Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, a woman can legally get an abortion. It's the law. It's not going anywhere regardless of politicians.When that "reproductive choice" takes place after the reproduction, you are right. It is a health concern. For the baby involved. It's actually a life or death concern.Wedge issues - more emotions than thought.
Always.
Back to the topic,
A woman's reproductive choice isn't an emotion...it's a health concern.
Dear babyhaterwithadriedoutwomb-With the exception ofrape, women make their reproductive choices 100% of the time. Rape will never be made legal. What you mean, candy corn, is vote for Obama if you want women to be guaranteed the right to deny fathers their paternity, and children their vitality.In the next four years, there will likely be at least 2 or 3 slots on the Supreme Court open up due to the age of the justices. Ruth Ginsberg is in questionable health and three othe justices (Kennedy, Scalia and Breyer) are all in their 70's.
If you're a woman who values the ability to make reproductive choices on your own, you should vote for the President since he is committed to letting you keep your right to make that choice.
It is the truth that the republican nominee has been on both sides of the abortion issue in the past. Where the nominee will end up when selecting a new justice and what litmus test he will apply to that selection is up in the air.
Even a swing of one vote could overturn Roe v. Wade. If given the opportunity, conservatives will take that chance to overturn this landmark ruling.
Just something to consider before you go into the polling place and fill out your ballot this November.
This is Candycorn and I approved this message.
Dear Misogynist;
She really doesn't need to translate for her.
xoxo
Boop
Hysterical buffoon.
Only morons believe that legal abortions will be taken away.
Chicken Little.
Just like only morons believe guns will be taken away by Democrats.
Yet everytime a Democrat gets elected that becomes the Republican war cry and NEA membership gets a boost.
REALLY?
Obama To Sign Anti-Gun U.N. Treaty?
U.N. Prepares Arms Trade Treaty That Threatens Second Amendment Rights - Investors.com
In the next four years, there will likely be at least 2 or 3 slots on the Supreme Court open up due to the age of the justices. Ruth Ginsberg is in questionable health and three othe justices (Kennedy, Scalia and Breyer) are all in their 70's.
If you're a woman who values the ability to make reproductive choices on your own, you should vote for the President since he is committed to letting you keep your right to make that choice.
It is the truth that the republican nominee has been on both sides of the abortion issue in the past. Where the nominee will end up when selecting a new justice and what litmus test he will apply to that selection is up in the air.
Even a swing of one vote could overturn Roe v. Wade. If given the opportunity, conservatives will take that chance to overturn this landmark ruling.
Just something to consider before you go into the polling place and fill out your ballot this November.
This is Candycorn and I approved this message.
Roe V Wade will not be overturned. We should be concerned with the disastrous economy and massive debt.
Just like only morons believe guns will be taken away by Democrats.
Yet everytime a Democrat gets elected that becomes the Republican war cry and NEA membership gets a boost.
REALLY?
Obama To Sign Anti-Gun U.N. Treaty?
U.N. Prepares Arms Trade Treaty That Threatens Second Amendment Rights - Investors.com
This is obviously an EDITORIAL.....not "news!"
Don't you know the difference?
If not you're too stupid to be allowed to own a gun anyway
Why don't you share some details about what this so called "anti-gun treaty" was really about ok?
Bet you can't.
Bet it wasn't REALLY about any threat to second amendment rights was it?
Obama is an idiot and there is no way around that. He is also incompetent. However, any treaty must be ratified by 2/3 vote in Congress, first of all. Secondly, no matter what treaty we sign and ratify, the Constitution still supersedes them.REALLY?
Obama To Sign Anti-Gun U.N. Treaty?
U.N. Prepares Arms Trade Treaty That Threatens Second Amendment Rights - Investors.com
This is obviously an EDITORIAL.....not "news!"
Don't you know the difference?
If not you're too stupid to be allowed to own a gun anyway
Why don't you share some details about what this so called "anti-gun treaty" was really about ok?
Bet you can't.
Bet it wasn't REALLY about any threat to second amendment rights was it?
not bothering with some condescending jerk
fuck off
Okay.
Psst....you forgot the ellipses.
Now, what was it you were saying about dishonesty?
Damn, I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.
Cheer on the wedge!
Sorry you can dish it out but not take it ... that seems to be a common trait among party hacks ... you should seek help for that malady ...
In the next four years, there will likely be at least 2 or 3 slots on the Supreme Court open up due to the age of the justices. Ruth Ginsberg is in questionable health and three othe justices (Kennedy, Scalia and Breyer) are all in their 70's.
If you're a woman who values the ability to make reproductive choices on your own, you should vote for the President since he is committed to letting you keep your right to make that choice.
It is the truth that the republican nominee has been on both sides of the abortion issue in the past. Where the nominee will end up when selecting a new justice and what litmus test he will apply to that selection is up in the air.
Even a swing of one vote could overturn Roe v. Wade. If given the opportunity, conservatives will take that chance to overturn this landmark ruling.
Just something to consider before you go into the polling place and fill out your ballot this November.
This is Candycorn and I approved this message.
Roe V Wade will not be overturned. We should be concerned with the disastrous economy and massive debt.
Yeah!
Lets let the Mitten take over and "restructure" our economy and wreck the country like he's done with so many corporations!
Not that giving you laughing seizures wouldn't be a stitch in and of itself, but I care. So, catch your breath before you read this one, too.
Psst....you forgot the ellipses.
Now, what was it you were saying about dishonesty?
Damn, I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.
Cheer on the wedge!
Sorry you can dish it out but not take it ... that seems to be a common trait among party hacks ... you should seek help for that malady ...
You calling someone out as a party hack?
And you can say it with a straight face?
.... If the teams are divided into two, I'm not on either team. ....It isn't scare tactics, it is the truth. What is Romney's position on Abortion, by the way?
i thought only the right did fear mongering, that read a lot like fear mongering? OR is it what we say about one side we dont about the other?
It's called "Fisking" and you best get used to it if you want to participate on online forums..... If the teams are divided into two, I'm not on either team. ....
(Don't forget your pom poms.)
Parsing my statement is a cheap trick. It's hard to take you seriously when you're being so dishonest.
Well, a woman can legally get an abortion. It's the law. It's not going anywhere regardless of politicians.When that "reproductive choice" takes place after the reproduction, you are right. It is a health concern. For the baby involved. It's actually a life or death concern.Back to the topic,
A woman's reproductive choice isn't an emotion...it's a health concern.
Something the OP just doesn't understand. Lawmakers can't overturn shit as far as precedent law is concerned.
Everyone needs to deal with those simple facts and get a grip.
Exactly.Well, a woman can legally get an abortion. It's the law. It's not going anywhere regardless of politicians.When that "reproductive choice" takes place after the reproduction, you are right. It is a health concern. For the baby involved. It's actually a life or death concern.
Something the OP just doesn't understand. Lawmakers can't overturn shit as far as precedent law is concerned.
Everyone needs to deal with those simple facts and get a grip.
I think they understand, I think they are being dishonest and using fear.
If I may expand on that, it's the view a charismatic told them was the view to have. Classic cult characteristics.That implies a level of self awareness that belies their actions.
I'm not so sure they know that. It's just "Their view of the 'truth'." At least that's what their morally relativist minds tell them.
In the next four years, there will likely be at least 2 or 3 slots on the Supreme Court open up due to the age of the justices. Ruth Ginsberg is in questionable health and three othe justices (Kennedy, Scalia and Breyer) are all in their 70's.
If you're a woman who values the ability to make reproductive choices on your own, you should vote for the President since he is committed to letting you keep your right to make that choice.
It is the truth that the republican nominee has been on both sides of the abortion issue in the past. Where the nominee will end up when selecting a new justice and what litmus test he will apply to that selection is up in the air.
Even a swing of one vote could overturn Roe v. Wade. If given the opportunity, conservatives will take that chance to overturn this landmark ruling.
Just something to consider before you go into the polling place and fill out your ballot this November.
This is Candycorn and I approved this message.
Can I feel free to Facebook this message?
ahhh spread the panic through another outlet.In the next four years, there will likely be at least 2 or 3 slots on the Supreme Court open up due to the age of the justices. Ruth Ginsberg is in questionable health and three othe justices (Kennedy, Scalia and Breyer) are all in their 70's.
If you're a woman who values the ability to make reproductive choices on your own, you should vote for the President since he is committed to letting you keep your right to make that choice.
It is the truth that the republican nominee has been on both sides of the abortion issue in the past. Where the nominee will end up when selecting a new justice and what litmus test he will apply to that selection is up in the air.
Even a swing of one vote could overturn Roe v. Wade. If given the opportunity, conservatives will take that chance to overturn this landmark ruling.
Just something to consider before you go into the polling place and fill out your ballot this November.
This is Candycorn and I approved this message.
Can I feel free to Facebook this message?
Sure...take off my "by line" though.
In the next four years, there will likely be at least 2 or 3 slots on the Supreme Court open up due to the age of the justices. Ruth Ginsberg is in questionable health and three othe justices (Kennedy, Scalia and Breyer) are all in their 70's.
If you're a woman who values the ability to make reproductive choices on your own, you should vote for the President since he is committed to letting you keep your right to make that choice.
It is the truth that the republican nominee has been on both sides of the abortion issue in the past. Where the nominee will end up when selecting a new justice and what litmus test he will apply to that selection is up in the air.
Even a swing of one vote could overturn Roe v. Wade. If given the opportunity, conservatives will take that chance to overturn this landmark ruling.
Just something to consider before you go into the polling place and fill out your ballot this November.
This is Candycorn and I approved this message.
Roe V Wade will not be overturned. We should be concerned with the disastrous economy and massive debt.
ahhh spread the panic through another outlet.Can I feel free to Facebook this message?
Sure...take off my "by line" though.
Talk about being basket cases over something that won't happen.
