These idiots really believe that the government is giving us rights, when it is the other way around.Wrong, the 2nd merely enumerates the natural Right to own weapons.
They have no concept of natural rights as supporters of a Nanny State.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
These idiots really believe that the government is giving us rights, when it is the other way around.Wrong, the 2nd merely enumerates the natural Right to own weapons.
/-----/ I'm gonna get me one of these things...The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms not guns. Guns are the weakest of the arms available in today's world. If you want to have the rights granted in the Constitution, you should be able to have all arms available to the militaries of the world.
Those who are fighting for just guns are a bunch of wooses. They are not fighting for the full rights of the 2nd amendment. They are ignoring and trampling on the 2nd amendment
1. arms - weapons considered collectively. implements of war
You don’t seem to know what “arms” are…..look it up as it applies to the constitution. “Weapons”, “guns” are terms not found in the 2@. you’re just babbling. The 2@ specifically refers to “people”:not “persons” and preempts the right to bear arms to members of a well regulated militia.The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms not guns. Guns are the weakest of the arms available in today's world. If you want to have the rights granted in the Constitution, you should be able to have all arms available to the militaries of the world.
Those who are fighting for just guns are a bunch of wooses. They are not fighting for the full rights of the 2nd amendment. They are ignoring and trampling on the 2nd amendment
1. arms - weapons considered collectively. implements of war
You don’t seem to know what “arms” are…..look it up as it applies to the constitution. “Weapons”, “guns” are terms not found in the 2@. you’re just babbling. The 2@ specifically refers to “people”:not “persons” and preempts the right to bear arm.The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms not guns. Guns are the weakest of the arms available in today's world. If you want to have the rights granted in the Constitution, you should be able to have all arms available to the militaries of the world.
Those who are fighting for just guns are a bunch of wooses. They are not fighting for the full rights of the 2nd amendment. They are ignoring and trampling on the 2nd amendment
1. arms - weapons considered collectively. implements of war
Originally, American Men owned their state armories and had a right to arm themselves from it. The Constitution was invented to prevent American Men from regulating their public servants.
I want a damn Davy Crockett for fuck's sake. Who's with me?
Davy Crockett (nuclear device) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
That is not what the second amendment says. You are altering the intent of the second amendment. My point the second amendment has changed with time, as it should. The nut cases yelling it cannot be changed are too late. It has been changed and should be changed as the world of arms changes.
You don’t seem to know what “arms” are…..look it up as it applies to the constitution. “Weapons”, “guns” are terms not found in the 2@. you’re just babbling. The 2@ specifically refers to “people”:not “persons” and preempts the right to bear arms to members of a well regulated militia.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You don’t seem to know what “arms” are…..look it up as it applies to the constitution. “Weapons”, “guns” are terms not found in the 2@. you’re just babbling. The 2@ specifically refers to “people”:not “persons” and preempts the right to bear arm.
people-human beings in general or considered collectively:
There is no right to bear arms for any persons as an individual. Hence, the SC has always advocated and accepted that “persons”: right to bear arms can and should be regulated. There has never been any exception to the ability of the govt, to regulate, never.