danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #8,101
I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Right To Bear Arms
- Thread starter Lakhota
- Start date
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,788
- 43,058
- 2,605
I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?judicial activism that has no basis in the common law.Exactly..it expressly ties gun protections to the well regulated militiaIf it has to be implied, it is not express. The 2nd is express.
That's not what the SC has ruled, and that applies.
The People are the Militia.
Not when the Second was written and passed.The People are the Militia.
can you translate that?
/———/ Correct, the Constitution does not list every citizen individually by name. Joe can own a gun, Bill can speak freely, John can vote. Wowza you’re the smart one.Judicial activism. There are no Individual terms in our Second Amendment. All terms are plural and collective./——/ The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms and was adopted on December 15, 1791, as part of the first ten amendments contained in the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the right belongs to individuals for self defense, while also ruling that the right is not unlimited and does not prohibit all regulation of either firearms or similar devices. State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing this right, per the incorporation of the Bill of Rights.WikipediaExactly..it expressly ties gun protections to the well regulated militialol. it must be implied that the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The 2nd amendment is an absolute and total prohibition against any federal weapons laws or jurisdiction.
It does not matter why.
No reason has to be given, and if a reason were given, it does not have to be the only one.
If it has to be implied, it is not express. The 2nd is express.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #8,104
Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?judicial activism that has no basis in the common law.Exactly..it expressly ties gun protections to the well regulated militia
That's not what the SC has ruled, and that applies.
The People are the Militia.
Not when the Second was written and passed.The People are the Militia.
can you translate that?
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #8,105
Our Constitution is Express not Implied. Any more special pleading?/———/ Correct, the Constitution does not list every citizen individually by name. Joe can own a gun, Bill can speak freely, John can vote. Wowza you’re the smart one.Judicial activism. There are no Individual terms in our Second Amendment. All terms are plural and collective./——/ The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms and was adopted on December 15, 1791, as part of the first ten amendments contained in the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the right belongs to individuals for self defense, while also ruling that the right is not unlimited and does not prohibit all regulation of either firearms or similar devices. State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing this right, per the incorporation of the Bill of Rights.WikipediaExactly..it expressly ties gun protections to the well regulated militialol. it must be implied that the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
If it has to be implied, it is not express. The 2nd is express.
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,788
- 43,058
- 2,605
Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?judicial activism that has no basis in the common law.That's not what the SC has ruled, and that applies.
The People are the Militia.
Not when the Second was written and passed.The People are the Militia.
can you translate that?
Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).
no women
no males under the age of 16.
no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).
militia member had to be able bodied.
Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.
So WOMEN could defend themselves.
So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.
They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #8,107
I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?judicial activism that has no basis in the common law.
The People are the Militia.
Not when the Second was written and passed.The People are the Militia.
can you translate that?
Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).
no women
no males under the age of 16.
no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).
militia member had to be able bodied.
Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.
So WOMEN could defend themselves.
So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.
They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,788
- 43,058
- 2,605
I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?Not when the Second was written and passed.
can you translate that?
Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).
no women
no males under the age of 16.
no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).
militia member had to be able bodied.
Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.
So WOMEN could defend themselves.
So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.
They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.
When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #8,109
anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?
can you translate that?
Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).
no women
no males under the age of 16.
no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).
militia member had to be able bodied.
Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.
So WOMEN could defend themselves.
So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.
They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.
When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,788
- 43,058
- 2,605
anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.can you translate that?
Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).
no women
no males under the age of 16.
no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).
militia member had to be able bodied.
Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.
So WOMEN could defend themselves.
So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.
They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.
When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?
Bud, you might as well state "The Lord is My Shepard" instead of that.
neither have squat to do with the 2nd.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #8,111
neither do you.anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.
Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).
no women
no males under the age of 16.
no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).
militia member had to be able bodied.
Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.
So WOMEN could defend themselves.
So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.
They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.
When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?
Bud, you might as well state "The Lord is My Shepard" instead of that.
neither have squat to do with the 2nd.
Our Constitution is Express not Implied.
Where are you getting your Individual natural rights from?
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,788
- 43,058
- 2,605
neither do you.anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?
Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).
no women
no males under the age of 16.
no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).
militia member had to be able bodied.
Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.
So WOMEN could defend themselves.
So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.
They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.
When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?
Bud, you might as well state "The Lord is My Shepard" instead of that.
neither have squat to do with the 2nd.
Our Constitution is Express not Implied.
Where are you getting your Individual natural rights from?
Our Constitution is Express not Implied.
You post that, but I see "The Lord is my Shepard".
Is there a chance of you coming back to Earth eventually?
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #8,113
you need a valid argument not a diversion; floozy.neither do you.anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.
When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?
Bud, you might as well state "The Lord is My Shepard" instead of that.
neither have squat to do with the 2nd.
Our Constitution is Express not Implied.
Where are you getting your Individual natural rights from?
Our Constitution is Express not Implied.
You post that, but I see "The Lord is my Shepard".
Is there a chance of you coming back to Earth eventually?
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,788
- 43,058
- 2,605
you need a valid argument not a diversion; floozy.neither do you.anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?
Bud, you might as well state "The Lord is My Shepard" instead of that.
neither have squat to do with the 2nd.
Our Constitution is Express not Implied.
Where are you getting your Individual natural rights from?
Our Constitution is Express not Implied.
You post that, but I see "The Lord is my Shepard".
Is there a chance of you coming back to Earth eventually?
you need a valid argument not a diversion
you need to find a mirror for that, whore.
Your statement, above, is a lieExactly..it expressly ties gun protections to the well regulated militia
You know your statement is a lie, or you argue form abject ignorance.How the fuck do you know what I know?Thus, a lie -- or, in your case, a series of them.
Tell us which.
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 67,354
- 33,340
- 2,300
Your statement, above, is a lie
In your OPINION doofus.
The word "lie" has no place in a debate filled with opinion.
If I intentionally misstate facts..THAT might be a lie. Not the case however.
Get back to me when you know how to debate
Thinker101
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2017
- 24,375
- 14,316
- 1,415
Your statement, above, is a lie
In your OPINION doofus.
The word "lie" has no place in a debate filled with opinion.
If I intentionally misstate facts..THAT might be a lie. Not the case however.
Get back to me when you know how to debate
Yet you use the word "lie" in every other post you make...go figure.
Incorrect.In your OPINION doofus.Your statement, above, is a lie
You are fully aware of the fact your statement is untrue.
Thus, you lied.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 34
- Views
- 854
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 238
- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 394
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 175
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 921
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 11
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8073
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-