The Real Trump? Here's the Real Trump, this just in...

Well, there was that little kerfluffle on Sept 11, 2001, but don't let that get in the way.

MORON....the tax cuts by GWB were enacted in MAY, 2003.....

How ignorant these right wing fools must be.......
 
His only hope now, is to flip on the Orange Comrade.


I also read an article about Flynn's woes with the Pentagon; his pension is in peril...

Fox news, however, may hire him as the pundit in "Ethics in Government".
 
He doesn't care about the debt, he only cares for the elites and his corps and his buddies corps. He will bankrupt the US like his companies.
You libfucks didn't give a shit about the debt that Obummer increased from 9 trillion to 19 trillion, why are you so fucking worried now? Without double standards, liberals would have no standards at all. Especially during that time, the liberal RICH got much RICHER, and the most in POVERTY. Yep cant get more stupid than a liberal.

He has no choice, Bush put us in a recession and he had to continue to fight the war Bush started for the US.

This Pres is a charlatan, and is going to ruin the country. As it is, we taxpayers pay state and Fed subsidies to these companies that are making billions a year. Trump is a dork.

No Democrats who controlled congress from Jan 2007 to Jan 2010 put us in a recession, while ignoring warnings from Bush. OH SNAP!

Another Republican lie. Bush's tax cuts crashed the economy, along with his unfunded wars, Medicaid Part D, and his housing for everyone proposals. Republicans, as usual blame everyone but themselves.

No they didn't, it was the Democrats pushing banks to make bad loans that fueled the meltdown. President Bush tried to stop them multiple times but Dem's refused and insisted nothing was wrong. When it blew up in their stupid faces then Dem's tried to blame Wall Street.
 
As posted above you are limited intellectually, and in you knowledge base, i.e. education: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion ...."; you might have someone read to you and help you understand the first amendment - which is under attack by President Trump with his constant attacks on the free press.
You do realize nowhere in the Constitution does it say separation of church and state?

The 2nd Amendment doesn't say you have the right to own a rifle or pistol.
sure it does. right to bear arms. did you miss that part?
As posted above you are limited intellectually, and in you knowledge base, i.e. education: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion ...."; you might have someone read to you and help you understand the first amendment - which is under attack by President Trump with his constant attacks on the free press.
You do realize nowhere in the Constitution does it say separation of church and state?

The 2nd Amendment doesn't say you have the right to own a rifle or pistol.
sure it does. right to bear arms. did you miss that part?


very NON SPECIFIC-----it could mean a bow and arrow
Could be hand gun, rifle, machine gun or any other fire arm. And?

They left it vague because they understood technology would replace the musket. You think?

What proof is there "They ...understood technology" or that one day an ARM would include the weapons of war available today?

In fact, ownership of a simple gun, and the technology of the day, allowed a rag tag army & navy to defeat the most powerful army in history at the time, Do you believe our nation could be defended from tyranny with weapons available at a local gun show?
 
Trump Wants Tax Plan to Cut Corporate Rate to 15%

"WASHINGTON—President Donald Trump has ordered White House aides to draft a tax plan that slashes the corporate tax rate to 15%, even if that means a loss of revenue, according to people familiar with the directive.

During a meeting in the Oval Office last week, Mr. Trump told staff he wants a massive tax cut to sell to the American public, these people said. He told aides it was less important to him that such a plan could add to the federal budget deficit..."

(and no you don't need the rest of the article (subscribers only) to get the point)


There it is. Trump effectively conceded that a huge corporate tax cut may very well balloon the deficit...

...and he doesn't care. I doubt that many of the big money corporate interests that apparently have Trump in their pocket care either.

Here's another look:

Trump Wants to Slash the Corporate Tax Rate to 15%: WSJ
The federal government has no claim on perceived taxes, Cut taxes help the American people immensely. Fact

False. If those tax cuts result in loss of Obamacare subsidies, or a lower standard of education, or the infrastructure continues to crumble as a result, these things are HURTING, not helping.

The US is losing jobs because your population is NOT well educated, and your infrastructure is crumbling, not just because of high labour costs. Countries like Ireland have spent heavily on infrastructure and have a better education system than the US. Yes, they have a low tax rate, but so does Mynamar and I don't see American companies lining up to relocate there.

The far left is loosing all over the world and they prove they do not understand why!

Western Democracies are losing the information war against a subversive state sponsor who has a vested interest in weakening their alliances.
 
He doesn't care about the debt, he only cares for the elites and his corps and his buddies corps. He will bankrupt the US like his companies.
You libfucks didn't give a shit about the debt that Obummer increased from 9 trillion to 19 trillion, why are you so fucking worried now? Without double standards, liberals would have no standards at all. Especially during that time, the liberal RICH got much RICHER, and the most in POVERTY. Yep cant get more stupid than a liberal.

He has no choice, Bush put us in a recession and he had to continue to fight the war Bush started for the US.

This Pres is a charlatan, and is going to ruin the country. As it is, we taxpayers pay state and Fed subsidies to these companies that are making billions a year. Trump is a dork.

No Democrats who controlled congress from Jan 2007 to Jan 2010 put us in a recession, while ignoring warnings from Bush. OH SNAP!

Another Republican lie. Bush's tax cuts crashed the economy, along with his unfunded wars, Medicaid Part D, and his housing for everyone proposals. Republicans, as usual blame everyone but themselves.

No they didn't, it was the Democrats pushing banks to make bad loans that fueled the meltdown. President Bush tried to stop them multiple times but Dem's refused and insisted nothing was wrong. When it blew up in their stupid faces then Dem's tried to blame Wall Street.

You drink too much of the kool-aid, banks are in business to make money. They made loans, sold them in bundles knowing that in five years they could default, and they did. But, the bankers and brokers made money, and the big losers were the American people, not just those who obtained loans, but all who had their savings invested; they saw their home value drop below what they owed, i.e. under water and only when the worst was seemed inevitable President Bush saw the light and on in Oct, 2008 passed a 700 Billion Dollar Financial Bailout Bill.

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 - Wikipedia

Consider that the management of those institutions deemed too big to fail were supposed to be experts on the economy, and today, several of them are members of the current administration. Once again, the fox has been hired to guard the chickens.
 
You libfucks didn't give a shit about the debt that Obummer increased from 9 trillion to 19 trillion, why are you so fucking worried now? Without double standards, liberals would have no standards at all. Especially during that time, the liberal RICH got much RICHER, and the most in POVERTY. Yep cant get more stupid than a liberal.

He has no choice, Bush put us in a recession and he had to continue to fight the war Bush started for the US.

This Pres is a charlatan, and is going to ruin the country. As it is, we taxpayers pay state and Fed subsidies to these companies that are making billions a year. Trump is a dork.

No Democrats who controlled congress from Jan 2007 to Jan 2010 put us in a recession, while ignoring warnings from Bush. OH SNAP!

Another Republican lie. Bush's tax cuts crashed the economy, along with his unfunded wars, Medicaid Part D, and his housing for everyone proposals. Republicans, as usual blame everyone but themselves.

No they didn't, it was the Democrats pushing banks to make bad loans that fueled the meltdown. President Bush tried to stop them multiple times but Dem's refused and insisted nothing was wrong. When it blew up in their stupid faces then Dem's tried to blame Wall Street.

You drink too much of the kool-aid, banks are in business to make money. They made loans, sold them in bundles knowing that in five years they could default, and they did. But, the bankers and brokers made money, and the big losers were the American people, not just those who obtained loans, but all who had their savings invested; they saw their home value drop below what they owed, i.e. under water and only when the worst was seemed inevitable President Bush saw the light and on in Oct, 2008 passed a 700 Billion Dollar Financial Bailout Bill.

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 - Wikipedia

Consider that the management of those institutions deemed too big to fail were supposed to be experts on the economy, and today, several of them are members of the current administration. Once again, the fox has been hired to guard the chickens.

Good grief, fine I'll educate you. Fannie and Freddie buy up the vast majority of home mortgages from the banks. Fannie and Freddie dictate the lending standards, if a bank makes a risky loan that does not conform, they can't sell it to Fannie and Freddie. Now, who controlled Fannie and Freddie and lowered the lending standards enabling these risky loans? YES THE DEMOCRATS THAT'S WHO! Who tried several times to stop the Dem's from doing this? Yes president Bush.
 
Bush Jr eased home ownership even more, so he is responsible. Anything for the banks and wall street.
 
No they didn't, it was the Democrats pushing banks to make bad loans that fueled the meltdown. President Bush tried to stop them multiple times but Dem's refused and insisted nothing was wrong. When it blew up in their stupid faces then Dem's tried to blame Wall Street.

The rise in subprime mortgages from from 7% to 20% happened between 2004 and 2006. The democrats were not in charge then.
 
Good grief, fine I'll educate you. Fannie and Freddie buy up the vast majority of home mortgages from the banks. Fannie and Freddie dictate the lending standards, if a bank makes a risky loan that does not conform, they can't sell it to Fannie and Freddie. Now, who controlled Fannie and Freddie and lowered the lending standards enabling these risky loans? YES THE DEMOCRATS THAT'S WHO! Who tried several times to stop the Dem's from doing this? Yes president Bush.

Again, this happened between 2004 and 2006, when the democrats didn't control anything.
 
Bush Jr eased home ownership even more, so he is responsible. Anything for the banks and wall street.

"eased" is the operative word. ANYONE could get a loan--------sadly lots of persons either incapable of....
or unwilling to PAY IT BACK------were delighted to INDULGE. Plus-----lots of ambitious ----"blue
collar style "LOAN OFFICERS"-----were delighted to UP their stats. and commissions. The program
became a disaster
 
Bush Jr eased home ownership even more, so he is responsible. Anything for the banks and wall street.

"eased" is the operative word. ANYONE could get a loan--------sadly lots of persons either incapable of....
or unwilling to PAY IT BACK------were delighted to INDULGE. Plus-----lots of ambitious ----"blue
collar style "LOAN OFFICERS"-----were delighted to UP their stats. and commissions. The program
became a disaster

Bush doubly contributed, both with policy of 'home ownership' and by illegally saying the states couldn't look into the subprime mortgages. Or enforce laws against predatory lending. Bush prevented the states from cracking down. see
CUOMO v. CLEARING HOUSE ASSN
 
Bush Jr eased home ownership even more, so he is responsible. Anything for the banks and wall street.

"eased" is the operative word. ANYONE could get a loan--------sadly lots of persons either incapable of....
or unwilling to PAY IT BACK------were delighted to INDULGE. Plus-----lots of ambitious ----"blue
collar style "LOAN OFFICERS"-----were delighted to UP their stats. and commissions. The program
became a disaster

Bush doubly contributed, both with policy of 'home ownership' and by illegally saying the states couldn't look into the subprime mortgages. Or enforce laws against predatory lending. Bush prevented the states from cracking down. see
CUOMO v. CLEARING HOUSE ASSN

ok----still seems to me to have been an "earnest" albeit MISGUIDED attempt to
provide lots of people with the means to OWN A HOME------the MESS was not planned
 
ok----still seems to me to have been an "earnest" albeit MISGUIDED attempt to
provide lots of people with the means to OWN A HOME------the MESS was not planned

Bush also 'meant well' when he invaded Iraq.

yes---he did-----the original sin was failure to put a bullet in the head of Saddam
in the mid-sixties. Bush failed to focus on the BEST CURE-------a bullet in the
head of Saddam
 
ok----still seems to me to have been an "earnest" albeit MISGUIDED attempt to
provide lots of people with the means to OWN A HOME------the MESS was not planned

Bush also 'meant well' when he invaded Iraq.

yes---he did-----the original sin was failure to put a bullet in the head of Saddam
in the mid-sixties. Bush failed to focus on the BEST CURE-------a bullet in the
head of Saddam

Saddam was the only person in Iraq who could have prevented ISIS.
 

Forum List

Back
Top