The true RINO's are the TPM

[bigrebnc1775]

The only people that some are impressing in this thread are lefty whackos.

 

[Mojo2]

Unless you were a white, straight, Christian male

Don't matter, you'd still have black and white TV, no air conditioning, segregation and Ike for President!

And a commie hiding behind every bush........gotta love the 50s

MOJO Note: If I mischaracterize you as a Commie or a bastard or a Commie bastard, please pardon my gaffe and disregard any references to you, personally or posterally.

Yeah, but whatever other effects it had it sure put the fear of GOD into you miserable misguided America hating Commie 'basterds'.



And it's been all of about 50 years and during that period we haven't had many of your kind of vermin to worry about.

McCarthyism worked.

Maybe we should look into ways of replicating the systemic cleansing effects of McCarthyism in the near future.

So, you may wonder why am I so anti-Communism and Communist? What do I have against Commies?

I think most reasonable people will find this information illuminating, if not persuasive.

Communism has been the greatest social engineering experiment we have ever seen. It failed utterly and in doing so it killed over 100,000,000 men, women, and children, not to mention the near 30,000,000 of its subjects that died in its often aggressive wars and the rebellions it provoked. But there is a larger lesson to be learned from this horrendous sacrifice to one ideology. That is that no one can be trusted with power. The more power the center has to impose the beliefs of an ideological or religious elite or impose the whims of a dictator, the more likely human lives are to be sacrificed. This is but one reason, but perhaps the most important one, for fostering liberal democracy.

MURDER BY COMMUNISM


And here's a real condensed version of our generalized view of Communism.

The United Sates proactive foreign policy known as "containment" was declared by Harry Truman as the Truman Doctrine on March 12, 1947.

For the next 30 years this doctrine was more successful than not. In 1949 the Communist Chinese won the long-term civil war in China and created the People's Republic of China. In 1953 the Viet Minh succeeded in taking control of North Vietnam. In 1959 Fidel Castro came out of the closet and admitted his little banana revolution in Cuba was a front for a Communist takeover.

After the American withdrawal from Vietnam in 1973 the neo-radical left in the US Congress disengaged the United States from the Cold War. For the next decade the USSR went berserk and promoted Wars of National Liberation all over the World, overrunning SEA (confirming the validity of the domino theory), destabilizing South and Central America, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. They deployed SS-20 missiles in Europe to neutralize NATO, threatened to invade Poland, and DID invade Afghanistan. Essentially the proved that Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon and Ford had been right all along. The USSR DID need to be contained.

The problem with the Communist aggression was that they tried to take-over by force. They destabilized whole regions and Continents in the hope of being able to seize control in the chaos. They set up exactly the kind of hot-house conditions which had sparked WW I and WW II. American policy was not JUST to fight Communism, we were trying to ensure that their little hair-brained military adventures did not boil over into a general war (WW III). Things almost got out of control in Korea in 1950, the Caribbean (Cuba) in 1962, and the Middle East in 1973 (the Yom Kippur War). But, in the end the Truman Doctrine was successful, and the USSR finally fell in 1991 after Ronald Reagan reengaged the US in the Cold War in 1980.

Source:
History-buff....

United States war against communism? - Yahoo! Answers

Commies behind ANY bush was treated sorta like a single cockaroach scurrying across the kitchen floor when you turn on the light.

You do whatever you can to eliminate them as quickly and as thoroughly as you can.

If you see ONE of either you KNOW there are dozens more you DON'T see which are hiding from view.

And after reading about the lethality of Communism tell me why anyone would persist in promoting it???

It doesn't work. It kills and enslaves people. It stomps on the human spirit. It makes all of US subjects and a small number of people in the Government our masters.

It's easy to scoff at the way America viewed Communism in the 1950's.

It's ONLY in hindsight that you are able to sit there and pretend you are Judge Joe Brown or Simon Cowell and pass judgement on those who were made of sterner stuff than the majority of today's Americans.

They knew what a threat Communism was because they read the papers and listened to the radio and tv reports about the dangerous spread of Communism.

EDIT: And the Soviet Reds had enough nuclear missiles pointed our way at the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis that it made one little boy piss his pants coming home from school he was so frightened that the World was going to end.

 

[rightwinger]

Don't matter, you'd still have black and white TV, no air conditioning, segregation and Ike for President!

And a commie hiding behind every bush........gotta love the 50s

Yeah, but whatever other effects it had it sure put the fear of GOD into you miserable misguided America hating Commie 'basterds'.



And it's been all of about 50 years and during that period we haven't had many of your kind of vermin to worry about.

McCarthyism worked.

Maybe we should look into ways of replicating the systemic cleansing effects of McCarthyism in the near future.

So, you may wonder why am I so anti-Communism and Communist? What do I have against Commies?

I think most reasonable people will find this information illuminating, if not persuasive.

Communism has been the greatest social engineering experiment we have ever seen. It failed utterly and in doing so it killed over 100,000,000 men, women, and children, not to mention the near 30,000,000 of its subjects that died in its often aggressive wars and the rebellions it provoked. But there is a larger lesson to be learned from this horrendous sacrifice to one ideology. That is that no one can be trusted with power. The more power the center has to impose the beliefs of an ideological or religious elite or impose the whims of a dictator, the more likely human lives are to be sacrificed. This is but one reason, but perhaps the most important one, for fostering liberal democracy.

MURDER BY COMMUNISM


And here's a real condensed version of our generalized view of Communism.

The United Sates proactive foreign policy known as "containment" was declared by Harry Truman as the Truman Doctrine on March 12, 1947.

For the next 30 years this doctrine was more successful than not. In 1949 the Communist Chinese won the long-term civil war in China and created the People's Republic of China. In 1953 the Viet Minh succeeded in taking control of North Vietnam. In 1959 Fidel Castro came out of the closet and admitted his little banana revolution in Cuba was a front for a Communist takeover.

After the American withdrawal from Vietnam in 1973 the neo-radical left in the US Congress disengaged the United States from the Cold War. For the next decade the USSR went berserk and promoted Wars of National Liberation all over the World, overrunning SEA (confirming the validity of the domino theory), destabilizing South and Central America, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. They deployed SS-20 missiles in Europe to neutralize NATO, threatened to invade Poland, and DID invade Afghanistan. Essentially the proved that Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon and Ford had been right all along. The USSR DID need to be contained.

The problem with the Communist aggression was that they tried to take-over by force. They destabilized whole regions and Continents in the hope of being able to seize control in the chaos. They set up exactly the kind of hot-house conditions which had sparked WW I and WW II. American policy was not JUST to fight Communism, we were trying to ensure that their little hair-brained military adventures did not boil over into a general war (WW III). Things almost got out of control in Korea in 1950, the Caribbean (Cuba) in 1962, and the Middle East in 1973 (the Yom Kippur War). But, in the end the Truman Doctrine was successful, and the USSR finally fell in 1991 after Ronald Reagan reengaged the US in the Cold War in 1980.

Source:
History-buff....

United States war against communism? - Yahoo! Answers

Commies behind ANY bush was treated sorta like a single cockaroach scurrying across the kitchen floor when you turn on the light.

You do whatever you can to eliminate them as quickly and as thoroughly as you can.

If you see ONE of either you KNOW there are dozens more you DON'T see which are hiding from view.

And after reading about the lethality of Communism tell me why anyone would persist in promoting it???

It doesn't work. It kills and enslaves people. It stomps on the human spirit. It makes all of US subjects and a small number of people in the Government our masters.

It's easy to scoff at the way America viewed Communism in the 1950's.

It's ONLY in hindsight that you are able to sit there and pretend you are Judge Joe Brown or Simon Cowell and pass judgement on those who were made of sterner stuff than the majority of today's Americans.

They knew what a threat Communism was because they read the papers and listened to the radio and tv reports about the dangerous spread of Communism.

EDIT: And the Soviet Reds had enough nuclear missiles pointed our way at the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis that it made one little boy piss his pants coming home from school he was so frightened that the World was going to end.

Ever notice how those commies had Jewish sounding names?

 

[HUGGY]

Don't matter, you'd still have black and white TV, no air conditioning, segregation and Ike for President!

And a commie hiding behind every bush........gotta love the 50s

Yeah, but whatever other effects it had it sure put the fear of GOD into you miserable misguided America hating Commie 'basterds'.



And it's been all of about 50 years and during that period we haven't had many of your kind of vermin to worry about.

McCarthyism worked.

Maybe we should look into ways of replicating the systemic cleansing effects of McCarthyism in the near future.

So, you may wonder why am I so anti-Communism and Communist? What do I have against Commies?

I think most reasonable people will find this information illuminating, if not persuasive.

Communism has been the greatest social engineering experiment we have ever seen. It failed utterly and in doing so it killed over 100,000,000 men, women, and children, not to mention the near 30,000,000 of its subjects that died in its often aggressive wars and the rebellions it provoked. But there is a larger lesson to be learned from this horrendous sacrifice to one ideology. That is that no one can be trusted with power. The more power the center has to impose the beliefs of an ideological or religious elite or impose the whims of a dictator, the more likely human lives are to be sacrificed. This is but one reason, but perhaps the most important one, for fostering liberal democracy.

MURDER BY COMMUNISM


And here's a real condensed version of our generalized view of Communism.

The United Sates proactive foreign policy known as "containment" was declared by Harry Truman as the Truman Doctrine on March 12, 1947.

For the next 30 years this doctrine was more successful than not. In 1949 the Communist Chinese won the long-term civil war in China and created the People's Republic of China. In 1953 the Viet Minh succeeded in taking control of North Vietnam. In 1959 Fidel Castro came out of the closet and admitted his little banana revolution in Cuba was a front for a Communist takeover.

After the American withdrawal from Vietnam in 1973 the neo-radical left in the US Congress disengaged the United States from the Cold War. For the next decade the USSR went berserk and promoted Wars of National Liberation all over the World, overrunning SEA (confirming the validity of the domino theory), destabilizing South and Central America, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. They deployed SS-20 missiles in Europe to neutralize NATO, threatened to invade Poland, and DID invade Afghanistan. Essentially the proved that Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon and Ford had been right all along. The USSR DID need to be contained.

The problem with the Communist aggression was that they tried to take-over by force. They destabilized whole regions and Continents in the hope of being able to seize control in the chaos. They set up exactly the kind of hot-house conditions which had sparked WW I and WW II. American policy was not JUST to fight Communism, we were trying to ensure that their little hair-brained military adventures did not boil over into a general war (WW III). Things almost got out of control in Korea in 1950, the Caribbean (Cuba) in 1962, and the Middle East in 1973 (the Yom Kippur War). But, in the end the Truman Doctrine was successful, and the USSR finally fell in 1991 after Ronald Reagan reengaged the US in the Cold War in 1980.

Source:
History-buff....

United States war against communism? - Yahoo! Answers

Commies behind ANY bush was treated sorta like a single cockaroach scurrying across the kitchen floor when you turn on the light.

You do whatever you can to eliminate them as quickly and as thoroughly as you can.

If you see ONE of either you KNOW there are dozens more you DON'T see which are hiding from view.

And after reading about the lethality of Communism tell me why anyone would persist in promoting it???

It doesn't work. It kills and enslaves people. It stomps on the human spirit. It makes all of US subjects and a small number of people in the Government our masters.

It's easy to scoff at the way America viewed Communism in the 1950's.

It's ONLY in hindsight that you are able to sit there and pretend you are Judge Joe Brown or Simon Cowell and pass judgement on those who were made of sterner stuff than the majority of today's Americans.

They knew what a threat Communism was because they read the papers and listened to the radio and tv reports about the dangerous spread of Communism.

EDIT: And the Soviet Reds had enough nuclear missiles pointed our way at the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis that it made one little boy piss his pants coming home from school he was so frightened that the World was going to end.

"McCarthyism worked."

No ...it did not.

No doubt certain elements thruout the globe including some communists were and are and will be enemies of the U S A. The best way to ferret out infiltraitors and spies is with good old fashioned police methods. How these moles are dealt with should not be a public circus. They just need to "dissappear". That is how many spies have been found out and disposed of in our history.

Giving criminals advanced warning is always a bad idea.

McCarthy was a drunkard and a self promoting fool whom did more harm than good.

Christian Fascists have always been loud mouths and counter productive to any serious problems we as a country have faced.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Don't matter, you'd still have black and white TV, no air conditioning, segregation and Ike for President!

And a commie hiding behind every bush........gotta love the 50s

Yeah, but whatever other effects it had it sure put the fear of GOD into you miserable misguided America hating Commie 'basterds'.



And it's been all of about 50 years and during that period we haven't had many of your kind of vermin to worry about.

McCarthyism worked.

Maybe we should look into ways of replicating the systemic cleansing effects of McCarthyism in the near future.

So, you may wonder why am I so anti-Communism and Communist? What do I have against Commies?

I think most reasonable people will find this information illuminating, if not persuasive.

Communism has been the greatest social engineering experiment we have ever seen. It failed utterly and in doing so it killed over 100,000,000 men, women, and children, not to mention the near 30,000,000 of its subjects that died in its often aggressive wars and the rebellions it provoked. But there is a larger lesson to be learned from this horrendous sacrifice to one ideology. That is that no one can be trusted with power. The more power the center has to impose the beliefs of an ideological or religious elite or impose the whims of a dictator, the more likely human lives are to be sacrificed. This is but one reason, but perhaps the most important one, for fostering liberal democracy.

MURDER BY COMMUNISM


And here's a real condensed version of our generalized view of Communism.

The United Sates proactive foreign policy known as "containment" was declared by Harry Truman as the Truman Doctrine on March 12, 1947.

For the next 30 years this doctrine was more successful than not. In 1949 the Communist Chinese won the long-term civil war in China and created the People's Republic of China. In 1953 the Viet Minh succeeded in taking control of North Vietnam. In 1959 Fidel Castro came out of the closet and admitted his little banana revolution in Cuba was a front for a Communist takeover.

After the American withdrawal from Vietnam in 1973 the neo-radical left in the US Congress disengaged the United States from the Cold War. For the next decade the USSR went berserk and promoted Wars of National Liberation all over the World, overrunning SEA (confirming the validity of the domino theory), destabilizing South and Central America, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. They deployed SS-20 missiles in Europe to neutralize NATO, threatened to invade Poland, and DID invade Afghanistan. Essentially the proved that Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon and Ford had been right all along. The USSR DID need to be contained.

The problem with the Communist aggression was that they tried to take-over by force. They destabilized whole regions and Continents in the hope of being able to seize control in the chaos. They set up exactly the kind of hot-house conditions which had sparked WW I and WW II. American policy was not JUST to fight Communism, we were trying to ensure that their little hair-brained military adventures did not boil over into a general war (WW III). Things almost got out of control in Korea in 1950, the Caribbean (Cuba) in 1962, and the Middle East in 1973 (the Yom Kippur War). But, in the end the Truman Doctrine was successful, and the USSR finally fell in 1991 after Ronald Reagan reengaged the US in the Cold War in 1980.

Source:
History-buff....

United States war against communism? - Yahoo! Answers

Commies behind ANY bush was treated sorta like a single cockaroach scurrying across the kitchen floor when you turn on the light.

You do whatever you can to eliminate them as quickly and as thoroughly as you can.

If you see ONE of either you KNOW there are dozens more you DON'T see which are hiding from view.

And after reading about the lethality of Communism tell me why anyone would persist in promoting it???

It doesn't work. It kills and enslaves people. It stomps on the human spirit. It makes all of US subjects and a small number of people in the Government our masters.

It's easy to scoff at the way America viewed Communism in the 1950's.

It's ONLY in hindsight that you are able to sit there and pretend you are Judge Joe Brown or Simon Cowell and pass judgement on those who were made of sterner stuff than the majority of today's Americans.

They knew what a threat Communism was because they read the papers and listened to the radio and tv reports about the dangerous spread of Communism.

EDIT: And the Soviet Reds had enough nuclear missiles pointed our way at the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis that it made one little boy piss his pants coming home from school he was so frightened that the World was going to end.

Speaking about a personal experience of yours?

 

[Derideo_Te]

And a commie hiding behind every bush........gotta love the 50s

Yeah, but whatever other effects it had it sure put the fear of GOD into you miserable misguided America hating Commie 'basterds'.



And it's been all of about 50 years and during that period we haven't had many of your kind of vermin to worry about.

McCarthyism worked.

Maybe we should look into ways of replicating the systemic cleansing effects of McCarthyism in the near future.

So, you may wonder why am I so anti-Communism and Communist? What do I have against Commies?

I think most reasonable people will find this information illuminating, if not persuasive.



MURDER BY COMMUNISM


And here's a real condensed version of our generalized view of Communism.

The United Sates proactive foreign policy known as "containment" was declared by Harry Truman as the Truman Doctrine on March 12, 1947.

For the next 30 years this doctrine was more successful than not. In 1949 the Communist Chinese won the long-term civil war in China and created the People's Republic of China. In 1953 the Viet Minh succeeded in taking control of North Vietnam. In 1959 Fidel Castro came out of the closet and admitted his little banana revolution in Cuba was a front for a Communist takeover.

After the American withdrawal from Vietnam in 1973 the neo-radical left in the US Congress disengaged the United States from the Cold War. For the next decade the USSR went berserk and promoted Wars of National Liberation all over the World, overrunning SEA (confirming the validity of the domino theory), destabilizing South and Central America, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. They deployed SS-20 missiles in Europe to neutralize NATO, threatened to invade Poland, and DID invade Afghanistan. Essentially the proved that Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon and Ford had been right all along. The USSR DID need to be contained.

The problem with the Communist aggression was that they tried to take-over by force. They destabilized whole regions and Continents in the hope of being able to seize control in the chaos. They set up exactly the kind of hot-house conditions which had sparked WW I and WW II. American policy was not JUST to fight Communism, we were trying to ensure that their little hair-brained military adventures did not boil over into a general war (WW III). Things almost got out of control in Korea in 1950, the Caribbean (Cuba) in 1962, and the Middle East in 1973 (the Yom Kippur War). But, in the end the Truman Doctrine was successful, and the USSR finally fell in 1991 after Ronald Reagan reengaged the US in the Cold War in 1980.

Source:
History-buff....

United States war against communism? - Yahoo! Answers

Commies behind ANY bush was treated sorta like a single cockaroach scurrying across the kitchen floor when you turn on the light.

You do whatever you can to eliminate them as quickly and as thoroughly as you can.

If you see ONE of either you KNOW there are dozens more you DON'T see which are hiding from view.

And after reading about the lethality of Communism tell me why anyone would persist in promoting it???

It doesn't work. It kills and enslaves people. It stomps on the human spirit. It makes all of US subjects and a small number of people in the Government our masters.

It's easy to scoff at the way America viewed Communism in the 1950's.

It's ONLY in hindsight that you are able to sit there and pretend you are Judge Joe Brown or Simon Cowell and pass judgement on those who were made of sterner stuff than the majority of today's Americans.

They knew what a threat Communism was because they read the papers and listened to the radio and tv reports about the dangerous spread of Communism.

EDIT: And the Soviet Reds had enough nuclear missiles pointed our way at the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis that it made one little boy piss his pants coming home from school he was so frightened that the World was going to end.

"McCarthyism worked."

No ...it did not.

No doubt certain elements thruout the globe including some communists were and are and will be enemies of the U S A. The best way to ferret out infiltraitors and spies is with good old fashioned police methods. How these moles are dealt with should not be a public circus. They just need to "dissappear". That is how many spies have been found out and disposed of in our history.

Giving criminals advanced warning is always a bad idea.

McCarthy was a drunkard and a self promoting fool whom did more harm than good.

Christian Fascists have always been loud mouths and counter productive to any serious problems we as a country have faced.

There wasn't much in the way of a difference between the show trials in the USSR and the McCarthy hearings. In essence he kept on claiming that he had a list of names that he was going to reveal but he never did. One of the oldest political tricks in the book to slander your "enemies" without having any actual evidence against them.

 

[Mertex]

one little boy piss his pants coming home from school he was so frightened that the world was going to end.

tldr..........

 

[Mojo2]

one little boy piss his pants coming home from school he was so frightened that the world was going to end.

tldr..........

Too bad. That partially explain why Libs are seldom able to prevail in debate without resorting to personal attacks and snide remarks.

The foundation of what MIGHT have been the key to their winning the debate, or deciding to better fight another battle with better odds, or even shifting one's allegiance to the "strong horse,' as the Arabs might say, if ONLY they'd bothered to read a little bit more. Have a little more curiosity.

Oh well.

Pretty is nice, too.

 

[Mojo2]

Yeah, but whatever other effects it had it sure put the fear of GOD into you miserable misguided America hating Commie 'basterds'.



And it's been all of about 50 years and during that period we haven't had many of your kind of vermin to worry about.

McCarthyism worked.

Maybe we should look into ways of replicating the systemic cleansing effects of McCarthyism in the near future.

So, you may wonder why am I so anti-Communism and Communist? What do I have against Commies?

I think most reasonable people will find this information illuminating, if not persuasive.



MURDER BY COMMUNISM


And here's a real condensed version of our generalized view of Communism.



United States war against communism? - Yahoo! Answers

Commies behind ANY bush was treated sorta like a single cockaroach scurrying across the kitchen floor when you turn on the light.

You do whatever you can to eliminate them as quickly and as thoroughly as you can.

If you see ONE of either you KNOW there are dozens more you DON'T see which are hiding from view.

And after reading about the lethality of Communism tell me why anyone would persist in promoting it???

It doesn't work. It kills and enslaves people. It stomps on the human spirit. It makes all of US subjects and a small number of people in the Government our masters.

It's easy to scoff at the way America viewed Communism in the 1950's.

It's ONLY in hindsight that you are able to sit there and pretend you are Judge Joe Brown or Simon Cowell and pass judgement on those who were made of sterner stuff than the majority of today's Americans.

They knew what a threat Communism was because they read the papers and listened to the radio and tv reports about the dangerous spread of Communism.

EDIT: And the Soviet Reds had enough nuclear missiles pointed our way at the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis that it made one little boy piss his pants coming home from school he was so frightened that the World was going to end.

"McCarthyism worked."

No ...it did not.

No doubt certain elements thruout the globe including some communists were and are and will be enemies of the U S A. The best way to ferret out infiltraitors and spies is with good old fashioned police methods. How these moles are dealt with should not be a public circus. They just need to "dissappear". That is how many spies have been found out and disposed of in our history.

Giving criminals advanced warning is always a bad idea.

McCarthy was a drunkard and a self promoting fool whom did more harm than good.

Christian Fascists have always been loud mouths and counter productive to any serious problems we as a country have faced.

There wasn't much in the way of a difference between the show trials in the USSR and the McCarthy hearings. In essence he kept on claiming that he had a list of names that he was going to reveal but he never did. One of the oldest political tricks in the book to slander your "enemies" without having any actual evidence against them.

You Commie lovers and McCarthy haters are proof that McCarthyism worked.

You wouldn't have dared reveal yourselves this brazenly before now.

What we need is a new, slightly revised 21st Century version of a Communist housecleaning to send you guys scurrying back to hiding under the kitchen stove.

Except this Commie housecleaning would be more PC...just the way Libs like it.

 

[Mojo2]

And a commie hiding behind every bush........gotta love the 50s

Yeah, but whatever other effects it had it sure put the fear of GOD into you miserable misguided America hating Commie 'basterds'.



And it's been all of about 50 years and during that period we haven't had many of your kind of vermin to worry about.

McCarthyism worked.

Maybe we should look into ways of replicating the systemic cleansing effects of McCarthyism in the near future.

So, you may wonder why am I so anti-Communism and Communist? What do I have against Commies?

I think most reasonable people will find this information illuminating, if not persuasive.



MURDER BY COMMUNISM


And here's a real condensed version of our generalized view of Communism.

The United Sates proactive foreign policy known as "containment" was declared by Harry Truman as the Truman Doctrine on March 12, 1947.

For the next 30 years this doctrine was more successful than not. In 1949 the Communist Chinese won the long-term civil war in China and created the People's Republic of China. In 1953 the Viet Minh succeeded in taking control of North Vietnam. In 1959 Fidel Castro came out of the closet and admitted his little banana revolution in Cuba was a front for a Communist takeover.

After the American withdrawal from Vietnam in 1973 the neo-radical left in the US Congress disengaged the United States from the Cold War. For the next decade the USSR went berserk and promoted Wars of National Liberation all over the World, overrunning SEA (confirming the validity of the domino theory), destabilizing South and Central America, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. They deployed SS-20 missiles in Europe to neutralize NATO, threatened to invade Poland, and DID invade Afghanistan. Essentially the proved that Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon and Ford had been right all along. The USSR DID need to be contained.

The problem with the Communist aggression was that they tried to take-over by force. They destabilized whole regions and Continents in the hope of being able to seize control in the chaos. They set up exactly the kind of hot-house conditions which had sparked WW I and WW II. American policy was not JUST to fight Communism, we were trying to ensure that their little hair-brained military adventures did not boil over into a general war (WW III). Things almost got out of control in Korea in 1950, the Caribbean (Cuba) in 1962, and the Middle East in 1973 (the Yom Kippur War). But, in the end the Truman Doctrine was successful, and the USSR finally fell in 1991 after Ronald Reagan reengaged the US in the Cold War in 1980.

Source:
History-buff....

United States war against communism? - Yahoo! Answers

Commies behind ANY bush was treated sorta like a single cockaroach scurrying across the kitchen floor when you turn on the light.

You do whatever you can to eliminate them as quickly and as thoroughly as you can.

If you see ONE of either you KNOW there are dozens more you DON'T see which are hiding from view.

And after reading about the lethality of Communism tell me why anyone would persist in promoting it???

It doesn't work. It kills and enslaves people. It stomps on the human spirit. It makes all of US subjects and a small number of people in the Government our masters.

It's easy to scoff at the way America viewed Communism in the 1950's.

It's ONLY in hindsight that you are able to sit there and pretend you are Judge Joe Brown or Simon Cowell and pass judgement on those who were made of sterner stuff than the majority of today's Americans.

They knew what a threat Communism was because they read the papers and listened to the radio and tv reports about the dangerous spread of Communism.

EDIT: And the Soviet Reds had enough nuclear missiles pointed our way at the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis that it made one little boy piss his pants coming home from school he was so frightened that the World was going to end.

Speaking about a personal experience of yours?

Yup. Thought I'd throw you a bone. And I'm glad to see you fetched it.

 

[Mojo2]

And a commie hiding behind every bush........gotta love the 50s

Yeah, but whatever other effects it had it sure put the fear of GOD into you miserable misguided America hating Commie 'basterds'.



And it's been all of about 50 years and during that period we haven't had many of your kind of vermin to worry about.

McCarthyism worked.

Maybe we should look into ways of replicating the systemic cleansing effects of McCarthyism in the near future.

So, you may wonder why am I so anti-Communism and Communist? What do I have against Commies?

I think most reasonable people will find this information illuminating, if not persuasive.



MURDER BY COMMUNISM


And here's a real condensed version of our generalized view of Communism.

The United Sates proactive foreign policy known as "containment" was declared by Harry Truman as the Truman Doctrine on March 12, 1947.

For the next 30 years this doctrine was more successful than not. In 1949 the Communist Chinese won the long-term civil war in China and created the People's Republic of China. In 1953 the Viet Minh succeeded in taking control of North Vietnam. In 1959 Fidel Castro came out of the closet and admitted his little banana revolution in Cuba was a front for a Communist takeover.

After the American withdrawal from Vietnam in 1973 the neo-radical left in the US Congress disengaged the United States from the Cold War. For the next decade the USSR went berserk and promoted Wars of National Liberation all over the World, overrunning SEA (confirming the validity of the domino theory), destabilizing South and Central America, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. They deployed SS-20 missiles in Europe to neutralize NATO, threatened to invade Poland, and DID invade Afghanistan. Essentially the proved that Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon and Ford had been right all along. The USSR DID need to be contained.

The problem with the Communist aggression was that they tried to take-over by force. They destabilized whole regions and Continents in the hope of being able to seize control in the chaos. They set up exactly the kind of hot-house conditions which had sparked WW I and WW II. American policy was not JUST to fight Communism, we were trying to ensure that their little hair-brained military adventures did not boil over into a general war (WW III). Things almost got out of control in Korea in 1950, the Caribbean (Cuba) in 1962, and the Middle East in 1973 (the Yom Kippur War). But, in the end the Truman Doctrine was successful, and the USSR finally fell in 1991 after Ronald Reagan reengaged the US in the Cold War in 1980.

Source:
History-buff....

United States war against communism? - Yahoo! Answers

Commies behind ANY bush was treated sorta like a single cockaroach scurrying across the kitchen floor when you turn on the light.

You do whatever you can to eliminate them as quickly and as thoroughly as you can.

If you see ONE of either you KNOW there are dozens more you DON'T see which are hiding from view.

And after reading about the lethality of Communism tell me why anyone would persist in promoting it???

It doesn't work. It kills and enslaves people. It stomps on the human spirit. It makes all of US subjects and a small number of people in the Government our masters.

It's easy to scoff at the way America viewed Communism in the 1950's.

It's ONLY in hindsight that you are able to sit there and pretend you are Judge Joe Brown or Simon Cowell and pass judgement on those who were made of sterner stuff than the majority of today's Americans.

They knew what a threat Communism was because they read the papers and listened to the radio and tv reports about the dangerous spread of Communism.

EDIT: And the Soviet Reds had enough nuclear missiles pointed our way at the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis that it made one little boy piss his pants coming home from school he was so frightened that the World was going to end.

Ever notice how those commies had Jewish sounding names?

Nope, can't say I ever did.

But I HAVE noticed that Muslim plants and non-violent pseudo-Stealthy Jihadists often adopt the identities and nicks and avatars of traditional American cultural icons.

 

[Derideo_Te]

one little boy piss his pants coming home from school he was so frightened that the world was going to end.

tldr..........

Too bad. That partially explain why Libs are seldom able to prevail in debate without resorting to personal attacks and snide remarks.

The foundation of what MIGHT have been the key to their winning the debate, or deciding to better fight another battle with better odds, or even shifting one's allegiance to the "strong horse,' as the Arabs might say, if ONLY they'd bothered to read a little bit more. Have a little more curiosity.

Oh well.

Pretty is nice, too.

Seems to be a bipartisan problem from my own experience. But ironic that you found it necessary to resort to "personal attacks and snide remarks" on "liberals" because you weren't able to make your own point succinctly enough.

 

[Derideo_Te]

"McCarthyism worked."

No ...it did not.

No doubt certain elements thruout the globe including some communists were and are and will be enemies of the U S A. The best way to ferret out infiltraitors and spies is with good old fashioned police methods. How these moles are dealt with should not be a public circus. They just need to "dissappear". That is how many spies have been found out and disposed of in our history.

Giving criminals advanced warning is always a bad idea.

McCarthy was a drunkard and a self promoting fool whom did more harm than good.

Christian Fascists have always been loud mouths and counter productive to any serious problems we as a country have faced.

There wasn't much in the way of a difference between the show trials in the USSR and the McCarthy hearings. In essence he kept on claiming that he had a list of names that he was going to reveal but he never did. One of the oldest political tricks in the book to slander your "enemies" without having any actual evidence against them.

You Commie lovers and McCarthy haters are proof that McCarthyism worked.

You wouldn't have dared reveal yourselves this brazenly before now.

What we need is a new, slightly revised 21st Century version of a Communist housecleaning to send you guys scurrying back to hiding under the kitchen stove.

Except this Commie housecleaning would be more PC...just the way Libs like it.

So your immediate response is to resort to "personal attacks and snide remarks" because you are incapable of defending McCarthyism?



Looks like you just took a self inflicted hit to the credibility region.

 

[Mojo2]

tldr..........

Too bad. That partially explain why Libs are seldom able to prevail in debate without resorting to personal attacks and snide remarks.

The foundation of what MIGHT have been the key to their winning the debate, or deciding to better fight another battle with better odds, or even shifting one's allegiance to the "strong horse,' as the Arabs might say, if ONLY they'd bothered to read a little bit more. Have a little more curiosity.

Oh well.

Pretty is nice, too.

Seems to be a bipartisan problem from my own experience. But ironic that you found it necessary to resort to "personal attacks and snide remarks" on "liberals" because you weren't able to make your own point succinctly enough.

You are like my one most devoted 'dog' (I love my dogs, btw) who never fails to fetch the bone when I throw it or to bring me the decoys I left lying along the path.

Who's a good boy? Who's a good boy?!?!! Derideo_Te

 

[Mojo2]

There wasn't much in the way of a difference between the show trials in the USSR and the McCarthy hearings. In essence he kept on claiming that he had a list of names that he was going to reveal but he never did. One of the oldest political tricks in the book to slander your "enemies" without having any actual evidence against them.

You Commie lovers and McCarthy haters are proof that McCarthyism worked.

You wouldn't have dared reveal yourselves this brazenly before now.

What we need is a new, slightly revised 21st Century version of a Communist housecleaning to send you guys scurrying back to hiding under the kitchen stove.

Except this Commie housecleaning would be more PC...just the way Libs like it.

So your immediate response is to resort to "personal attacks and snide remarks" because you are incapable of defending McCarthyism?



Looks like you just took a self inflicted hit to the credibility region.

Hmmm, no. More like a slap to the face of a prize fighter.



I'll play ball with ya.

Why did it take several years before Ed Murrow (Of all people! Where were the political 'leaders'? Why didn't THEY stop him???) took him down?

Part of it probably was due to the way he intimidated folks. And some of the other tactics he used were absolutely wrong as well.

But part of the answer to why he wasn't stopped earlier is that people KNEW what he was doing was a dirty but necessary job they were thankful someone would and could do at all!

See? The people in the 1950's understood that the health of this country affects every one of US. Because they loved this country and were committed to keeping our republic in good repair and as close to original operating specs and blueprints as possible, the American public gave McCarthy the 'wink' (figuratively...with their tacit assent) to do what he did.

They understood better than you do, it appears, that Communism is bad for freedom loving people who also oppose the government turning it's powers and it's guns on the citizens.

A majority of even the most brain dead liberals of that generation were smart enough to know not to support Communism.

And they weren't able to access anywhere near as much information as you can. Yet, they were able to understand what was good and what was bad for them.

Survival was understood to be a matter that CAN be in doubt.

Most of you have grown up with the 'assumption of invulnerability' all your life.

No World War One. No Influenza Pandemic of 1918. No Great Depression. No World War Two. No Cold War. Nothing in your direct personal experience has ever happened to make you actually consider this country's existential vulnerabilities.

You all, (well mostly, anyway...) have no idea what Obama is preparing this country for.

You have no idea of how vulnerable we are or aren't to events or conditions or situations or domestic plots or aggressive acts by foreign powers sufficiently precise enough or incredibly 'lucky' enough (from their POV) to cause a meltdown in any numbers of areas all at once or in concert. Over load of our utilities infrastructure, of our entitlements system, disablement of our economy, making Americans completely dependent on the Government for our health care and using that lever to push us around the way they want and on and on and on.

You can't discount ANY possibility with this guy. He might do ANYTHING to get the power over the people of this great land.

Anyway, Communism MIGHT be part of Obama's plan for US.

After all, his Daddy WAS a Marxist (among other things as well) and Barack DID take his father's dreams to be his own.

So, Communism?

Sure!

Why not? He might ask.

But that's also why we should need no other reason to say NO to it.

If HE likes it, it MUST be bad for America!

General rule of thumb.

 

[Derideo_Te]

You Commie lovers and McCarthy haters are proof that McCarthyism worked.

You wouldn't have dared reveal yourselves this brazenly before now.

What we need is a new, slightly revised 21st Century version of a Communist housecleaning to send you guys scurrying back to hiding under the kitchen stove.

Except this Commie housecleaning would be more PC...just the way Libs like it.

So your immediate response is to resort to "personal attacks and snide remarks" because you are incapable of defending McCarthyism?



Looks like you just took a self inflicted hit to the credibility region.

Hmmm, no. More like a slap to the face of a prize fighter.

I can understand why you feel the need to flatter yourself.

I'll play ball with ya.

Why did it take several years before Ed Murrow (Of all people! Where were the political 'leaders'? Why didn't THEY stop him???) took him down?

Part of it probably was due to the way he intimidated folks. And some of the other tactics he used were absolutely wrong as well.

But part of the answer to why he wasn't stopped earlier is that people KNEW what he was doing was a dirty but necessary job they were thankful someone would and could do at all!

See? The people in the 1950's understood that the health of this country affects every one of US. Because they loved this country and were committed to keeping our republic in good repair and as close to original operating specs and blueprints as possible, the American public gave McCarthy the 'wink' (figuratively...with their tacit assent) to do what he did.

They understood better than you do, it appears, that Communism is bad for freedom loving people who also oppose the government turning it's powers and it's guns on the citizens.

A majority of even the most brain dead liberals of that generation were smart enough to know not to support Communism.

And they weren't able to access anywhere near as much information as you can. Yet, they were able to understand what was good and what was bad for them.

They were more susceptible to government propaganda because they lacked much in the way of alternative independent sources of information.

Survival was understood to be a matter that CAN be in doubt.

Most of you have grown up with the 'assumption of invulnerability' all your life.

No World War One. No Influenza Pandemic of 1918. No Great Depression. No World War Two. No Cold War. Nothing in your direct personal experience has ever happened to make you actually consider this country's existential vulnerabilities.

You all, (well mostly, anyway...) have no idea what Obama is preparing this country for.

You have no idea of how vulnerable we are or aren't to events or conditions or situations or domestic plots or aggressive acts by foreign powers sufficiently precise enough or incredibly 'lucky' enough (from their POV) to cause a meltdown in any numbers of areas all at once or in concert. Over load of our utilities infrastructure, of our entitlements system, disablement of our economy, making Americans completely dependent on the Government for our health care and using that lever to push us around the way they want and on and on and on.

You can't discount ANY possibility with this guy. He might do ANYTHING to get the power over the people of this great land.

Anyway, Communism MIGHT be part of Obama's plan for US.

After all, his Daddy WAS a Marxist (among other things as well) and Barack DID take his father's dreams to be his own.

So, Communism?

Sure!

Why not? He might ask.

But that's also why we should need no other reason to say NO to it.

If HE likes it, it MUST be bad for America!

General rule of thumb.

That's it? That's all you got? Your own paranoia fed by extreme right wing disinformation?

 

[Mojo2]

So your immediate response is to resort to "personal attacks and snide remarks" because you are incapable of defending McCarthyism?



Looks like you just took a self inflicted hit to the credibility region.

Hmmm, no. More like a slap to the face of a prize fighter.

I can understand why you feel the need to flatter yourself.

I'll play ball with ya.

Why did it take several years before Ed Murrow (Of all people! Where were the political 'leaders'? Why didn't THEY stop him???) took him down?

Part of it probably was due to the way he intimidated folks. And some of the other tactics he used were absolutely wrong as well.

But part of the answer to why he wasn't stopped earlier is that people KNEW what he was doing was a dirty but necessary job they were thankful someone would and could do at all!

See? The people in the 1950's understood that the health of this country affects every one of US. Because they loved this country and were committed to keeping our republic in good repair and as close to original operating specs and blueprints as possible, the American public gave McCarthy the 'wink' (figuratively...with their tacit assent) to do what he did.

They understood better than you do, it appears, that Communism is bad for freedom loving people who also oppose the government turning it's powers and it's guns on the citizens.

A majority of even the most brain dead liberals of that generation were smart enough to know not to support Communism.

And they weren't able to access anywhere near as much information as you can. Yet, they were able to understand what was good and what was bad for them.

They were more susceptible to government propaganda because they lacked much in the way of alternative independent sources of information.

Survival was understood to be a matter that CAN be in doubt.

Most of you have grown up with the 'assumption of invulnerability' all your life.

No World War One. No Influenza Pandemic of 1918. No Great Depression. No World War Two. No Cold War. Nothing in your direct personal experience has ever happened to make you actually consider this country's existential vulnerabilities.

You all, (well mostly, anyway...) have no idea what Obama is preparing this country for.

You have no idea of how vulnerable we are or aren't to events or conditions or situations or domestic plots or aggressive acts by foreign powers sufficiently precise enough or incredibly 'lucky' enough (from their POV) to cause a meltdown in any numbers of areas all at once or in concert. Over load of our utilities infrastructure, of our entitlements system, disablement of our economy, making Americans completely dependent on the Government for our health care and using that lever to push us around the way they want and on and on and on.

You can't discount ANY possibility with this guy. He might do ANYTHING to get the power over the people of this great land.

Anyway, Communism MIGHT be part of Obama's plan for US.

After all, his Daddy WAS a Marxist (among other things as well) and Barack DID take his father's dreams to be his own.

So, Communism?

Sure!

Why not? He might ask.

But that's also why we should need no other reason to say NO to it.

If HE likes it, it MUST be bad for America!

General rule of thumb.

That's it? That's all you got? Your own paranoia fed by extreme right wing disinformation?

MOJO NOTE: I was trying out a slightly different strategy in dealing with a pesty poster. I wanted to demonstrate to my fellow Righties what happens when you try to be civil and polite and respectful, especially to someone like our fellow poster, "Manti teo." Of course the exchanges have been rough and crude but we're all consenting adults, right?

Anyway, I wanted to show you what happens when you allow your opponent to think he stands a chance with you. He will gain confidence and courage and will feel inspired and become an even greater pest. Until the only thing left to you to do is to overwhelm him with a massive SOMETHING. Whatever tool or technique, pour it on and hope he won't keep coming at you.

The easier, cleaner, more humane way of dealing with him would have been to pull out my best argument and my best evidence and let him have it with ONE sustained assault to win that point then move on to the next one.

Follow this exchange because it might go either way, even though I know I have the facts and the "law" (sort of) and all he has is the table (emotions and name calling) to "pound."

Joe McCarthy, Rovere concluded, had never actually believed in the monstrous crusade he had set in motion; anticommunism, patriotism, the Catholic church, were all tools for self-promotion, never sacred causes. "To McCarthy, everything was profane." He had some decent instincts — "who doesn't?" Rovere had to add — but "in the mirror, McCarthy must have seen and recognized a fraud."

Joseph McCarthy

Just ONE of the lessons that might be learned from this article is that many of McCarthy's worst qualities and characteristics are now recognized (ESPECIALLY BY LIBERALS THEMSELVES) as identifiably Liberal descriptors.

That partly explains the venom he inspired from the fangs of the Libs and Dems and Progs and Leftists and Socialists and Marxists and Communists at the time as well as today more than 50 years later!

He looks like a composite of all the worst aspects of Libs and Conservative liberals all in one guy.

He sounds like he could have been Barack Obama's role model!

I swear you could read some of the things said about him and it could have been written this morning about Obama!

Anyway, when Libs look at him and who he was they see a lot of themselves and they don't like it. And they can't help recognizing and being reminded of it.

So, whenever they can they let the arrows fly at even the mention of his name.

If only America's moderate Muslim population was as sincerely outraged at the fundamentalist and violent and non-violent Jihadi who they resemble (hell, it's impossible to know one from the next!) as today's Liberal Americans are outraged at ol' "Tailgunner Joe", we'd be that much better off!

And I haven't even finished reading this article yet! I want to wait until I can spend the time enjoying the ride with such an interesting and competent writer telling a compelling and very revealing story.

BTW, is Derideo_Te an Australian term? What, if I might 'aks', does it mean? Is it anything close to being the utterance of a heavily accented Ozzie toddler or a drunk doing an imitation of Eddie Murphy's SNL era, "Buh Weat".

What I imagine he might have been saying is, "...the radio! [O]'tay?"

But, I digress...

McCarthy is made out to be the absolute worst villain in history after Hitler or Stalin. But in reality he was just another guy who'd made his way to the Senate. And he was a human being just like anyone else who had his share of good and bad qualities.

As a public servant Joe McCarthy was little different in the service he performed for this country than your weekly Refuse Collectors or street cleaners or snow plow drivers or cops or EMT and Fire responders or the members of our military to our elected leaders on the local, statewide and national levels, all of whom sometimes have to perform really difficult and really dirty jobs.

These servants of the people may cheat on their wives, gamble away their weekly paycheck, do a little pot on weekends, might accidentally shoot their friends in the face or maybe even bow to Saudi leaders who are kith n kin to bin Laden himself.

What I'm getting at is that no matter what his personal faults and flaws were or are, as a PUBLIC SERVANT McCarthy saw his job to be, at least in part, to expose Commies and others in our Govt.

Even without full conviction in his own anti-Communist effort McCarthy performed at least this aspect of his job very successfully, no matter his original intent.

Sen. McCarthy may have been the perfect teacher for you Libs. He may not look like Obama, but many of their actions and tactics are similar.

As for other lessons you ibs might learn from this story, if you succeed in keeping your emotions out of your job, whatever your job might be, you will often be rewarded with a totally new way of seeing and maybe appreciating whatever the thing, subject, topic, person, philosophy, reality of life or whatever...might be

This article, I hope, will conclude by saying McCarthy may have had his faults as a person and a politician and he may have just 'happened' upon the cause of ridding America of Reds, but there is no question he performed this country a great service.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Hmmm, no. More like a slap to the face of a prize fighter.

I can understand why you feel the need to flatter yourself. They were more susceptible to government propaganda because they lacked much in the way of alternative independent sources of information.

That's it? That's all you got? Your own paranoia fed by extreme right wing disinformation?

Joe McCarthy, Rovere concluded, had never actually believed in the monstrous crusade he had set in motion; anticommunism, patriotism, the Catholic church, were all tools for self-promotion, never sacred causes. "To McCarthy, everything was profane." He had some decent instincts — "who doesn't?" Rovere had to add — but "in the mirror, McCarthy must have seen and recognized a fraud."

Joseph McCarthy

Just ONE of the lessons that might be learned from this article is that many of McCarthy's worst qualities and characteristics are now recognized (ESPECIALLY BY LIBERALS THEMSELVES) as identifiably Liberal descriptors.

That partly explains the venom he inspires from the fangs of the Libs and Dems and Progs and Leftists and Socialists and Marxists and Communists.

When they look at him and who he was they see a lot of themselves and they don't like it. And they can't help recognizing and being reminded of it.

So, whenever they can they let the arrows fly at even the mention of his name.

If only America's moderate Muslim population was as sincerely outraged at the fundamentalist and violent and non-violent Jihadi who they resemble (hell, it's impossible to know one from the next!) as today's Liberal Americans are outraged at ol' "Tailgunner Joe"!

And I haven't even finished reading this article yet! I want to wait until I can spend the time enjoying the ride with such an interesting and competent writer telling a compelling and very revealing story.

And, so I wonder, (BTW, is Derideo_Te an Australian term? What, if I might 'aks', does it mean? Is it anything close to being the utterance of a heavily accented Ozzie toddler or a drunk doing an imitation of Eddie Murphy's SNL era, "Buh Weat".

What I imagine he might have been saying is, "...the radio! [O]'tay?"

But, I digress...

He was little different in the service he performed for this country than your weekly Refuse Collectors or street cleaners or snow plow drivers or cops or EMT and Fire responders or the members of our military to our elected leaders on the local, statewide and national levels, all of whom sometimes have to perform really difficult and really dirty jobs.

These servants of the people may cheat on their wives, gamble away their weekly paycheck, do a little pot on weekends, might accidentally shoot their friends in the face or maybe even bow to Saudi leaders who are kith n kin to bin Laden himself.

What I'm getting at is that no matter what his personal faults and flaws were or are, you must try to separate your emotions from your assessment of the facts.

This article, I hope, will conclude by saying McCarthy may have had his faults as a person but there is no question he performed this country a great service.

Preaching to the rightwing choir again? You dredge up something written by a conservative with an anti-liberal agenda and it provides you with exactly the mindless fodder that you wanted. It takes all of the egregious faults of the conservative McCarthy and conveniently labels them as "liberal". It could have been written by Ann Coulter or any of the other rightwing hacks that churn out this endless stream of "red meat" to feed the fragile egos of the extreme right.

But thanks for conceding the point that your paranoia is being constantly fed by rightwing disinformation.

Oh, and if you want a hint, try Latin!

 

[Mojo2]

I can understand why you feel the need to flatter yourself. They were more susceptible to government propaganda because they lacked much in the way of alternative independent sources of information.

That's it? That's all you got? Your own paranoia fed by extreme right wing disinformation?

Joseph McCarthy

Just ONE of the lessons that might be learned from this article is that many of McCarthy's worst qualities and characteristics are now recognized (ESPECIALLY BY LIBERALS THEMSELVES) as identifiably Liberal descriptors.

That partly explains the venom he inspires from the fangs of the Libs and Dems and Progs and Leftists and Socialists and Marxists and Communists.

When they look at him and who he was they see a lot of themselves and they don't like it. And they can't help recognizing and being reminded of it.

So, whenever they can they let the arrows fly at even the mention of his name.

If only America's moderate Muslim population was as sincerely outraged at the fundamentalist and violent and non-violent Jihadi who they resemble (hell, it's impossible to know one from the next!) as today's Liberal Americans are outraged at ol' "Tailgunner Joe"!

And I haven't even finished reading this article yet! I want to wait until I can spend the time enjoying the ride with such an interesting and competent writer telling a compelling and very revealing story.

And, so I wonder, (BTW, is Derideo_Te an Australian term? What, if I might 'aks', does it mean? Is it anything close to being the utterance of a heavily accented Ozzie toddler or a drunk doing an imitation of Eddie Murphy's SNL era, "Buh Weat".

What I imagine he might have been saying is, "...the radio! [O]'tay?"

But, I digress...

He was little different in the service he performed for this country than your weekly Refuse Collectors or street cleaners or snow plow drivers or cops or EMT and Fire responders or the members of our military to our elected leaders on the local, statewide and national levels, all of whom sometimes have to perform really difficult and really dirty jobs.

These servants of the people may cheat on their wives, gamble away their weekly paycheck, do a little pot on weekends, might accidentally shoot their friends in the face or maybe even bow to Saudi leaders who are kith n kin to bin Laden himself.

What I'm getting at is that no matter what his personal faults and flaws were or are, you must try to separate your emotions from your assessment of the facts.

This article, I hope, will conclude by saying McCarthy may have had his faults as a person but there is no question he performed this country a great service.

Preaching to the rightwing choir again? You dredge up something written by a conservative with an anti-liberal agenda and it provides you with exactly the mindless fodder that you wanted. It takes all of the egregious faults of the conservative McCarthy and conveniently labels them as "liberal". It could have been written by Ann Coulter or any of the other rightwing hacks that churn out this endless stream of "red meat" to feed the fragile egos of the extreme right.

But thanks for conceding the point that your paranoia is being constantly fed by rightwing disinformation.

Oh, and if you want a hint, try Latin!

(Is this guy s'pposed to be Michael Flatley or somethin???)

Oh yeah???

Well, this here's for you.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Joseph McCarthy

Just ONE of the lessons that might be learned from this article is that many of McCarthy's worst qualities and characteristics are now recognized (ESPECIALLY BY LIBERALS THEMSELVES) as identifiably Liberal descriptors.

That partly explains the venom he inspires from the fangs of the Libs and Dems and Progs and Leftists and Socialists and Marxists and Communists.

When they look at him and who he was they see a lot of themselves and they don't like it. And they can't help recognizing and being reminded of it.

So, whenever they can they let the arrows fly at even the mention of his name.

If only America's moderate Muslim population was as sincerely outraged at the fundamentalist and violent and non-violent Jihadi who they resemble (hell, it's impossible to know one from the next!) as today's Liberal Americans are outraged at ol' "Tailgunner Joe"!



He was little different in the service he performed for this country than your weekly Refuse Collectors or street cleaners or snow plow drivers or cops or EMT and Fire responders or the members of our military to our elected leaders on the local, statewide and national levels, all of whom sometimes have to perform really difficult and really dirty jobs.

These servants of the people may cheat on their wives, gamble away their weekly paycheck, do a little pot on weekends, might accidentally shoot their friends in the face or maybe even bow to Saudi leaders who are kith n kin to bin Laden himself.

What I'm getting at is that no matter what his personal faults and flaws were or are, you must try to separate your emotions from your assessment of the facts.

This article, I hope, will conclude by saying McCarthy may have had his faults as a person but there is no question he performed this country a great service.

Preaching to the rightwing choir again? You dredge up something written by a conservative with an anti-liberal agenda and it provides you with exactly the mindless fodder that you wanted. It takes all of the egregious faults of the conservative McCarthy and conveniently labels them as "liberal". It could have been written by Ann Coulter or any of the other rightwing hacks that churn out this endless stream of "red meat" to feed the fragile egos of the extreme right.

But thanks for conceding the point that your paranoia is being constantly fed by rightwing disinformation.

Oh, and if you want a hint, try Latin!

(Is this guy s'pposed to be Michael Flatley or somethin???)

Oh yeah???

Well, this here's for you.

Your inability to provide even a remote facsimile of a reasonable response means that you have not only conceded your position entirely but you have managed to expose everything in your "note" as being utter nonsense.