The "Shut Up" Culture

[JakeStarkey]

The "Shut Up" Culture

Excellent description of the far right.

 

[bendog]

This thread wasn't started as topic for debate. I posted it as a matter of FACT.

Which it is.

Do with the knowledge what you will. I don't care.

Maybe a call-out thread designed to specifically attack the liberal posters on this board doesn't belong in this forum.

Why, how intolerant of you! (-:

 

[NYcarbineer]

This happens on this board every day. Every minute of every hour of every day. Well.... Okay, maybe not in the wee hours of the morning. But average it out and I'm right -- Every minute of every hour of every day.

These days if you want to talk about liberal policy, if you want to talk about obama's liberal policy, Eric Holder's liberal policy or even liberal policy in general......

You are instantly accused of being the vilest of people. Terrorist sympathizer, misogynist, racist, homophobe, woman-hater..... Whatever.

They find something to accuse you of. Because they don't want to talk about their liberal policies.

At all.

I challenge you to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that in my time on this forum I have refused to talk about 'liberal policies', that I don't make substantive fact based arguments, and that most of my participation in threads/topics consists of nothing more than namecalling.

You definitely use a different device than namecalling. It's called patronization. That's sort of like making certain the other debater is put in terms of a no-win situation. Literary devices may be related. I'm certain I'm guilty of that, too, since I'm always right.

When I can drive posters like Edgetho to threaten my life, I know I've won that debate.

 

[Edgetho]

I challenge you to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that in my time on this forum I have refused to talk about 'liberal policies', that I don't make substantive fact based arguments, and that most of my participation in threads/topics consists of nothing more than namecalling.

You definitely use a different device than namecalling. It's called patronization. That's sort of like making certain the other debater is put in terms of a no-win situation. Literary devices may be related. I'm certain I'm guilty of that, too, since I'm always right.

When I can drive posters like Edgetho to threaten my life, I know I've won that debate.

I would never threaten something that doesn't exist

 

[bendog]

Yer with us or aggen us.

 

[freedombecki]

dimocraps lie.

It's what they do

I actually am fond of many leftists, Mr. Edgetho. They're Americans, and quite often they're better Americans than I admit on debate boards. Probably less than 1% of us can understand Mary Matalin's marriage choice. I can even though not married to a liberal American man and wouldn't be because I would drive him absolutely bonkers, which has consequences not related to this topic.

I din't say anything about 'leftists' Ms Becki

I actually enjoy the company of some leftists and enjoy their sunny attitude toward life.

But I'm talking about leftists. I'm talking about dimocraps. dimocraps like the Liar in Chief, like Eric Himmler, Valerie Jarrett, Harry Reid, Nazi Pelousy, Dick Turban and like 99% of the supporters of dimocraps on this Board.

I would LOVE to see the leftists of this Country re-take the what has become the scummiest party in American History -- The criminal enterprise I call the dimocrap party.

But they can't. They don't have the power. They've been kicked to the curb. Like the Night of The Long Knives or Stalin's purge of the Soviet Army or Kim Jong Un's purge of his political rivals.

Same shit, minus the blood.

I have no problem with leftists. Or even socialists or communists or any other form of government or economic system people want to talk about.

What I have a problem with is dimocraps. Because they're LIARS, they're CRIMINALS and their voters don't give a flying fuck.

It is up to the left to take back the dimocrap party. Not me. Not us. Them.

They lost it. Just like they lost Occupy and the Flower Movement and the Anti-War movement and the Woman's movement and the NAACP and.... Well, everything else. They lost it all to dimocrap scum. Now they own it, not the left.

I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for the left to retake what they started

Corruption is not a pretty thing, and it's quite illegal.
Some groups want more advantages than they deserve.
Take Roe v. Wade, for example. It seemed like a corrective alternative to the deaths of 10,000 young women per year who died as a consequence of going to illegal quacks. It resulted in today's 1.3 million abortions, a sexual revolution that increased promiscuity and divorces, and the anti-Constitutional lawmaking that doesn't have to account to taxpayers for its financial and social consequences.

This nation came close to financing an international global warming tic based on omitted data. Fortunately, its chief perpetrators left a plethora of their plans online that was criticized and exposed by someone who received the email that was offended by its omission. All it would have taken here was a politically-appointed judicial benchmeister to have supported the lies created by that omission to indenture the American population to the tune of trillions of dollars for a comparative dime of correction. Our financial wizards knew this first, and exposed other omissions in the huge AGW push to embezzle taxpayer money with the myth they created.

How do we fix it so that the Constitution's charge to the Congress remains in the hands of the Congress?

The death of 1.3 million Americans isn't sitting well with the majority of Americans, nor is the import of foreign people hostile to the nation's founders, which also isn't sitting well in America.

It only took a handful of extremist America-haters and less than a million dollars to create a 9/11 situation that resulted in trillions of dollars of money routed to correct what true enemies did to the nation. Calumnies arose during the bickering over what to do about the situation, so anything that was done drew harsh criticism that split our nation when it was down.

The worst cruelty of my lifetime has been watching the American press making a ton of money by misrepresenting journalism's tenets and saddling America with evil jibes for a profit and self-aggrandizing on a scale never seen before on this continent.

What do we do about this?

Nothing, because the calumnies are allowed to go on forever.

The calumny is accepted as "criticism." How could it be when it is grounded in falsehood?

 

[freedombecki]

I challenge you to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that in my time on this forum I have refused to talk about 'liberal policies', that I don't make substantive fact based arguments, and that most of my participation in threads/topics consists of nothing more than namecalling.

You definitely use a different device than namecalling. It's called patronization. That's sort of like making certain the other debater is put in terms of a no-win situation. Literary devices may be related. I'm certain I'm guilty of that, too, since I'm always right.

When I can drive posters like Edgetho to threaten my life, I know I've won that debate.

Your win cycle, love, has a high price tag. Just sayin' .

 

[frigidweirdo]

I would LOVE to see the leftists of this Country re-take the what has become the scummiest party in American History -- The criminal enterprise I call the dimocrap party.

But they can't. They don't have the power. They've been kicked to the curb. Like the Night of The Long Knives or Stalin's purge of the Soviet Army or Kim Jong Un's purge of his political rivals.

You talk as if the right aren't as corrupt and aren't as scummy.

 

[Edgetho]

I would LOVE to see the leftists of this Country re-take the what has become the scummiest party in American History -- The criminal enterprise I call the dimocrap party.

But they can't. They don't have the power. They've been kicked to the curb. Like the Night of The Long Knives or Stalin's purge of the Soviet Army or Kim Jong Un's purge of his political rivals.

You talk as if the right aren't as corrupt and aren't as scummy.

They're not. Not by a long shot.

If the only way you can justify backing a criminal enterprise (the dimocrap party) is by telling yourself that we're just as bad (tu quoque equivalency) then you need to grow up or get some professional help.

 

[bendog]

One word: Iraq.

Trying to argue one side is worse than the other is self-delusion ... at best.

 

[frigidweirdo]

They're not. Not by a long shot.

If the only way you can justify backing a criminal enterprise (the dimocrap party) is by telling yourself that we're just as bad (tu quoque equivalency) then you need to grow up or get some professional help.

Both of them are as corrupt as hell. Both take part in the monopoly of power and both of them are paid for by people who want them to do exactly what they're told to do.

And the people, like you, play their part in keeping it all together by fighting and diverting attention from the reality.

 

[Edgetho]

They're not. Not by a long shot.

If the only way you can justify backing a criminal enterprise (the dimocrap party) is by telling yourself that we're just as bad (tu quoque equivalency) then you need to grow up or get some professional help.

Both of them are as corrupt as hell. Both take part in the monopoly of power and both of them are paid for by people who want them to do exactly what they're told to do.

And the people, like you, play their part in keeping it all together by fighting and diverting attention from the reality.

The difference is, we can control Republicans. When Nixon got out of control, a LOT of Republicans sided with democrats to take him down.

We have a conscience. We believe in the United States and in the Founding Principles.

dimocrap scum don't. dimocrap scum believe in unrestricted power. dimocrap scum are totalitarian scum and aren't afraid to use and misuse any power they have.

Do you live under a rock or something? Benghazi, the IRS, Fast and Furious, tapping the AP's phone lines, going after Sharyl Attkisson, James Rosen having his phone tapped, the dozens of illegal executive orders, the refusal to enforce lawfully enacted bills.... The list is almost endless.

dimocraps are scum

Don't give me this 'They're all the same' bullshit. Save that for your weak-minded pals.

P.S.
I'm not so much pro-Republican as I am anti-dimocrap. I don't really 'like' Republicans. But I hate, despise and detest, with every fiber of my being, dimocraps.

 

[freedombecki]

I would LOVE to see the leftists of this Country re-take the what has become the scummiest party in American History -- The criminal enterprise I call the dimocrap party.

But they can't. They don't have the power. They've been kicked to the curb. Like the Night of The Long Knives or Stalin's purge of the Soviet Army or Kim Jong Un's purge of his political rivals.

You talk as if the right aren't as corrupt and aren't as scummy.

That's not what I said. Did you intentionaly misquote what I said?

If you point the finger of accusation at somebody, you should use their words and not somebody else's, which confuses people quoting you for wings.

 

[Edgetho]

I would LOVE to see the leftists of this Country re-take the what has become the scummiest party in American History -- The criminal enterprise I call the dimocrap party.

But they can't. They don't have the power. They've been kicked to the curb. Like the Night of The Long Knives or Stalin's purge of the Soviet Army or Kim Jong Un's purge of his political rivals.

You talk as if the right aren't as corrupt and aren't as scummy.

That's not what I said. Did you intentionaly misquote what I said?

He quoted me, not you. I was quoting you and he quoted me and.....

Nevermind

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

And the same happens when the right speak, the left speak, whatever, whoever.

Why?

Because people are too comfortable to give a damn about finding the TRUTH.

The truth doesn't matter any more.

Actually the truth does matter. The problem is that each and every thread that starts out with a relevant topic and well thought-out replies gets derailed halfway through the first page with unrelated rhetoric or personal insults.

EVERY thread.

Exactly! It's almost not worth the time to post a well-thought-out response to an important issue. Someone will immediately call you a "hater" or "hillbilly" or "Conservatard" or call you an "effin'" idiot or some other inane, brainless, kneejerk, childish response.

Hold on right about here for a minute. I make personal attacks on others, but it is based on individual interactions and you attitude towards me or the side that I am representing. I can be the nicest guy in the world, but when confronted by not only your explicit words but your implications, I will take and individual and grind on them ....

I have tried using facts, I make sure to link all sources, but most of you others fail to respond. What is even worse you either go back and restate the same idiotic horse shit or you make a run from another senseless angle. When you become that aloof that you are not hearing what I am saying, then yeah, we might roll in the mud.

 

[nodoginnafight]

One word: Iraq.

Trying to argue one side is worse than the other is self-delusion ... at best.

BINGO - we have a winner!

 

[whitehall]

Are lefties ever going to stop whining about the "unfairness" of only controlling 2/3 of the government or a single fair and balanced network when they have the rest of the media? Will we ever hear anything but whining about the "vast right wing conspiracy? What a bunch of whiny jerks.

 

[Edgetho]

Think we have the right to question this dirtbag's motivations? To ask where this scumbag gets his 'facts'?

Try it and listen to the resounding "Shut Up" you get from the collective left.

Listen to this shit, people. It's disgusting. It's going on all over the Country, in every facet of life. And the people having this forced down their throats?

They don't have any choice but to listen

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3ZJB53PX74]Brent Terry, professor at Eastern Connecticut State University bashes conservatives - YouTube[/ame]

AUDIO: Professor rants ?Racist, misogynist, money-grubbing people? looking to suppress liberal youth vote, if GOP wins universities will close

A professor at Eastern Connecticut State University (ECSU) was caught on audio telling his creative writing class that Republicans will close colleges if they prevail in 2014 and that “racist, misogynist, money-grubbing people” want to suppress the liberal vote.

In a four-minute recording of a classroom lecture obtained by Campus Reform, Professor Brent Terry is heard strongly suggesting that conservatives are greedy racists who want to suppress the vote of anyone who might vote liberal.

“…racist, misogynist, money-grubbing people have so much power over the rest of us. And want things to go back—not to 1955, but to 1855,” Terry said to his Introduction to Creative Writing class Monday morning.

“There are a lot of people out there that do not want black people to vote, do not want Latinos to vote. Do not want old people to vote, or young people to vote. Because generally, people like you are liberal.”

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

Perhaps some of the left would like to explain the war on the right ...

Our parties have always been polar opposites, but since when has it been acceptable to wage a war against a political faction because of their belief's ??

I mean with guns drawn by the BLM ... cattle eating a few blades of grass??
Domestic Terrorist ... Terrorist, we reserve that word for our common enemies who wish to harm all of America.
IRS targeting political opponents.
Harry Reid using his bully pulpit to incite a nation.

I see a pattern of what I would call terrorism, looks to be clearly leveled against the right and either aided or driven by the left.

We all have different perspectives, some of them are knee jerk reactions to our perceived enemies and some are actually well thought out.

 

[ClosedCaption]

The "Shut Up" Culture

Excellent description of the far right.

Excellent description of the OP. Edge is the worst person to complain about this typa shit