The Next Four Years

Stop, this is leftist BS. I am a Republican Woman, Roe v Wade is a done deal............it's not going away. Quit using left talking points as scare tactics.

It isn't scare tactics, it is the truth. What is Romney's position on Abortion, by the way?

i thought only the right did fear mongering, that read a lot like fear mongering? OR is it what we say about one side we dont about the other?

There is plenty of hypocrisy to go around...thats for sure. If the teams are divided into two, I'm not on either team. Which is why I'm for voter registration laws, think that unions are their own worst enemy, and think that we should keep the prisoners at Gitmo until they die. I don't think that many on the left would agree with me on these hot-button issues.

Putting aside the scorecards for a second; here is what Governor Romney says on his website:

Mitt Romney is pro-life. He believes it speaks well of the country that almost all Americans recognize that abortion is a problem. And in the quiet of conscience, people of both political parties know that more than a million abortions a year cannot be squared with the good heart of America.

Mitt believes that life begins at conception and wishes that the laws of our nation reflected that view. But while the nation remains so divided, he believes that the right next step is for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade – a case of blatant judicial activism that took a decision that should be left to the people and placed it in the hands of unelected judges. With Roe overturned, states will be empowered through the democratic process to determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by judicial mandate.

-Those aren't scare tactics, he believes Roe should be overturned--FACT.
-Four supreme court justices, Kennedy, Breyer, Scalia, and Ginsburg are 70+ y/o--FACT.
-Whomever is President from 2012-2016 will be able to likely appoint 1-3 justices--FACT as much as it can be as as much as human aging dictates.
-Governor Romney says he wants Roe overturned. He will likely have that opportunity if elected--FACT.

If you value a woman's right to choose her own reproductive rights, you should vote for Obama. If you would like for a woman to have her bodily functions regulated by politicians, you should likely cast your vote for Governor Romney. FACT
 
In the next four years, there will likely be at least 2 or 3 slots on the Supreme Court open up due to the age of the justices. Ruth Ginsberg is in questionable health and three othe justices (Kennedy, Scalia and Breyer) are all in their 70's.

If you're a woman who values the ability to make reproductive choices on your own, you should vote for the President since he is committed to letting you keep your right to make that choice.

It is the truth that the republican nominee has been on both sides of the abortion issue in the past. Where the nominee will end up when selecting a new justice and what litmus test he will apply to that selection is up in the air.

Even a swing of one vote could overturn Roe v. Wade. If given the opportunity, conservatives will take that chance to overturn this landmark ruling.

Just something to consider before you go into the polling place and fill out your ballot this November.

This is Candycorn and I approved this message.
Hysterical buffoon.

Only morons believe that legal abortions will be taken away.

Chicken Little.

Just like only morons believe guns will be taken away by Democrats.

Yet everytime a Democrat gets elected that becomes the Republican war cry and NEA membership gets a boost.

REALLY?
Obama To Sign Anti-Gun U.N. Treaty?
U.N. Prepares Arms Trade Treaty That Threatens Second Amendment Rights - Investors.com
 
Hysterical buffoon.

Only morons believe that legal abortions will be taken away.

Chicken Little.

Here is what Governor Romney says:

Mitt Romney is pro-life. He believes it speaks well of the country that almost all Americans recognize that abortion is a problem. And in the quiet of conscience, people of both political parties know that more than a million abortions a year cannot be squared with the good heart of America.

Mitt believes that life begins at conception and wishes that the laws of our nation reflected that view. But while the nation remains so divided, he believes that the right next step is for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade – a case of blatant judicial activism that took a decision that should be left to the people and placed it in the hands of unelected judges. With Roe overturned, states will be empowered through the democratic process to determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by judicial mandate.

That will take away the gurantee of a woman's right to choose. If you're saying that someone like Rick Perry will preserve that right, well, you'd be lying and you know that.
You DO know that a POTUS is not the SCOTUS, right?

See, there are three branches of .....

Oh, nevermind. Public school fail on display. If it weren't so tragic........

Scientists tell us that the President appoints Supreme Court Justices with Senate confirmation. One of the two candidates wants a Supreme Court decision overturned (at least he did when they posted that on his website). If you can't connect those dots, perhaps you should attend a public school because you do not seem to know much about the way the process works.
 
.... If the teams are divided into two, I'm not on either team. ....
:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

(Don't forget your pom poms.)

Parsing my statement is a cheap trick. It's hard to take you seriously when you're being so dishonest.
:cuckoo: Ellipses...look up the meaning.

All I'm doing is laughing at a cheerleader's self delusion. The rest really is just you repeating yourself, without any further impact than before.
 
:cuckoo: Ellipses...look up the meaning.

All I'm doing is ... self delusion.

Okay.
:lol:

Psst....you forgot the ellipses.

Now, what was it you were saying about dishonesty?

Damn, I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.

Cheer on the wedge! :woohoo:

Sorry you can dish it out but not take it ... that seems to be a common trait among party hacks ... you should seek help for that malady ...

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Hysterical buffoon.

Only morons believe that legal abortions will be taken away.

Chicken Little.

Just like only morons believe guns will be taken away by Democrats.

Yet everytime a Democrat gets elected that becomes the Republican war cry and NEA membership gets a boost.
Wedge issues - more emotions than thought.

Always.

Back to the topic,

A woman's reproductive choice isn't an emotion...it's a health concern.
 
The worst the Supreme Court could do is overturn Roe v. Wade, which would have no effect or very little effect. The issue would return to the states. If you are afraid that a majority in each state would overturn their own abortion laws, then you have no faith that the majority supports abortion rights do you?
 
:lol:

Psst....you forgot the ellipses.

Now, what was it you were saying about dishonesty?

Damn, I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.

Cheer on the wedge! :woohoo:

Sorry you can dish it out but not take it ... that seems to be a common trait among party hacks ... you should seek help for that malady ...

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I just find it funny that you are such a great example of public school fail.

I honestly thought that ellipses were taught in grammar school. But, then again, public education has failed so many.

But, for those who are so inclined, they can help themselves. Then again, there is an entire majority who wants the government to do that for them.

So tragic. Really.

So, back to the moronic wedge issue, as they all are.

Oops, don't forget these:

pom-poms_2.jpg


Dealing with the emotional is always easy.
 
It isn't scare tactics, it is the truth. What is Romney's position on Abortion, by the way?

i thought only the right did fear mongering, that read a lot like fear mongering? OR is it what we say about one side we dont about the other?

There is plenty of hypocrisy to go around...thats for sure. If the teams are divided into two, I'm not on either team. Which is why I'm for voter registration laws, think that unions are their own worst enemy, and think that we should keep the prisoners at Gitmo until they die. I don't think that many on the left would agree with me on these hot-button issues.

Putting aside the scorecards for a second; here is what Governor Romney says on his website:

Mitt Romney is pro-life. He believes it speaks well of the country that almost all Americans recognize that abortion is a problem. And in the quiet of conscience, people of both political parties know that more than a million abortions a year cannot be squared with the good heart of America.

Mitt believes that life begins at conception and wishes that the laws of our nation reflected that view. But while the nation remains so divided, he believes that the right next step is for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade – a case of blatant judicial activism that took a decision that should be left to the people and placed it in the hands of unelected judges. With Roe overturned, states will be empowered through the democratic process to determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by judicial mandate.

-Those aren't scare tactics, he believes Roe should be overturned--FACT.
-Four supreme court justices, Kennedy, Breyer, Scalia, and Ginsburg are 70+ y/o--FACT.
-Whomever is President from 2012-2016 will be able to likely appoint 1-3 justices--FACT as much as it can be as as much as human aging dictates.
-Governor Romney says he wants Roe overturned. He will likely have that opportunity if elected--FACT.

If you value a woman's right to choose her own reproductive rights, you should vote for Obama. If you would like for a woman to have her bodily functions regulated by politicians, you should likely cast your vote for Governor Romney. FACT


See im with the pro lifers on this, but hear me out on my opinions":


The female doesnt have control of her body when the child is in her, she does not tell it when to eat, she does not tell it when to grow, shes an incubator and protector of the child while its in the womb. Thats how humans do it but DONT see it as. Now regardless of how else u want to spin it, how come libs are willing to give a murder and criminals a second chance but kill off an innocent baby? I dont see that logic.
 
i thought only the right did fear mongering, that read a lot like fear mongering? OR is it what we say about one side we dont about the other?

There is plenty of hypocrisy to go around...thats for sure. If the teams are divided into two, I'm not on either team. Which is why I'm for voter registration laws, think that unions are their own worst enemy, and think that we should keep the prisoners at Gitmo until they die. I don't think that many on the left would agree with me on these hot-button issues.

Putting aside the scorecards for a second; here is what Governor Romney says on his website:

Mitt Romney is pro-life. He believes it speaks well of the country that almost all Americans recognize that abortion is a problem. And in the quiet of conscience, people of both political parties know that more than a million abortions a year cannot be squared with the good heart of America.

Mitt believes that life begins at conception and wishes that the laws of our nation reflected that view. But while the nation remains so divided, he believes that the right next step is for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade – a case of blatant judicial activism that took a decision that should be left to the people and placed it in the hands of unelected judges. With Roe overturned, states will be empowered through the democratic process to determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by judicial mandate.

-Those aren't scare tactics, he believes Roe should be overturned--FACT.
-Four supreme court justices, Kennedy, Breyer, Scalia, and Ginsburg are 70+ y/o--FACT.
-Whomever is President from 2012-2016 will be able to likely appoint 1-3 justices--FACT as much as it can be as as much as human aging dictates.
-Governor Romney says he wants Roe overturned. He will likely have that opportunity if elected--FACT.

If you value a woman's right to choose her own reproductive rights, you should vote for Obama. If you would like for a woman to have her bodily functions regulated by politicians, you should likely cast your vote for Governor Romney. FACT


See im with the pro lifers on this, but hear me out on my opinions":


The female doesnt have control of her body when the child is in her, she does not tell it when to eat, she does not tell it when to grow, shes an incubator and protector of the child while its in the womb. Thats how humans do it but DONT see it as. Now regardless of how else u want to spin it, how come libs are willing to give a murder and criminals a second chance but kill off an innocent baby? I dont see that logic.

I hear you out on your opinions. I don't see how you reduce a human being to being an incubator devoid of rights. The abortion/capital punishment argument is food for thought. I'm not totally against capital punishment althought I'm anti-death penalty in most cases.

So, I take it you're for outlawing abortion across the board; not giving it back to the states as Governor Romney wants to do? Total outlawing of abortion?
 
:lol:

Psst....you forgot the ellipses.

Now, what was it you were saying about dishonesty?

Damn, I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.

Cheer on the wedge! :woohoo:

Sorry you can dish it out but not take it ... that seems to be a common trait among party hacks ... you should seek help for that malady ...

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I just find it funny that you are such a great example of public school fail.
It takes one to know one I guess.


I honestly thought that ellipses were taught in grammar school. But, then again, public education has failed so many.

But, for those who are so inclined, they can help themselves. Then again, there is an entire majority who wants the government to do that for them.

So tragic. Really.
Apparently sentence fragments aren't frowned upon any longer either.


So, back to the moronic wedge issue, as they all are.

Oops, don't forget these:

pom-poms_2.jpg


Dealing with the emotional is always easy.

As is dealing with the politically inept.
 
Sorry you can dish it out but not take it ... that seems to be a common trait among party hacks ... you should seek help for that malady ...

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I just find it funny that you are such a great example of public school fail.
It takes one to know one I guess.


I honestly thought that ellipses were taught in grammar school. But, then again, public education has failed so many.

But, for those who are so inclined, they can help themselves. Then again, there is an entire majority who wants the government to do that for them.

So tragic. Really.
Apparently sentence fragments aren't frowned upon any longer either.


So, back to the moronic wedge issue, as they all are.

Oops, don't forget these:

pom-poms_2.jpg


Dealing with the emotional is always easy.

As is dealing with the politically inept.
Let's see, you're clueless on the meaning of simple punctuation and what a wedge issue is.

Okie doke.

Tragic.
 
There is plenty of hypocrisy to go around...thats for sure. If the teams are divided into two, I'm not on either team. Which is why I'm for voter registration laws, think that unions are their own worst enemy, and think that we should keep the prisoners at Gitmo until they die. I don't think that many on the left would agree with me on these hot-button issues.

Putting aside the scorecards for a second; here is what Governor Romney says on his website:



-Those aren't scare tactics, he believes Roe should be overturned--FACT.
-Four supreme court justices, Kennedy, Breyer, Scalia, and Ginsburg are 70+ y/o--FACT.
-Whomever is President from 2012-2016 will be able to likely appoint 1-3 justices--FACT as much as it can be as as much as human aging dictates.
-Governor Romney says he wants Roe overturned. He will likely have that opportunity if elected--FACT.

If you value a woman's right to choose her own reproductive rights, you should vote for Obama. If you would like for a woman to have her bodily functions regulated by politicians, you should likely cast your vote for Governor Romney. FACT


See im with the pro lifers on this, but hear me out on my opinions":


The female doesnt have control of her body when the child is in her, she does not tell it when to eat, she does not tell it when to grow, shes an incubator and protector of the child while its in the womb. Thats how humans do it but DONT see it as. Now regardless of how else u want to spin it, how come libs are willing to give a murder and criminals a second chance but kill off an innocent baby? I dont see that logic.

I hear you out on your opinions. I don't see how you reduce a human being to being an incubator devoid of rights. The abortion/capital punishment argument is food for thought. I'm not totally against capital punishment althought I'm anti-death penalty in most cases.

So, I take it you're for outlawing abortion across the board; not giving it back to the states as Governor Romney wants to do? Total outlawing of abortion?



not at all, but its time for people to be educated on science and on some religious beliefs, than make their decisions, ive talked to many a people specially the young and majority of the anwers are the same "isnt it up to the female, its her body" Yes and no, again its her body, but the baby or fetus calls the shots, it has a right to life because u took the act that brings it being, now ur saying wait i wanted teh sex, not the responsiblity of what comes with it.

But also if it is her body, where are the rights for the baby and where is the voice for hte baby? WHo decides when to kill and what right without a court can they make that decision? Because if u say abortion is legal wow where do the killings stop?
 
The worst the Supreme Court could do is overturn Roe v. Wade, which would have no effect or very little effect. The issue would return to the states. If you are afraid that a majority in each state would overturn their own abortion laws, then you have no faith that the majority supports abortion rights do you?

The majority, at one time or another, supported a great many things that are totally incongruent to entlightened thinking. Do you still think we should dunk women in wells to see if they are witches?

Lets say a woman who is of child bearing age is offered a promotion to a branch manager at her comany's new branch opening up in Texas. But she knows that if Roe is overturned, Texas will be ground zero for outlawing it on a state level. We all know that is going to be the case; as much as we know that California and Mass will be the first ones to ratify it the other way.

She would have to think twice about accepting it if she wants to maintain her reproductive rights. Wouldn't she.
 
Civil liberties are much more important than economics in my view.

This.

And honestly, I'm a little surprised more "conservatives" here aren't agreeing. You guys are screaming about "freedom" on a daily basis, but when someone else talks about her freedom, you suddenly claim the economy is more improtant. Why the flip flop?
 
The worst the Supreme Court could do is overturn Roe v. Wade, which would have no effect or very little effect.

Actually, no. The worst they could do is overturn Roe v Wade and declare an zygote a full citizen from conception. Judicial over reach. Much like the Citizen United case. This would have such a devastating impact on our country, we might never recover.
 

Forum List

Back
Top