saveliberty
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2009
- 58,756
- 10,837
- 2,030
Ok people. There's no need to go off on your partisan rants.
Yes, there have been 2 different bills that are very close to each other. So much so that reconciliation is possible.
I acknowledged the damn differences by saying that there were House and Senate versions. Don't instantly start accusing me of trying to re-write history...because I dont fabricate and I dont lie. Don't assume based on some partisan twisting of my words that you know me...or that I'm making some evil spin. That's not me. Got it?
This is why 95% of the talk on this forum is completely worthless. You engage in this back-biting crap that doesnt attempt to discuss anything with any good faith and just tries to slam people. Yeah, it's an internet forum board, but if any of you think you're to be taken seriously, try to be civil.
I think this is where my problem with your position lies (see bold above). You view the bills as very close to each other. I do not. The idea of penalties on those who choose not to be covered is important. Also, abortion as a potentially government funded option is unacceptable. On those two issues alone I would vote it down.
You have also assumed that one of these bills or a hybrid is a good bill. Government inching it's way into controlling my choices for health care is not a direction I have an interest. So, in closing, I submit you are blinded to your own partisanship.