Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The ban on those nasty CFCs back in the 80s which closed "The Hole in the Ozone" (queue woman screaming) was a bunch of Liberal Hooey. But the success of the Ozone scam gave birth the Warmer movement and many of the same scientists that pushed the Ozone scare are the same ones pushing human caused climate change. Don't believe them, they have a reason why they use "science" to push scams just like they did with the Ozone Hole and CFCs.
New Ozone Hole Scare Won't Save the Great Climate Hoax | PSI Intl
Except that there was hole in the ozone, there still is to a certain extent.
This is what it looked like in 2006
This is what it looked like 3 days ago.
Big difference. Why?
The ban on those nasty CFCs back in the 80s which closed "The Hole in the Ozone" (queue woman screaming) was a bunch of Liberal Hooey. But the success of the Ozone scam gave birth the Warmer movement and many of the same scientists that pushed the Ozone scare are the same ones pushing human caused climate change. Don't believe them, they have a reason why they use "science" to push scams just like they did with the Ozone Hole and CFCs.
New Ozone Hole Scare Won't Save the Great Climate Hoax | PSI Intl
Except that there was hole in the ozone, there still is to a certain extent.
This is what it looked like in 2006
This is what it looked like 3 days ago.
Big difference. Why?
Ozone is the result of O2 absorbing UV. O3 absorbs some UV but because it is so unstable, The molecule breaks before it has absorbed anywhere as much energy as it takes to break an O2 molecule to allow the formation of O3. But do feel free to prove me wrong hairball.
I find this. These are from Time Magazine
This from the Telegraph
The Washington Post
NASA JPL (an animation but the board won't let me put it in as media)
2018 ozone hole image - Google Search:
The graph I posted and that you quoted also appears to show no improvement. The animation at the link I provided, however, shows that it has low periods during the course of a year. Ozone depletion takes place at a greater rate with lower temperatures, so there is an annual cycle to the depletion. FCT, are you getting ready to join the local "Montreal-Was-A-Scam" bandwagon hereabouts?
Ozone is the result of O2 absorbing UV. O3 absorbs some UV but because it is so unstable, The molecule breaks before it has absorbed anywhere as much energy as it takes to break an O2 molecule to allow the formation of O3. But do feel free to prove me wrong hairball.
Largest ozone creation factory on this planet is lightning. Not UV..
NASA - Top Story - SURPRISE! LIGHTNING HAS BIG EFFECT ON ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY - March 19, 2003
The ban on those nasty CFCs back in the 80s which closed "The Hole in the Ozone" (queue woman screaming) was a bunch of Liberal Hooey. But the success of the Ozone scam gave birth the Warmer movement and many of the same scientists that pushed the Ozone scare are the same ones pushing human caused climate change. Don't believe them, they have a reason why they use "science" to push scams just like they did with the Ozone Hole and CFCs.
New Ozone Hole Scare Won't Save the Great Climate Hoax | PSI Intl
Except that there was hole in the ozone, there still is to a certain extent.
This is what it looked like in 2006
This is what it looked like 3 days ago.
Big difference. Why?
The ban on those nasty CFCs back in the 80s which closed "The Hole in the Ozone" (queue woman screaming) was a bunch of Liberal Hooey. But the success of the Ozone scam gave birth the Warmer movement and many of the same scientists that pushed the Ozone scare are the same ones pushing human caused climate change. Don't believe them, they have a reason why they use "science" to push scams just like they did with the Ozone Hole and CFCs.
New Ozone Hole Scare Won't Save the Great Climate Hoax | PSI Intl
Except that there was hole in the ozone, there still is to a certain extent.
This is what it looked like in 2006
This is what it looked like 3 days ago.
Big difference. Why?
The ban on those nasty CFCs back in the 80s which closed "The Hole in the Ozone" (queue woman screaming) was a bunch of Liberal Hooey. But the success of the Ozone scam gave birth the Warmer movement and many of the same scientists that pushed the Ozone scare are the same ones pushing human caused climate change. Don't believe them, they have a reason why they use "science" to push scams just like they did with the Ozone Hole and CFCs.
New Ozone Hole Scare Won't Save the Great Climate Hoax | PSI Intl
. Ozone depletion takes place at a greater rate with lower temperatures, so there is an annual cycle to the depletion.
And, on a percentage basis, how much has solar input changed in the last 40 years?
Looks like 1366.8 Wm^-2 to 1366.9 Wm^-2 or
a 0.0073105% INCREASE
Idiot
Why don't YOU show us that data? You were the one who claimed that changes in solar insolation were entirely repsonsible for ozone changes. It is YOUR responsibility to provide evidence of your claims. My inability to locate such material is hardly proof that it exists.
Asshole
The gap was not in the involvement of sunlight in the production of ozone. The data you claim but have still failed to produce is a significant change in the insolation of the polar regions responsible for changes in the pole's ozone levels.