Remember When The House Was Obstructing Trump/Attorneys From Questioning Whistleblower?,Hmm.

LeeOnLido

Gold Member
Jul 1, 2018
5,703
1,675
190
so why is it OK for the leading Dem's of the house to obstruct Trump from questioning the whistleblower, yet they want to impeach Trump for obstruction of the House?
Anyone see what Chiff had to say today? he kept bringing up obstruction, yet its him and the Dem's that seem to be obstructing any republican from questioning certain witnessess.
:eusa_think: :eusa_think: :eusa_wall: :eusa_shifty: :eusa_think: :eusa_snooty:
 
so why is it OK for the leading Dem's of the house to obstruct Trump from questioning the whistleblower, yet they want to impeach Trump for obstruction of the House?
Anyone see what Chiff had to say today? he kept bringing up obstruction, yet its him and the Dem's that seem to be obstructing any republican from questioning certain witnessess.
:eusa_think: :eusa_think: :eusa_wall: :eusa_shifty: :eusa_think: :eusa_snooty:
The Senate can subpoena him or her anytime, snowflake
 
Why wasn't Trump allowed to confront the whistleblower during the investigation conducted by the House? Because the House does the investigation, and the trial (where Trump could confront his accuser) is done by the Senate.
 
Chiff kept bringing up his whistle blower, yet wont give us his name? Obstruction again?
 
Why wasn't Trump allowed to confront the whistleblower during the investigation conducted by the House? Because the House does the investigation, and the trial (where Trump could confront his accuser) is done by the Senate.
 
so why is it OK for the leading Dem's of the house to obstruct Trump from questioning the whistleblower, yet they want to impeach Trump for obstruction of the House?
Anyone see what Chiff had to say today? he kept bringing up obstruction, yet its him and the Dem's that seem to be obstructing any republican from questioning certain witnessess.
:eusa_think: :eusa_think: :eusa_wall: :eusa_shifty: :eusa_think: :eusa_snooty:

More Monkeys with a Keyboard typing from you.

The Whistleblower is protected from revealing his identity. And the Reps have labored long and hard to try and uncover who that person is. While it may not be illegal, it certain borders on it. Plus, the Whistleblower didn't have first hand knowledge. But he pointed out those that did. That means his testimony is irrelevant and the ONLY reason you and your band of criminals want to know who he/she is is to discourage others from coming forward. And one other reason. It gives you another "Hey, look over there" by a bunch of monkeys with keyboards.
 

Forum List

Back
Top