The religion of atheists is socialism

[Mudda]

Yes, I have a question. Would you like to expand the social contract for the general welfare of all Americans?

Only that Libtard Jesus would.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, I have a question. Would you like to expand the social contract for the general welfare of all Americans?

Only that Libtard Jesus would.

If Only, He could have gone to a "sanctuary city".

 

[ding]

No. That's not the only reason. In fact, it probably doesn't even make the list of reasons. Would you like to expand the social contract for the general welfare of all Americans?

Yes, that is the Only reason. Our social Contract already applies to all Americans.

No. It isn't. Would you like to expand the social contract for the general welfare of all Americans?

Our federal Constitution applies to the People of our Republic. Any questions?

Yes, I have a question. Would you like to expand the social contract for the general welfare of all Americans?

No need to expand it; it already covers, all Americans.

But not all of them have guaranteed fair wages, right? Don't you care about them?

 

[ding]

There is no need to micromanage anyone. That is what you are effectively doing when you advocate pareto optimal. We're all adults here. We don't need to be micromanaged.

just more right wing fantasy? we have laws. any laws, gains say your contention.

You are not making any sense. You advocate pareto optimal which is based on micromanagement. I am arguing that we don't need to be micromanaged. This is independent of the fact that we have laws. Yes, we have laws. So what?

The law is socialism. Any law is a limit on natural rights. We are managed, all the time; either by morals, laws, or culture.

No. That law is not socialism. We have individual rights not group rights.

rights involve the law; we have social justice; it is socialism.

Surely we can do more, right?

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, that is the Only reason. Our social Contract already applies to all Americans.

No. It isn't. Would you like to expand the social contract for the general welfare of all Americans?

Our federal Constitution applies to the People of our Republic. Any questions?

Yes, I have a question. Would you like to expand the social contract for the general welfare of all Americans?

No need to expand it; it already covers, all Americans.

But not all of them have guaranteed fair wages, right? Don't you care about them?

fair is relative. minimum standards are ok as a social safety net.

 

[danielpalos]

just more right wing fantasy? we have laws. any laws, gains say your contention.

You are not making any sense. You advocate pareto optimal which is based on micromanagement. I am arguing that we don't need to be micromanaged. This is independent of the fact that we have laws. Yes, we have laws. So what?

The law is socialism. Any law is a limit on natural rights. We are managed, all the time; either by morals, laws, or culture.

No. That law is not socialism. We have individual rights not group rights.

rights involve the law; we have social justice; it is socialism.

Surely we can do more, right?

of course; we should be striving for a more perfect Union of States.

 

[ding]

No. It isn't. Would you like to expand the social contract for the general welfare of all Americans?

Our federal Constitution applies to the People of our Republic. Any questions?

Yes, I have a question. Would you like to expand the social contract for the general welfare of all Americans?

No need to expand it; it already covers, all Americans.

But not all of them have guaranteed fair wages, right? Don't you care about them?

fair is relative. minimum standards are ok as a social safety net.

That does not sound like the good of general welfare for all. Shame on you.

 

[ding]

You are not making any sense. You advocate pareto optimal which is based on micromanagement. I am arguing that we don't need to be micromanaged. This is independent of the fact that we have laws. Yes, we have laws. So what?

The law is socialism. Any law is a limit on natural rights. We are managed, all the time; either by morals, laws, or culture.

No. That law is not socialism. We have individual rights not group rights.

rights involve the law; we have social justice; it is socialism.

Surely we can do more, right?

of course; we should be striving for a more perfect Union of States.

Can I count on you to support redistribution of wealth?

 

[TNHarley]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

That is one of the dumbest OPs I have ever read. And that includes rderps political threads and gunos flame threads. Congratulations.

 

[ding]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

That is one of the dumbest OPs I have ever read. And that includes rderps political threads and gunos flame threads. Congratulations.

Thanks. Given that socialism intentionally defies examination, it is understandable that you have never made these connections.

 

[TNHarley]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

That is one of the dumbest OPs I have ever read. And that includes rderps political threads and gunos flame threads. Congratulations.

Thanks. Given that socialism intentionally defies examination, it is understandable that you have never made these connection.

Lol, maybe because it isn't reality?

 

[ding]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

That is one of the dumbest OPs I have ever read. And that includes rderps political threads and gunos flame threads. Congratulations.

Thanks. Given that socialism intentionally defies examination, it is understandable that you have never made these connection.

Lol, maybe because it isn't reality?

Nope. It isn't a new observation.

 

[danielpalos]

Our federal Constitution applies to the People of our Republic. Any questions?

Yes, I have a question. Would you like to expand the social contract for the general welfare of all Americans?

No need to expand it; it already covers, all Americans.

But not all of them have guaranteed fair wages, right? Don't you care about them?

fair is relative. minimum standards are ok as a social safety net.

That does not sound like the good of general welfare for all. Shame on you.

sure it does; you merely don't understand any of the concepts. a rising minimum wage tide lifts all wage boats.

 

[danielpalos]

The law is socialism. Any law is a limit on natural rights. We are managed, all the time; either by morals, laws, or culture.

No. That law is not socialism. We have individual rights not group rights.

rights involve the law; we have social justice; it is socialism.

Surely we can do more, right?

of course; we should be striving for a more perfect Union of States.

Can I count on you to support redistribution of wealth?

sure; we already have death and taxes.

 

[ding]

Yes, I have a question. Would you like to expand the social contract for the general welfare of all Americans?

No need to expand it; it already covers, all Americans.

But not all of them have guaranteed fair wages, right? Don't you care about them?

fair is relative. minimum standards are ok as a social safety net.

That does not sound like the good of general welfare for all. Shame on you.

sure it does; you merely don't understand any of the concepts. a rising minimum wage tide lifts all wage boats.

Really? Those people still seem to be struggling mightily to me. Are you sure we shouldn't redistribute some wealth?

 

[ding]

No. That law is not socialism. We have individual rights not group rights.

rights involve the law; we have social justice; it is socialism.

Surely we can do more, right?

of course; we should be striving for a more perfect Union of States.

Can I count on you to support redistribution of wealth?

sure; we already have death and taxes.

That doesn't seem like it is enough. Can I count on you for more?

 

[danielpalos]

No need to expand it; it already covers, all Americans.

But not all of them have guaranteed fair wages, right? Don't you care about them?

fair is relative. minimum standards are ok as a social safety net.

That does not sound like the good of general welfare for all. Shame on you.

sure it does; you merely don't understand any of the concepts. a rising minimum wage tide lifts all wage boats.

Really? Those people still seem to be struggling mightily to me. Are you sure we shouldn't redistribute some wealth?

we already have. poor is relative. the right wing wants, no minimum wage for our First World economy and labor force.

 

[danielpalos]

rights involve the law; we have social justice; it is socialism.

Surely we can do more, right?

of course; we should be striving for a more perfect Union of States.

Can I count on you to support redistribution of wealth?

sure; we already have death and taxes.

That doesn't seem like it is enough. Can I count on you for more?

still trying solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, simply for the sake of public morals.

 

[ding]

Surely we can do more, right?

of course; we should be striving for a more perfect Union of States.

Can I count on you to support redistribution of wealth?

sure; we already have death and taxes.

That doesn't seem like it is enough. Can I count on you for more?

still trying solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, simply for the sake of public morals.

If you like your poverty, you can keep your poverty.

 

[ding]

But not all of them have guaranteed fair wages, right? Don't you care about them?

fair is relative. minimum standards are ok as a social safety net.

That does not sound like the good of general welfare for all. Shame on you.

sure it does; you merely don't understand any of the concepts. a rising minimum wage tide lifts all wage boats.

Really? Those people still seem to be struggling mightily to me. Are you sure we shouldn't redistribute some wealth?

we already have. poor is relative. the right wing wants, no minimum wage for our First World economy and labor force.

I don't believe it has been enough. You need to aim higher.