vulnerable to a terrorist attack. What has Lame Duck President Obama proposed for our power grid?

Doesn't matter if it is state, local or federal...it is still tax dollars going overseas

Federal money has always "trickled down" to help pay for major infrastructure improvements in the form of grants

Our power grid is ancient and inefficient. Beyond being vulnerable, it lacks the backups and efficient re routing around breakages

 

[rightwinger]

Actually we can defend our shore with one tenth the military we have today. We have not seen a foreign invader in 200 years. Two huge oceans will do that

The money we spend on a military to police the world comes out of money we could spend on modern infrastructure, education, healthcare and feeding our poor

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

After 7 1/2 years why are they still substandard, when 1 trillion dollars when to shovel ready jobs, that weren't really shovel ready? Liberals are as dumb as the Radical Left Wing Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorists.

It was around $300 billion that went to short term shovel ready jobs. By definition, shovel ready is not a major infrastructure investment

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

After 7 1/2 years why are they still substandard, when 1 trillion dollars when to shovel ready jobs, that weren't really shovel ready? Liberals are as dumb as the Radical Left Wing Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorists.

It was around $300 trillion that went to short term shovel ready jobs. By definition, shovel ready is not a major infrastructure investment

Was that 300 trillion dollars added to the debt or just printed with Obama dollars?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

."
What does this even mean? Quote from you. "All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world."

As you know, the vast majority of roads, bridges, and water distribution are all LOCAL matters. Yes, our power grid is extremely vulnerable to a terrorist attack. What has Lame Duck President Obama proposed for our power grid?

Doesn't matter if it is state, local or federal...it is still tax dollars going overseas

Federal money has always "trickled down" to help pay for major infrastructure improvements in the form of grants

Our power grid is ancient and inefficient. Beyond being vulnerable, it lacks the backups and efficient re routing around breakages

At one time, before the liberal regulations started castrating the power companies did their own power grid operation and repairs, they did such a great job that everyone was happy. Of course this pissed off the liberals because anyone happy must be punished because a liberal loser isn't. So the government takes over and now we get the shit of a country that the fundamental transformation gets with Hope and Change. Such stupid people who vote dumbocrat.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The richest woman in Venezuela is Hugo Chavez's daughter

• Diario las Americas claims that Maria Gabriela Chavez, 35, has $4.2billion in assets held in American and Andorran banks

• Hugo Chavez famously declared 'being rich is bad' and during his lifetime railed against the wealthy for being lazy and gluttonous

• Efforts to determine Chavez's wealth have been made before, without much luck

• It happens everytime when socialism/liberalism/Marxism/fascism/progressivism is enacted in a country. Everyone else must be poor and miserable, but those in charge get millions and billions of dollars. You dumbass liberals want government cheese and shit healthcare, you got it, want to be like Venezuela? Vote for the Vagina candidate. Clintons are worth 150 billion dollars, have you received any of that money? Not one cent. Stupid people vote dumbocrat.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

So when the GOP is in control they are intimidated by democrats?
They can declare war and spend trillions, but cower to take away the trillion in welfare.....
Sounds like a lack of your convictions..

sounds like a lack of support from electorate, media, academy, hollywood,etc. Obviously if there was enough support it would be done instantly!!

 

[Markle]

PLEASE be SPECIFIC, who would fill the vacuum?

Russia, China, Iran or North Korea?

As you know, we are now, and will forever be a WORLD ECONOMY. So please tell us how anyone else filling the vacuum is good for America and our citizens.

Don't say no one, or let everyone take care of themselves. That's a typical Progressive diversion, dodge, whatever you want to call it?

Lame Duck President Obama has simply shown his impotence and timidity and Russia has taken over Crimea and has tanks and combat troops in Ukraine. China is building Islands for combat troops and air bases in the contested islands in the China Sea. North Korea's people are starving and he is doing nuclear testing and launching missiles from submarines. Iran is building a nuclear weapon and the Middle East has exploded since President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's foreign policy failures.

Who would fill the vacuum

EU, S Korea, Japan

All have more social programs and more modern infrastructure because they can lean on us to defend them

Please explain for us all how having more social programs, making citizens dependent on government instead of personal responsibility a good thing?

The question, by the way, is who would fill the vacuum and how would that be great for America?

What "modern infrastructure" does the EU, South Korea or Japan have which we do not.

Please do not go to high-speed rail. The only one in the US that pays its way is the Acela line in the NE with about 40 million potential riders along the line. Any others in the US are losing money as are most in Europe and Japan. If anything, we should expand and improve our FREIGHT lines.

Because helping Americans who need help is a better use of our tax dollars than nation building and propping up foreign empires
Our infrastructure problems go beyond high speed rail......it includes roads, bridges, communications and power grids, water distribution
All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world

."
What does this even mean? Quote from you. "All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world."

As you know, the vast majority of roads, bridges, and water distribution are all LOCAL matters. Yes, our power grid is extremely vulnerable to a terrorist attack. What has Lame Duck President Obama proposed for our power grid?

Doesn't matter if it is state, local or federal...it is still tax dollars going overseas

Federal money has always "trickled down" to help pay for major infrastructure improvements in the form of grants

Our power grid is ancient and inefficient. Beyond being vulnerable, it lacks the backups and efficient re routing around breakages

So now we have reached a point where it doesn't matter where the tax payers money comes from? Amusing.

Here in Tallahassee, Florida, we have added a major new road joining two northern areas of the county and cutting a great deal of time between the two areas. It was financed by bonds and has a nominal toll to pay for the construction.

Our Capital Circle, originally a truck route running around 3/4th of the outskirts of the city. It was two lanes and has been enlarged to a 4 lane divided lighted highway. It is a Federal Highway. A major subdivision is being built in the SE section of the CC. Florida has a concurrency law that requires developers, in other words, the homeowners in that area, to pay for the needed infrastructure. That massive (for us) cost has been paid for by bonds. Those bonds are being paid from monthly payments by the homeowners of that area to our tax collector over the next 15 years.

Florida is fiscally sound including our government retirement plan, one of the few in the nation. Leon County is a progressive county as the state capital and two universities, a major community college and a major technical school. Yet our state has a Republican governor, house, and senate.

You failed to answer a question I posed. Let me post it again for your convenience.

What does this even mean? Quote from you. "All are substandard...what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world."

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

..what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world."

we are the world's policeman so we have to spend the most. Imagine how peaceful the world would be if we spent 100%

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The richest woman in Venezuela is Hugo Chavez's daughter

• Diario las Americas claims that Maria Gabriela Chavez, 35, has $4.2billion in assets held in American and Andorran banks

• Hugo Chavez famously declared 'being rich is bad' and during his lifetime railed against the wealthy for being lazy and gluttonous

• Efforts to determine Chavez's wealth have been made before, without much luck

• It happens everytime when socialism/liberalism/Marxism/fascism/progressivism is enacted in a country. Everyone else must be poor and miserable, but those in charge get millions and billions of dollars. You dumbass liberals want government cheese and shit healthcare, you got it, want to be like Venezuela? Vote for the Vagina candidate. Clintons are worth 150 billion dollars, have you received any of that money? Not one cent. Stupid people vote dumbocrat.

I apologize for mistaking the wealth of the Clintons, it is 150 million dollars. Still how much has the dipshit liberal received from the redistribution of wealth that Obama promised? How is that Hope and Change.....

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

..what you expect when you spend 47 cents on every military dollar in the world."

we are the world's policeman so we have to spend the most. Imagine how peaceful the world would be if we spent 100%

How peaceful the world would of been if the liberals didn't put restrictions on our military to provide peace. If America could of crossed the 39th parallel, the Korean war would of ended differently. The Vietnam war might of never happened. If the Radical Islamic Fundamentalist who took the Iran embassy were bombed to hell, then the uprising that Jimmy(the peanut) Carter would of been put down, instead of the Air Force having to stand down(I know I was there with the F-4s fully loaded but stopped by the spineless weiner). If more people were FORCED to join the military instead of sitting in their parents basement collecting welfare, then the economy of the US would be a much better place, but since the citizens were FORCED to buy unaffordable healthcare, that just put more people into poverty. Liberals are the dumbest people on the planet.