The Supreme Court effectively abolishes the right to mass protest in three US states

Didn't you read the story? An organizer of a protest is held liable for violence at his protest that he had nothing to do with.

What about his free speech?
We already determined - without much effort - that Trump was not the organizer.

In fact, he encouraged his followers to act peacefully.

You have nothing to whine about on this subject.
 
We already determined - without much effort - that Trump was not the organizer.

In fact, he encouraged his followers to act peacefully.

You have nothing to whine about on this subject.
He is the one that sent them to the Capitol.

That's where the violence occurred.
 
Recent Golden Gate Bridge fiasco
Link to the court case so we can read it please. Did the organizers have a permit? Did they promote folks to do what ever they did? I haven't got a clue what you are talking about, or if it has a thing to do with First Amendment Issues, or if it was a case court.

Does it have a damn thing to even do with this thread?

Five words, with no link or verb, is not an argument.
 
5
Link to the court case so we can read it please. Did the organizers have a permit? Did they promote folks to do what ever they did? I haven't got a clue what you are talking about, or if it has a thing to do with First Amendment Issues, or if it was a case court.

Does it have a damn thing to even do with this thread?

Five words, with no link or verb, is not an argument.
55 Gallon drums of Cement with Agitators attached to them across a well traveled Major Interstate Bridge during Rush Hour is not a Protest
 
Ah, so the new conservative jurisprudence only applies to black people.
Specious lie.

The recent "jurisprudence" held a black protest organizer responsible for violence he planned, and encouraged.

Trump neither organized or encouraged violence.

Its dishonest to intentionally distort and misstate facts to present a false perception.

You're a lying ass.

Try to do better.
 
This is false. He neither planned or encouraged violence.
You're entitled to disagree with his trial results.


That doesn't give you leave to lie and misdirect the scenario elsewhere.

You can fuck off now.
 
You're entitled to disagree with his trial results.


That doesn't give you leave to lie and misdirect the scenario elsewhere.

You can fuck off now.
The trial did not argue that he planned or encouraged violence.
 

Forum List

Back
Top