I note you posted no data to back up your claim. In contrast, I backed up my claim with hard data. I can do that because all the data says you're making stuff up, and I'm telling the truth. Here, let me do some more of the thing that you pseudoscience cultists hate the most, which is use actual data. This comes from Karl 2015. Not how the the corrections make the past look warmer, which makes the warming look smaller. If you'd like, scientists could use nothing but raw data, which would make the warming look bigger. Is that what you want?