2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,973
- 52,242
- 2,290
Here are 11 things that left wingers need to know before susan rice and various other obama minions go to jail.....
Cover-Up: 11 Things the Media Won't Tell You About Obama Spying On Trump
2. Obama Spying on Trump Is NOT "Normal and Routine"
Take a moment, just a moment, to stop and think about the crap sandwich your media wants you to eat. You are being asked to believe that an outgoing administration spying on a presidential campaign and an incoming presidential administration is usual-usual, that this happens all the time in our democracy.
This, of course, is preposterous.
Even if Team Barry had caught Team Trump doing something illegal or unethical -- AND THEY DID NOT -- this is highly unusual behavior, for one very simple reason…
The White House is not a collector of intelligence.
The White House does not investigate intelligence.
The White House is a consumer of intelligence.
The act of "unmasking" is an act of collecting and investigating intelligence, which is the job of our intelligence agencies.
Moreover, thanks to Barry's last-minute Machiavellian rule change that allows for the widest distribution of intelligence possible, Susan Rice's highly unusual act of unmasking Team Trump was almost certainly done to ensure this intelligence would leak to a willing media, and the leaking of intelligence is a felony, and therefore not at all routine.
6. All This Illegal Spying and Still No Russian Smoking Gun
Look at the chilling extremes Barry went to in the hopes of catching Team Trump doing something illegal or unethical: outright spying through warrantless wiretaps and felonious leaks to a willing media…. And STILL there is no evidence of any kind that there was any collusion between the Russians and the Trump camp.
On top of that, we have had 7 months of a media frenzy, 7 months of hundreds of partisan investigative journalists using their sources within a Deep State desperate to depose Trump, and STILL there is no evidence Trump did a single thing wrong.
8. Rice's Unmasking Had Zero To Do With Russia
Rep. Peter King is a member of the House Intelligence Committee and has seen the documents Rice unmasked. Let me assure you that the last thing the media wants you to know is the following…
The intelligence reports at the center of the Susan Rice unmasking controversy were detailed, and almost resembled a private investigator’s file, according to a Republican congressman familiar with the documents.
"This is information about their everyday lives," Rep. Peter King of New York, a member of the House Intelligence committee said. "Sort of like in a divorce case where lawyers are hired, investigators are hired just to find out what the other person is doing from morning until night and then you try to piece it together later on.”
This was purely a political operation. A police state in action, nothing more, nothing less.
9. Devin Nunes is 100% Vindicated
After House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes dropped the bomb about Barry's spying, the national media went into a frenzy hoping to discredit WHAT THE MEDIA ALREADY KNEW WAS TRUE. This was no doubt done as a cynical means to distract from the only real wrongdoing we are so far aware of, all of it committed by the Obama administration.
Even though he has stepped down from this particular investigation, Nunes is now 100% vindicated … and then some.
11. What Barry Did To Trump Is a TEXTBOOK Definition of 'Wiretapping'
Yes, Trump was 100% correct when he accused Obama of "tapping his wires." Feel free to argue with an actual MIT textbook if you don’t believe it:
Wiretapping is the traditional term for interception of telephone conversations. This should not be taken too literally. The word is no longer restricted to communications traveling by wire, and contemporary wiretaps are more commonly placed on radio links [ed. cell phones] or inside telephone offices. The meaning has also broadened in that the thing being tapped need no longer be a telephone call in the classic sense; it may be some other form of electronic communication, such as a fax or data.
Compared with the more precise but more general phrase "communications interception," the word "wiretapping" has two connotations. Much the stronger of these is that a wiretap is aimed at a particular target, in sharp contrast to the "vacuum cleaner" interception widely practiced by national intelligence agencies. The weaker connotation is that it is being done by the police.
--
Obama weaponized the IRS against his political opponents, those everyday, powerless Americans in the Tea Party.
Obama weaponized the Department of Justice against the media, even though the media adored him.
Cover-Up: 11 Things the Media Won't Tell You About Obama Spying On Trump
2. Obama Spying on Trump Is NOT "Normal and Routine"
Take a moment, just a moment, to stop and think about the crap sandwich your media wants you to eat. You are being asked to believe that an outgoing administration spying on a presidential campaign and an incoming presidential administration is usual-usual, that this happens all the time in our democracy.
This, of course, is preposterous.
Even if Team Barry had caught Team Trump doing something illegal or unethical -- AND THEY DID NOT -- this is highly unusual behavior, for one very simple reason…
The White House is not a collector of intelligence.
The White House does not investigate intelligence.
The White House is a consumer of intelligence.
The act of "unmasking" is an act of collecting and investigating intelligence, which is the job of our intelligence agencies.
Moreover, thanks to Barry's last-minute Machiavellian rule change that allows for the widest distribution of intelligence possible, Susan Rice's highly unusual act of unmasking Team Trump was almost certainly done to ensure this intelligence would leak to a willing media, and the leaking of intelligence is a felony, and therefore not at all routine.
6. All This Illegal Spying and Still No Russian Smoking Gun
Look at the chilling extremes Barry went to in the hopes of catching Team Trump doing something illegal or unethical: outright spying through warrantless wiretaps and felonious leaks to a willing media…. And STILL there is no evidence of any kind that there was any collusion between the Russians and the Trump camp.
On top of that, we have had 7 months of a media frenzy, 7 months of hundreds of partisan investigative journalists using their sources within a Deep State desperate to depose Trump, and STILL there is no evidence Trump did a single thing wrong.
8. Rice's Unmasking Had Zero To Do With Russia
Rep. Peter King is a member of the House Intelligence Committee and has seen the documents Rice unmasked. Let me assure you that the last thing the media wants you to know is the following…
The intelligence reports at the center of the Susan Rice unmasking controversy were detailed, and almost resembled a private investigator’s file, according to a Republican congressman familiar with the documents.
"This is information about their everyday lives," Rep. Peter King of New York, a member of the House Intelligence committee said. "Sort of like in a divorce case where lawyers are hired, investigators are hired just to find out what the other person is doing from morning until night and then you try to piece it together later on.”
This was purely a political operation. A police state in action, nothing more, nothing less.
9. Devin Nunes is 100% Vindicated
After House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes dropped the bomb about Barry's spying, the national media went into a frenzy hoping to discredit WHAT THE MEDIA ALREADY KNEW WAS TRUE. This was no doubt done as a cynical means to distract from the only real wrongdoing we are so far aware of, all of it committed by the Obama administration.
Even though he has stepped down from this particular investigation, Nunes is now 100% vindicated … and then some.
11. What Barry Did To Trump Is a TEXTBOOK Definition of 'Wiretapping'
Yes, Trump was 100% correct when he accused Obama of "tapping his wires." Feel free to argue with an actual MIT textbook if you don’t believe it:
Wiretapping is the traditional term for interception of telephone conversations. This should not be taken too literally. The word is no longer restricted to communications traveling by wire, and contemporary wiretaps are more commonly placed on radio links [ed. cell phones] or inside telephone offices. The meaning has also broadened in that the thing being tapped need no longer be a telephone call in the classic sense; it may be some other form of electronic communication, such as a fax or data.
Compared with the more precise but more general phrase "communications interception," the word "wiretapping" has two connotations. Much the stronger of these is that a wiretap is aimed at a particular target, in sharp contrast to the "vacuum cleaner" interception widely practiced by national intelligence agencies. The weaker connotation is that it is being done by the police.
--
Obama weaponized the IRS against his political opponents, those everyday, powerless Americans in the Tea Party.
Obama weaponized the Department of Justice against the media, even though the media adored him.
