pgm
Member
to bad the stimulus worked huh?
yes BO said unemploymet would never hit 8%, it hit 9-12% and has stayed there!! THe worst economic performance since the liberal Great Depression and for the same exact reasons.
No, he didn't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
to bad the stimulus worked huh?
yes BO said unemploymet would never hit 8%, it hit 9-12% and has stayed there!! THe worst economic performance since the liberal Great Depression and for the same exact reasons.
Bullshit. The government put everyone to work.
No, the government took 30% of the labor force and sent them to war in Europe and Asia.
The able bodied men were drafted and their housewives took their places in the factories. Anyone who wanted a paycheck and was willing to work could get one. When the war ended and all the troops came home, they SPENT, resulting in an economic boom.
Economic boom?
ROFL
Obviously the answer to that depends on what the given multiplier is. I'm very sorry you're stupid.So you can show that increase in GDP exceeds the principle amounts of Porkulus by a given multiplier?
I await your proofs eagerly.
I never said otherwise.ROFL
War is not a time of plenty, despite what the uneducated claim. WWII was marked by severe depredation that Americans had not seen since the 1930. Americans were told to "tighten their belts" in support of the war effort, and that's exactly what they did.
You're little game of claiming that I portrayed the war as a time of plenty when its quite obvious to anyone who can understand the English language that I stated that the time of plenty came AFTER the war reveals that you are nothing but a lying gobshite twat not worth speaking to So go fuck yourself and I sincerely hope that all the bad things in life happen to you and only you!Your little game of rewriting history to portray the war as a time of plenty is not just dishonest, but insulting to the millions who sacrificed as a matter of patriotic duty.
A young hoodlum? Really? A young hoodlum?A young hoodlum say,...
What you meant to source was Frédéric Bastiat's 1850 essay,"Ce qu'on voit et ce qu'on ne voit pas," which Heney Hazlitt clearly borrowed from. From reading the quote of Hazlitt you posted, its evident he was just rephrasing Bastiat's points from the perspective of white fear of black "hoodlums". And as fancy as the idea is to simpletons like yourself, it clearly doesn't ALWAYS apply. In fact, I've already refuted it you moron, In this economy, your shopkeeper isn't going to buy a new suit with the money -he's going to stash it in savings and not spend it. I'm not saying its good if the shopkeeper's window is broken - but if his 250 that he wasn't going to spend is taxed and spent on a road - then clearly the "community" you so love gains a road. You can't think in more than one dimension, can you?excerpts from ECONOMICS IN ONE LESSON by Henry Hazlitt
If we think of him as part of the community....
... the little hoodlum...
Name one "right winger" who came out in favor of more debt.
Ronald Wilson Reagan.
Name one "right winger" who came out in favor of more debt.
Ronald Wilson Reagan.
Wrong.