The Politics of PPACA/Obamacare: Facts & History & Constitutionality
It seems obvious that some on the right and some just plainly upset with Obama have their own facts and conclusions about what is and is not correct. Chief among these is the constitutionality and ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). Why is this so? How can this be?
Simple: Commentators and spinmeisters and others have been out in public on blogs, websites, newspapers, radio and television distorting and misconstruing most everything they can on this one. Ever since the day of the ruling, misanthropic troglodytes, mainly on the right, have been looking at angles and revisiting them with the intentions of sowing the seeds of discontent with the act. Now along comes a website rollout and you'd think the US Marines just landed in Benghazzi.
4. The majority did not address the serverability question after concluding that the Individual Mandate was constitutional.
stay tuned.
added info: The Court and Health Care Reform | Oyez Today Oyez, Oyez, Oyez! The 2011?2012 U.S. Supreme Court Term in Review | Britannica BlogTerm: 2010-2019 : 2011
http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_11_400
Facts of the Case Amid intense public interest, Congress passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), which became effective March 23, 2010. The ACA sought to address the fact that millions of Americans had no health insurance, yet actively participated in the health care market, consuming health care services for which they did not pay.
It seems obvious that some on the right and some just plainly upset with Obama have their own facts and conclusions about what is and is not correct. Chief among these is the constitutionality and ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). Why is this so? How can this be?
Simple: Commentators and spinmeisters and others have been out in public on blogs, websites, newspapers, radio and television distorting and misconstruing most everything they can on this one. Ever since the day of the ruling, misanthropic troglodytes, mainly on the right, have been looking at angles and revisiting them with the intentions of sowing the seeds of discontent with the act. Now along comes a website rollout and you'd think the US Marines just landed in Benghazzi.
4. The majority did not address the serverability question after concluding that the Individual Mandate was constitutional.
stay tuned.
Last edited: