The Next Four Years

[candycorn]

See im with the pro lifers on this, but hear me out on my opinions":


The female doesnt have control of her body when the child is in her, she does not tell it when to eat, she does not tell it when to grow, shes an incubator and protector of the child while its in the womb. Thats how humans do it but DONT see it as. Now regardless of how else u want to spin it, how come libs are willing to give a murder and criminals a second chance but kill off an innocent baby? I dont see that logic.

I hear you out on your opinions. I don't see how you reduce a human being to being an incubator devoid of rights. The abortion/capital punishment argument is food for thought. I'm not totally against capital punishment althought I'm anti-death penalty in most cases.

So, I take it you're for outlawing abortion across the board; not giving it back to the states as Governor Romney wants to do? Total outlawing of abortion?

not at all, but its time for people to be educated on science and on some religious beliefs, than make their decisions, ive talked to many a people specially the young and majority of the anwers are the same "isnt it up to the female, its her body" Yes and no, again its her body, but the baby or fetus calls the shots, it has a right to life because u took the act that brings it being, now ur saying wait i wanted teh sex, not the responsiblity of what comes with it.

But also if it is her body, where are the rights for the baby and where is the voice for hte baby? WHo decides when to kill and what right without a court can they make that decision? Because if u say abortion is legal wow where do the killings stop?

Im having trouble understanding what you're stating. The politicians should be able to tell you to keep a baby to term? The politicians shouldn't be able to tell you? A woman should have a right to choose what she does with her body/incubator?

I think women are reasonable/responsible enough to make their own decisions on the topic of reproductive choice.

If you think otherwise, you should vote for Governor Romney.

 

[Montrovant]

So not only is Romney going to nominate justices based on their desire to overturn Roe, they are going to be confirmed and then the court is going to hear a Roe-based case. This, based on one quote from Romney's website, which could just as likely be pandering to his base as an honestly held opinion. Oh, and with no current history of anyone making a serious attempt to overturn Roe that I'm aware of.

I'm sorry, this is a stretch at best. As Si aptly pointed out, it's a wedge issue.

 

[Si modo]

Civil liberties are much more important than economics in my view.

This.

And honestly, I'm a little surprised more "conservatives" here aren't agreeing. You guys are screaming about "freedom" on a daily basis, but when someone else talks about her freedom, you suddenly claim the economy is more improtant. Why the flip flop?

It's. A. Wedge. Issue.

Now, if we want to talk about basic Bill of Rights violations, we can talk about ACTUAL stripping rights of jurisprudence and habeus corpus from citizens during this administration. The 5th and 14th are soooooooo overrated.
.

 

[candycorn]

Civil liberties are much more important than economics in my view.

This.

And honestly, I'm a little surprised more "conservatives" here aren't agreeing. You guys are screaming about "freedom" on a daily basis, but when someone else talks about her freedom, you suddenly claim the economy is more improtant. Why the flip flop?

Well, I'm not surprised.

As I have often heard; Conservatives want a small government--small enough to fit in your bedroom.

 

[Sinjorri]

The worst the Supreme Court could do is overturn Roe v. Wade, which would have no effect or very little effect. The issue would return to the states. If you are afraid that a majority in each state would overturn their own abortion laws, then you have no faith that the majority supports abortion rights do you?

The majority, at one time or another, supported a great many things that are totally incongruent to entlightened thinking. Do you still think we should dunk women in wells to see if they are witches?

Lets say a woman who is of child bearing age is offered a promotion to a branch manager at her comany's new branch opening up in Texas. But she knows that if Roe is overturned, Texas will be ground zero for outlawing it on a state level. We all know that is going to be the case; as much as we know that California and Mass will be the first ones to ratify it the other way.

She would have to think twice about accepting it if she wants to maintain her reproductive rights. Wouldn't she.

define child bearing age, do u know how many females dont know their own bodies child bearing age? My friends was when she was 14 to 16?

How do u feel when parents pay a huge amount of money to try and bear their own child instead of adopting?

 

[candycorn]

Civil liberties are much more important than economics in my view.

This.

And honestly, I'm a little surprised more "conservatives" here aren't agreeing. You guys are screaming about "freedom" on a daily basis, but when someone else talks about her freedom, you suddenly claim the economy is more improtant. Why the flip flop?

It's. A. Wedge. Issue.

Now, if we want to talk about basic Bill of Rights violations, we can talk about ACTUAL stripping rights of jurisprudence and habeus corpus from citizens during this administration. The 5th and 14th are soooooooo overrated.
.

Yes, the wedge is to separate women from their reproductive choice.

 

[Sinjorri]

Civil liberties are much more important than economics in my view.

This.

And honestly, I'm a little surprised more "conservatives" here aren't agreeing. You guys are screaming about "freedom" on a daily basis, but when someone else talks about her freedom, you suddenly claim the economy is more improtant. Why the flip flop?

Well, I'm not surprised.

As I have often heard; Conservatives want a small government--small enough to fit in your bedroom.

some wnat a small but active? why is that so bad? how is the seat belt over reach doing for u, i hear a lot of women now when they get pulled over and the cop gives them a ticket because the child took it off and mommy dindt know and next thing she knows the cops hauling her in for child abuse, a bit of a stretch im sure but its possible. Everyone always told me "they will never MAKE u wear a seatbelt in the back" and here we are.

 

[Si modo]

This.

And honestly, I'm a little surprised more "conservatives" here aren't agreeing. You guys are screaming about "freedom" on a daily basis, but when someone else talks about her freedom, you suddenly claim the economy is more improtant. Why the flip flop?

It's. A. Wedge. Issue.

Now, if we want to talk about basic Bill of Rights violations, we can talk about ACTUAL stripping rights of jurisprudence and habeus corpus from citizens during this administration. The 5th and 14th are soooooooo overrated.
.

Yes, the wedge is to separate women from their reproductive choice.

Yup. That's the wedge issue.

(Dayum...you really don't know what that means. I thought you did. Wow. Really wow.)

 

[candycorn]

I just find it funny that you are such a great example of public school fail.

It takes one to know one I guess.



Apparently sentence fragments aren't frowned upon any longer either.

So, back to the moronic wedge issue, as they all are.

Oops, don't forget these:

Dealing with the emotional is always easy.

As is dealing with the politically inept.

Let's see, you're clueless on the meaning of simple punctuation and what a wedge issue is.

Okie doke.

Tragic.

Did they teach "okie doke" at Princeton? LOL.

No, I know what a wedge issue is and this isn't one of them.

I have listed the facts--that you ignore. But here they are again.

Governor Romeny wants to overturn Roe. Fact.
President Obama wants to preserve Roe. Fact.
The next 4 years will see likely 1-3 justices being replaced on the USSC. Fact.

It's a simple as that.

If you value a woman's right to reproductive choice, vote for Obama.
If not, vote for Governor Romney.

 

[DontBeStupid]

Civil liberties are much more important than economics in my view.

This.

And honestly, I'm a little surprised more "conservatives" here aren't agreeing. You guys are screaming about "freedom" on a daily basis, but when someone else talks about her freedom, you suddenly claim the economy is more improtant. Why the flip flop?

It's. A. Wedge. Issue.

Now, if we want to talk about basic Bill of Rights violations, we can talk about ACTUAL stripping rights of jurisprudence and habeus corpus from citizens during this administration. The 5th and 14th are soooooooo overrated.
.

Women's basic rights are a wedge issue?

Wow. Sexist much?

 

[Si modo]

It takes one to know one I guess.



Apparently sentence fragments aren't frowned upon any longer either.




As is dealing with the politically inept.

Let's see, you're clueless on the meaning of simple punctuation and what a wedge issue is.

Okie doke.

Tragic.

Did they teach "okie doke" at Princeton? LOL.

No, I know what a wedge issue is and this isn't one of them.

I have listed the facts--that you ignore. But here they are again.

Governor Romeny wants to overturn Roe. Fact.
President Obama wants to preserve Roe. Fact.
The next 4 years will see likely 1-3 justices being replaced on the USSC. Fact.

It's a simple as that.

If you value a woman's right to reproductive choice, vote for Obama.
If not, vote for Governor Romney.

Oh?

This ISN'T a wedge issue?



Damn, your stupid is thick.

 

[candycorn]

This.

And honestly, I'm a little surprised more "conservatives" here aren't agreeing. You guys are screaming about "freedom" on a daily basis, but when someone else talks about her freedom, you suddenly claim the economy is more improtant. Why the flip flop?

Well, I'm not surprised.

As I have often heard; Conservatives want a small government--small enough to fit in your bedroom.

some wnat a small but active? why is that so bad? how is the seat belt over reach doing for u, i hear a lot of women now when they get pulled over and the cop gives them a ticket because the child took it off and mommy dindt know and next thing she knows the cops hauling her in for child abuse, a bit of a stretch im sure but its possible. Everyone always told me "they will never MAKE u wear a seatbelt in the back" and here we are.

 

[candycorn]

Let's see, you're clueless on the meaning of simple punctuation and what a wedge issue is.

Okie doke.

Tragic.

Did they teach "okie doke" at Princeton? LOL.

No, I know what a wedge issue is and this isn't one of them.

I have listed the facts--that you ignore. But here they are again.

Governor Romeny wants to overturn Roe. Fact.
President Obama wants to preserve Roe. Fact.
The next 4 years will see likely 1-3 justices being replaced on the USSC. Fact.

It's a simple as that.

If you value a woman's right to reproductive choice, vote for Obama.
If not, vote for Governor Romney.

Oh?

This ISN'T a wedge issue?



Damn, your stupid is thick.

Hey, call it what you want. It's an important choice the electorate has to make.

Between Governor Romney who wants the choice to be made for women and President Obama who wants women to make their own choices about reproductive rights.

Apparently there is no getting through to you on this but...You Can't Fix Stupid.

Just call me Tater Salad.

 

[candycorn]

This.

And honestly, I'm a little surprised more "conservatives" here aren't agreeing. You guys are screaming about "freedom" on a daily basis, but when someone else talks about her freedom, you suddenly claim the economy is more improtant. Why the flip flop?

It's. A. Wedge. Issue.

Now, if we want to talk about basic Bill of Rights violations, we can talk about ACTUAL stripping rights of jurisprudence and habeus corpus from citizens during this administration. The 5th and 14th are soooooooo overrated.
.

Women's basic rights are a wedge issue?

Wow. Sexist much?

And they wonder why they have a problem garnering the women's vote.

 

[Sinjorri]

Well, I'm not surprised.

As I have often heard; Conservatives want a small government--small enough to fit in your bedroom.

some wnat a small but active? why is that so bad? how is the seat belt over reach doing for u, i hear a lot of women now when they get pulled over and the cop gives them a ticket because the child took it off and mommy dindt know and next thing she knows the cops hauling her in for child abuse, a bit of a stretch im sure but its possible. Everyone always told me "they will never MAKE u wear a seatbelt in the back" and here we are.

let me do that again


some of us wnat a small but active government, why do u feel that that is bad?

THe seatbelt law has now been overreached since anyone in a car needs a seat belt, lots of people told me personally that would never happen, and now it has.

People were all for the seat belt laws, stil mothers starting finding out the kids can take them off and when being pulled over by a police officer they were getting two tickets, one for the infraction and one for the child not wearing a seat belt. Sucks now but in theory it sounded grand. Utopia has its price.

 

[ConzHateUSA]

Dear Candycorn

Whether it is women's rights or the economy, the choice is obvious.

I hear Rush Limbaugh has recently come out against women voting?

I know i heard him say it, not sure if he is now pretending it was sarcasm or not

Since we know the entire GOP takes direction from the likes of that scumbag, we might want to take this election deadly serious and we might want to take the rightwing terrorists attempts to prevent you and me from voting, equally deadly serious

this is it, either we are able to vote, all of us (obama cant lose if we all vote) or there will be consequences

 

[Sinjorri]

Did they teach "okie doke" at Princeton? LOL.

No, I know what a wedge issue is and this isn't one of them.

I have listed the facts--that you ignore. But here they are again.

Governor Romeny wants to overturn Roe. Fact.
President Obama wants to preserve Roe. Fact.
The next 4 years will see likely 1-3 justices being replaced on the USSC. Fact.

It's a simple as that.

If you value a woman's right to reproductive choice, vote for Obama.
If not, vote for Governor Romney.

Oh?

This ISN'T a wedge issue?



Damn, your stupid is thick.

Hey, call it what you want. It's an important choice the electorate has to make.

Between Governor Romney who wants the choice to be made for women and President Obama who wants women to make their own choices about reproductive rights.

Apparently there is no getting through to you on this but...You Can't Fix Stupid.

Just call me Tater Salad.

where is it stupid and who are u to make that call? If the SC court rules it one way under law but the people still have an opinion do we call them stupid, opinons within reason i am making that disclaimer, but its still an opinion and its still a way of life. I may not agree with the amish but they have the right to live their lives?

 

[Seawytch]

The Supreme Court is just one of the many reasons to re-elect President Obama. The court does not need more far right ideologs that spout Hannity's and Limpbaugh's talking points from the bench. 70% of the country opposed the Citizens United ruling. A President Romney would double down on that crap.

Of course partisan hacks HATE the First Amendment.

Wrong. We "hacks" (hello pot, have you met kettle?) love the 1st Amendment...we just don't think the wealthy should be able to purchase more free speech than everyone else.

Are you calling the majority of Americans "partisan hacks" because they think Citizens United is bad for our political system?

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...ling-on-campaign-finance-the-public-dissents/

 

[Sinjorri]

Dear Candycorn

Whether it is women's rights or the economy, the choice is obvious.

I hear Rush Limbaugh has recently come out against women voting?

I know i heard him say it, not sure if he is now pretending it was sarcasm or not

Since we know the entire GOP takes direction from the likes of that scumbag, we might want to take this election deadly serious and we might want to take the rightwing terrorists attempts to prevent you and me from voting, equally deadly serious

this is it, either we are able to vote, all of us (obama cant lose if we all vote) or there will be consequences

taking an opinion turning it into fact and than fear mongering way to make that leap are u in the olympics by any chance? U leap well.

 

[Zxereus]

In the next four years, there will likely be at least 2 or 3 slots on the Supreme Court open up due to the age of the justices. Ruth Ginsberg is in questionable health and three othe justices (Kennedy, Scalia and Breyer) are all in their 70's.

If you're a woman who values the ability to make reproductive choices on your own, you should vote for the President since he is committed to letting you keep your right to make that choice.

It is the truth that the republican nominee has been on both sides of the abortion issue in the past. Where the nominee will end up when selecting a new justice and what litmus test he will apply to that selection is up in the air.

Even a swing of one vote could overturn Roe v. Wade. If given the opportunity, conservatives will take that chance to overturn this landmark ruling.

Just something to consider before you go into the polling place and fill out your ballot this November.

This is Candycorn and I approved this message.

Thanks for mentioning this, the SCOTUS is one of the key reasons I'm voting for anyone other than a liberal for POTUS.