The Trump Confession To Article II Of Impeachment(?)! (Really Public, Too!)

[CrusaderFrank]

But what has been admitted is hardly the point. It's pretty much conceded Individual1 has done everything alleged. Neither the Republican Senate nor his base cares.

So McConnell is NOT suppressing the evidence, correct?

 

[cnm]

So McConnell is NOT suppressing the evidence, correct?

Of course McConnell is suppressing more evidence. He's trying to reduce his colleagues' embarrassment. No amount of evidence will change the result of this process. As I said, pretty much everyone concedes Individual1 has done all that is alleged, both he and others have admitted it on tv but the Republican senators and his base don't care.

You don't care do you? I mean, you're perfectly happy for further evidence of Individual1's guilt to be suppressed to minimise embarrassment but it won't make any difference to your position if it's revealed to the world. You don't care about Individual1's abuse of power.

It isn't a great mystery.

 

[Lesh]

“Honestly, we have all the material. They don’t have the material,” the president told reporters in Davos, Switzerland

Let the American Public see this evidence

 

[Crepitus]

The president can invoke executive privilege in order to withhold some internal executive branch communications from the other branches of government

Some, not all.

How is he withholding ALL evidence when you're telling us that you have an airtight case complete with overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence?

There's a big disconnect somewhere

Don't be stupider than you have to be, son.

 

[The VOR]

I thought the House had incontrovertible evidence??? Were they lying?

They do.

No. Lying is what trump does every time he speaks.

 

[The VOR]

Does John Donald Trump ever get his facts straight?

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(". . .Thy Kingdom Come, Thy will be done. . ." (Matt 25:14-30)

Only his alternative facts.

 

[The VOR]

Does John Donald Trump ever get his facts straight?

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(". . .Thy Kingdom Come, Thy will be done. . ." (Matt 25:14-30)

Where's the incontrovertible evidence?

You won't find it on trump TV, that's for sure. But I'm guessing that's pretty much all you watch.

 

[Polishprince]

Apparently one of the staffers of one of the House Managers finally upstaged a Trump Tweet! Regarding the documents supportive of the House Impeachment Articles: "The second article of impeachment was for obstruction of Congress: Covering up witnesses and documents from the American people. This morning the President not only confessed to it, he bragged about it."

Contempt of Congress in fact is a standard criminal charge (aka, crime), in the United States. Putin can do what he wants, just comparing.

Trump Admits to Withholding Evidence From Impeachment Inquiry

________________________
"President Trump appeared to admit Wednesday that he is comfortable with how his impeachment trial is playing out in the Senate—because the White House is withholding evidence about his dealings with Ukraine. “Honestly, we have all the material. They don’t have the material,” the president told reporters in Davos, Switzerland, where he is attending the World Economic Forum, regarding the documents the White House has refused to turn over. “When we released that conversation, all hell broke out with the Democrats because they say, wait a minute, this is much different than shifty Schiff told us, so we’re doing very well. I got to watch enough, I thought our team did a very good job,” Trump said, referencing House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA), who has spearheaded the House impeachment inquiry against the president."

"Rep. Val Demings (D-FL), one of the seven congressional impeachment managers, blasted Trump’s admission on Twitter, writing, 'The second article of impeachment was for obstruction of Congress: covering up witnesses and documents from the American people. This morning the President not only confessed to it, he bragged about it.'"

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Moses had the audacity to ascribe Pharaoh's subjugation math to a deity, even, (Deut 23: 19-20))

So what?

Obstruction of Congress isn't a crime at all, much less a high crime.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Apparently one of the staffers of one of the House Managers finally upstaged a Trump Tweet! Regarding the documents supportive of the House Impeachment Articles: "The second article of impeachment was for obstruction of Congress: Covering up witnesses and documents from the American people. This morning the President not only confessed to it, he bragged about it."

Contempt of Congress in fact is a standard criminal charge (aka, crime), in the United States. Putin can do what he wants, just comparing.

Trump Admits to Withholding Evidence From Impeachment Inquiry

________________________
"President Trump appeared to admit Wednesday that he is comfortable with how his impeachment trial is playing out in the Senate—because the White House is withholding evidence about his dealings with Ukraine. “Honestly, we have all the material. They don’t have the material,” the president told reporters in Davos, Switzerland, where he is attending the World Economic Forum, regarding the documents the White House has refused to turn over. “When we released that conversation, all hell broke out with the Democrats because they say, wait a minute, this is much different than shifty Schiff told us, so we’re doing very well. I got to watch enough, I thought our team did a very good job,” Trump said, referencing House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA), who has spearheaded the House impeachment inquiry against the president."

"Rep. Val Demings (D-FL), one of the seven congressional impeachment managers, blasted Trump’s admission on Twitter, writing, 'The second article of impeachment was for obstruction of Congress: covering up witnesses and documents from the American people. This morning the President not only confessed to it, he bragged about it.'"

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Moses had the audacity to ascribe Pharaoh's subjugation math to a deity, even, (Deut 23: 19-20))

/——/ Every President cites Executive Privilege, even Obozo did it.

 

[mascale]

Contempt of Congress is in statute, using obstruction and concealment language. It is even jail time level, as an offense. Then over and over again, Executive Privilege is limited. Contempt cannot violate self-incrimination, so that too: Is Limited. Because of that--many can reason: That is why Executive Privilege is limited.

Contempt of Congress

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("Thy kingdom come, thy will be done. . . ," (Matt 25: 14-30) is fairly intentional and therefore condemning of the prayerful--an example. Problem is that is considered religion, in human rules, though it shows the absence of some loving deity!)

 

[Polishprince]

Contempt of Congress is in statute, using obstruction and concealment language. It is even jail time level, as an offense. Then over and over again, Executive Privilege is limited. Contempt cannot violate self-incrimination, so that too: Is Limited. Because of that--many can reason: That is why Executive Privilege is limited.

Contempt of Congress

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("Thy kingdom come, thy will be done. . . ," (Matt 25: 14-30) is fairly intentional and therefore condemning of the prayerful--an example. Problem is that is considered religion, in human rules, though it shows the absence of some loving deity!)

President Trump isn't accused of "Contempt of Congress", but instead, "Obstruction of Congress".

 

[kyzr]

Contempt of Congress is in statute, using obstruction and concealment language. It is even jail time level, as an offense. Then over and over again, Executive Privilege is limited. Contempt cannot violate self-incrimination, so that too: Is Limited. Because of that--many can reason: That is why Executive Privilege is limited.

Contempt of Congress

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("Thy kingdom come, thy will be done. . . ," (Matt 25: 14-30) is fairly intentional and therefore condemning of the prayerful--an example. Problem is that is considered religion, in human rules, though it shows the absence of some loving deity!)

Contempt of Congress is not what Article-2 is based on. Eric Holder has many "Contempt of Congress" medals. No big deal.

"Obstruction of the House" is what Article-2 is based on, and the USSC killed Article-2 by ruling that Trump does ion-fact have due process rights, when they took the House subpoena for Trump's tax records.

 

[mascale]

The higher-level criminal obstruction even has basis in due process. The witnesses, e.g. Bolton, have Constitutional Rights to offer testimony: Except that the sitting President refused to allow their Civil Rights.

The hate of American Civil liberties--kyzr and Polishprince posters--has no legal standing since Imperial Monarchy is not recognized in Constitution. Personal Civil Rights are recognized in Constitution.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Financial Inclusion via Matt 20: 1-16, thought rarely recognized: Is in statute, has been taken out of additional statute, and is in statute international: E.G. Nigerian Traders Moni!)

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Any minute now...

I do think it is good that we get to vote the democrats out for a good reason.

Democrats have no intention of being voted out. Didn't you hear Schiff yesterday?

 

[mascale]

Obstruction of Proceedings is actually a five-year prison term.

18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(The authenticity of Moses is regarded religious, even: A legend in history(?)!)

 

[Kilroy2]

“Honestly, we have all the material. They don’t have the material,”

So why don't you show us this material Mr President

You're thinking like you're Back in the USSR. In America, no one ever has to prove their innocence.

Maybe Iran Nan sent the 2 non crimes backed with no evidence because she thought she thought she was her beloved USSR

if your Innocent then you have nothing to hide

 

[boedicca]

Apparently one of the staffers of one of the House Managers finally upstaged a Trump Tweet! Regarding the documents supportive of the House Impeachment Articles: "The second article of impeachment was for obstruction of Congress: Covering up witnesses and documents from the American people. This morning the President not only confessed to it, he bragged about it."

Contempt of Congress in fact is a standard criminal charge (aka, crime), in the United States. Putin can do what he wants, just comparing.

Trump Admits to Withholding Evidence From Impeachment Inquiry

________________________
"President Trump appeared to admit Wednesday that he is comfortable with how his impeachment trial is playing out in the Senate—because the White House is withholding evidence about his dealings with Ukraine. “Honestly, we have all the material. They don’t have the material,” the president told reporters in Davos, Switzerland, where he is attending the World Economic Forum, regarding the documents the White House has refused to turn over. “When we released that conversation, all hell broke out with the Democrats because they say, wait a minute, this is much different than shifty Schiff told us, so we’re doing very well. I got to watch enough, I thought our team did a very good job,” Trump said, referencing House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA), who has spearheaded the House impeachment inquiry against the president."

"Rep. Val Demings (D-FL), one of the seven congressional impeachment managers, blasted Trump’s admission on Twitter, writing, 'The second article of impeachment was for obstruction of Congress: covering up witnesses and documents from the American people. This morning the President not only confessed to it, he bragged about it.'"

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Moses had the audacity to ascribe Pharaoh's subjugation math to a deity, even, (Deut 23: 19-20))

Scuze moi, but all Trump has done is to exercise Constitutionally appropriate Executive Privilege. The President is responsible for Foreign Policy, and has the right to keep conversations with other heads of government confidential.

 

[Polishprince]

Apparently one of the staffers of one of the House Managers finally upstaged a Trump Tweet! Regarding the documents supportive of the House Impeachment Articles: "The second article of impeachment was for obstruction of Congress: Covering up witnesses and documents from the American people. This morning the President not only confessed to it, he bragged about it."

Contempt of Congress in fact is a standard criminal charge (aka, crime), in the United States. Putin can do what he wants, just comparing.

Trump Admits to Withholding Evidence From Impeachment Inquiry

________________________
"President Trump appeared to admit Wednesday that he is comfortable with how his impeachment trial is playing out in the Senate—because the White House is withholding evidence about his dealings with Ukraine. “Honestly, we have all the material. They don’t have the material,” the president told reporters in Davos, Switzerland, where he is attending the World Economic Forum, regarding the documents the White House has refused to turn over. “When we released that conversation, all hell broke out with the Democrats because they say, wait a minute, this is much different than shifty Schiff told us, so we’re doing very well. I got to watch enough, I thought our team did a very good job,” Trump said, referencing House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA), who has spearheaded the House impeachment inquiry against the president."

"Rep. Val Demings (D-FL), one of the seven congressional impeachment managers, blasted Trump’s admission on Twitter, writing, 'The second article of impeachment was for obstruction of Congress: covering up witnesses and documents from the American people. This morning the President not only confessed to it, he bragged about it.'"

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Moses had the audacity to ascribe Pharaoh's subjugation math to a deity, even, (Deut 23: 19-20))

Scuze moi, but all Trump has done is to exercise Constitutionally appropriate Executive Privilege. The President is responsible for Foreign Policy, and has the right to keep conversations with other heads of government confidential.

Its essential for the President to have executive privilege as the foreign crowned head need to be able to talk freely as well. Getting an agreement is difficult enough, but when if the leader of Germany or Mexico or Congo thinks their dialogue with America is going to be on the news media, that's a problem.

 

[mascale]

If the foreign governments don't want the US Congress to send them any money, then of course they can ask the President to invoke "Executive Privilege:" So that no hearings on any such money appropriations every be held, no money appropriated to be sent.

Congress holds hearings on Executive Branch requests. Security protocols agreeable to all parties happen routinely.

When the inquiry is obstructed--and into why money was suddenly diverted, or sequestered: "Executive Privilege" is more likely no longer applicable. "Criminal" is not a basis to invoke "Executive Privilege." People can actually go to jail on many matters.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Roman Imperial Administration actually celebrated local religion: And in the name of "Subjugation," if not so-stated directly--using armed force instead!0

 

[CrusaderFrank]

“Honestly, we have all the material. They don’t have the material,”

So why don't you show us this material Mr President

You're thinking like you're Back in the USSR. In America, no one ever has to prove their innocence.

Maybe Iran Nan sent the 2 non crimes backed with no evidence because she thought she thought she was her beloved USSR

if your Innocent then you have nothing to hide

First, that's the opposite of the America Judicial system.

Second, you're saying that Schiff and the Bidens should testify, right?