The Strange Case of Hunter Biden

toobfreak

Tungsten/Glass Member
Apr 29, 2017
74,235
68,862
3,615
On The Way Home To Earth
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



redobiden.jpg
 
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



View attachment 380016

And then there was China. His dealings with Ukraine were small potatoes compared to what he was given from the CHICOMS.
 
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



View attachment 380016

And then there was China. His dealings with Ukraine were small potatoes compared to what he was given from the CHICOMS.
Right! And the fact that three debates are likely to go on without ANY of this subject being breached just furthers my feeling these debates are fundamentally dishonest. If such low and criminal people as this and Hillary, etc., are allowed to run for PRESIDENT, it can only be because THEY WANT THEM to.
 
It's a well-organized crime family, although the key players are insufferably stupid and hapless. I'd like to know what Hunted was thinking while fucking his brother's widow. Jerry Springer meets Maury Pauvich meets 3rd generation trailer trash.... what a ridiculous spectacle this shitstain is.

And who gets kicked out of the Navy for smoking crack cocaine? Just wow.....
 
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



View attachment 380016

And then there was China. His dealings with Ukraine were small potatoes compared to what he was given from the CHICOMS.
And Quid Pro Joe still hasn't explained why he took Hunter to China on Air Force 2.
 
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



View attachment 380016

And then there was China. His dealings with Ukraine were small potatoes compared to what he was given from the CHICOMS.
And Quid Pro Joe still hasn't explained why he took Hunter to China on Air Force 2.
It really does amaze me that such things go on not only without any apparent government interest, but even with no media interest as well, and I bet the topic barely comes up if at all during the debates. And we wonder why this country is in the mess it is.
 
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



View attachment 380016
You have to realize democRats don't give a shit about that stuff. But toss them a food stamp and a free pass to Obama's men's bath house they would vote for even hillary.
 
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



View attachment 380016


A former top prosecutor in Ukraine has spoken out to disprove one of President Donald Trump’s favorite conspiracy theories. The president and his allies tried to bribe Ukraine into investigating the Bidens via holding up military aid while laying on the pressure for an investigation into the Bidens’ baselessly alleged corruption. Now, former Ukrainian top prosecutor Ruslan Ryaboshapka has told Reuters that there’s no evidence supporting the president’s allegations against the Bidens of corruption. Specifically, the Trump team wanted Ukraine to re-examine a case in which former VP Joe’s son Hunter Biden had served on the board of a Ukrainian energy company called Burisma. Ryaboshapka’s office did so amidst a broader review of predecessors’ cases, and he says there was nothing there.

An audit of thousands of old case files by Ukrainian prosecutors found no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Hunter Biden, the former prosecutor general, who had launched the audit, told Reuters… After taking office, [Ruslan] Ryaboshapka in October announced an audit of old cases he inherited, including those related to the energy company Burisma, where Hunter Biden was a board member between 2014-2019.’


 
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



View attachment 380016

Hunter Biden is not running for anything. If we want to look at Hunter Biden maybe we should look at the Trump family. Is it coincidence that Trump wanted to build a new FBI headquarters across from one of his hotels? Or that fact that the US military has had it's personnel stay at Trump's resort in Scotland?

The fact is that Hunter Biden was named to the board because they wanted a name recognizable to the West. That is not unusual even in the United States. Board members are not required to run the company. They are a balance to the CEO and perform oversight of management.

State Department officials never expressed any concerns he was doing anything illegal. Just the appearance was not good.

Shokin's dropping of the investigation of Burisma was one of the reasons that Biden came to Ukraine with a ultimatum. Fire the corrupt Shokin or no US economic aid. Joe Biden was not trying to halt a investigation into Burisma.

What Trump wanted was a phony investigation of Hunter Biden. All for the sake of his re-election. There is no basis for a investigation of Hunter Biden.
 
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



View attachment 380016

And then there was China. His dealings with Ukraine were small potatoes compared to what he was given from the CHICOMS.

He was not given anything. The money he received was part of a investment fund. He did not pocket any of it.
 
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



View attachment 380016

And then there was China. His dealings with Ukraine were small potatoes compared to what he was given from the CHICOMS.
Right! And the fact that three debates are likely to go on without ANY of this subject being breached just furthers my feeling these debates are fundamentally dishonest. If such low and criminal people as this and Hillary, etc., are allowed to run for PRESIDENT, it can only be because THEY WANT THEM to.

You are dishonest. There is absolutely no evidence of anything illegal. It should not be a part of the debate as Hunter Biden is not running for anything. The Trump family is the crime family.
 
Too bad there won't be six debates
A former top prosecutor in Ukraine has spoken out to disprove one of President Donald Trump’s favorite conspiracy theories.
PULEEZE.
  1. That is like the Fox swearing he never ate the chickens.
  2. It's not up to any prosecutor in Ukraine to "clear" Biden of the charges since it is OUR charges and questions being made and asked not theirs, what qualification does that guy have that makes HIS opinion and word above reproach since corruption was the original problem there anyway?, and it is no "conspiracy theory" that Hunter had a mysterious job there that begs explanation that not only was a serious conflict of interest for the Bidens and Obama Administration but for which Joe Biden refuses to explain!
If this is a just a lot of ado about nothing, then let Hunter, Joe, Obama and others come forward and answer the questions but forth. The very fact that the Pelosi House sought to bury this aspect during her impeachment investigation PROVES there is a cover up here just as much as the way Mueller danced around investigating any illegalities in the Russia probe that pointed back at Obama's and Hillary's people and chose instead to focus solely on petty Trump campaign prosecutions.

Swing and a miss.
 
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family!

toobfreak boy did you hit a nerve with this one... :th_thgoodpost: Just look at the loony left that jumped on this op and are acting all nergeous and shit... Some of them even stuttered in their responses...
 
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



View attachment 380016

Hunter Biden is not running for anything. If we want to look at Hunter Biden maybe we should look at the Trump family.

People HAVE been looking at the Trump family. Strawman argument about Hunter, he only got that job because he was son of our VP and now that VP wants to be POTUS. Argument dismissed. The case and connections with Hunter-Ukraine and Hunter-China MUST be asked and answered because they were obviously tied to and driven by Biden as VP of the Obama Administration. Was there any crimes going on here? We know that if the table were turned, this would be a matter of GRAVE NATIONAL CONCERN for the Democrats!

WHAT IS JOE BIDEN'S REAL BACKROOM HISTORY AND CONNECTIONS WITH UKRAINE AND CHINA? If what we see on the surface appears so improper, what more lies below the surface? WHY DOES AMERICA NEED TO SEE TRUMP's TAX RECORDS AND BANKING BUT DOESN'T NEED TO KNOW THIS? These are VITAL questions needing answered by someone before we can even consider him for the highest office in the land. These are questions which need answered even if Joe wasn't running for anything at all. These are questions we must have good answers to so we can understand what furture relations a President Biden would have with the most dangerous superpower on the planet, China.
 
Last edited:
Too bad there won't be six debates, there really ought to be, but I understand the Democrats don't want to allow too much time to dig TOO deeply into the Biden Family! That is if Joe debates at all. Take his son, Hunter. The sad fact is questions really need be and OUGHT to be asked of Joe about this as Joe could be our next president and how can the voters know where he will be going in office if they have no real idea where he came, but I feel certain will simply be tip-toed around by the moderators at the debates wanting to stick to the "serious," less "conspiracy theory" topics of "real concern" to the nation.

  1. A corrupt Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on the board of his gas company, even though he had no experience in Ukraine — or in the energy sector. None. Yet he was paid millions to do nothing.
  2. Despite his lack of expertise, he joined the board of Burisma beginning in 2014 when his father as vice president was publicly representing U.S. policy on the country, which had become the center of a tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
  3. The oligarch behind the firm, Mykola Zlochevsky, faced investigations for money laundering and tax evasion.
  4. Staff at the State Department expressed concerns in 2015 when Hunter Biden started serving on the board of Burisma, but Hunter remained on. Where was Obama during all of this?
  5. The details of what Hunter actually did there have been mysterious and murky. Reuters reported that Hunter weighed in during scheduled meetings but did little of any substance. The report suggests he was compensated for contributing his high-profile name (as son of the U.S. VP).
  6. Exactly how much Hunter Biden was paid remains unclear despite continued questioning. As a director, Biden made up to $50,000 per month some months, according to the New York Times. He left Burisma in spring 2019, around the time that his father announced his 2020 presidential run.
  7. No one knows what became of all this money earned or what it was used on.
  8. In 2019, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump for asking the government there to look into the Bidens’ activities, yet we found no evidence that Hunter Biden himself was ever investigated by either Ukrainian or American authorities for his role as a board member of Burisma, despite the fact that Hunter's role there and the CONFLICT OF INTEREST it represented to VP Joe Biden and the Obama Administration oddly mirrored exactly what the House Democrats were impeaching Trump over for claiming!
It is my sincere wish Trump, if not some of the debate moderators, find a little time to actually delve into this gaping question.



View attachment 380016

And then there was China. His dealings with Ukraine were small potatoes compared to what he was given from the CHICOMS.

He was not given anything. The money he received was part of a investment fund. He did not pocket any of it.
HOW DO YOU KNOW? Why does Joe Biden and the Democrats refuse to confirm that then?
 

Forum List

Back
Top