- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,505
- 143,625
- 2,615
In other words, you approve of the illegal slaughter of 650,000 American citizens.
I think that attitude defines a true fascist scumbag.
Southern traitors had no right to secede.
Sure they did. Where does the Constitution say otherwise?
They took up arms against their own country because they wanted to engage in human rights atrocities
Wrong again. Lincoln invaded the Confederacy. After a state secedes, the USA is no longer its country. If anyone engaged in human rights atrocities, it was Lincoln.
The blame rests totally with the traitorous south
Always has......always will
The Constitution defines treason as follows:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
Note that it says it consists of levying war against THEM [plural]. Treason is not defined as levying war against the federal government. Lincoln levied war against the states, not the confederacy. Lincoln is the traitor. He should have been tried for war crimes.
Doesn't get more treasonous than that. Not only did they levy war against this great nation, they levied war against an entire race of Americans
We were too soft on the traitors and slave holders in the South. They should have been forced to repay all the families of the north and all the slaves in the south for their dastardly ways
Slave holders should have been forced to give up their lands and slave holding families should have been made indentured servants to freed slaves until their debt was repaid. The former slaves should have decided when they were paid in full