Crackerjack
Too sick for a cure
By the way, the neat part of this argument is that additive manufacturing techniques are going to make it completely moot in about a decade, if not sooner.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was under the impression that the founders were against having a standing army. That the 2nd amendment exists so that the state can summon a militia in times of need.No. They weren't. They wanted the civilians to be as equally armed as the government military; so when the consent to be governed was revoked, the citizens could enforce it. That's why the 2nd amendment exists.If the founders were wrong, amend.
Muskets for all; you have to be able to load and shoot in under a minute, to be well regulated.The right of the people to have motherfucking machine guns, shall not be infringed.
We must get back to the true meaning of infringement:
in·fringe
inˈfrinj/
verb
- actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
"making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright"
synonyms: contravene, violate, transgress, break, breach; More
- act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.
"his legal rights were being infringed"
synonyms: restrict, limit, curb, check, encroach on;
As is still the case. And it’s true... they were against a standing army. But we have one now. Which makes an armed citizenry all the more important, to maintain our freedom.I was under the impression that the founders were against having a standing army. That the 2nd amendment exists so that the state can summon a militia in times of need.No. They weren't. They wanted the civilians to be as equally armed as the government military; so when the consent to be governed was revoked, the citizens could enforce it. That's why the 2nd amendment exists.If the founders were wrong, amend.
We have to fear our men and women in the military? That's a different message than what we might normally hear from those on the right.As is still the case. And it’s true... they were against a standing army. But we have one now. Which makes an armed citizenry all the more important, to maintain our freedom.I was under the impression that the founders were against having a standing army. That the 2nd amendment exists so that the state can summon a militia in times of need.No. They weren't. They wanted the civilians to be as equally armed as the government military; so when the consent to be governed was revoked, the citizens could enforce it. That's why the 2nd amendment exists.If the founders were wrong, amend.
.Doesnt say anything about machine gunsThe right of the people to have motherfucking machine guns, shall not be infringed.
We must get back to the true meaning of infringement:
in·fringe
inˈfrinj/
verb
- actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
"making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright"
synonyms: contravene, violate, transgress, break, breach; More
- act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.
"his legal rights were being infringed"
synonyms: restrict, limit, curb, check, encroach on;
and it also says its contingent on having a well regulated militia like the national guard. Sorry
Like your avatar, it puts the lie to the other lefties here who are trying to hide the fact they are communists/marxists.We have to fear our men and women in the military? That's a different message than what we might normally hear from those on the right.As is still the case. And it’s true... they were against a standing army. But we have one now. Which makes an armed citizenry all the more important, to maintain our freedom.I was under the impression that the founders were against having a standing army. That the 2nd amendment exists so that the state can summon a militia in times of need.No. They weren't. They wanted the civilians to be as equally armed as the government military; so when the consent to be governed was revoked, the citizens could enforce it. That's why the 2nd amendment exists.If the founders were wrong, amend.
More so those who command them...We have to fear our men and women in the military? That's a different message than what we might normally hear from those on the right.As is still the case. And it’s true... they were against a standing army. But we have one now. Which makes an armed citizenry all the more important, to maintain our freedom.I was under the impression that the founders were against having a standing army. That the 2nd amendment exists so that the state can summon a militia in times of need.No. They weren't. They wanted the civilians to be as equally armed as the government military; so when the consent to be governed was revoked, the citizens could enforce it. That's why the 2nd amendment exists.If the founders were wrong, amend.
so they can summon an armed militia in times of need, not mention that there would be less need to summon an already armed populace...and regardless of the founders/framers intentions concerning a standing army they made sure their intentions of an armed populace were included in the constitution.I was under the impression that the founders were against having a standing army. That the 2nd amendment exists so that the state can summon a militia in times of need.
We should have Standing Army tax rates; but it goes against right wing fantasy.I was under the impression that the founders were against having a standing army. That the 2nd amendment exists so that the state can summon a militia in times of need.No. They weren't. They wanted the civilians to be as equally armed as the government military; so when the consent to be governed was revoked, the citizens could enforce it. That's why the 2nd amendment exists.If the founders were wrong, amend.
Irrelevant. What you are saying is that the men and women in our military are willing to turn their arms against the people they have sworn to protect. Could you be any more disrespectful.More so those who command them...We have to fear our men and women in the military? That's a different message than what we might normally hear from those on the right.As is still the case. And it’s true... they were against a standing army. But we have one now. Which makes an armed citizenry all the more important, to maintain our freedom.I was under the impression that the founders were against having a standing army. That the 2nd amendment exists so that the state can summon a militia in times of need.No. They weren't. They wanted the civilians to be as equally armed as the government military; so when the consent to be governed was revoked, the citizens could enforce it. That's why the 2nd amendment exists.If the founders were wrong, amend.