The ONE qst. that should be asked of every GOP candidate

nat4900

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2015
42,021
5,964
1,870
At every scheduled debate for the GOP primaries, each of the candidates should be asked one very simple question....just to separate the sane from the insane:

"Do you believe in creationism or evolution....."

The answer to the above can help dwindle down the number of whomever should even be given a microphone and a podium.
 
During the revolt in Egypt as the'Arab Spring' was unravelling, discussion groups of activists posed a simple question to others at the table. The question was 'what are your attitudes about art?'

Like evolution versus creationism, this question was designed to ferret out radicals and extremists so they could not hold sway in constructing a new Egyptian constitution. Fundamentalists and radical extremists hold decidedly conservative views on art and could not hide from their loony attitudes.

Hey Mike Huckabee, hey Li'l Ricky Santorum, hey Donald Trump. What are your views on art?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
And that has what to do with their ability to run the country?

Well, perhaps for voters like you the question you might prefer is whether a candidate believes in gravity.
 
At every scheduled debate for the GOP primaries, each of the candidates should be asked one very simple question....just to separate the sane from the insane:

"Do you believe in creationism or evolution....."

The answer to the above can help dwindle down the number of whomever should even be given a microphone and a podium.

Prove the two are mutually exclusive.
 
At every scheduled debate for the GOP primaries, each of the candidates should be asked one very simple question....just to separate the sane from the insane:

"Do you believe in creationism or evolution....."

The answer to the above can help dwindle down the number of whomever should even be given a microphone and a podium.

Do you believe we have 57 states? Do you believe Lizzy Warren has Cherokee Cheekbones?
 
Your question is flawed in that it demands an either/or option only. The are many more answers available.

I would suggest that it is your own tunnel vision that is creating your problem.
 
If you were walking in the woods and found a watch. You would logically assume that there was a watchmaker out there somewhere who made it.

How come?
 
do you think socialism will work in America?

I'll do one better, thanks to Sinclair Lewis.

upload_2015-7-28_21-29-55.png
 
If you were walking in the woods and found a watch. You would logically assume that there was a watchmaker out there somewhere who made it.

How come?

When JFK was running for the presidency, your ilk was concerned that the WH and the US was going to be subjugated to the wishes of the Vatican.....What the heck happened?
 
If you were walking in the woods and found a watch. You would logically assume that there was a watchmaker out there somewhere who made it.

How come?

When JFK was running for the presidency, your ilk was concerned that the WH and the US was going to be subjugated to the wishes of the Vatican.....What the heck happened?

My ilk? You know nothing about me.

Now answer my question.
 
Look right wingers, if you want a president who believes in the "Rapture", you're certainly entitled to that level of stupidity....For my part, I'd rather have leadership of just a bit higher caliber.
 
At every scheduled debate for the GOP primaries, each of the candidates should be asked one very simple question....just to separate the sane from the insane:

"Do you believe in creationism or evolution....."

The answer to the above can help dwindle down the number of whomever should even be given a microphone and a podium.
thanks for confirming all democrats are scrum bag atheist pinko's
 
My ilk? You know nothing about me.

Now answer my question.

The best answer to your simplistic question may be found in what Franklin and Jefferson believed in......that there may have been a deity as watchmaker, winding up the watch and letting it run out. They felt strongly that there was a segment of the population who were dumb enough to intermix politics and policy with religiosity......democracy, they felt, had to also contend with a good dose of stupidity among its constituents.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top