- Thread starter
- #41
we're done because the Congressional Record is right?
of course if so you would present a primary source to prove it rather than pretend like a small child you are right in the face of evidence.
"Although people were still deeply ambivalent about political parties, although one party did not necessarily recognize the legitimacy of the other, and although men on both sides were nostalgic- at one time or another- for the imaginary golden age of political harmony, few people could be found in the early 1790's who believed the parties did not exist. The parties had names: Federalist and Republican."-Susan Dunn, Jefferson's Second Revolution.
if I said anything about 1854 or Lincoln I'll pay you 10,000. Bet or run away again with your liberal tail between you legs
We're done because in that CR the term "Republican" is short for "Democratic-Republican,"
of course if so you would present a primary source to prove it rather than pretend like a small child you are right in the face of evidence.
"Although people were still deeply ambivalent about political parties, although one party did not necessarily recognize the legitimacy of the other, and although men on both sides were nostalgic- at one time or another- for the imaginary golden age of political harmony, few people could be found in the early 1790's who believed the parties did not exist. The parties had names: Federalist and Republican."-Susan Dunn, Jefferson's Second Revolution.
and because you are pretending to be so incredibly STUPID that you actually believe this party is the same one as the Republican Party which was founded in 1854 and whose first president was Abraham Lincoln.
if I said anything about 1854 or Lincoln I'll pay you 10,000. Bet or run away again with your liberal tail between you legs
Last edited: