The reason homosexuality is a choice

[Bass v 2.0]

You can be neutral and not vote either way, that way you won't forsake your religion.

Why shouldn't the Bass vote? Your options for others is retarded, they basically consist of either vote for sodomite marriage or don't vote at all, what kind of BS is that?

Well you shouldn't vote to push your religion onto others so...

You present no compelling case that voting against something based on religious beliefs constitutes forcing one's religion on somebody else. And what about those who are not religious yet are against gay marriage? What are you going to tell them?

 

[ABikerSailor]

Face it Chucked Ass.......you've been pwned yet again.

I bet your sphincter is around the size of the Holland Tunnel by now......

 

[Father Time]

Why shouldn't the Bass vote? Your options for others is retarded, they basically consist of either vote for sodomite marriage or don't vote at all, what kind of BS is that?

Well you shouldn't vote to push your religion onto others so...

You present no compelling case that voting against something based on religious beliefs constitutes forcing one's religion on somebody else. And what about those who are not religious yet are against gay marriage? What are you going to tell them?

"Can we have gay marraige"
"No"
"Why not"
"Because it's against my religion"

Sure sounds like it to me. Your religion would be unaffected by the new law.

Also I'd argue with your non-religious friends that there's no reason to keep it outlawed.

 

[AVG-JOE]

Lets say homosexuality is natural, that is- people are born that way, that still doesn't explain why gay men like taking it up the anus and why women like lick licking each others vagina and use dildos to have sex. The fact that women use dildos instead of a penis prove its all a choice, because naturally they would not be born wanting to use a dildo, just as men are not born wanting to have anal sex, both are learned sexual practices meaning it involves choice.

Charlie, if you don't understand why people like to fuck, you're doing it wrong.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Hey..........even his penis has too many moving parts for Chucked Ass.

 

[MajikMyst]

Why shouldn't the Bass vote? Your options for others is retarded, they basically consist of either vote for sodomite marriage or don't vote at all, what kind of BS is that?

Well you shouldn't vote to push your religion onto others so...

You present no compelling case that voting against something based on religious beliefs constitutes forcing one's religion on somebody else. And what about those who are not religious yet are against gay marriage? What are you going to tell them?

And you present no compelling evidence that a lump of shit has less brains than you do..

Voting on a law based on your religion IS forcing your religion on others.. Unless said law only effects people of the same religion.. Since we are not all christian in this country.. Any vote on a law based on chrisitian belief is forcing your relgion on to others and it is wrong..

Reguardless.. As I pointed out and you ignored.. Judge not les ye be judged.. It isn't for you to decide if anal sex or homosexuality is wrong.. In fact it is not.. If you actually read your bible you would know that.. Research it yourself.. I am tired of teaching you christain morons what you should already know..

Just remember, Athiests and Agnostics know more about the bible, christian history, and the christian religion in general and you still call yourself a christian..

Your a disgrace and a sinner.. I am no christian, so I can and will judge you!! I am not bound by your stupid laws and ideas..

 

[Father Time]

Well you shouldn't vote to push your religion onto others so...

You present no compelling case that voting against something based on religious beliefs constitutes forcing one's religion on somebody else. And what about those who are not religious yet are against gay marriage? What are you going to tell them?

And you present no compelling evidence that a lump of shit has less brains than you do..

Voting on a law based on your religion IS forcing your religion on others.. Unless said law only effects people of the same religion..

I don't know about that but this would not change how religions operate unless they choose to marry gays so you can't play the religion card here and pretend you're not forcing it on others.

 

[Toronado3800]

IF 51% of the folks in the country believe in Killing 1st born babies because of their religion we can't let them vote for that.

How about if 51% favor separate and equal for the races based on their religion? After all, give to the Romans what is Roman. Can't let that happen.

What if 51% of the population feels working on Sunday should be illegal based on their religion, can't let that happen.

What if 51% of folks want to criminalize pre-marital sex based on their religion?

Adult magazines?

Prostitution? (ha!)

Sex with for purposes other than procreation? Afterall, that is wasting God's gift to us.

We need lots of protection against what even a possible majority of folks believe in.

 

[Cold Fusion38]

JANE GOODALL. You need to know NOTHING MORE about homosexuality as a "CHOICE" than to read her research with primates. WAKE UP!!! Sexual orinatation is NOT a choice!!!

 

[ABikerSailor]

IF 51% of the folks in the country believe in Killing 1st born babies because of their religion we can't let them vote for that.

How about if 51% favor separate and equal for the races based on their religion? After all, give to the Romans what is Roman. Can't let that happen.

What if 51% of the population feels working on Sunday should be illegal based on their religion, can't let that happen.

What if 51% of folks want to criminalize pre-marital sex based on their religion?

Adult magazines?

Prostitution? (ha!)

Sex with for purposes other than procreation? Afterall, that is wasting God's gift to us.

We need lots of protection against what even a possible majority of folks believe in.

I sincerely hope that is satire, otherwise, that means you've gone off the deep end.

51 percent feels like not working on Sunday? Guess what, blue laws still exist.

"Give to Rome what is Rome's?" No. You got the scripture wrong, because Yeshua stated "render unto Cesar what is Cesar's, and render unto God what is His". Oh yeah.....guess what, the pagan rituals of over 1,000 years ago are still being practiced today, it's called the Catholic religion, which uses solstices and fertility symbols to rip off Yeshua. Oh yeah, the KJV (most widely used Bible today), is HEAVILY censored and edited. Ever hear of the Niecine council?

Criminalizing pre marital sex? Ummm......the Moron Minority has that covered already, it's called abstinence only sex education.

Ban adult magazines? Then what will all the horny 13 year old boys whack off to?

Prostitution is illegal here in the US (except Nevada), and we STILL have all sorts of problems. Legalize it, or at the very least, decriminalize it, so that if a working girl is robbed, raped or beaten, she will have the means to get justice for herself, even though what she was doing was illegal. Beats the costs of funerals.

Oh yeah........over in Europe, where their culture is SIGNIFICANTLY older than ours, it's legal. Not many problems over there either, as the Carabineri (Italian police) cruise the brothel district in Catania Sicily regularly.

Incidentally, probably the safest place in the city.

Sex for procreation only? Umm........no. Why? Well, in several different philosophies, it states that evil is that which stops life, and goodness is that which fosters it. Additionally, if you talk to psychologists, you will understand that every human is a pleasure seeking individual, although some put off gratification for something else, but eventually they will be happy because then they will be getting gratified.

Bottom line, if sex is bad, why does it feel so good?

And this little gem..........We need lots of protection against what even a possible majority of folks believe in? Ya know, it sounds just like the kind of thinking that will get people killed. Ever hear of Torquemada?

Additionally, the only "sins" that God said not to do are in the 10 Commandments, or, if you prefer, the original 7 Noahide Commandments, which say pretty much the same thing.

All these other "sins"? Those are nothing more than an interpretation of a heavily and censored book called the KJV, that men use to try to control others.

 

[Toronado3800]

yeah, let me be clear. I DO NOT support any of that banning work or alcohol on Sunday or banning porn crud just to appease someone's religion.

By all means I want to keep their religion out of my life and they should want to keep mine out of theirs.

The post was meant to be more sarcastic, or "what if" my religion says no anal sex even in marriage and we're in the majority, wouldn't you want protection from my religion type of a thing.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Cool.......I was hoping you were sarcastic.

Whew........

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Still no compelling evidence that voting against gay marriage means one is imposing there religion onto others, you sodomite lovers can't have your way or no way.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Have your way or no way?

That's like giving someone the choice between life in jail and execution.

You ain't exactly the sharpest or brightest crayon in the box, are ya Ass Chucker?

 

[amrchaos]

Still no compelling evidence that voting against gay marriage means one is imposing there religion onto others, you sodomite lovers can't have your way or no way.

Religious belief is a perspective

Everyone tends to vote there perspective

Therefore, not only are you trying to impose your religious beliefs on others, they are imposing their beliefs onto you!!!

On this issue, Bass, tell those hypocrites to back off!! Voting your beliefs is the American Way!!

 

[Liability]

Still no compelling evidence that voting against gay marriage means one is imposing there religion onto others, you sodomite lovers can't have your way or no way.

Religious belief is a perspective

Everyone tends to vote there perspective

Therefore, not only are you trying to impose your religious beliefs on others, they are imposing their beliefs onto you!!!

On this issue, Bass, tell those hypocrites to back off!! Voting your beliefs is the American Way!!

Since I am not a strong advocate for the alleged "right" of gays to get "married," my question is more genuine than you might guess.

The question is: IS it really a matter about which the majority should have an absolute and determinative say?

Or, is it one of those matters that transcends any notion of majority rule?

For illustration only (not a true analog): this nation used to hold that blacks were inferior and worthy of being held as mere property. When slavery ended, there was a long period in our history (at least in some ares in the land) where blacks were not entitled to actual equal protection of the laws. If a majority wanted "those" blacks to live in separate communities and to be required to drink water from separate water fountains and dine at separate lunch counters, etc., was that properly something that was subject to the will of a voting majority? Or was that kind of legislation a wrong that transcended the will of the majority?

 

[amrchaos]

Still no compelling evidence that voting against gay marriage means one is imposing there religion onto others, you sodomite lovers can't have your way or no way.

Religious belief is a perspective

Everyone tends to vote there perspective

Therefore, not only are you trying to impose your religious beliefs on others, they are imposing their beliefs onto you!!!

On this issue, Bass, tell those hypocrites to back off!! Voting your beliefs is the American Way!!

Since I am not a strong advocate for the alleged "right" of gays to get "married," my question is more genuine than you might guess.

The question is: IS it really a matter about which the majority should have an absolute and determinative say?

Or, is it one of those matters that transcends any notion of majority rule?

For illustration only (not a true analog): this nation used to hold that blacks were inferior and worthy of being held as mere property. When slavery ended, there was a long period in our history (at least in some ares in the land) where blacks were not entitled to actual equal protection of the laws. If a majority wanted "those" blacks to live in separate communities and to be required to drink water from separate water fountains and dine at separate lunch counters, etc., was that properly something that was subject to the will of a voting majority? Or was that kind of legislation a wrong that transcended the will of the majority?

I personally think the issue "transcends any notion of majority rule".

The idea of keeping a group of people from practicing basic rights due to their eccentric behavior appears to be based on prejudices against that group.

But the Bass is trying to argue that he is not imposing his religious beliefs on others. When you put issues like this to a vote, you are expressing your sincerest beliefs. And since Homosexuals are a minority in the population, they will become oppressed by the majority of Heterosexuals until they wise up.

Like start a religion that marry Gays and get it recognized by the US government!! That is the quickest path to obtaining their rights--through the protection of a newly minted Gay friendly religion.

I wonder will their minister wear a Habit??

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Marriages is *NOT* a basic right, the problem with a lot of us Americans is that we have so much freedom that we think falsely we have a "right" to almost anything to the point where we think its automatic and "basic," marriage is not one of them. Sodomites are not lacking basic rights nor are they an oppressed minority or a minority at all for that matter, they're simply a group of people with a sexually deviant lifestyle seeking to have that lifestyle legitimatized and accepted and want special right to get married.

 

[Cold Fusion38]

How about we get the gov't out of RELIGION. Marriage is a RELIGIOUS institution so the gov't can give CIVIL UNIONS and your Chruch can or can NOT marry same sex persons if they WANT to. PROBLEM SOLVED!

 

[Bass v 2.0]

How about we get the gov't out of RELIGION. Marriage is a RELIGIOUS institution so the gov't can give CIVIL UNIONS and your Chruch can or can NOT marry same sex persons if they WANT to. PROBLEM SOLVED!

How about not politicizing sexual lifestyles? Whatever one does in their bedroom sexually should stay there and not be politically legitimatized, if religion should should stay out o government so should sexual lifestyles.