- Thread starter
- #61
There does seem to be some evidence of that but those who champion the needs of the few over the many do not want to hear about that or think about it or see it or believe it.Really.....trannies rape at will in women's prisond
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There does seem to be some evidence of that but those who champion the needs of the few over the many do not want to hear about that or think about it or see it or believe it.Really.....trannies rape at will in women's prisond
There is a great difference between a need and a want or desire. Let's summarily dismiss all wants an individual says the society should provide them. "Needs" should be specifically defined and limited to life and death.Does anybody have a good formula to use to determine that?
I think needs include more than just life and death. The need for companionship, love, affection, to have purpose/value, etc. and all that varies from individual to individual.There is a great difference between a need and a want or desire. Let's summarily dismiss all wants an individual says the society should provide them. "Needs" should be specifically defined and limited to life and death.
Depends on who the many, or "one" are...Perhaps. So is that another way of saying that neither the needs of the many nor the needs of the one matter in the grand scheme of things?
Which is what this thread is about. I just get a bit frustrated with those who insist on conversing figuratively on in their own special code that others are expected to figure out. That's just me.Depends on who the many, or "one" are...
I thought I offered a rationale for each. Which are you unclear about?Thank you for your input. It's very 'woke' and for the most part offers no rationale but the 'woke' point of view, but it is your input.
There's no code. I couldn't have said it plainer...Which is what this thread is about. I just get a bit frustrated with those who insist on conversing figuratively on in their own special code that others are expected to figure out. That's just me.
And drink beer"Teach a man to fish, and all he'll want to do is go fishing."
Nope you just stated a list of opinions. A rationale is an explanation for why you hold an opinion.I thought I offered a rationale for each. Which are you unclear about?
Maybe to you. But do have a pleasant evening.There's no code. I couldn't have said it plainer...
Babies/children who are not given companionship, love, and affection fail to thrive. Who interferes with these things not given to the young?I think needs include more than just life and death. The need for companionship, love, affection, to have purpose/value, etc. and all that varies from individual to individual.
I know that. I would support resources to be sure that babies and children who don't have parents to provide companionship, love, affection are provided that by others. In that case, to me, the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many.Babies/children who are not given companionship, love, and affection fail to thrive. Who interferes with these things not given to the young?
During Covid, it were some governments that interfered with people and their communities. No church, no schools, no office work, etc. Government decided they would protect the "needs" of the few, ignoring the needs of the many.
I am against supporting "resources". We are the resource, the people closest to the problem or the need.I know that. I would support resources to be sure that babies and children who don't have parents to provide companionship, love, affection are provided that by others. In that case, to me, the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many.
Resources are the naturally occurring elements of the Earth, how those are utilized, what we earn and what we are able to have from what we earn as well as the labor, gifts, aptitude, talents, knowledge, creativity, intellect of the people. But if we do not 'support' the production of/availability of food, shelter, energy, other necessities of life, they won't happen at all. If nobody buys the wheat the farmer grows the farmer will stop growing wheat.I am against supporting "resources". We are the resource, the people closest to the problem or the need.
Try reading it again.Nope you just stated a list of opinions. A rationale is an explanation for why you hold an opinion.
I just took it as an exception to the "100 percent".do you fucks ever tell the truth??
"just not" is only part of what I said,, what are the words after it you changed before and are now leaving out completely,,,
And not necessarily in that order.And drink beer
I just took it as an exception to the "100 percent".
You said in effect, 'except for the fact that trannies might be a threat to children I'm for them 100 percent'.maybe you should stop applying your standards to other people and listen to what they say,,
how about you explain why first you changed my words and then left out part of what I said and are now running away from explaining your dishonest actions??You said, 'except for the fact that trannies might be a threat to children I'm for them 100 percent'.