The Multiverse????

[PoliticalChic]

And, a trip down memory lane...

"Kaku explained the importance of the God particle this way in a radio interview, "If we don't find the Higgs boson we are in deep trouble. We are in deep doo-doo. The reason is that the subatomic particles in the Standard Model are the basis, the foundation of everything we know about the Big Bang, everything we know about the universe, cosmic rays (and) black holes. So if that theory is wrong, then we are really in trouble. It means we have to throw out what is called the Standard Model — and even string theory would be in danger because string theory also has a Higgs boson. Steve Hawking, my colleague, said, "Well, if we don't find the Higgs boson things would be very interesting.' No. It will be a disaster if we don't find Higgs boson, because basically the entire edifice of modern physics depends upon it." Creation theory may be wrong collider hasn t found God particle

 

[Montrovant]

Higgs found Science News

Where the Higgs -- or God particle -- was found - CNN.com

Evidence found for the Higgs boson direct decay into fermions

Higgs Boson Confirmed God Particle Found

These are the kinds of articles I'm talking about.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You can believe this......

"A group of researchers, however, has casted doubt on whether or not the supposed particle discovered during experiments with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the largest and most powerful particle collider in the world, is the long sought after Higgs Boson.
The researchers found that while scientists agree that the experiments with the CERN particle accelerator resulted in the discovery of a new particle and that the calculations indicate this newly found particle is the Higgs Boson, there was no conclusive evidence that proves the particle was indeed the God particle.

Although it is possible that scientists at CERN have indeed detected the Higgs particle, Frandsen said that there can be other possible explanations for the data since these can also be gathered from other particles.

"The current data is not precise enough to determine exactly what the particle is. It could be a number of other known particles," Frandsen said."
Did or did not CERN discover Higgs Boson particle We deserve to know SCIENCE Tech Times


Or you can believe this:

 

[HUGGY]

In actuality,the faith and belief that was once invested in religion is now, in the same way and to the same degree, in what we call 'science.'

What's your interpretation of the difference between "faith" and "belief"?

Faith vs Belief ethicsdefined.org Ethics Defined

I'm gonna stick to this thread...and you may benefit from what it will contain before I conclude....

....but you may wish to review this one:
America Without God No Moral Facts US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Blow it out your poop shooter Toots. America is a moral nation? Really?

America could be a moral nation but so far since it's inception it has been anything but.

It was a good idea to get out from under the British rule but that's about when this moral took a side ways turn towards greed and immorality. Certainly the rest of the influences from other nations had enormous effect on the path we took colonizing the rest of the land we call America today, but seriously, how we accomplished this was the most vile destruction of a civilization as we saw world wide in the 18-1900's.

You think your faith gives you a free pass on morality? Get real. Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs.

Even now we are reaping the reward for being such a moral nation turning the rather spectacular police matter known as 9/11 in major destruction of two sovereign nations in the mid-East because that idiot Bush and his daddy believed in GAAAWWWDDD.

Moral? No, we are most certainly NOT moral by any standard. We are rich and still greedy, We are well fed and still deny food to those that cannot feed themselves, our rich are well cared for by high priced medicine designed to make a profit not to heal, and denied to those that haven't participated in the greed fest.

Moral? You are the worst kind of hypocrite.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In actuality,the faith and belief that was once invested in religion is now, in the same way and to the same degree, in what we call 'science.'

What's your interpretation of the difference between "faith" and "belief"?

Faith vs Belief ethicsdefined.org Ethics Defined

I'm gonna stick to this thread...and you may benefit from what it will contain before I conclude....

....but you may wish to review this one:
America Without God No Moral Facts US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Blow it out your poop shooter Toots. America is a moral nation? Really?

America could be a moral nation but so far since it's inception it has been anything but.

It was a good idea to get out from under the British rule but that's about when this moral took a side ways turn towards greed and immorality. Certainly the rest of the influences from other nations had enormous effect on the path we took colonizing the rest of the land we call America today, but seriously, how we accomplished this was the most vile destruction of a civilization as we saw world wide in the 18-1900's.

You think your faith gives you a free pass on morality? Get real. Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs.

Even now we are reaping the reward for being such a moral nation turning the rather spectacular police matter known as 9/11 in major destruction of two sovereign nations in the mid-East because that idiot Bush and his daddy believed in GAAAWWWDDD.

Moral? No, we are most certainly NOT moral by any standard. We are rich and still greedy, We are well fed and still deny food to those that cannot feed themselves, our rich are well cared for by high priced medicine designed to make a profit not to heal, and denied to those that haven't participated in the greed fest.

Moral? You are the worst kind of hypocrite.

" Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs."

Not only have you proven to be truly stupid....but you represent the result of government schooling and total acceptance sans any thinking.

As America slips further and further into the abyss....folks like you will be the grease that speeds it along.

 

[Montrovant]

You can believe this......

"A group of researchers, however, has casted doubt on whether or not the supposed particle discovered during experiments with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the largest and most powerful particle collider in the world, is the long sought after Higgs Boson.
The researchers found that while scientists agree that the experiments with the CERN particle accelerator resulted in the discovery of a new particle and that the calculations indicate this newly found particle is the Higgs Boson, there was no conclusive evidence that proves the particle was indeed the God particle.

Although it is possible that scientists at CERN have indeed detected the Higgs particle, Frandsen said that there can be other possible explanations for the data since these can also be gathered from other particles.

"The current data is not precise enough to determine exactly what the particle is. It could be a number of other known particles," Frandsen said."
Did or did not CERN discover Higgs Boson particle We deserve to know SCIENCE Tech Times


Or you can believe this:

Even if I believe the article, it leaves the possibility that yes, the Higgs boson was found with the LHC.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You can believe this......

"A group of researchers, however, has casted doubt on whether or not the supposed particle discovered during experiments with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the largest and most powerful particle collider in the world, is the long sought after Higgs Boson.
The researchers found that while scientists agree that the experiments with the CERN particle accelerator resulted in the discovery of a new particle and that the calculations indicate this newly found particle is the Higgs Boson, there was no conclusive evidence that proves the particle was indeed the God particle.

Although it is possible that scientists at CERN have indeed detected the Higgs particle, Frandsen said that there can be other possible explanations for the data since these can also be gathered from other particles.

"The current data is not precise enough to determine exactly what the particle is. It could be a number of other known particles," Frandsen said."
Did or did not CERN discover Higgs Boson particle We deserve to know SCIENCE Tech Times


Or you can believe this:

Even if I believe the article, it leaves the possibility that yes, the Higgs boson was found with the LHC.

Some people will believe anything.



But you have given me an idea for a thread exposing the ignorance you evince re: science, and the reasons for said ignorance.

You have inadvertently become my muse.

 

[Montrovant]

You can believe this......

"A group of researchers, however, has casted doubt on whether or not the supposed particle discovered during experiments with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the largest and most powerful particle collider in the world, is the long sought after Higgs Boson.
The researchers found that while scientists agree that the experiments with the CERN particle accelerator resulted in the discovery of a new particle and that the calculations indicate this newly found particle is the Higgs Boson, there was no conclusive evidence that proves the particle was indeed the God particle.

Although it is possible that scientists at CERN have indeed detected the Higgs particle, Frandsen said that there can be other possible explanations for the data since these can also be gathered from other particles.

"The current data is not precise enough to determine exactly what the particle is. It could be a number of other known particles," Frandsen said."
Did or did not CERN discover Higgs Boson particle We deserve to know SCIENCE Tech Times


Or you can believe this:

Even if I believe the article, it leaves the possibility that yes, the Higgs boson was found with the LHC.

Some people will believe anything.



But you have given me an idea for a thread exposing the ignorance you evince re: science, and the reasons for said ignorance.

You have inadvertently become my muse.

Either you believe the article you provided as evidence, and it is possible the research at the LHC found the Higgs boson, or you don't believe the article, so why did you provide it as evidence of your point?

The article clearly says it is possible that the Higgs boson was found, just that it isn't certain.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You can believe this......

"A group of researchers, however, has casted doubt on whether or not the supposed particle discovered during experiments with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the largest and most powerful particle collider in the world, is the long sought after Higgs Boson.
The researchers found that while scientists agree that the experiments with the CERN particle accelerator resulted in the discovery of a new particle and that the calculations indicate this newly found particle is the Higgs Boson, there was no conclusive evidence that proves the particle was indeed the God particle.

Although it is possible that scientists at CERN have indeed detected the Higgs particle, Frandsen said that there can be other possible explanations for the data since these can also be gathered from other particles.

"The current data is not precise enough to determine exactly what the particle is. It could be a number of other known particles," Frandsen said."
Did or did not CERN discover Higgs Boson particle We deserve to know SCIENCE Tech Times


Or you can believe this:

Even if I believe the article, it leaves the possibility that yes, the Higgs boson was found with the LHC.

Some people will believe anything.



But you have given me an idea for a thread exposing the ignorance you evince re: science, and the reasons for said ignorance.

You have inadvertently become my muse.

Either you believe the article you provided as evidence, and it is possible the research at the LHC found the Higgs boson, or you don't believe the article, so why did you provide it as evidence of your point?

The article clearly says it is possible that the Higgs boson was found, just that it isn't certain.

".... says it is possible that the Higgs boson was found, just that it isn't certain."


We have a winner in the category of 'Unintentional Humor'!!!

 

[Hollie]

And, a trip down memory lane...

"Kaku explained the importance of the God particle this way in a radio interview, "If we don't find the Higgs boson we are in deep trouble. We are in deep doo-doo. The reason is that the subatomic particles in the Standard Model are the basis, the foundation of everything we know about the Big Bang, everything we know about the universe, cosmic rays (and) black holes. So if that theory is wrong, then we are really in trouble. It means we have to throw out what is called the Standard Model — and even string theory would be in danger because string theory also has a Higgs boson. Steve Hawking, my colleague, said, "Well, if we don't find the Higgs boson things would be very interesting.' No. It will be a disaster if we don't find Higgs boson, because basically the entire edifice of modern physics depends upon it." Creation theory may be wrong collider hasn t found God particle

Creation theory may be wrong? That's a bit of a stretch as there is no "creation theory" aside from from silly claims screeching out "the gawds did it".

The reason that christian fundies react so negatively to science investigation such as that being done with LHD is that your beliefs in magic and supernaturalism are directly challenged. Knowledge has incrementally stripped your gawds of so much of their authority that they're left with little more than paper shuffling tasks.

 

[HUGGY]

In actuality,the faith and belief that was once invested in religion is now, in the same way and to the same degree, in what we call 'science.'

What's your interpretation of the difference between "faith" and "belief"?

Faith vs Belief ethicsdefined.org Ethics Defined

I'm gonna stick to this thread...and you may benefit from what it will contain before I conclude....

....but you may wish to review this one:
America Without God No Moral Facts US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Blow it out your poop shooter Toots. America is a moral nation? Really?

America could be a moral nation but so far since it's inception it has been anything but.

It was a good idea to get out from under the British rule but that's about when this moral took a side ways turn towards greed and immorality. Certainly the rest of the influences from other nations had enormous effect on the path we took colonizing the rest of the land we call America today, but seriously, how we accomplished this was the most vile destruction of a civilization as we saw world wide in the 18-1900's.

You think your faith gives you a free pass on morality? Get real. Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs.

Even now we are reaping the reward for being such a moral nation turning the rather spectacular police matter known as 9/11 in major destruction of two sovereign nations in the mid-East because that idiot Bush and his daddy believed in GAAAWWWDDD.

Moral? No, we are most certainly NOT moral by any standard. We are rich and still greedy, We are well fed and still deny food to those that cannot feed themselves, our rich are well cared for by high priced medicine designed to make a profit not to heal, and denied to those that haven't participated in the greed fest.

Moral? You are the worst kind of hypocrite.

" Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs."

Not only have you proven to be truly stupid....but you represent the result of government schooling and total acceptance sans any thinking.

As America slips further and further into the abyss....folks like you will be the grease that speeds it along.

Wrong Little Missy!

Your belief if fairy tales is the thinking that has been the rails of this crazy train.

 

[Montrovant]

You can believe this......

"A group of researchers, however, has casted doubt on whether or not the supposed particle discovered during experiments with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the largest and most powerful particle collider in the world, is the long sought after Higgs Boson.
The researchers found that while scientists agree that the experiments with the CERN particle accelerator resulted in the discovery of a new particle and that the calculations indicate this newly found particle is the Higgs Boson, there was no conclusive evidence that proves the particle was indeed the God particle.

Although it is possible that scientists at CERN have indeed detected the Higgs particle, Frandsen said that there can be other possible explanations for the data since these can also be gathered from other particles.

"The current data is not precise enough to determine exactly what the particle is. It could be a number of other known particles," Frandsen said."
Did or did not CERN discover Higgs Boson particle We deserve to know SCIENCE Tech Times


Or you can believe this:

Even if I believe the article, it leaves the possibility that yes, the Higgs boson was found with the LHC.

Some people will believe anything.



But you have given me an idea for a thread exposing the ignorance you evince re: science, and the reasons for said ignorance.

You have inadvertently become my muse.

Either you believe the article you provided as evidence, and it is possible the research at the LHC found the Higgs boson, or you don't believe the article, so why did you provide it as evidence of your point?

The article clearly says it is possible that the Higgs boson was found, just that it isn't certain.

".... says it is possible that the Higgs boson was found, just that it isn't certain."


We have a winner in the category of 'Unintentional Humor'!!!

You find it humorous that the article you use to show the Higgs boson wasn't found claims that it may have been?

 

[Vikrant]

Change the subject because I'm totally correct?
All three are based on a religious faith.

Now...the next absurdity.....String theory.

String theory only exists as a bunch of equations with no testable predictions. If science is based on experiment, observation, and empirical knowledge, then it isn’t science.


'When scientists appeal to various unobservable entities- universal forces, grand symmetries, twice-differential functions as in mechanics, Calabi-Yau manifolds, ionic bonds, or quantum fields- the shovel is in plain sight, but what is about to be shoveled is nowhere to be seen. Why physicists should enjoy inferential advantages denied theologians is not explained.'
Berlinski, “Devil’s Delusion"

"So, to accept the doctrine of the twenty-four elementary particles, one requires the fundamental laws of physics and a congeries of computational schemes, algorithms, specialized programming languages, techniques for numerical integration, huge canned programs, computer graphics, interpolation methods, nifty shortcuts, and the best efforts by mathematicians and physicists to convert the data of various experiments into coherent patterns, artfully revealing symmetries and continuous narratives.
What better elucidation of faith!"
Ibid.


Let's face it....you are no more than a mind-numbed drone who will accept any dish placed in front of you.

I'm surprised you're "quoting" Berlinski as he only serves to devalue your typically valueless cutting and pasting.

As you know, Berlinski is a failure at so many things and has been reduced to shilling for the charlatans at the silly Disco'tute.

You whacked out religious fundamentalists do seem to find the worst examples of fraud and failure to make your failed attempts at argument.

Maybe just do yourself a favor and drink the Kool-Aid?

Encyclopedia of American Loons Search results for Berlinski

Berlinski is one of the movers and shakers of the contemporary creationist movement, associated with the Discovery Institute and one of their most frequent and famous debaters. A delusional, pompous narcissist with an ego to fit a medieval pope. Also a name-dropper (most of his talks concern important people he has talked to). A comment on one of his lunatic self-aggrandizing rants can be found here(sums up this guy pretty well):

He is apparently really angry at evolution (it is unclear why), and famous for his purely enumerative “cows cannot evolve into whales” argument.

Berlinski was once a moderately respected author of popular-science books on mathematics. He can still add numbers together, but has forgotten the GIGO rule (“garbage in, garbage out") of applied mathematics. Some of his rantings are discussed here.

Likes to play ‘the skeptic’ (which means denialism in this case, and that is not the same thing).

So sorry, but you're not equipped to engage in this discussion.


Please return when the issue under consideration is favorite 24-hour Cartoon Network.

I was certain you would be reduced to stuttering and mumbling as your only tactic.

Because you're clueless, I'll advise that the charlatan, Berlinski, is not an astronomer and is as clueless regarding astronomy as you are.

Sorry, but your typically pointless cutting and pasting of goofy "quotes" from pointless frauds such as Berlinski and the Disco'tute make you an accomplice to fraud.

Your Kool-Aid is waiting.

Copying and pasting: That explains why are posts are so incoherent. It is almost next to impossible to make any sense of her posts.

I detect that you have begin to sense your defeat.

Let's remind all.....what you call 'science' is no different from what other folks call religion.


There is no laboratory proof of God's existence.....

But neither is there any proof of:

The mulitiverse theory
String theory
The HIggs boson
The universe created out of nothing.


You can obfuscate all you like, about me, about how I choose to post factual material, but the truth is exactly what I wrote above.
There is no proof of any of those 'beliefs.'

Clearly, I understand science far better than you do.

I have detected that you lack basic knowledge of science. You are not qualified to start a thread in science and technology section. You do not even have rudimentary sense to know the difference between science and religion. What you are attempting to discuss can only be characterized as religion. There is nothing wrong with that though but you should take that discussion to religion section. My annoyance with you is that you are spamming science and technology section with your religious beliefs.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You can believe this......

"A group of researchers, however, has casted doubt on whether or not the supposed particle discovered during experiments with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the largest and most powerful particle collider in the world, is the long sought after Higgs Boson.
The researchers found that while scientists agree that the experiments with the CERN particle accelerator resulted in the discovery of a new particle and that the calculations indicate this newly found particle is the Higgs Boson, there was no conclusive evidence that proves the particle was indeed the God particle.

Although it is possible that scientists at CERN have indeed detected the Higgs particle, Frandsen said that there can be other possible explanations for the data since these can also be gathered from other particles.

"The current data is not precise enough to determine exactly what the particle is. It could be a number of other known particles," Frandsen said."
Did or did not CERN discover Higgs Boson particle We deserve to know SCIENCE Tech Times


Or you can believe this:

Even if I believe the article, it leaves the possibility that yes, the Higgs boson was found with the LHC.

Some people will believe anything.



But you have given me an idea for a thread exposing the ignorance you evince re: science, and the reasons for said ignorance.

You have inadvertently become my muse.

Either you believe the article you provided as evidence, and it is possible the research at the LHC found the Higgs boson, or you don't believe the article, so why did you provide it as evidence of your point?

The article clearly says it is possible that the Higgs boson was found, just that it isn't certain.

".... says it is possible that the Higgs boson was found, just that it isn't certain."


We have a winner in the category of 'Unintentional Humor'!!!

You find it humorous that the article you use to show the Higgs boson wasn't found claims that it may have been?

I find it humorous how gullible folks like you are.

But I'll soon post an OP about what science is and what science is not....

Hope you'll read it/comment.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm surprised you're "quoting" Berlinski as he only serves to devalue your typically valueless cutting and pasting.

As you know, Berlinski is a failure at so many things and has been reduced to shilling for the charlatans at the silly Disco'tute.

You whacked out religious fundamentalists do seem to find the worst examples of fraud and failure to make your failed attempts at argument.

Maybe just do yourself a favor and drink the Kool-Aid?

Encyclopedia of American Loons Search results for Berlinski

Berlinski is one of the movers and shakers of the contemporary creationist movement, associated with the Discovery Institute and one of their most frequent and famous debaters. A delusional, pompous narcissist with an ego to fit a medieval pope. Also a name-dropper (most of his talks concern important people he has talked to). A comment on one of his lunatic self-aggrandizing rants can be found here(sums up this guy pretty well):

He is apparently really angry at evolution (it is unclear why), and famous for his purely enumerative “cows cannot evolve into whales” argument.

Berlinski was once a moderately respected author of popular-science books on mathematics. He can still add numbers together, but has forgotten the GIGO rule (“garbage in, garbage out") of applied mathematics. Some of his rantings are discussed here.

Likes to play ‘the skeptic’ (which means denialism in this case, and that is not the same thing).

So sorry, but you're not equipped to engage in this discussion.


Please return when the issue under consideration is favorite 24-hour Cartoon Network.

I was certain you would be reduced to stuttering and mumbling as your only tactic.

Because you're clueless, I'll advise that the charlatan, Berlinski, is not an astronomer and is as clueless regarding astronomy as you are.

Sorry, but your typically pointless cutting and pasting of goofy "quotes" from pointless frauds such as Berlinski and the Disco'tute make you an accomplice to fraud.

Your Kool-Aid is waiting.

Copying and pasting: That explains why are posts are so incoherent. It is almost next to impossible to make any sense of her posts.

I detect that you have begin to sense your defeat.

Let's remind all.....what you call 'science' is no different from what other folks call religion.


There is no laboratory proof of God's existence.....

But neither is there any proof of:

The mulitiverse theory
String theory
The HIggs boson
The universe created out of nothing.


You can obfuscate all you like, about me, about how I choose to post factual material, but the truth is exactly what I wrote above.
There is no proof of any of those 'beliefs.'

Clearly, I understand science far better than you do.

I have detected that you lack basic knowledge of science. You are not qualified to start a thread in science and technology section. You do not even have rudimentary sense to know the difference between science and religion. What you are attempting to discuss can only be characterized as religion. There is nothing wrong with that though but you should take that discussion to religion section. My annoyance with you is that you are spamming science and technology section with your religious beliefs.

"I have detected that you lack basic knowledge of science."

Now...you know that's a lie.

What you found is that you are unable to honestly respond to the logic of my point.

BTW....I'm more versed in science than you.



And, proof that you've been embarrassed to the point that you feel the need to lie is that you wrote....
"My annoyance with you is that you are spamming science and technology section with your religious beliefs."

....let's see you quote where I provided any of my religious beliefs in the whole thread.

If you cannot.......you've established my veracity and your deceit.


That was easy, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

In actuality,the faith and belief that was once invested in religion is now, in the same way and to the same degree, in what we call 'science.'

What's your interpretation of the difference between "faith" and "belief"?

Faith vs Belief ethicsdefined.org Ethics Defined

I'm gonna stick to this thread...and you may benefit from what it will contain before I conclude....

....but you may wish to review this one:
America Without God No Moral Facts US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Blow it out your poop shooter Toots. America is a moral nation? Really?

America could be a moral nation but so far since it's inception it has been anything but.

It was a good idea to get out from under the British rule but that's about when this moral took a side ways turn towards greed and immorality. Certainly the rest of the influences from other nations had enormous effect on the path we took colonizing the rest of the land we call America today, but seriously, how we accomplished this was the most vile destruction of a civilization as we saw world wide in the 18-1900's.

You think your faith gives you a free pass on morality? Get real. Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs.

Even now we are reaping the reward for being such a moral nation turning the rather spectacular police matter known as 9/11 in major destruction of two sovereign nations in the mid-East because that idiot Bush and his daddy believed in GAAAWWWDDD.

Moral? No, we are most certainly NOT moral by any standard. We are rich and still greedy, We are well fed and still deny food to those that cannot feed themselves, our rich are well cared for by high priced medicine designed to make a profit not to heal, and denied to those that haven't participated in the greed fest.

Moral? You are the worst kind of hypocrite.

" Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs."

Not only have you proven to be truly stupid....but you represent the result of government schooling and total acceptance sans any thinking.

As America slips further and further into the abyss....folks like you will be the grease that speeds it along.

Wrong Little Missy!

Your belief if fairy tales is the thinking that has been the rails of this crazy train.

See....this is my problem, Huggy.....


I can't conceive of this once great nation surviving if we go on raising folks as stupid as you are.

 

[HUGGY]

What's your interpretation of the difference between "faith" and "belief"?

Faith vs Belief ethicsdefined.org Ethics Defined

I'm gonna stick to this thread...and you may benefit from what it will contain before I conclude....

....but you may wish to review this one:
America Without God No Moral Facts US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Blow it out your poop shooter Toots. America is a moral nation? Really?

America could be a moral nation but so far since it's inception it has been anything but.

It was a good idea to get out from under the British rule but that's about when this moral took a side ways turn towards greed and immorality. Certainly the rest of the influences from other nations had enormous effect on the path we took colonizing the rest of the land we call America today, but seriously, how we accomplished this was the most vile destruction of a civilization as we saw world wide in the 18-1900's.

You think your faith gives you a free pass on morality? Get real. Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs.

Even now we are reaping the reward for being such a moral nation turning the rather spectacular police matter known as 9/11 in major destruction of two sovereign nations in the mid-East because that idiot Bush and his daddy believed in GAAAWWWDDD.

Moral? No, we are most certainly NOT moral by any standard. We are rich and still greedy, We are well fed and still deny food to those that cannot feed themselves, our rich are well cared for by high priced medicine designed to make a profit not to heal, and denied to those that haven't participated in the greed fest.

Moral? You are the worst kind of hypocrite.

" Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs."

Not only have you proven to be truly stupid....but you represent the result of government schooling and total acceptance sans any thinking.

As America slips further and further into the abyss....folks like you will be the grease that speeds it along.

Wrong Little Missy!

Your belief if fairy tales is the thinking that has been the rails of this crazy train.

See....this is my problem, Huggy.....


I can't conceive of this once great nation surviving if we go on raising folks as stupid as you are.

Right back at ya Sugar Tits.

 

[HUGGY]

Bucky has tiny balls.

That's all I have to say about THAT!

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm gonna stick to this thread...and you may benefit from what it will contain before I conclude....

....but you may wish to review this one:
America Without God No Moral Facts US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Blow it out your poop shooter Toots. America is a moral nation? Really?

America could be a moral nation but so far since it's inception it has been anything but.

It was a good idea to get out from under the British rule but that's about when this moral took a side ways turn towards greed and immorality. Certainly the rest of the influences from other nations had enormous effect on the path we took colonizing the rest of the land we call America today, but seriously, how we accomplished this was the most vile destruction of a civilization as we saw world wide in the 18-1900's.

You think your faith gives you a free pass on morality? Get real. Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs.

Even now we are reaping the reward for being such a moral nation turning the rather spectacular police matter known as 9/11 in major destruction of two sovereign nations in the mid-East because that idiot Bush and his daddy believed in GAAAWWWDDD.

Moral? No, we are most certainly NOT moral by any standard. We are rich and still greedy, We are well fed and still deny food to those that cannot feed themselves, our rich are well cared for by high priced medicine designed to make a profit not to heal, and denied to those that haven't participated in the greed fest.

Moral? You are the worst kind of hypocrite.

" Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs."

Not only have you proven to be truly stupid....but you represent the result of government schooling and total acceptance sans any thinking.

As America slips further and further into the abyss....folks like you will be the grease that speeds it along.

Wrong Little Missy!

Your belief if fairy tales is the thinking that has been the rails of this crazy train.

See....this is my problem, Huggy.....


I can't conceive of this once great nation surviving if we go on raising folks as stupid as you are.

Right back at ya Sugar Tits.

I appreciate another opportunity to discuss proof of your stupidity.

You wrote:
"Moral? You are the worst kind of hypocrite."

I knew exactly what sort of imbecile I was dealing with when I read that.
Obviously you were trying for some sort of insult...but it escaped your notice that you are unaware of the definition of 'hypocrite.'


Government school grad?

 

[HUGGY]

Blow it out your poop shooter Toots. America is a moral nation? Really?

America could be a moral nation but so far since it's inception it has been anything but.

It was a good idea to get out from under the British rule but that's about when this moral took a side ways turn towards greed and immorality. Certainly the rest of the influences from other nations had enormous effect on the path we took colonizing the rest of the land we call America today, but seriously, how we accomplished this was the most vile destruction of a civilization as we saw world wide in the 18-1900's.

You think your faith gives you a free pass on morality? Get real. Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs.

Even now we are reaping the reward for being such a moral nation turning the rather spectacular police matter known as 9/11 in major destruction of two sovereign nations in the mid-East because that idiot Bush and his daddy believed in GAAAWWWDDD.

Moral? No, we are most certainly NOT moral by any standard. We are rich and still greedy, We are well fed and still deny food to those that cannot feed themselves, our rich are well cared for by high priced medicine designed to make a profit not to heal, and denied to those that haven't participated in the greed fest.

Moral? You are the worst kind of hypocrite.

" Faith has been the cause of more debauchery than just about any human concept since we were able to stand on two legs."

Not only have you proven to be truly stupid....but you represent the result of government schooling and total acceptance sans any thinking.

As America slips further and further into the abyss....folks like you will be the grease that speeds it along.

Wrong Little Missy!

Your belief if fairy tales is the thinking that has been the rails of this crazy train.

See....this is my problem, Huggy.....


I can't conceive of this once great nation surviving if we go on raising folks as stupid as you are.

Right back at ya Sugar Tits.

I appreciate another opportunity to discuss proof of your stupidity.

You wrote:
"Moral? You are the worst kind of hypocrite."

I knew exactly what sort of imbecile I was dealing with when I read that.
Obviously you were trying for some sort of insult...but it escaped your notice that you are unaware of the definition of 'hypocrite.'


Government school grad?

Home school?

I usually dig Asian chicks but you make it hard..NOT!

I guess stupid comes in all nationalities.

Let's just say I can write my name in the snow and you can't. Kay-Kay?

I would suggest that you just stick to popping out babies but that would be a hard road for any children you created.

You don't REALLY want to compare IQs do you?